| This page wasproposed for deletion byYsangkok (talk ·contribs) on 21 July 2020. |
| This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The articleEOS.IO, along with other pages relating toblockchain andcryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as acontentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
| On 7 September 2021, it was proposed that this article bemoved toEOSIO. The result ofthe discussion wasno consensus. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are availableon the course page. Peer reviewers:Yq712.
Above undated message substituted fromTemplate:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment byPrimeBOT (talk)20:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Who says it's captured the public's attention?70.42.157.62 (talk)23:00, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This language no longer appears in the article.--Tom Cox (talk)19:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should change to the name of this page to eosio as they have rebranded yesterday.omegshi147 •talk21:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Agree. There should be a wikipedia article for "EOSIO" (this one, which is about the blockchain software), and a new wikipedia article for "EOS" which is the blockchain using the EOSIO software.
So done.
This article has awful sourcing (mostly primary). Looping a couple other crypto editors@Jytdog: &@Smallbones: &@Retimuko: to add this to their patrol.Jtbobwaysf (talk)13:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
As perMOS:DL, please create wiki link forBrendan Blumer in the infobox just like it is done forDaniel Larimer in the same field.
This needs to be done in the "original authors" field of the infobox because adding a wikilink in the infobox is helpful for readers to navigate as perMOS:DL.
This is also the first occurrence of the name in the article and as far as the article for Brendan Blumer exists, this should be wikilinked.203.82.59.110 (talk)11:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
On the sidebar of the article, change Latest release from 1.1.4 / August 8, 2018 to1.8.1 / 09-Jul-2019
Sources:https://github.com/EOSIO/eos/releases and the release notes:https://github.com/EOSIO/eos/releases/tag/v1.8.1
The last line of the 'History' section needs to be updated similarly. Please change 1.1.4to1.8.1
--Tom Cox (talk)01:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Latest release is now 2.1.0https://github.com/EOSIO/eos/releases/tag/v2.1.0
|answered=yes code to|answered=noAnon126 (notify me of responses! /talk /contribs)05:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]"computing resources distributed equally among EOS cryptocurrency holders"This is misleadingVizslah (talk)13:42, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is definitely misleading. A more accurate statement would be something like "computing resources are distributed in proportion to the number of tokens staked for each of the two renewable resources, CPU and Network." More info on this is available here:https://www.eoscanada.com/en/what-does-staking-and-unstaking-eos-tokens-mean--Tom Cox (talk)20:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Please add missing comma after "incentives" in the following:
"a social network with monetary incentives and BitShares,"Black Walnut (talk)04:18, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why isn'tBrock Pierce even mentioned in article??What's up with EOS? - Brock Pierce Interviewed by Roger Ver video (uploaded by "Bitcoin.com - Official Channel" on Oct 28, 2019) at YouTube has thumbnail (aka preview image) of "Exclusive interview with Brock Pierce co-founder of EOS". Wikipedia's Brock Pierce article currently says "currency was named EOS and marketed through a new vehicle called Block.one of which Pierce was variously described as co-founder, head, minority partner and advisor." --EarthFurst (talk)00:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Two changes, there are more inaccuracies.
1)Change this lineEOSIO's Dawn 1.0 was launched on the EOSIO mainnet on June 1, 2018ToEOSIO's Dawn 1.0 was launched on the EOSIO mainnet on June 10, 2018 and was activated on June 14, 2018.[1]
2) Add another Block Explorerhttps://eosauthority.comWritercreate (talk)17:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
References
What does " smart contract platform " mean in traditional, general English?— Precedingunsigned comment added by67.209.133.113 (talk)14:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ysangkok: This article should not beWP:PROD, if you feel strongly to delete it go through AfD (and please ping me if you do). Why try to use PROD on an article with 10 RS?Jtbobwaysf (talk)13:44, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Iran isn't a Wikipedia blocker.Aminabzz (talk)22:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Change this:Daniel Larimer is currently the Chief Technology Officer of block.one, notable for his role in building Bitshares, a decentralized exchange, building Steemit, a decentralized social media platform, developing delegated proof-of-stake and proposing the idea of a decentralized autonomous corporation.[10]
To this:Daniel Larimer was the Chief Technology Officer of block.one, notable for his role in building Bitshares, a decentralized exchange, building Steemit, a decentralized social media platform, developing delegated proof-of-stake and proposing the idea of a decentralized autonomous corporation.[10] On January 10 Daniel announced his resignation from block.one.[1]Aurelius9 (talk)08:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
References
{{cite web}}:Check date values in:|access-date= (help)This article is linking 3 different topics together which should be separate articles
Can we split this in 3?Mdarwin (talk)
The result of the move request was:no consensus. No formal support or oppose arguments three weeks after being contested at the technical move requests page. If the proposer can cite references that show keeping this article title would violate policy, I am more than happy to reconsider this close.(non-admin closure)Rotideypoc41352 (talk·contribs)15:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
EOS.IO →EOSIO – product renamed in 2018, see talk page Mdarwin (talk) 03:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. ASUKITE15:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
"EOS.IO is a blockchain protocol based on the cryptocurrency EOS."
On the faq for EOS.io it states: "EOSIO is a highly performant open-source blockchain platform, built to support safe, compliant, and predictable digital infrastructures. It supports public networks such as EOS, Telos, and WAX, and private networks alike. EOSIO is fast, flexible, and forward-driven, enabling developers, entrepreneurs, co-creators, and institutions to build and innovate with confidence." which more or less aligns with B1 statement on their about page.
Removing all the corporate/advertising speak it basically boils down to the following:
"EOS.IO is a blockchain protocol built by block.one that allows people to build their own cryptocurrency token and governance.
This makes it seem as if EOS.io is relying on EOS for it to work, which is factually wrong. The EOS.io framework allows for different cryptocurrencies such as EOS, Telos and WAX to build on top of EOS.io. I get that the naming convection is very confusing but having wrong information on the wiki page for said protocol/product makes it even more confusing.
[1][2]87.208.247.35 (talk)18:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, we cannot use eos blogs as anWP:RS on cryptocurrency articles, as we have a consensus in place to only use mainstream sources for all cyrpto articles.Jtbobwaysf (talk)21:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]