| This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The same problems I noted in the 2008 and 2012 maps for Alaska apply even moreso in 2004. Not only are there not borough by borough absentee and question ballot totals, but the early votes for 2004 are aggregated over the totality of the four administrative regions that comprise multiple lower state house districts and there is a small category called "partial ballots" that also aggregates over multiple districts. The reporting was so opaque that the Alaska Democrats sued to get a hold of the Diebold database, but no one has ever to my knowledge made it give reports that are consistent in format with the other elections since 1998. It looks again like this is just the precinct totals without the other ballot types, and with Absentee ballots as important as they are in Alaska, that's a major omission.--2601:B:8000:67E:949E:19BA:FAAE:C8EB (talk)07:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC) John Foelster[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onUnited States presidential election in Alaska, 2004. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag tohttp://www.dcpoliticalreport.com/members/2004/Pred2.htm#NWWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)16:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]