| This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information obtained about the 153d CACS was public information from many different sources: Air Force Historical Research Agency, Air Force Space Command, 90th Missile Wing FOIA office to name a few(arren). The information specifically asked for was: Air Force Form 35, Request for Authorization for Assumption of/Appointment to Command (these have commander's names and unit activation dates), lineage and heraldry for 4 CACS, 721 MCCS, and other units which were kludged into the 153d (the logo and bits of the history). Oh, and Air Force Space Command general orders when bestowing Air Force Outstanding Unit Awards - those are sometimes good for unit designations and locations.TDRSS (talk)17:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
--JeffGBot (talk)16:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on153d Command and Control Squadron. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)17:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]