2016 Paris–Roubaix has been listed as one of theSports and recreation good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it. Review: May 22, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

CyclingLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. FranceLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofFrance on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

HiRacklever. Regardingthis edit, I was asked in a couple of GA reviews to move away from the "The 2016 X was the 115th X", because it's a bit tautologous and doesn't immediately describe the event to a lay reader. In the articles I've written recently, I've changed the order so that information goes later in the opening paragraph, asin this edit. Hope that looks OK to you.Relentlessly (talk)16:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK --Racklever (talk)20:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This review istranscluded fromTalk:2016 Paris–Roubaix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:Zwerg Nase (talk·contribs)07:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this.Zwerg Nase (talk)07:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. It isreasonably well written.

   a(prose): b(MoS forlead,layout,word choice,fiction, andlists):

2. It isfactually accurate andverifiable.

   a(reference section): b(citations toreliable sources): c(OR):

3. It isbroad in its coverage.

   a(major aspects): b(focused):

4. It follows theneutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It isstable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated byimages and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a(images are tagged and non-free content havefair use rationales): b(appropriate use withsuitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I made some minor changes myself. What is left:

• You should putpeloton in italics everywhere it appears.
• Race summary: "after coming back from being his crash" - something is not right here.
• Race summary: "he agreed to work fully for Stannard" - pure speculation, you should rephrase this.
• Post-race: Same problem here as with E3, try to find more ways to write "he said".

That's about it. Again, good work! On hold for now.Zwerg Nase (talk)11:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stepped in and fixed all except point three. The ref does note that pretty clearly, actually, so I don't know how that'd be rephrased without making it incorrect.Wizardman14:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,Wizardman! Promoted.Zwerg Nase (talk)14:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on2016 Paris–Roubaix. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20160415002332/http://www.cyclingnews.com/paris-roubaix/results/ tohttp://www.cyclingnews.com/paris-roubaix/results/
• Corrected formatting/usage forhttp://www.uci.html.infostradasports.com/cache/2/TheASP.asp%40PageID%3D102007%26SportID%3D102%26CompetitionID%3D24055%26SeasonID%3D490%26EventID%3D12146%26GenderID%3D1%26ClassID%3D1%26EventPhaseID%3D1444755%26Phase1ID%3D1444791%26TaalCode%3D2%26StyleID%3D0%26Cache%3D2.html?988949

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)20:25, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia good articles
• Sports and recreation good articles
• GA-Class cycling articles
• Low-importance cycling articles
• GA-Class France articles
• Low-importance France articles
• All WikiProject France pages