This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

United States:Washington /SeattleLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byWikiProject Washington (assessed asLow-importance). This article is supported byWikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed asLow-importance). Comedy This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale. Film:Canadian /American This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you canjoin the discussion and see lists ofopen tasks andregional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation. To improve this article, please refer to theguidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by theCanadian cinema task force. This article is supported by theAmerican cinema task force.

Image:3000graceland.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot04:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 9-1-1 attacks were perfectly planned in terms of exploiting US authority patterns. The makers of this film saw those authority patterns. The critics--Authority--could not stand this aspersion. The movie came out just as the US Supreme Court was wiping its hands of the 2000 Presidential election, having chosen a winner, with the consent of the loser. The movie was dreamt up years before. These things do not spring up out of nothing.I'll bet you could do a very neat sociological study of the political connections of movie critics.The rest of the world, in which the movie made back its 62 million dollar investment, already knew this truth about the US. I wonder what the overseas critics said about it. No, I'll predict it. This is the US that everybody knows, and some want to get in on the action. Since 2001 that ambitious few has ridden the US kamikaze machine just about to earth.— Precedingunsigned comment added byChrisrushlau (talk •contribs)20:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on3000 Miles to Graceland. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. You may add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing forhttp://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/2001/2001st.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}06:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thisedit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

• What I think should be changed: the 2nd sentence, where it says, "Lichtenstein co-wrote the script with Richard Recco", should be changed to: "Richard Recco wrote the original screenplay on spec and later shared credit with Lichtenstein after changes were made to the final shooting script"
• Why it should be changed: As it is now I believe it leads readers to think that Myself (Richard Recco) and Lichtenstein were writing partners, or that "3,000 Miles To Graceland" was Lichtenstein's script that I participated in writing with him. That was never the case because I came up with the idea and wrote the original script on my own and copyrighted it in 1998, before I ever sent the script to anyone, and before Lichtenstein had any knowledge that I was writing a script in the first place.
• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-feb-23-ca-28999-story.html

https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/10071564?query=Richard%20recco&field_type=Keyword&records_per_page=10&page_number=3&date_field=representative_date

Richardrecco (talk)00:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wording not precisely as requested, but adjustments have been made in line with the sourcing. ♠PMC♠(talk)07:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class United States articles
• Low-importance United States articles
• Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
• Start-Class Washington articles
• Low-importance Washington articles
• WikiProject Washington articles
• Start-Class Seattle articles
• Low-importance Seattle articles
• WikiProject Seattle articles
• WikiProject United States articles
• Start-Class Comedy articles
• Unknown-importance Comedy articles
• WikiProject Comedy articles
• Start-Class film articles
• Start-Class Canadian cinema articles
• Canadian cinema task force articles
• Start-Class American cinema articles
• American cinema task force articles
• WikiProject Film articles
• Implemented requested edits