Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Computer animation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theComputer animation article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly thoserepresenting the subject of the article, arestrongly advised not to directly edit the article. SeeWikipedia:Conflict of interest. You mayrequest corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, orcontact us if the issue is urgent.
This level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFilm:Filmmaking
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you canjoin the discussion and see lists ofopen tasks andregional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation. To improve this article, please refer to theguidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by theFilmmaking task force.
WikiProject iconAnimation:ComputerTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide toanimation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you canedit the article attached to this page, help out with theopen tasks, or contribute to thediscussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe Computer animation work group (assessed asTop-importance).
WikiProject iconComputer graphicsHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomputer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
The following Wikipediacontributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may includeconflict of interest,autobiography, andneutral point of view.

iconTo-do list forComputer animation:edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2021-01-14


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Priority * -- 22:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
This article was the subject of aneducational assignment in February 2013. Further details are availablehere.


icon
Archives (Index)



This page is archived byClueBot III.

Splitting 3D and 2D into two different categories

[edit]
The following discussion is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to splitGothicGolem29 (talk)23:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Over the next few weeks I plan to separate the topics of 3D and 2D animation into two separate categories as is noted on this article's "To-do list." I will be sure to preserve the content and particularly focus on making the article more readable and organized by allowing each sub topic to have its own section. Feel free to leave any suggestions here or questions about what I will do here.ZacZig (talk)18:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely support. —theMainLogan (tc)01:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
is this still happening? Some related articles that also need some work arevirtual cinematography, and theTraditional animation article, which is terribly named and mixes digital 2D animation and hand-drawn cel animation. —jonas (talk)05:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support They are entirely different.RuzDD (talk)11:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So, it's been over a year. Shall we do the split?Lililolol (talk)04:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think so. Not being solely a reason and not being limited to these articles, seperation between 2D and 3D CGI should be made well.RuzDD (talk)16:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should we request a closure first do you think?GothicGolem29 (talk)23:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Asking becauseWikipedia:Splitting says to close the discussion.GothicGolem29 (talk)23:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind it says any user can close so I will close and perform the split.GothicGolem29 (talk)23:53, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New topic structure

[edit]

Hello all - I see that there is a plan to split the article into 2d and 3d animation pages but I have a different idea - given that animation has advanced so much, there is now 1d, 2d, 3d, 4d (yes it exists now), and hybrid. So instead I would like to remove the 2 parts and discuss the coordinate systems and how they make the animation disciplines different. This will also enable us to make the article more specific on the topics which are ubiquitous across, for example, 2d and 3d animation.SnoopLoops (talk)20:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Computer_animation&oldid=1321988627"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp