Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Bethlem Royal Hospital

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theBethlem Royal Hospital article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1
This article iswritten inBritish English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,defence,artefact,analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus.
This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects.
WikiProject iconPsychologyMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPsychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLondonMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofLondon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHistoric sites
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofhistoric sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
???This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNational Health Service (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject National Health Service, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.National Health ServiceWikipedia:WikiProject National Health ServiceTemplate:WikiProject National Health ServiceNational Health Service
WikiProject iconSocial WorkLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsocial work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHospitalsHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofHospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMiddle AgesLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofthe Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Tip: Anchors arecase-sensitive in most browsers.

This article containsbroken links to one or more targetanchors:

  • [[Physical restraint#Medical restraints in the UK|restraint]] The anchor (#Medical restraints in the UK) is no longer available because it wasdeleted by a user before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking thepage history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed |Report an error

An inaccuracy?

[edit]

I am reading a theatre play from 1622, the Changeling, and there is a place similar to Bedlam, very likely to have been taken up from the real one, and there is a passage mentioning "patients" as well as "daily visitants" who were looking at the madmen for fun. This would render the first dates of mentioning the former (18th century) and latter respectively (19th century) questionable.Malej19:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a different possible inaccuracy. The first footnote link to a journal discussing the possible madness or insanity of Jesus, rather than the playwright or the quote the footnote is attached to.92.234.30.143 (talk)06:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cite supports the Nathaniel Lee quote. But it's derived from Porter, so probably better to use that if it's to be retained. The paragraph as it is is confused.FiachraByrne (talk)00:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Public visitations certainly had begun by early 17th century and possibly by late 16th centuryFiachraByrne (talk)01:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Public visits almost certainly by 1590s. Should have some account of prevalence of Bethlem/Bedlam in Jacobean plays. Also really need to account for term Bedlam.FiachraByrne (talk)22:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of The Curtain inclusion

[edit]

The distance between the original Bishopsgate site and the site of the Curtain is somewhat over a kilometer. You must have a rather strong arm to be able to throw a stone that distance! More to the point, is there any connection between the two, beyond the Shakespearean references above? Is it demonstrable, perhaps, thatRobert Armin, whose house was close to Bedlam, had any relationship with the hospital? There was much else in the area too.— Precedingunsigned comment added by94.5.142.222 (talk)21:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The point about the distance of Bethlem from those theatres is a fair one and the wording could be changed. Also, the image caption is currently unsourced, although presumably Andrews et al. 1997 and Hattori 1995 could be used. However, the connection between those theatres and Bethlem is sourced insofar as their proximity to the asylum is offered as one of two possible explanations for the staging of Bethlem in theatrical productions from the late 16th century onwards. Following an admittedly cursory search I can't find any reference in the literature linking Armin to Bethlem.FiachraByrne (talk)12:44, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed clean-up tag

[edit]

Removed clean-up tag as I couldn't find any text omitted by the use of internal comments[1].FiachraByrne (talk)14:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


1816 - 1930?

[edit]

The article speaks of the Parlament inquiry of 1815-16, notes that Tomas Monro resigned due to scandal...and then goes on to mention that the hospital moved in 1930. There is no mention of what happened at Bedlam in response to the inquiry, or anything else that might have happened over the span of more than a century. Surely, there must have been a reaction, and other things must have happened.85.229.60.8 (talk)10:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're right, 1815 inquiry and scandal was pivotal in Bethlem; by about mid-19thC it had essentially become a private and quite up-market asylum. Just never got around to writing the end of the article I'm afraid.FiachraByrne (talk)14:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date infobox image

[edit]

The image in the infobox may need to be replaced, as the current (November 2015) image depicts the hospital administration block, which now contains the museum and gallery.Personal knowledge.SENIRAM (talk)15:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 November 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was:not moved(page movernac)Floodedwith themhundreds15:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


– This is its common name, steeped in hundreds of years of history. By the principle of least surprise, it should be Bedlam. Nobody even knows the alleged real name of Bedlam. Somebody, without getting consensus, took over a disambig page and cut-and-pasted the text, and turned theBedlam page into a disambig. Presumably they thought they were righting a great wrong, that the name Bedlam is negative and its fancied real name is better.Abductive (reasoning)16:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose If it's not the actual name of the hospital, it should not be the name of the article.SleepForever  talk November 14, 10:02 (UTC)
  • No, most people (and reliable sources) used the actual title and still do. "Bedlam" is just a nickname. We only use nicknames when they are absolutely established as far and away the most common name. That certainly isn't the case here. --Necrothesp (talk)09:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on thistalk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)12:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last paragraph of introduction looks as if it may have been added accidentally

[edit]

The last paragraph of the intro looks to be in the wrong section, as well as having numerous grammatical and word choice errors. It introduces a story that belongs in the institution's history, with no connection to the general overview directly above. It also contains no citations for the incident it describes. The out-of-place paragraph reads as follows:

On an early September afternoon patients within the ward named “special cases” there began a mental out burst as the news papers explained it. the patients raided cupboards med labs and multiple other vital medicinal necessities were ruined putting the other patients in other wards in danger they later restrained majority of the patients except for 7 people who remain unnamed unfortunately. The city was distraught about this mishap and the condolences go out to the family’s of the lost patients since then the hotel is under new management and nothing bad has happened since September of 1978

I suggest that this incident, if confirmed, would belong in the "1930 to the present" subsection, where it is not currently mentioned. The final sentence incorrectly identifies Bethlem as a "hotel" (typo for "hospital"?). Its claim that "nothing bad has happened since September of 1978" seems too vague to substantiate, and is directly contradicted by the later "Fatal restraints" incident cited in 2010.

--2601:196:8602:D303:E00E:910:3F71:3830 (talk)20:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Official website should be changed

[edit]

If you click on the link by "Website" it takes you to a page that notifies you that "the page you are looking for is not available." The linked website should be changed tohttps://slam.nhs.uk/bethlem-royal-hospitalAosc2 (talk)16:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updated. Thanks.Dormskirk (talk)16:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spital vs Hospital

[edit]

Wasn't Bedlam actually St. Mary spital (for poor) in contrast to a hospital (for wealthy)? On map from 1300 there's St. Mary spital in St. Botolph ward that would corespond to it's original location, north of Bishopsgate.Lwh (talk)15:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Fatal Restraints"

[edit]

We must be careful not too be blasé about a serious topic like death.

"Lessons were learned and the adolescent unit where Brennan died was assessed as good in 2016" is vague and dismissive. What lessons "were learned?" What specific changes were made? Who re-assessed the hospital?Raeofsunshine393 (talk)00:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plain language

[edit]

I think the historical sections could benefit from a review for plain language, the complexity feels unnecessarySk8erboimp3 (talk)21:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bethlem_Royal_Hospital&oldid=1322546736"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp