| This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is a show on food network called Chopped. I came here looking for that. Could we not have the term "chopped" lead here as a redirect? I would do it myself but I don't know how. I suggest that we make a disambiguation page. Chopped can refer to Chopped and screwed, and to the Food Network show Chopped.—Precedingunsigned comment added by68.237.213.205 (talk)18:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could someone reference the quotes so that they do not have to be deleted? --Topspinslams (talk)01:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I cleaned up a lot of the language, but haven't verified any of the information or wikified the page format. I have also deleted an inappropriate comment here on the discussion page.Eine11:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I did a bit of wikification, mostly sectioning. Wikified as part of theWikification wikiproject!JubalHarshaw14:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Many albums aredragged and chopped andslowed and chopped among various other "kinds" of alerations. Are these the same asScrewed and Chopped?
They are certainly within a subgenre of "rap." Screwed and Chopped country or alt. rock would be more notable—Precedingunsigned comment added byRockingbeat (talk •contribs)15:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
...For examples of what music in this genre sound like.
--Mik23:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Someone should make a list.—Precedingunsigned comment added by69.151.205.221 (talk)04:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think based on the fact most albums that would fall under this category are remixes of existing albums, and therefore there is a potentially infinite number of albums.
The main reference link for"Chopped and Screwed: A History" from MTV2 is now a 404 page. This seems problematic.— Precedingunsigned comment added byKlangfarben (talk •contribs)20:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onChopped and screwed. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I check pages listed inCategory:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content fororphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some ofChopped and screwed's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct forthis article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "nyt":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.AnomieBOT⚡01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onChopped and screwed. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)17:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Even though the content of this article is interesting and fascinating to read, there is a big problem with the cited sources.
for example:source 2 is a website without date, author nor the reference.
Source 3 is just a blog.
Source 4 can't be opened
Source 5 is a blog
I suggest all this source be replaced with credible and reliable sources.Triaser (talk)14:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]