Talk:20th Century Animation
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20th Century Fox Animation, according toIMDb and any other source I could pull up, exists only as the boutique distribution label for theBlue Sky Studios films and the company's other animated output. It is not involved in any of the Fox television shows or their feature/direct to DVD derivatives (which are distributed by20th Century Fox Television and produced by outside studios;The Simpsons Movie was distributed by 20th Century Fox proper). This film division was also not involved in any of the pre-Fox Animation Studios films that Fox distributed (FernGully,Once Upon a Forest, etc.) --FuriousFreddy (talk)22:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 | An image used in this article,File:20th Century Fox Animation Print Logo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion atWikimedia Commons for the following reason:Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevantimage page (File:20th Century Fox Animation Print Logo.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk)11:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
 | Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
72.81.137.16 (talk)22:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done No request specified.Joseph2302 (talk)22:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Wisonsindisco (talk)22:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.Stickee(talk)01:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Euro2099 (talk)14:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Walt Disney Company
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —KuyaBriBriTalk14:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]Please revert the "Simpsons Movie 2" release date back to TBA, as the supporting sources do not say 2021. Thank you.152.15.113.10 (talk)11:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
The reporting structure on the page is wrong, and doesn't match the citation. Rob & Andrea report to Alan Horn. So do others, including Emma and Jennifer. Rob & Andrea do NOT report to Alan, Emma and Jennifer, like the wiki entry states.
Change "On March 21, 2019, Disney announced that the 20th Century Fox Animation label (including Blue Sky Studios) would be integrated as new units within the Walt Disney Studios with Co-Presidents Andrea Miloro and Robert Baird continuing to lead the studio reporting directly to Horn, Watts and Walt Disney Animation Studios chief creative officer Jennifer Lee."to "On March 21, 2019, Disney announced that the 20th Century Fox Animation label (including Blue Sky Studios) would be integrated as new units within the Walt Disney Studios with Co-Presidents Andrea Miloro and Robert Baird continuing to lead the studio reporting directly to Horn."Eolas38 (talk)20:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Already doneNiciVampireHeart19:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Change"reporting directly to Horn, Watts and Walt Disney Animation Studios chief creative officer Jennifer Lee."to"reporting directly to Horn."
Remove "The Wrap" citation, it's wrong. The Deadline citation has it correct, Rob Baird and Andrea Miloro (co-presidents of Fox Animation) report to Alan Horn, as do other creative heads of divisions including Jennifer Lee (Disney Animation) and Emma Watts (Fox live-action films).Eolas38 (talk)20:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Already doneNiciVampireHeart19:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]Why you don't add Fox Corporation subsidiary with Disney together?— Precedingunsigned comment added by177.122.211.109 (talk)23:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So you’re say that 20th Century Fox Animation now reports to Walt Disney Studios and not 20th Century Fox. Does that mean 20th Century Fox animation devision has been separated?Brian K. Tyler (talk)23:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
There is some vital information missing.77.100.106.84 (talk)20:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since 20th Century Fox Animation was renamed "20th Century Animation", why haven't we changed the article's name yet?XSMan2016 (talk)19:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever you say.XSMan2016 (talk)20:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Put new 20th Century Animation logoWeirdEssential (talk)15:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please providereliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Do you have a URL for the logo?GoingBatty (talk)18:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
I need to rename it to 20th Century Animation.114.108.224.215 (talk)08:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. If you're talking about the title of the article, seeWP:RM, but be prepared to support your case well. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos)14:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request to20th Century Fox Animation has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
The title of this page needs to be changed to "20th Century Animation" instead of "20th Century Fox Animation" since the name changed to that, as shown by the article and the source given by the article.108.246.15.108 (talk)03:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: page move requests should be made atWikipedia:Requested moves.JTP(talk •contribs)06:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
How long will this article be semi-protected?45.72.227.120 (talk)18:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: not an edit request. -
.svg)
.svg)
Flori4nKt •c19:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]Flori4nKt •c19:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
173.16.218.123 (talk)17:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stephen: Edit Article
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide areliable source if appropriate.AsarteaTrick|Treat17:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]Why do the films from Fox Family Films have to be listed here if none of them are animated?
Why isn't there a Wikipedia article for the 20th Century Animation andLocksmith Animation movieRon's Gone Wrong? The movie's supposed to come out on October 22, 2021, and there still isn't an article.— Precedingunsigned comment added by73.137.33.36 (talk)15:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could you addDiary of a Wimpy Kid (2021),Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again, andIce Age: Adventures of Buck Wild to the "Co-productions" section of this article?
I check pages listed inCategory:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content fororphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of20th Century Animation's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct forthis article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "THRReview":
It's 69 minutes long, including 10 devoted to the credits, ... arguable feature length for the program is reached by tacking on a six-minute opening cartoon,The Ballad of Nessie,...
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.AnomieBOT⚡00:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Animation365 (talk)17:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)The Bob's Burgers Movie would be 20th Century Animation's first film to have the company credited.[reply]
For example: "20th Century Studios, 20th Century Animation and 20th Century Family present" for The Bob's Burgers Movie.
Animation245 (talk)13:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)With the seventh Ice Age film and the third Rio film currently in development, 20th Century Animation will act as a typical animation studio like Pixar and Walt Disney Animation Studios.[reply]
Large chunks of this article are not properly referenced.Wikipedia:Verifiability is a core principle, not an optional extra. The various tables that include Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scoresconsistently fail to provide references for that information, making it excessively difficult for readers and editors to check that false information has not been inserted (or as frequently happens that over enthusiastic fans have not replaced the the main scores with the more favorableuser scores). Other infomation such as the Box office gross and the budget should be properly sourced, that information is not as definitive as this article looks, many films have conflicting reports of how much was actually spent on their production budget.
It would be a good idea to decide if all this information is really necessary at all, but if editors do decide to keep it then it should be properly sourced, and inline references added in all cases. --109.79.72.233 (talk)19:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
???94.254.171.42 (talk)18:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Blue Sky Studios was a unit of 20th Century Animation, not its predecessor. —Starforce1319:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]I'm confused about the relationship between 20th Century Animation andFox Animation Studios. At different sections, the articles state one was a subsidiary of the other, one (as Fox Family Films) co-produced with the other, and one became the other. I know very little about movie studios, but editingAnastasia, I couldn't figure if "20th Century Fox Animation" should even be mentioned.70.163.208.142 (talk)06:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please note thatWP:FANSITEs should not be used as references. If information has not yet been published by a reliable source (or press release) then it has not been "reported" and remains rumor. That means that sites such as TheDisinsider.com or DisneyPlusInformer.com or Whatsondisneyplus.com should not be used as references in this article, if you see them please remove them.
Specifically the entry for the upcoming Wimpy Kid film is using TheDisinsider.com as a reference. That reference should be removed or replaced. --109.79.167.143 (talk)14:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
20th Century Animation does not have an in-house animation style but rather outsources the actual hand-drawn and CGi animation production to its sister company, 20th Arts inGlendale, with Canadian offices inVancouver,British Columbia andMontreal,Quebec while pre-production and post-production is 20th Century Animation based. This is due to the closure ofBlue Sky Studios in April 2021. It is similar toSony Pictures Animation who outsources most of its films to Sony Pictures Traditionalworks for hand-drawn animationSony Pictures Imageworks for CGi animation.JennyD44 (talk)18:20, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We need to add bothFuturama shortsAmazon Adventure andA Terrifying Message from Al Gore on there. I meanInside the CIA could squeak in easily.2600:8801:8E:9900:D1CF:243E:A13F:5791 (talk)19:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Someone should add the detail that 20th Century Animation is moving to Burbank like all the other 20th Century Studios-related assets in this article's history section.2600:1008:B230:D939:4057:A39E:D960:AA34 (talk)21:38, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the logo for TCA is official. According to the file history, it was sourced from Logopedia, which traced it from a png from the Disney Wiki. The source image came from fan account Disney TV Animation News, and the source logo appears to have been photoshopped, given the original image looks fuzzy.Raymondsze (talk)00:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
I want to fix something on one of the opening texts.Doggie Doggy (talk)02:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a"change X to Y" format and provide areliable source if appropriate.Chess enjoyer (talk)02:29, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Not done: Whether something is a media franchise or not isn't strictly defined by the number of films that are released. It's more about derivative works being released across more than one medium, which seems to be satisfied here considering Anastasia was adapted into astage musical.Day Creature (talk)17:47, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]Anastasia is a franchise, Bartok the Magnificent was made as a direct to video follow-up to Anastasia and it was adapted into a stage musical and thus Anastasia should be considered a franchise.~2025-42158-36 (talk)22:14, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can I revert Mr. Doggy Dog's edit? Anastasia is a franchise, Bartok the Magnificent was made as a direct to video follow-up to Anastasia and it was adapted into a stage musical and thus Anastasia should be considered a franchise.~2025-42228-53 (talk)23:06, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can I revert Mr. Doggy Dog's edit? Anastasia is a franchise, Bartok the Magnificent was made as a direct to video follow-up to Anastasia and it was adapted into a stage musical and thus Anastasia should be considered a franchise.CallahanKieranKiki42 (talk)23:22, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ice Age (2002–present) and Rio (2011–present) are the studio's most commercially successful franchises, while Anastasia (1997), Robots (2005), [...] are among its most critically praised films.
Anastasia, Ice Age and Rio are the studio's most commercially successful franchises, while Robots (2005), [...] are among its most critically praised films,
Ice Age (2002–present) and Rio (2011–present) are the studio's most commercially successfulfilm franchises, while Anastasia (1997), Robots (2005), [...] are among its most critically praised films.