This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofJudaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theBible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
It is interesting that reading this part of the scripture in th bible (Joshua 10), I suddenly realize that striking resemblance with Melchizedek. I know that all mentions in the bible are not coincidental but rather their timings are effectively used for a message by God. Whether it was in error or intentional.
i think looking wt Adonizedek from the perspective of Melchizedek could yield something unique on this matter.
Why Adonizedek? Why now? And why Jerusalem? In the face of the principles of strongholds, could Jerusalem be holding the key to eternal spiritual triumph?102.217.7.14 (talk)03:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
While doing research on the character ofMelchizedek, I found an unusual interpretation which asserts that Melchizedek and Jesus are the same person. Now, since Melchizedek is often believed to have fought at the Vale of Siddim, this view would practically lead us to think that Jesus himself fought in that battle.ADM (talk)15:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
