This T and O map, from the first printed version ofIsidore'sEtymologiae, identifies the three known continents as populated by descendants of Sem (Shem), Iafeth (Japheth) and Cham (Ham).TheHereford Mappa Mundi, ca. AD 1300,Hereford Cathedral, England. A classic "T-O" map with Jerusalem at center, east toward the top,Europe at bottom left and Africa on the right.
AT and O map orO–T orT–O map (orbis terrarum, orb or circle of the lands; with the letter T inside an O), also known as anIsidoran map, is a type ofearly world map that represents theAfro-Eurasian landmass as a circle (= O) divided into three parts by a T-shaped combination of the Mediterranean sea, the river Tanais (Don) and theNile.[1] The origins of this diagram are contested, with some scholars hypothesizing an origin in Roman or late antiquity, while others consider it to have originated in 7th or early-8th century Spain.[2]
So the earth may be divided into three sides (trifarie), of which one part isEurope, anotherAsia, and the third is calledAfrica. Europe is divided from Africa by a sea from the end of theocean and thePillars of Hercules. And Asia is divided fromLibya withEgypt by theNile... Moreover, Asia – as the most blessedAugustine said – runs from the southeast to the north ... Thus we see the earth is divided into two to comprise, on the one hand, Europe and Africa, and on the other only Asia.[6]
Etymologiae 14.2.1:
The world is called round after the roundness of a circle, because it is like a wheel [...] Because of this, theOcean flowing around it is contained in a circular limit, and it is divided in three parts, one part being called Asia, the second Europe, and the third Africa.[7]
Although Isidore taught in theEtymologiae that the Earth was "round", his meaning was ambiguous and some writers think he referred to a disc-shaped Earth. However, other writings by Isidore make it clear that he considered the Earth to bespherical.[8][9] Indeed, the spherical Earth had been the prevailing scholarly assumption since at leastAristotle, who had delineated afrigid clime at thepoles, atorrid clime near theequator, and a habitabletemperate clime in between.
Ideal reconstruction of medieval world maps (fromMeyers Konversationslexikon, 1895)A "T-O" map made with modern cartography
The T and O map represents only half of the spherical Earth,[10] presumably a convenientprojection of the known northern temperate region. It was believed that no one could cross the torrid equatorial clime and reach the unknown lands to the south, theantipodes.[10][11]
TheT is theMediterranean, theNile, and theDon (formerly called the Tanais) dividing the threecontinents,Asia,Europe andAfrica, and theO is the encirclingocean.[12] In line with Isidore's description, Asia is normally depicted as equal in size to Africa and Europe combined.[13] The majority T-O maps are oriented to the east, though examples of north, south and westward orientation can also be found.[14]
The idea thatJerusalem was generally represented in the center of the map as the navel of the world, theumbilicus mundi, is a false generalisation from a relatively small number of very famous 13th-centurymappae mundi.[15] The earliest T-O maps marked no particular geographic center and while some earlymappae mundi were specifically centered on classical sites like Delos or the Cyclades, most simply had the Mediterranean or Aegean Sea in the middle.[16] It was only after the First Crusade that Jerusalem began to be represented as the center of the world on medieval maps, a trend which rose to prominence from the mid-12th century through the early-14th century, but was never universally observed.[17]
The location of Paradise (the Garden of Eden) in the east of Asia is based upon theSeptuagint translation of Genesis 2:8, which describes the garden of Eden being planted in the east. This is a longstanding feature of Christian textual geographies, and while not present on the earliest T-O maps, it is a prominent feature of many earlymappae mundi, especially theBeatus maps.[18] These depictions are often combined with a depiction of the four rivers of Paradise: the Tigris, Euphrates, Pishon and Gihon, the latter two of which were sometimes understood by medieval cartographers as the Ganges and Nile (or Geon) respectively. These were either depicted as flowing within/out from paradise and/or as four major rivers on the map.[19]
This qualitative and conceptual type of medievalcartography could yield extremely detailed maps in addition to simple representations. The earliest maps had only a few cities and the most important bodies of water noted.[dubious –discuss][citation needed]
Different cartographic material, which represented more useful tools for the traveler, were theitinerarium, which listed in order the names of towns between two points, and theperiplus that did the same for harbors and landmarks along a seacoast.[citation needed]
Later maps of the T-and-O conceptual format featured many rivers and cities ofEastern as well asWestern Europe, and other features encountered during theCrusades. Decorative illustrations were also added in addition to the new geographic features. The most important cities would be represented by sketches of fortifications and towers in addition to their names, and the empty spaces would be filled with mythical creatures.[citation needed]
Unknown,Mer des hystoires world map, 1491, following the model of the T-O map, centered on Jerusalem with East (the biblical location of Paradise) at the top.
On the left part of the sheet is a zonal or climatic map, communicating geographical information. On the right is a "T-O" map. ByJacobus Philippus Bergomensis.
^David Woodward, "MedievalMappaemundi", inThe History of Cartography, Vol. 1:Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient, and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean, ed. J. B. Harley and David Woodward (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), 296.
^For an overview of the different scholarly positions on the origins of the diagrammatic form, see Christoph Mauntel, "The T-O Diagram and its Religious Connotations – a Circumstantial Case", inGeography and Religious Knowledge in the Medieval World, ed. Christoph Mauntel (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2021), 60-65.
^El Escorial, Real Biblioteca, R.II.18, fol. 24v; see also Mauntel, "The T-O Diagram and its Religious Connotations", 61 and Woodward, "MedievalMappaemundi", 301.
^Williams 1997, p. 13: "...the Isidoran tradition, as it was known from peninsular examples, including the earliest of the ubiquitous T-O maps. This emblematic figure appears twice at the foot of folio 24v in a copy of Isidore's De Natura Rerum, now Escorial R.II.18. [...] When, in the ninth century, the Escorial manuscript fell into the hands of Eulogius and was supplemented, this precise text (Etymologiae XIV, 2, 3) was placed on the page, folio 25r, facing the primitive map and was introduced another small T-O map. To this later T-O diagram, however, were added the names of Noah's sons- Shem, Japheth and Ham, for Asia, Europe and Africa, respectively-outside the circle of the globe. This apportionment is only implicit in the Bible (Genesis 9: 18-19). Josephus (d. c.100 AD) is more explicit as was Hippolytus of Rome, whose chronicle of 234 in its Latin translation disseminated the Noachid distribution in the West. Isidore's Etymologiae, however, the distribution of Noah's sons is not highlighted, but only incidentally reported with the description of the location of cities in Book IX. It seems clear, if we accept the evidence of Escorial R.II.18, that the Shem-Japheth-Ham distribution was not in the primitive Isidoran diagram. This means that Isidore's use of the T-O diagram was not informed by any overt religious content."
^Isidore of Seville: On the Nature of Things, trans. Calvin B. Kendall and Faith Wallis (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2016), 175.
^ Trans.Williams 1997, p. 13;Patrologia Latina, vol. 83, coll. 1016D-1017A: "Regio autem terrae dividitur trifariam, e quibus una pars Europa, altera Asia, tertia Africa vocatur. Europam igitur ab Africa dividit mare ab extremis oceani finibus, et Herculi columnis. Asiam autem, et Libyam cum Aegypto disterminat ostium Nili fluvii [...] Asia autem, ut ait beatissimus Augustinus, a meridie per orientem usque ad septentrionem pervenit. [...] Unde videntur orbem dimidium duae tenere, Europa, et Africa. Alium vero dimidium sola Asia."
^Isidori Hispalensis episcopi Etymologiarum sive Originvm libri XX, 2 vols, ed. W. M. Lindsay (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1911), n.p.: "Orbis a rotunditate circuli dictus, quia sicut rota est. [...] Divisus est autem trifarie: e quibus una pars Asia, altera Europa, tertia Africa nuncupatur."
^Mauntel, "The T-O Diagram and its Religious Connotations", 59. A small number of T-O maps instead depict Africa as taking up half the circle as opposed to Asia (Woodward, "MedievalMappaemundi", 343.) and a smaller number still depict Europe in this way (e.g. Ingrid Baumgärtner, "Die Wahrnehmung Jerusalems auf mittelalterlichen Weltkarten", inJerusalem: im Hoch- und Spätmittelalter: Konflikte und Konfliktbewältigung - Vorstellungen und Vergegenwärtigungen, ed. Dieter R. Bauer, Klaus Herbers and Nikolas Jaspert (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2001), 271-73).
^ Non-eastern orientations are associated above all with T-O maps that accompanySallust'sJugurthine War, on which see Woodward, "MedievalMappaemundi", 343-4, where examples of all four orientations are also provided. There is no consensus on the origins of the predominantly eastern orientation, some like Mauntel, "The T-O Diagram and its Religious Connotations", 65-9 argue that it is a specifically Christian development, while others like Patrick Gautier Dalché, "L'héritage antique de la cartographie médiévale: Les problèmes et les acquis", inCartography in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Fresh Perspectives, New Methods, ed. Richard J. A. Talbert and Richard W. Unger (Leiden: Brill, 2008), 55-6 are more circumspect about the specifically Christian significance of this orientation.
^Woodward, "MedievalMappaemundi", 340 and Baumgärtner, "Die Wahrnehmung Jerusalems", 304.
^ Baumgärtner, "Die Wahrnehmung Jerusalems", 275-94.
^Woodward, "MedievalMappaemundi", 341-2 and Baumgärtner, "Die Wahrnehmung Jerusalems", 294-310.
^Mauntel, "The T-O Diagram and its Religious Connotations", 67-9.
Baumgärtner, Ingrid (2001). "Die Wahrnehmung Jerusalems auf mittelalterlichen Weltkarten". In Dieter R. Bauer, Klaus Herbers and Nikolas Jaspert (eds.),Jerusalem: im Hoch- und Spätmittelalter: Konflikte und Konfliktbewältigung - Vorstellungen und Vergegenwärtigungen, pp. 271-334. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.ISBN978-3593368511
Englisch, Brigitte (2002).Ordo orbis terrae. Die Weltsicht in den Mappae mundi des frühen und hohen Mittelalters. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.ISBN3-05-003635-4
Gautier Dalché, Patrick (2008). "L'héritage antique de la cartographie médiévale: Les problèmes et les acquis", pp. 29-66. In Richard J. A. Talbert and Richard W. Unger (eds.)Cartography in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Fresh Perspectives, New Methods. Leiden: Brill.ISBN9789004166639
Mauntel, Christoph (2023).Die Erdteile in der Weltordnung des Mittelalters. Asien – Europa – Afrika (Monographien zur Geschichte des Mittelalters 71) Stuttgart: Hiersemann.ISBN978-3-7772-2311-7
Mauntel, Christoph (2021). "The T-O Diagram and its Religious Connotations – a Circumstantial Case", in Christoph Mauntel (ed.),Geography and Religious Knowledge in the Medieval World, pp. 57-82. Berlin: deGruyter.ISBN9783110685954
Woodward, David (1987)."MedievalMappaemundi"(PDF). In Harley, J. B.; Woodward, David (eds.).The History of Cartography. Vol. 1: Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient, and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.ISBN0-226-31633-5.
Zaccagnini, Carlo (2012). "Maps of the World", in Giovanni B. Lanfranchi et al.,Leggo! Studies Presented to Frederick Mario Fales on the occasion of his 65th birthday, pp. 865–874. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz Verlag.ISBN9783447066594