Talk:Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can anyone provide a citation to prove that English and Australian censors required the removal of all the monsters from the film (as stated in the article)? If this is true, A&C Meet Frankenstein must have been released as a 10-minute short in those countries!23skidoo03:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I foundImage:A&cdvd3.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the{{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under theGFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under anon-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) thenthe image will be deleted48 hours after 04:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
Betacommand(talk •contribs •Bot)04:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:A&cdvd3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand(talk •contribs •Bot)04:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:A&cdvd3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot10:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I added back in for a second time an error in the film where a character calls another character by an incorrect name. Errors (commonly called 'Film Flubs' or 'movie mistakes') are relevant to an article about a film and should remain. Please discuss before removing.Donaldd23 (talk)00:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vincent Price had appeared (?) inThe Invisible Man Returns for Universal so this is possibly why he was called in for the final gag. Matthew B-G117.102.151.16 (talk)11:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ismil and Abdel Meet Frankenstein is a latter-day alternate title forHaram Alek (1954); suggest this should be noted and referenced, since text presents them as separate films. The News Hound 20:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)—Precedingunsigned comment added byThe News Hound (talk •contribs)
When Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein was released on VHS the run time was reduced to 88 minutes. Why? Because the people producing the tape decided the transformation scene with Lon Chaney Jr was too scary. Why else would the cut the best change ever produced at that time or any other time. Ok maybe the transformation in the remake of The Werewolf of London could be called better. Was it not for the technology that existed when it was made. Technology Buddy Westmore did not have when he turned Chaney into the Wolfman for Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein.--Neal5521 (talk)23:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ummmm... no. Since this is not true, I'd say this is not worth making an edit. There's nothing cut out of the VHS version, the DVD, the Blu-Ray or the broadcast version. It also goes against the standing Wiki rule about "original research." If you can find anyplace this has ever appeared in print, though, hey, by all means add it!Ted Newsom (talk)04:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In the scene where Costello enters Larry Talbot's room, Costello enters the room 3 times, not once. I saw it many times as a kid. Apparently that footage is now lost.— Precedingunsigned comment added by69.125.85.123 (talk)10:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ummmm... no. Since this is not true, I'd say this is not worth making an edit. It also goes against the standing Wiki rule about "original research." If you can find anyplace this has ever appeared in print, though, hey, by all means add it!Ted Newsom (talk)04:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Shall we call Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein a sci-fi fantasy horror comedy film or is it just fine as is? --TMProofreader (talk)19:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
