| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theBethlem Royal Hospital article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1 |
| This article iswritten inBritish English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,defence,artefact,analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tip: Anchors arecase-sensitive in most browsers. This article containsbroken links to one or more targetanchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking thepage history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed |Report an error |
I am reading a theatre play from 1622, the Changeling, and there is a place similar to Bedlam, very likely to have been taken up from the real one, and there is a passage mentioning "patients" as well as "daily visitants" who were looking at the madmen for fun. This would render the first dates of mentioning the former (18th century) and latter respectively (19th century) questionable.Malej19:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just a different possible inaccuracy. The first footnote link to a journal discussing the possible madness or insanity of Jesus, rather than the playwright or the quote the footnote is attached to.92.234.30.143 (talk)06:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The distance between the original Bishopsgate site and the site of the Curtain is somewhat over a kilometer. You must have a rather strong arm to be able to throw a stone that distance! More to the point, is there any connection between the two, beyond the Shakespearean references above? Is it demonstrable, perhaps, thatRobert Armin, whose house was close to Bedlam, had any relationship with the hospital? There was much else in the area too.— Precedingunsigned comment added by94.5.142.222 (talk)21:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed clean-up tag as I couldn't find any text omitted by the use of internal comments[1].FiachraByrne (talk)14:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article speaks of the Parlament inquiry of 1815-16, notes that Tomas Monro resigned due to scandal...and then goes on to mention that the hospital moved in 1930. There is no mention of what happened at Bedlam in response to the inquiry, or anything else that might have happened over the span of more than a century. Surely, there must have been a reaction, and other things must have happened.85.229.60.8 (talk)10:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The image in the infobox may need to be replaced, as the current (November 2015) image depicts the hospital administration block, which now contains the museum and gallery.Personal knowledge.SENIRAM (talk)15:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was:not moved(page movernac)Floodedwith themhundreds15:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
– This is its common name, steeped in hundreds of years of history. By the principle of least surprise, it should be Bedlam. Nobody even knows the alleged real name of Bedlam. Somebody, without getting consensus, took over a disambig page and cut-and-pasted the text, and turned theBedlam page into a disambig. Presumably they thought they were righting a great wrong, that the name Bedlam is negative and its fancied real name is better.Abductive (reasoning)16:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)12:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The last paragraph of the intro looks to be in the wrong section, as well as having numerous grammatical and word choice errors. It introduces a story that belongs in the institution's history, with no connection to the general overview directly above. It also contains no citations for the incident it describes. The out-of-place paragraph reads as follows:
On an early September afternoon patients within the ward named “special cases” there began a mental out burst as the news papers explained it. the patients raided cupboards med labs and multiple other vital medicinal necessities were ruined putting the other patients in other wards in danger they later restrained majority of the patients except for 7 people who remain unnamed unfortunately. The city was distraught about this mishap and the condolences go out to the family’s of the lost patients since then the hotel is under new management and nothing bad has happened since September of 1978
I suggest that this incident, if confirmed, would belong in the "1930 to the present" subsection, where it is not currently mentioned. The final sentence incorrectly identifies Bethlem as a "hotel" (typo for "hospital"?). Its claim that "nothing bad has happened since September of 1978" seems too vague to substantiate, and is directly contradicted by the later "Fatal restraints" incident cited in 2010.
--2601:196:8602:D303:E00E:910:3F71:3830 (talk)20:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you click on the link by "Website" it takes you to a page that notifies you that "the page you are looking for is not available." The linked website should be changed tohttps://slam.nhs.uk/bethlem-royal-hospitalAosc2 (talk)16:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't Bedlam actually St. Mary spital (for poor) in contrast to a hospital (for wealthy)? On map from 1300 there's St. Mary spital in St. Botolph ward that would corespond to it's original location, north of Bishopsgate.Lwh (talk)15:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We must be careful not too be blasé about a serious topic like death.
"Lessons were learned and the adolescent unit where Brennan died was assessed as good in 2016" is vague and dismissive. What lessons "were learned?" What specific changes were made? Who re-assessed the hospital?Raeofsunshine393 (talk)00:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the historical sections could benefit from a review for plain language, the complexity feels unnecessarySk8erboimp3 (talk)21:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]