Talk:Development of the New Testament canon
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theDevelopment of the New Testament canon article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:12 months  |
 | Text and/or other creative content fromDevelopment of the New Testament canon was copied or moved intoChristian biblical canons withthis edit. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The introduction is just perfect the way it is.
Before edits by user 174.28.120.116 today, there were three uses of CE and two of AD in dates in the body of this article. The IP user changed two of the CEs to ADs, so now it's 4 ADs and one CE. I really have little opinion on which way this should go, but it would be best to be consistent. I was bold and changed the last CE to AD.Rwessel (talk)18:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article may have started from a crib of theEB 11 article, which was a gutting of themuch more thoroughEB 9 article:
There's obviously more modern scholarship, but there might be lines that were simply copied that should be attributed and theEB 9 article is a good source for the traditional views in the 19th century, based on the surviving textual resources. See also theEB 11's article on the Bible, which has detailed sections on the canon:
— LlywelynII14:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onDevelopment of the New Testament canon. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)00:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
NAn editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the|checked= totrue
This article has been revised as part ofa large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (Seethe investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored,unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot acceptcopyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences orphrases. Accordingly, the materialmay be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the originalorplagiarize from that source. Please see ourguideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!02:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In the lead, Polycarp's name appears between two full-stops without any further explanation. That makes little sense. Unless someone can clarify why the name is mentioned, it should be deleted.Nikolaj1905 (talk)12:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
