This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Disability 1829 braille is within the scope ofWikiProject Disability. For more information, visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability Writing systemsMid‑importance This article falls within the scope ofWikiProject Writing systems, aWikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating towriting systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop bythe project page and/or leave a query atthe project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

I thought expanding the table to all theoretically possible forms was rather confusing, so I reduced it to what Braille proposed. The theory should be evident enough from this and the main braille article, I think. —kwami (talk)06:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's just fine. Two quick thoughts going forward, though: 1) You only have 96 cells in the pared-down table, but prose says there were 97 patterns used. 2) I still think the excised cells should be present for completeness, maybe in a separate table.VanIsaac_WSVex^contribs07:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The 97th is the blank cell.

I don't get the point of the theoretical cells. They were never used for anything; AFAICT, not even all the cells in the table were ever used for anything. (Though he did use a few dot-only cells which don't appear in the table.) This system was abandoned so quickly that it's really only of historical interest.

Anyway, thanks for making the table. It's rather ridiculous to expect the visually impaired to read the table in that photo of embossed paper. —kwami (talk)16:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on1829 braille. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttp://www.webcitation.org/69o3fSsEr?url=http://www.nfb.org/Images/nfb/Publications/braille/TheFirstPublicationoftheBrailleCode.html tohttp://www.nfb.org/Images/nfb/Publications/braille/TheFirstPublicationoftheBrailleCode.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)09:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectBraille Extended-A has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 4 § Braille Extended-A until a consensus is reached._signed,Rosguill^talk04:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to@Vanisaac for reverting one of my edits, I didn't read the sentence carefully enough.HueAskew (talk)00:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class Disability articles
• WikiProject Disability articles
• C-Class Writing system articles
• Mid-importance Writing system articles