Smacker video is flagged as not notable, butFFmpeg decoding can't be too bad. How about a section here, as historic background? It would also allow to join theTemplate:Compression formats entries. –Be..anyone (talk)17:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Smacker and Bink have been used in 2300 and 6200 video games, respectively, so by that measure, Smacker and Bink are approximately equally notable.Conquerist (talk)09:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Meanwhile theSmacker video article is better than theBink Video stub, so I guess at least the direction of the suggested merge was wrong. If you are confident that a merge only muddies the water remove the tags, please. –Be..anyone (talk)19:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that the two topics are separate enough to warrant their own articles. But the Bink article doesn't cover as much of the topic as it could. I think I'll add more details to the Bink article, its scope should be similar to the Smacker article after that. No need to merge after that I think.Conquerist (talk)21:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybemerge both toRAD Game Tools. Yes, all three are notable. Yes, we could keep standalone articles. That doesn't mean we must. There is certainly a lot of overlap between the three topics, and treating them all together would probably make for a better read. Otherwise I couldsupport merging the two, though I'm not sure which to which, but for largely the same reasons. There's enough redundant content that the two can probably be better discussed in a single article. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/09:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
