Talk:Diablo III
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theDiablo III article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find video game sources: "Diablo III" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR ·free images ·free news sources ·TWL ·NYT ·WP reference ·VG/RS ·VG/RL ·WPVG/Talk |
Archives:1,2,3,4,5Auto-archiving period:31 days  |
|
 | This page isnot a forum for general discussion aboutDiablo III. Any such commentsmay be removed orrefactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions aboutDiablo III at theReference desk. |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
I think that act II is a little incorrect. I will replay Act II on my switch it make sure. In particular: Emperor Hakan II is a previous character from a lore. I thought Caldeum had an empress. Would you be okay if I change this?L10nM4st3r (1) (talk)13:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onDiablo III. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links onDiablo III. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)00:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In cases like this (Metacritic metascore 88 vs Users score 4.1), in which a game has very good reviews from official sites (which very often is part of the marketing), compared with general bad reviews from the users (also reflected on future sales and migration of the player base to the competition, like Path of Exile); shouldn't figure the Metacritic user note alongside official notes? Also maybe with an explanation about main gripes the community had about this game (like the real money auction house, the poor itemization, and the over simplification in gameplay).— Precedingunsigned comment added byAntarte (talk •contribs)21:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
