This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Film:British /German This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you canjoin the discussion and see lists ofopen tasks andregional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation. To improve this article, please refer to theguidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by theBritish cinema task force. This article is supported by theGerman cinema task force. HorrorLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror infilm,literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to thegeneral Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. LondonLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofLondon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

I removed the supposed subtext of the film from the article:

"The film's take on the slasher genre is an interesting one due to its focus on Kate's search for love. Kate, who is a distinctly unlikeable character, in searching for her perfect man encounters a number of men, including the killer, who are all socially unacceptable yet are all either likeable or attract the viewer's sympathy, both things which Kate struggles to do."

Having seen the film this strikes me as a personal interpretation. We should only put this in if we know its what the filmmaker's intended, or its how the film is being widely interpreted.Jihg 20:52, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)

It is what the filmmaker intended, he said as much in a Q&A session I attended. Although in retrospect I think you are probably right to remove the section as it was. I don't think there's a problem with including interpretations, although I think they should be clearly identified as such (which in this case it wasn't).Rje 09:10, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

Well, if that's what he said... :-) I've put it back in the article. Any details of where he said it?Jihg 14:28, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

It was at the Phoenix Arts Cinema in Leicester on December 4 last year, although I believe he's said similar things at other Q&As he's done.Rje 17:43, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

Man, that's the last thing I was thinking while watching this movie... I'd also have to disagree with "the heroine Kate comes across as unlikeable at times": I never her found her anything but unlikeable and was hoping she'd just die. Is that based on a verifiable source, or a personal opinion?Mark Grant01:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Text states "some viewers" questioned their inclusion; does anyone have a valid reference as such?Nick Cooper17:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

seems too POV to me, I'd remove it, if it remains unreferenced.

Well, for sure they weren't alive inside thoes glass, but i can't tell if they were deformed or something. --R2cyberpunk17:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless I misread it, I think this should be how the plot section finishes: ".. state of her clothes. She laughs briefly and then sobs. As she looks back over to the tunnel where she left the creep, her expression turns from misery to alarm, and the film immediately ends."

The implication is that the creep is not dead and has followed her along the tunnel into the station. If anyone else agrees, please make the above change.Open4D00:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another possibility is taht there is (or maybe are) (an) other Creep(s). --84.44.159.88 (talk)22:19, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Creep movie poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk)20:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class film articles
• Start-Class British cinema articles
• British cinema task force articles
• Start-Class German cinema articles
• German cinema task force articles
• WikiProject Film articles
• Start-Class horror articles
• Low-importance horror articles
• WikiProject Horror articles
• Start-Class London-related articles
• Low-importance London-related articles