This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofIraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofArchaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcrime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofDisaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article, begun on 9 March 2006, remains very much so a work in progress. I have no illusions that it is complete or properly written (e.g. NPOV), and no intentions of leaving it as is. Please feel free to edit my work or add to it, but please keep in mind that I intend to work on it further within the next few days and to expand and improve it greatly. Thank you.LordAmeth18:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as this is an ongoing problem, easily one of the worst places for archaeological looting in the world, I am leaving the current event tag on it. I have not heard anything about the Iraqi government, American military, or other organizations making significant steps to curb the activity, and as far as I am aware, pieces continued to be looted at an extraordinary rate. If anyone knows differently, please simply provide a reference source, and add the information to the article itself, describing how and when the looting problem was reduced or ended.LordAmeth03:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged the article with unsourced and NPOV. There is not a single source cited in this article, and it contains POV statements.Crockspot17:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you looked at the reference section, you would see the source I cited. All the information in this short stub of an article comes from that source. If there is anything in particular that you find to be of a non-neutral POV, other than the general point of view of being against thievery and other criminal acts, please let me know and I shall change it. There is no need for this to be a controversial article.LordAmeth22:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I added a few more sources that refer specifically to the continued looting of Iraq, one of whom is a Marine colonel who is trying to retrieve the artifacts stolen in April, 2003 but also is concerned about the continued looting outside of Baghdad... Additionally, there is an article included by aColumbia University archeologistZainab Bahrani of the continued looting as well as articles from the Global Heritage Fund...Stevenmitchell02:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, archaeological looting has become a minor problem.' Then why does it merit an article?Smacks of US mitigation propaganda.Beingsshepherd (talk)04:08, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Beingsshepherd[reply]
When I came across this article, I tried to fix typos and improve readability, rephrasing and putting in paragraph breaks. It mostly appears to be a long summary of one book and the author's name was incorrect in 80 references. I am not sure that this page is really worthwhile.SuW (talk)23:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
At the end of the section "Protection of museums under Ba'athist Iraq" there is the sentence "As 2002 came to an end the media and government were only broadcasting the good done by the troops in not destroying cultural heritage themselves but not on the looting done by people in Iraq and the Americans duty to protect the antiquities.[24]" This sentence is incorrect. There were not any American troops in Iraq in 2002, however there were American troops in Iraq in 2003. I am not in a position to determine if that is a typo or an unreliable source, but felt the error should be noted and corrected by a user who is in a position to do so. --Guest 20:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)— Precedingunsigned comment added by173.9.90.197 (talk)
I have just modified 2 external links onArchaeological looting in Iraq. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between17 January 2022 and13 May 2022. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Adillon243 (article contribs).