Talk:Anarchism in Cuba
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Anarchism in Cuba has been listed as one of theSocial sciences and society good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in the"Did you know?" column onDecember 7, 2007. The text of the entry was:Did you know ...thatanarchism once was the strongest current in theCubanlabor movement? | |||||||||
| This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
DDG a.k.a. Manuel Gaona Sousa's document "A Clarification and a Declaration of the Cuban Libertarians" seems to be a pretty important document in dampening international support for Cuban anarchists during the early Castro epoch. But if the document were widely distributed to international anarchists, isn't it puzzling that there's very little sign of it on the web (through google anyway)? The Frank Fernandez reference heavily used in the article talks about it.
Page 139 of Fernandez (pdf) says that the international damage was mostly in Mexico, Venezuela and Argentina, which suggests one obvious reason: the document was primarily circulated in spanish, not english (which is not really surprising!). So we would need to know the exact spanish title in order to search for it. Hmmmit seems like the title isUna aclaración y una declaración de los libertarios cubanos, printed 24 November 1961. Google with hl=es (for spanish) doesn't find terribly much on this either :(.
i could imagine that not many people study cuban anarchist history, and the actual people who received the document in Mexico/Venezuela/Argentina in the early 1960's are now 70 or 80 years old and none of them thought that it would be useful to scan the document and put it into an online archive.
Someone stuck a "clarify" template about this, and i agree. This sort of thing should come from more than one source, and if it's a document, then it would be best if that document is itself consultable online in some form, e.g.wikisource.Boud (talk)15:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onAnarchism in Cuba. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)11:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onAnarchism in Cuba. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)16:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
