This article was nominated fordeletion on 2007-12-01. The result ofthe discussion wasKeep.

This article is ratedStub-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Computing:Software This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomputers,computing, andinformation technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byWikiProject Software. This article has beenautomatically rated by abot or other tool asStub-class because it uses astub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the|auto= parameter.

Other entry likehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProCite also has one line. I have not seen the page that was first created for this entry. I do not know why it was deleted. Is there a way to see it?

ProCite is developed byThomson Corporation, which has an article on Wikipedia and seems to be a fairly large company, unlike the developer of this program. This product seemsnon-notable and therefore seems like advertising (although I think the proper tag should have been notability, not blatant advertising).Tucker001 (talk |contribs)04:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google ranks the home page of a web site. If you have google toolbar, it will be displayed on the toolbar. If you do a google search of Biblioscape, it has 2.5 million hits. If you go to "More | Books", Biblioscape has been mentioned in 27 books.—Precedingunsigned comment added byXiannong (talk •contribs)16:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then put some of this information into the article.I'm not trying to be mean here; we insist on information from impartial third-party sources to verify notability and detailed claims. "It's on google" does not constitute proper sourcing of information. --Orange Mike |Talk16:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onBiblioscape. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20071030000135/http://www.researchinformation.info:80/rispring03review_notabene_biblioscape.html tohttp://www.researchinformation.info/rispring03review_notabene_biblioscape.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)19:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Stub-Class Computing articles
• Unknown-importance Computing articles
• Stub-Class software articles
• Unknown-importance software articles
• Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
• All Software articles
• Automatically assessed Computing articles
• All Computing articles

• Talk pages with comments before the first section