| Gold Apollo AR924 was nominated fordeletion.The discussion was closed on3 October 2024 with a consensus tomerge. Its contents weremerged into2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please seeits history; for its talk page, seehere. |
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to the2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1,2,3Auto-archiving period:30 days |
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of yourcommon.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;} Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related totheArab–Israeli conflict, which issubject to theextended-confirmed restriction. You are not anextended-confirmed user, soyou must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make anedit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates totheArab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
This page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
| A news item involving 2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks was featured on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theIn the news section on18 September 2024. |
| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in theTop 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
| This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination. Discussions:
|
Replace the Infobox civilian attack with some infobox relevant to military operations, because that's what this was.Jerdle (talk)12:35, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Proportionality section is so unbalanced that it essentially absolves the terrorist attacker from any ethical consideration of carrying out such a brutal and indiscriminate attack.2001:4C4E:24AF:5A00:E14:20B:9267:4231 (talk)06:59, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:Remove "Land" from West Point international law institute name. Causes a dead link.Diff:
| − | An analysis published by the Lieber Institute for Law & | + | An analysis published by the Lieber Institute for Law & Warfare at West Point concluded that while not all relevant facts are yet known, if Israeli officials were of the "genuine and good faith professional opinion" that most of the people impacted by the attack were lawful targets, the operation may have been legal. |
198.2.5.112 (talk)21:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Remove the mis-cited reference "[16]" at the end of the sentence in the lead. The cited source does not support the statement. The sentence should be removed or cited accurately.
Diff:
| − | + | (Removeorcite) |
TheWolfWar (talk)03:11, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]