| Sulka | |
|---|---|
| Native to | Papua New Guinea |
| Region | easternPomio District,East New Britain Province |
Native speakers | (2,500 cited 1991)[1] |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | sua |
| Glottolog | sulk1246 |
| ELP | Sulka |
| Coordinates:5°16′33″S152°05′32″E / 5.275769°S 152.092315°E /-5.275769; 152.092315 (Guma Village) | |
Sulka is alanguage isolate ofNew Britain,Papua New Guinea.[2] In 1991, there were 2,500 speakers in easternPomio District,East New Britain Province.[3] Villages include Guma (5°16′33″S152°05′32″E / 5.275769°S 152.092315°E /-5.275769; 152.092315 (Guma Village)) inEast Pomio Rural LLG.[4] With such a low population of speakers, this language is considered to be endangered.[citation needed] Sulka speakers had originally migrated to East New Britain fromNew Ireland.[5]
Sulka is spoken along the coastal region ofWide Bay,[4] on the Southern coast of theGazelle Peninsula,[6] on the eastern side ofNew Britain Island,Papua New Guinea. Some estimate speakers to number as high as between 3,000 and 3,500.[7][4] Reesink (2005) reports on some Sulka speakers who have intermingled in neighboring villages with speakers of other languages such as Mali, southeast ofKokopo.[4]
Sulka may be described as having ancient Papuan (non-Austronesian) roots, which additionally displays morphosyntactic constructions and some vocabulary items associated with the Oceanic branch of Austronesian (i.e. languages of the St. George linkage such asMali).[8] Alternatively, it has been proposed as possibly related toKol orBaining as part of theEast Papuan proposal, but Palmer (2018) treats Sulka as alanguage isolate.[9]
Sulka has some influence from theMengen language.[5]
Over 3,000 to 3,500 years ago, the linguistic ancestors of Sulka speakers arrived in the Papua New Guinea area.[2]
Although the history of the language is not well known, it may display a mixture of Oceanic and Papuan language traits.[10] These are languages Sulka came into contact with, when the peoples speaking these other languages populated the area in neighboring villages, around 3,200 years ago.[11]
The phonological system of Sulka comprises 28 contrasting segments, fourteenconsonants, and sevenvowels.[4] On the topic of consonants, there is no recent evidence to support contrast between [b] and [β], therefore they're assumed to beallophones and are represented in the table of consonants as [β] only.[4]
Sulka consonants are:[5]
| Bilabial | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Uvular | Glottal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stop | voiced | (d) | g | (q) | |||
| voiceless | p | t | k | ||||
| Nasal | m | ŋ | (ɴ) | ||||
| Fricative | β | s | (ɣ) | (ʁ) | h | ||
| Lateral | l | ||||||
| Trill | r | ||||||
| Approximant | j | ||||||
For its vowels, Sulka has a contrast between three front vowels: high, mid, and low, [i], [e], and [ε], but there is no instance of the central high vowel [ɨ].[4] However, when it comes to vocalic contrasts, it is not always clear. The mid front vowel may fluctuate somewhere between close-mid [e] and the more central-close vowel [ɪ], pronounced like Englishi in 'in'.[4] The sounds [o] and [u] often fluctuate with each other as in the example of '1SG verbal pronoun' [ku] and [ko]. This pattern of fluctuation seems to commonly occur for high front vowels. When looking at the length of vowels, long vowels are often confused with diphthongs.
| Front | Back | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Close | short | i | u |
| long | iː | uː | |
| Mid | short | e ~ɪ,ɛ | o,ɔ |
| long | eː | oː,ɔː | |
| Open | short | a | |
| long | aː |
The seven vowel sounds can be found in the following words:[4]
| IPA | Meaning |
|---|---|
| [hip] | 'tree wallaby' |
| [hep] | 'bed' |
| [hɛp] | 'make fire' |
| [lul] | 'flow' |
| [lol] | 'carry (PL object)' |
| [yok] | 'namesake' |
| [yɔk] | 'taro' |
| [ko] | 'there' |
| [kat] | 'again' |
The words below contain closed syllables which are the only attested words showing that syllable length is phonemic:[4]
| IPA | Meaning |
|---|---|
| [iːs] | 'able, enough' |
| [pkɔːn] | 'hornbill' |
| [harpeːt] | 'fall' |
| [βuːt] | 'fall (lightly)' |
| [poːm] | 'push' |
| [naːk] | 'grave mound' |
A great majority of Sulka's lexicon is not Oceanic/Austronesian as stated by Schneider. However, there are a few words that are shared between both Papuan and Oceanic.
Examples from Geelvink (2005):
Selected Sulka nouns showing singular and plural forms (Tharp 1996: 161–163):[12]
| gloss | singular | plural |
|---|---|---|
| ‘part’ | mhe | mhetor |
| ‘vagina’ | kha | khator |
| ‘house’ | rɨk | rɨktor |
| ‘hole’ | nho | nhotor |
| ‘cliff’ | vɨk | vɨktor |
| ‘colorful belt’ | lɨp | lɨptor |
| ‘knife’ | kom | komtok |
| ‘water’ | yi | yitok |
| ‘heart’ | ngaung | ngaungtok |
| ‘nose’ | vorngap | vrongtok |
| ‘green lizard’ | gut | gɨtok |
| ‘song’ | kni | knituk |
| ‘head’ | lpek | lpetuk |
| ‘morning’ | rot | ruteik |
| ‘string bag’ | psang | vasngeik |
| ‘family’ | valngan | valngneik |
| ‘charcoal’ | valang | valngeik |
| ‘finger nail’ | pga | pgeik |
| ‘small garden plot’ | sar | sareik |
| ‘vein’ | spang | sapngeik |
| ‘shoulder’ | volha | volheik |
| ‘sky’ | volkha | volkheik |
| ‘mountain’ | vul | vleik |
| ‘container’ | kolhi | kolheik |
| ‘wildpitpit’ | ngaiphe | ngaiphol |
| ‘snake’ | vim | vimol |
| ‘bat’ | viɨng | viɨngol |
| ‘disciplining stick’ | khap | khapol |
| ‘fruit’ | mit | mitol |
| ‘mushroom’ | tling | tinngol |
| ‘fish’ | slang | sinngol |
| ‘meat’ | vothek | vothol |
| ‘place’ | ngaekam | ngaekmol |
| ‘roof of mouth’ | kning | kningol |
| ‘reed’ | psiɨng | psiɨngol |
| ‘bird’ | ngaining | iningol |
| ‘edge’ | ngaiting | itngol |
| ‘monster’ | ngainkuo | inkuol |
| ‘sister’s brother’ | lu | rlok |
| ‘mountain’ | vul | vlik |
| ‘coconut leaf’ | kriar | kerik |
| ‘forehead’ | lein | leinik |
| ‘kina shell’ | ngaek | igik |
| ‘fetish’ | tarmek | tarmki |
| ‘lobster’ | hivotek | hivotgi |
| ‘coss-buai’ | rongtep | rongtvi |
| ‘root’ | kavgot | kvukti |
| ‘lake’ | ngaenker | enekri |
| ‘lime’ | ngaiker | ikri |
| ‘anger’ | ngaesik | resik |
| ‘ear’ | ngaela | rela |
| ‘door’ | ngaegot | relot |
| ‘job’ | ngaeha | reha |
| ‘wing’ | ngaeho | reho |
| ‘road’ | ngaelot | relot |
| ‘sound’ | ngaeti | reti |
| ‘type ofkaukau’ | ngoye | roye |
| ‘brawl’ | ngaus | raus |
| ‘brother’s brother’ | nopia | rnopeik |
| ‘father’s daughter’ | kvɨk | rkvɨk |
| ‘father’s father’ | poi | rpoik |
| ‘sister’s brother’ | lu | rlok |
| ‘brother’s sister’ | etem | rotmik |
| ‘father’s son’ | hal | rhol |
| ‘reef’ | kamngal | komngol |
| ‘tree’ | ho | hi |
| ‘skin’ | ptaik | ptek |
| ‘hair’ | ngiris | ngɨris |
| ‘grass skirt’ | nhep | nhek |
| ‘blood’ | ɨndiɨl | ɨriɨl |
| ‘yam’ | tou | sngu |
| ‘coconut’ | ksiɨ | ges |
| ‘speech’ | rere | rhek |
| ‘shell money’ | pek | kirpik |
| ‘ground’ | mmie | marhok |
| ‘person’ | mhel | mia |
| ‘road’ | ngaelaut | nghek |
| Free | Perfective Realis | Future Irrealis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1SG | dok | ko-~ku- | ngu-er(a) |
| 2SG | yen | i- | ngi-er(a) |
| 3SG | ëën | t- | n-er(a) |
| 1PL | mor | ngo-t- | ngur-er(a) |
| 2PL | muk | mu-tu | mug-er(a) |
| 3PL | mar | nga-t- | ng-er(a) |
| 1DU | muo | mo-t- | mu-er(a) |
| 2DU | moe | më-t- | më-er(a) |
| 3DU | men | men-t-ngen-t | ngen-er(a) |
Basic verb phrases are similar to Oceanic languages. For a typical Austronesian sentence structure, it follows thesubject-verb-object word order whereas Papuan follows asubject-object-verb word order. Free pronouns mainly act as verbal or prepositional object. Instead of having the bilabial nasal found on the free pronouns, first and third person plural have an initial velar.[4] Additionally, the basic verb phrase begins with a subject proclitic indicating both subject person/number and aspect/mood. This is followed by one or more verbs, a (pro)nominal object where necessary, and optional oblique constituents.[4]
orom
orom
with
Sulka
Sulka
Sulka
re.
re
talk
Kua pater yen orom o Sulka nga re.
Ku-apat-eryen orom o Sulkanga re
1SG-IPFV think-TR 2SG with PL Sulka 3SG.POSS talk
"I am teaching you the Sulka language"
According to Reesink (2005), the most common future form he recorded was the same one identified previously. He cites this work by Schneider (1942:323) where this form was named a separate modal particleer(a).[4]
vokong
vokong
see
ho
ho
tree
lang
lang
certain
to
to
that
hurpis.
hur-pis
appear-arrive
Ngiera vokong a ho lang to nera hurpis.
Ngi=er=a vokong a ho lang to n=er=a hur-pis
2SG.IRR-FUT-IPFV see SG tree certain that 3SG.IRR-FUT-IPFV appear-arrive
"You will see a certain tree sprouting."
Habitual aspect and conditional mood utilize the same forms as the irrealis, both for1SG and2SG. In contrast, all of the other forms have more in common with the future pronouns because they also lack3SG-t. Below, see examples of the habitual and the conditional, respectively:
vle
vle
stay
Mlavui
Mlavui
Mlavui
kun
kun
inside
mnam
mnam
inside
rengmat
rengmat
village
to
to
that
Guma.
Guma
Guma
Koma vle ma Mlavui kun mnam a rengmat to e Guma.
Ko=ma vle ma Mlavui kun mnam a rengmat to e Guma
1SG=HAB=IPFV stay LOC Mlavui inside inside SG village that ART Guma
"I am staying at Mlavui inside the village Guma."
ya
ya
good
va
va
and
ngae.
ngae
go
Kopa ya va kopa ngae.
Ko=pa=a ya va Ko=p=a ngae
1SG=COND=IPFV good and 1SG=COND=IPFV go
"If I had been well, I would have gone."
Most Papuan languages have masculine and feminine distinctions. However, the Sulka language does not follow this rule. As for the Austronesian languages, where they have inclusive and exclusive opposition in nonsingular first person, Sulka does not follow them either (Sulka of East New Britain: A Mixture of Oceanic and Papuan Traits, Reesink, 2005). As stated by Reesink, "There is not even a third person differentiation between feminine and masculine genders".
| Austronesian | Papuan | |
|---|---|---|
| Word order | SVO and prepositions | |
| Phonology | Phonemic inventory resembles Mengen phonemic contrast [l] and [r] | ResemblesKol, (almost) all consonants occur word-finally many consonant clusters |
| Lexicon | Lacks typical AN lexicon | |
| Verb morphology | Mood: realis vs irrealis as portmanteau with subject proclitics sequential ka | |
| Valency changing devices | Transitivizing suffix no causative prefix *pa(ka) no reciprocal *paRi stem change for object number | |
| Pronominal system | Lacks gender on 3SG | Lacks INCL/EXCL on 1 NONSG |
| Nominal constituent | Prenominal articles/demonstratives | |
| Plural formation | Plural formation with irregular forms, some of which are possibly cognate with Kol, Kuot, and Lavukaleve | |
| Adjectives | Attributive adjective=nominalized form | |
| Possessive constructions | Possessor is prefixed to possessed item no POSS suffix on inalienables | |
| Counting system | Quinary (base-5) system | |
| Deictic elements | Some cognates with Tolai | |
| Social organization | Moieties with clans resembling Mengen matrilineal |