Talk:Daggett Rock/GA1
Page contents not supported in other languages.
The following discussion is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article(edit |visual edit |history) ·Article talk(edit |history) ·Watch
Nominator:Alces Alces Americana (talk ·contribs)16:57, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer:I2Overcome (talk·contribs)13:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I will begin reviewing this within the next week.I2Overcometalk13:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Well-written: | ||
 | 1a. the prose is clear, concise, andunderstandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Corrected some grammatical errors, restructured a couple sentences |
| 1b. it complies with theManual of Style guidelines forlead sections,layout,words to watch,fiction, andlist incorporation. | Remamed Geologic history → Geology, added unit conversions, otherwise looks good |
| 2.Verifiable withno original research, as shown by asource spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance withthe layout style guideline. | Added publisher (Maine Geological Survey) and date, corrected websites, otherwise looks good |
| 2b.reliable sources arecited inline. All content thatcould reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Added a few additional citations. The wrong sources were cited for some claims; this has been corrected. |
| 2c. it containsno original research. | Two claims were not found in the sources: the southern segment is the largest and the rock is 0.25 miles from Wheeler Hill Road. These have been removed. |
| 2d. it contains nocopyright violations orplagiarism. | There was some close paraphrasing in the History section. I have modified some of the wording. |
| 3.Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses themain aspects of the topic. | Very short, but there doesn't appear to be much else to say about this topic. |
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (seesummary style). | |
| 4.Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
| 5.Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoingedit war or content dispute. | Nom was only significant author prior to my improvements for this review |
| 6.Illustrated, if possible, bymedia such asimages,video, oraudio: | ||
| 6a. media aretagged with theircopyright statuses, andvalid non-free use rationales are provided fornon-free content. | Added caption, only photo is the nom's own work |
| 6b. media arerelevant to the topic, and havesuitable captions. | Another photo showing multiple segments of the boulder or an aerial photo would be nice, if available |
| 7.Overall assessment. | Had a few issues, but now meets the Good Article criteria. Nice article. |