Talk:Calcium in biology
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 | The content ofCalcium storage wasmerged intoCalcium in biology on 2001-03-14. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see itstalk page. |
Why is protists in quotation marks? It is a perfectly valid scientific term. Have removed them.82.153.195.20308:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't calcium necissary for the heart to beat? --Susan Walton23:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can the calcium content of thecommon bean be added?Badagnani (talk)00:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are some problems of the first paragraph.
Something like[[===formula here</math></math>phosphate]][[Media:Insert non-formatted]]'' ''text hereInsert non-formatted text here===Other eukaryotes==Insert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here]]'' appear in the text and I think there is no relationship with the text.—Precedingunsigned comment added byDeluxenville (talk •contribs)11:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good to see that the section on food sources of calcium refers tosesame seeds.ACEOREVIVED (talk)16:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onCalcium in biology. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)04:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Created section Humans to include Dietary recommendations, Food sources and Measurement in blood.David notMD (talk)13:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In Dietary recommendations:"May 27, 2016 it was revised to 1300 mg to bring it into agreement with the RDA."In the table it says: "19-50 years1000"Should the table not say 19-50 years 1300mg?Mermaidthrone (talk)21:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added more detail on what approved and what not.David notMD (talk)10:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectCa²⁺ has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 7 § Calcium ion until a consensus is reached.1234qwer1234qwer402:53, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
