This article is ratedList-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

ListsLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize alllist pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. YearsLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofYears on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

• November 29 -Soviet invasion of Afghanistan: TheUnited Nations General Assembly passes United Nations Resolution 37, stating that theSoviet Union should withdraw fromAfghanistan.

This entry is a complete mistake ?? or a fake ?There was an invations on Dec 1979, but this one ??Am I right or wrong ?Regards J*rgen Lund, CopenhagenNick: The Librarian

There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.

For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).

Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.

Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically).talk--BozMo13:51, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the Dengue fever outbreak in Cuba for two reasons - firstly, I haven't found any other links substantiating the number infected in one day, secondly the WHO report on DHF in Cuba (written, you may note, by Cuban scientists) states that the outbreak was in 1981WHO report. If the comment can't even get the year right, why should we believe that allegations that the CIA was responsible are sufficiently confirmed to be non POV? Also, it is quite possible for an infectious disease to spread from south east Asia to Cuba without the help of the CIA.Average Earthman09:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I removed "estonia's first casualty in iraqi war in the coalition of the willing" because there was in my opinion a mistake in the year (not sure which year it happened but i'm quite positive it wasn't february 1982)

We might need a disambig link for this page. 1982 is also the name of Randy Travis' first hit. - Thanks,Hoshie10:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does the song have an article? --TM13:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No not yet. I have the song on my iPod and was trying to use the wiki to find an article about it and I ended up here. - Thanks,Hoshie03:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages are really only necessary when there is actually another article to link to, otherwise it doesn't serve much purpose. (And for the song to have its own article it must meet importance guidelines, I'm not sure on the criteria for individual songs though.) --TM15:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the page, I noticed the awards section seems a little awkward - in particular, there's a subsection for firlds medalists, nobel prizes and the templeton prize, and I intend to merge those three sections into a single Awards section. Since the current method is in use for the various years, I want to have comments before I actually merge the section - in my opinion, this would be a bold edit that goes against the current standard. --Sigma 7 (talk)20:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article,File:ARA Belgrano sinking.jpg, has been nominated for deletion atWikimedia Commons in the following category:Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image isnon-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is nofair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk)15:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should theSuperbowl be included for this year? Centralized discussion atWT:YEARS#Superbowls —Arthur Rubin(talk)17:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on1982. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20160306232450/http://www.pagetable.com/?p=547 tohttp://www.pagetable.com/?p=547

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)20:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Dan Stevens (32493693323) (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page.Community Tech bot (talk)04:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Hayley Atwell by Gage Skidmore.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)19:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Catherine Elizabeth Middleton (colorized).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)07:36, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SeeWT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page.Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk)23:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Hayley Atwell - TWiFF (SarahBoaman-Original).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)15:51, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Miguel Ydigoras Fuentes.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)07:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Tomás Romero Pereira.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)10:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If people are in favor of a photo collage as seen from '87-2022, I would like to hear some consensus on thoughts about what images should be included in it. ThanksThe ganymedian (talk)22:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Randy Rhoads21314.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)00:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• List-Class List articles
• Low-importance List articles
• WikiProject Lists articles
• List-Class Years articles
• Low-importance Years articles
• List-Class Years articles of Low-importance