This article is within the scope of theAviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists ofopen tasks andtask forces. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Wikipedia pages on airports generally have a section on aviation incidents (e.g. crashes) that have occurred there. Unless Aspen is miraculously crash-free since its founding, it should have an incidents section as well. (I don't have the knowledge necessary to write such a section, but I'm sure that info would be available on the NTSB/FAA websites.)KBurchfiel (talk)04:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you to the person who made a bunch of changes from 205.170.51.30 on 24 August. If you can add some inline citations, that would be most helpful. Also, consider registering an account. You clearly have the knowledge and desire to contribute. S4n1HS22WMX695In (talk)01:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Irrelevant. That is the name of the airport, and therefore that is the name we should be using for the article. We do not get to make up spellings of items that have established names, like airports.Apteva (talk)05:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
MOS does not apply - it does not tell us how to spell airports, and as far as I have been able to determine, there are no proper nouns which include an endash, while there are many that use a hyphen. It would be wise to include the name of this airport as an example in the MOS, as suggested (spelled with a hyphen). Right now there are at least three examples in the endash section which are incorrectly spelled, using the wrong punctuation and/or the wrong capitalization (one is marked as under discussion). How is anyone to believe the MOS when it is riddled with errors?Apteva (talk)05:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a proper name with en dash (Aspen–Pitkin County Airport). More books use slash than hyphen in styling this proper name, indicating a parallel relationship between the city and the county; that's the sort of relationship for which WP style uses the en dash.Dicklyon (talk)05:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What is disruptive is someone else moving these to using an endash, when a hyphen is clearly called for. There are 9,000 airports, and none use an endash. These could have been combined, but are more easily discussed separately.Apteva (talk)21:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is never disruption to fix errors. It is, however disruption to introduce them. There are 9,000 airports, and none are spelled using an endash.Apteva (talk)06:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have just modified one external link onAspen–Pitkin County Airport. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.
