Name | Year | Flights | Location |
---|---|---|---|
Mercury-Redstone 3 Mercury-Redstone 4 | 1961 | 2 | Cape Canaveral |
X-15 Flight 90 X-15 Flight 91 | 1963 | 2 | Edwards AFB |
Soyuz 18a | 1975 | 1 | Baikonur Cosmodrome |
SpaceShipOne Flight 15P SpaceShipOne Flight 16P SpaceShipOne Flight 17P | 2004 | 3 | Mojave Air and Space Port |
Blue Origin NS-16[1] Blue Origin NS-18 Blue Origin NS-19 | 2021 | 3 | Corn Ranch |
Blue Origin NS-20 Blue Origin NS-21 | 2022 | 3 | |
Blue Origin NS-25 Blue Origin NS-26 Blue Origin NS-28 | 2024 | 3 | |
Blue Origin NS-30 | 2025 | 1 |
Name | Year | Flights | Location |
---|---|---|---|
X-15 Flight 62 | 1962 | 1 | Edwards AFB |
X-15 Flight 77 X-15 Flight 87 | 1963 | 2 | |
X-15 Flight 138 X-15 Flight 143 X-15 Flight 150 X-15 Flight 153 | 1965 | 4 | |
X-15 Flight 174 | 1966 | 1 | |
X-15 Flight 190 X-15 Flight 191 | 1967 | 2 | |
X-15 Flight 197 | 1968 | 1 | |
Soyuz MS-10 | 2018 | 1 | Baikonur Cosmodrome |
VSSUnity VP-03 | 2018 | 1 | Mojave Air and Space Port |
VSSUnity VF-01 | 2019 | 1 | |
VSSUnity Unity21 VSSUnity Unity22 | 2021 | 2 | Spaceport America |
VSSUnity Unity25 Galactic 01 Galactic 02 Galactic 03 Galactic 04 Galactic 05 | 2023 | 6 | Spaceport America |
Galactic 06 Galactic 07 | 2024 | 2 | Spaceport America |
Asub-orbital spaceflight is aspaceflight in which thespacecraft reachesouter space, but itstrajectory intersects the surface of thegravitating body from which it was launched. Hence, it will not complete oneorbital revolution, will not become anartificial satellite nor will it reachescape velocity.
For example, the path of an object launched fromEarth that reaches theKármán line (about 83 km [52 mi] – 100 km [62 mi][2] abovesea level), and then falls back to Earth, is considered a sub-orbital spaceflight. Some sub-orbital flights have been undertaken to test spacecraft andlaunch vehicles later intended fororbital spaceflight. Other vehicles are specifically designed only for sub-orbital flight; examples include crewed vehicles, such as theX-15 andSpaceShipTwo, and uncrewed ones, such asICBMs andsounding rockets.
Flights which attain sufficient velocity to go intolow Earth orbit, and thende-orbit before completing their first full orbit, are not considered sub-orbital. Examples of this include flights of theFractional Orbital Bombardment System.
A flight that does not reach space is still sometimes called sub-orbital, but cannot officially be classified as a "sub-orbital spaceflight". Usually a rocket is used, but some experimental sub-orbital spaceflights have also been achieved via the use ofspace guns.[3]
By definition, a sub-orbital spaceflight reaches analtitude higher than 100 km (62 mi) abovesea level. This altitude, known as the Kármán line, was chosen by theFédération Aéronautique Internationale because it is roughly the point where a vehicle flying fast enough to support itself withaerodynamic lift from theEarth's atmosphere would be flying faster thanorbital speed.[4] The US military andNASA awardastronaut wings to those flying above 50 mi (80 km),[5] although theU.S. State Department does not show a distinct boundary between atmospheric flight andspaceflight.[6]
Duringfreefall the trajectory is part of anelliptic orbit as given by theorbit equation. Theperigee distance is less than theradius of the EarthR including atmosphere, hence theellipse intersects the Earth, and hence the spacecraft will fail to complete an orbit. The major axis is vertical, thesemi-major axisa is more thanR/2. Thespecific orbital energy is given by:
where is thestandard gravitational parameter.
Almost alwaysa <R, corresponding to a lower than the minimum for a full orbit, which is
Thus the net extra specific energy needed compared to just raising the spacecraft into space is between 0 and.
To minimize the requireddelta-v (anastrodynamical measure which strongly determines the requiredfuel), the high-altitude part of the flight is made with therockets off (this is technically called free-fall even for the upward part of the trajectory). (Compare withOberth effect.) The maximumspeed in a flight is attained at the lowest altitude of this free-fall trajectory, both at the start and at the end of it.[citation needed]
If one's goal is simply to "reach space", for example in competing for theAnsari X Prize, horizontal motion is not needed. In this case the lowest required delta-v, to reach 100 km altitude, is about 1.4 km/s. Moving slower, with less free-fall, would require more delta-v.[citation needed]
Compare this with orbital spaceflights: a low Earth orbit (LEO), with an altitude of about 300 km, needs a speed around 7.7 km/s, requiring a delta-v of about 9.2 km/s. (If there were no atmospheric drag the theoretical minimum delta-v would be 8.1 km/s to put a craft into a 300-kilometer high orbit starting from a stationary point like the South Pole. The theoretical minimum can be up to 0.46 km/s less if launching eastward from near the equator.)[citation needed]
For sub-orbital spaceflights covering a horizontal distance the maximum speed and required delta-v are in between those of a vertical flight and a LEO. The maximum speed at the lower ends of the trajectory are now composed of a horizontal and a vertical component. The higher the horizontaldistance covered, the greater the horizontal speed will be. (The vertical velocity will increase with distance for short distances but will decrease with distance at longer distances.) For theV-2 rocket, just reaching space but with a range of about 330 km, the maximum speed was 1.6 km/s.Scaled Composites SpaceShipTwo which is under development will have a similar free-fall orbit but the announced maximum speed is 1.1 km/s (perhaps because of engine shut-off at a higher altitude).[citation needed][needs update]
For larger ranges, due to the elliptic orbit the maximum altitude can be much more than for a LEO. On a 10,000-kilometer intercontinental flight, such as that of an intercontinental ballistic missile or possible futurecommercial spaceflight, the maximum speed is about 7 km/s, and the maximum altitude may be more than 1300 km.Anyspaceflight that returns to the surface, including sub-orbital ones, will undergoatmospheric reentry. The speed at the start of the reentry is basically the maximum speed of the flight. Theaerodynamic heating caused will vary accordingly: it is much less for a flight with a maximum speed of only 1 km/s than for one with a maximum speed of 7 or 8 km/s.[citation needed]
The minimum delta-v and the corresponding maximum altitude for a given range can be calculated,d, assuming a spherical Earth of circumference40000 km and neglecting the Earth's rotation and atmosphere. Let θ be half the angle that the projectile is to go around the Earth, so in degrees it is 45°×d/10000 km. The minimum-delta-v trajectory corresponds to an ellipse with one focus at the centre of the Earth and the other at the point halfway between the launch point and the destination point (somewhere inside the Earth). (This is the orbit that minimizes the semi-major axis, which is equal to the sum of the distances from a point on the orbit to the two foci. Minimizing the semi-major axis minimizes thespecific orbital energy and thus the delta-v, which is the speed of launch.) Geometrical arguments lead then to the following (withR being the radius of the Earth, about 6370 km):
The altitude of apogee is maximized (at about 1320 km) for a trajectory going one quarter of the way around the Earth (10000 km). Longer ranges will have lower apogees in the minimal-delta-v solution.
(whereg is the acceleration of gravity at the Earth's surface). The Δv increases with range, leveling off at 7.9 km/s as the range approaches20000 km (halfway around the world). The minimum-delta-v trajectory for going halfway around the world corresponds to a circular orbit just above the surface (of course in reality it would have to be above the atmosphere). See lower for the time of flight.
Anintercontinental ballistic missile is defined as a missile that can hit a target at least 5500 km away, and according to the above formula this requires an initial speed of 6.1 km/s. Increasing the speed to 7.9 km/s to attain any point on Earth requires a considerably larger missile because the amount of fuel needed goes up exponentially with delta-v (seeRocket equation).
The initial direction of a minimum-delta-v trajectory points halfway between straight up and straight toward the destination point (which is below the horizon). Again, this is the case if the Earth's rotation is ignored. It is not exactly true for a rotating planet unless the launch takes place at a pole.[7]
In a vertical flight of not too high altitudes, the time of the free-fall is both for the upward and for the downward part the maximum speed divided by theacceleration of gravity, so with a maximum speed of 1 km/s together 3 minutes and 20 seconds. The duration of theflight phases before and after the free-fall can vary.[citation needed]
For an intercontinental flight theboost phase takes 3 to 5 minutes, the free-fall (midcourse phase) about 25 minutes. For an ICBM the atmospheric reentry phase takes about 2 minutes; this will be longer for any soft landing, such as for a possible future commercial flight.[citation needed]Test flight 4 of the SpaceX 'Starship' performed such a flight with a lift off from Texas and a simulated soft touchdown in the Indian Ocean 66 minutes after liftoff.
Sub-orbital flights can last from just seconds to days.Pioneer 1 wasNASA's firstspace probe, intended to reach theMoon. A partial failure caused it to instead follow a sub-orbital trajectory, reentering the Earth's atmosphere 43 hours after launch.[8]
To calculate the time of flight for a minimum-delta-v trajectory, according toKepler's third law, the period for the entire orbit (if it did not go through the Earth) would be:
UsingKepler's second law, we multiply this by the portion of the area of the ellipse swept by the line from the centre of the Earth to the projectile:
This gives about 32 minutes for going a quarter of the way around the Earth, and 42 minutes for going halfway around. For short distances, this expression isasymptotic to.
From the form involving arccosine, the derivative of the time of flight with respect tod (or θ) goes to zero asd approaches20000 km (halfway around the world). The derivative of Δv also goes to zero here. So ifd =19000 km, the length of the minimum-delta-v trajectory will be about19500 km, but it will take only a few seconds less time than the trajectory ford =20000 km (for which the trajectory is20000 km long).
While there are a great many possible sub-orbital flight profiles, it is expected that some will be more common than others.
The first sub-orbital vehicles which reached space wereballistic missiles. The first ballistic missile to reach space was the GermanV-2, the work of the scientists atPeenemünde, on October 3, 1942, which reached an altitude of 53 miles (85 km).[9] Then in the late 1940s the US andUSSR concurrently developed missiles all of which were based on the V-2 Rocket, and then much longer range Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). There are now many countries who possess ICBMs and even more with shorter rangeIntermediate Range Ballistic Missiles (IRBMs).[citation needed]
Sub-orbital tourist flights will initially focus on attaining the altitude required to qualify as reaching space. The flight path will be either vertical or very steep, with the spacecraft landing back at its take-off site.
The spacecraft will shut off itsengines well before reaching maximum altitude, and then coast up to its highest point. During a few minutes, from the point when the engines are shut off to the point where the atmosphere begins to slow down the downward acceleration, the passengers will experienceweightlessness.
Megaroc had been planned for sub-orbital spaceflight by theBritish Interplanetary Society in the 1940s.[10][11]
In late 1945, a group led by M. Tikhonravov K. and N. G. Chernysheva at the Soviet NII-4 academy (dedicated to rocket artillery science and technology), began work on a stratospheric rocket project,VR-190, aimed at vertical flight by a crew of two pilots, to an altitude of 200 km (65,000 ft) using capturedV-2.[12]
In 2004, a number of companies worked on vehicles in this class as entrants to the Ansari X Prize competition. TheScaled Composites SpaceShipOne was officially declared byRick Searfoss to have won the competition on October 4, 2004, after completing two flights within a two-week period.
In 2005,Sir Richard Branson of theVirgin Group announced the creation ofVirgin Galactic and his plans for a 9-seat capacity SpaceShipTwo namedVSSEnterprise. It has since been completed with eight seats (one pilot, one co-pilot and six passengers) and has taken part in captive-carry tests and with the first mother-shipWhiteKnightTwo, orVMSEve. It has also completed solitary glides, with the movable tail sections in both fixed and "feathered" configurations. Thehybrid rocket motor has been fired multiple times in ground-based test stands, and was fired in a powered flight for the second time on 5 September 2013.[13] Four additional SpaceShipTwos have been ordered and will operate from the newSpaceport America. Commercial flights carrying passengers were expected in 2014, but became cancelled due to thedisaster during SS2 PF04 flight. Branson stated, "[w]e are going to learn from what went wrong, discover how we can improve safety and performance and then move forwards together."[14]
A major use of sub-orbital vehicles today is asscientificsounding rockets. Scientific sub-orbital flights began in the 1920s whenRobert H. Goddard launched the firstliquid fueled rockets, however they did not reachspace altitude. In the late 1940s, captured GermanV-2 ballistic missiles were converted intoV-2 sounding rockets which helped lay the foundation for modern sounding rockets.[15] Today there are dozens of different sounding rockets on the market, from a variety of suppliers in various countries. Typically, researchers wish to conduct experiments inmicrogravity or above the atmosphere.
Research, such as that done for theX-20 Dyna-Soar project suggests that a semi-ballistic sub-orbital flight could travel from Europe to North America in less than an hour.
However, the size of rocket, relative to the payload, necessary to achieve this, is similar to an ICBM. ICBMs have delta-v's somewhat less than orbital; and therefore would be somewhat cheaper than the costs for reaching orbit, but the difference is not large.[16]
Due to the high cost of spaceflight, suborbital flights are likely to be initially limited to high value, very high urgency cargo deliveries such ascourier flights,military fast-response operations orspace tourism.[opinion]
TheSpaceLiner is a hypersonicsuborbital spaceplane concept that could transport 50 passengers fromAustralia toEurope in 90 minutes or 100 passengers from Europe toCalifornia in 60 minutes.[17] The main challenge lies in increasing the reliability of the different components, particularly the engines, in order to make their use for passenger transportation on a daily basis possible.
SpaceX is potentially considering using theirStarship as a sub-orbital point-to-point transportation system.[18]
Above 100 km (62.14 mi) in altitude.[a]
Date (GMT) | Mission | Crew | Country | Remarks | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1961-05-05 | Mercury-Redstone 3 | Alan Shepard | ![]() | First crewed sub-orbital spaceflight, first American in space |
2 | 1961-07-21 | Mercury-Redstone 4 | Virgil Grissom | ![]() | Second crewed sub-orbital spaceflight, second American in space |
3 | 1963-07-19 | X-15 Flight 90 | Joseph A. Walker | ![]() | First winged craft in space |
4 | 1963-08-22 | X-15 Flight 91 | Joseph A. Walker | ![]() | First person and spacecraft to make two flights into space |
5 | 1975-04-05 | Soyuz 18a | Vasili Lazarev Oleg Makarov | ![]() | Failed orbital launch. Aborted after malfunction during stage separation |
6 | 2004-06-21 | SpaceShipOne flight 15P | Mike Melvill | ![]() | First commercial spaceflight |
7 | 2004-09-29 | SpaceShipOne flight 16P | Mike Melvill | ![]() | First of two flights to winAnsari X-Prize |
8 | 2004-10-04 | SpaceShipOne flight 17P | Brian Binnie | ![]() | Second X-Prize flight, clinching award |
9 | 2021-07-20 | Blue Origin NS-16 | Jeff Bezos Mark Bezos Wally Funk Oliver Daemen | ![]() | First crewed Blue Origin flight |
10 | 2021-10-13 | Blue Origin NS-18 | Audrey Powers Chris Boshuizen Glen de Vries William Shatner | ![]() | Second crewed Blue Origin flight |
11 | 2021-12-11 | Blue Origin NS-19 | Laura Shepard Churchley Michael Strahan Dylan Taylor Evan Dick Lane Bess Cameron Bess | ![]() | Third crewed Blue Origin flight |
12 | 2022-03-31 | Blue Origin NS-20 | Marty Allen Sharon Hagle Marc Hagle Jim Kitchen George Nield Gary Lai | ![]() | Fourth crewed Blue Origin flight |
13 | 2022-06-04 | Blue Origin NS-21 | Evan Dick Katya Echazarreta Hamish Harding Victor Correa Hespanha Jaison Robinson Victor Vescovo | ![]() | Fifth crewed Blue Origin flight |
14 | 2022-08-04 | Blue Origin NS-22 | Coby Cotton Mário Ferreira Vanessa O'Brien Clint Kelly III Sara Sabry Steve Young | ![]() | Sixth crewed Blue Origin flight |
15 | 2024-05-19 | Blue Origin NS-25 | Mason Angel Sylvain Chiron Ed Dwight Kenneth Hess Carol Schaller Gopichand Thotakura | ![]() | Seventh crewed Blue Origin flight |
16 | 2024-08-29 | Blue Origin NS-26 | Nicolina Elrick Rob Ferl Eugene Grin Eiman Jahangir Karsen Kitchen Ephraim Rabin | ![]() | Eighth crewed Blue Origin flight |
17 | 2024-11-22 | Blue Origin NS-28 | Henry (Hank) Wolfond Austin Litteral James (J.D.) Russell Sharon Hagle Marc Hagle Emily Calandrelli | ![]() | Ninth crewed Blue Origin flight |
18 | 2024-02-25 | Blue Origin NS-30 | Lane Bess Jesús Calleja Tushar Shah Richard Scott Elaine Chia Hyde Russell Wilson | ![]() | Tenth crewed Blue Origin flight |
Most manned rocket flights were eitherorbital spaceflights or flights of rocket-powered aircraft, which were launched horizontally. Manned vertically-launched suborbital flights were before the first launch ofNew Shepard rare and often the result of a failure of a manned rocket for orbital spaceflight. The following list shows all manned vertically-launched suborbital rocket flights.
Date (GMT) | Mission | Crew | Launch vehicle | Apogee | Country | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1945-03-01 | M23-1 | Lothar Sieber | Bachem Ba 349 Natter | 1.5 km | ![]() | ended in crash whereby Lothar Sieber was killed |
1961-05-05 | Mercury-Redstone 3 | Alan Shepard | Mercury-Redstone Launch Vehicle | 187.5 km | ![]() | first American in space |
1961-07-21 | Mercury-Redstone 4 | Virgil Grissom | Mercury-Redstone Launch Vehicle | 190.3 km | ![]() | second American in space |
1975-04-05 | Soyuz 18a | Vasili Lazarev Oleg Makarov | Soyuz | 192 km | ![]() | Failed orbital launch. Aborted after malfunction during stage separation |
1983-09-26 | Soyuz 7K-ST No.16L | Vladimir Titov Gennadi Strekalov | Soyuz | 0.65 km | ![]() | Launch abort |
1986-01-28 | STS-25 | Francis R. "Dick" Scobee Michael J. Smith Ellison S. Onizuka Judith A. Resnik Ronald E. McNair Gregory B. Jarvis S. Christa McAuliffe | Space Shuttle Challenger | 20 km | ![]() | Space Shuttle Challenger disaster, all astronauts on board were killed |
2014-01-30 | Hughes 1 | Mike Hughes | self-built rocket | 0.419 km | ![]() | Mike Hughes got injured |
2018-03-24 | Hughes 2 | Mike Hughes | self-built rocket | 0.572 km | ![]() | |
2018-10-11 | Soyuz MS-10 | Aleksey Ovchinin Nick Hague | Soyuz | 93 km | ![]() | Failed orbital launch |
2020-02-22 | Hughes 3 | Mike Hughes | self-built rocket | 1.5 km | ![]() | Mike Hughes killed at crash landing as parachute was destroyed at launch |
2021-07-20 | Blue Origin NS-16 | Jeff Bezos Mark Bezos Wally Funk Oliver Daemen | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | First crewed Blue Origin flight |
2021-10-13 | Blue Origin NS-18 | Audrey Powers Chris Boshuizen Glen de Vries William Shatner | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | Second crewed Blue Origin flight |
2021-12-11 | Blue Origin NS-19 | Laura Shepard Churchley Michael Strahan Dylan Taylor Evan Dick Lane Bess Cameron Bess | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | Third crewed Blue Origin flight |
2022-03-31 | Blue Origin NS-20 | Marty Allen Sharon Hagle Marc Hagle Jim Kitchen George Nield Gary Lai | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | Fourth crewed Blue Origin flight |
2022-06-04 | Blue Origin NS-21 | Evan Dick Katya Echazarreta Hamish Harding Victor Correa Hespanha Jaison Robinson Victor Vescovo | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | Fifth crewed Blue Origin flight |
2022-08-04 | Blue Origin NS-22 | Coby Cotton Mário Ferreira Vanessa O'Brien Clint Kelly III Sara Sabry Steve Young | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | Sixth crewed Blue Origin flight |
2024-05-19 | Blue Origin NS-25 | Mason Angel Sylvain Chiron Ed Dwight Kenneth Hess Carol Schaller Gopichand Thotakura | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | Seventh crewed Blue Origin flight |
2024-08-29 | Blue Origin NS-26 | Nicolina Elrick Rob Ferl Eugene Grin Eiman Jahangir Karsen Kitchen Ephraim Rabin | New Shepard | 105 km | ![]() | Eighth crewed Blue Origin flight |
2024-11-22 | Blue Origin NS-28 | Henry (Hank) Wolfond Austin Litteral James (J.D.) Russell Sharon Hagle Marc Hagle Emily Calandrelli | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | Ninth crewed Blue Origin flight |
2025-02-25 | Blue Origin NS-30 | Lane Bess Jesús Calleja Tushar Shah Richard Scott Elaine Chia Hyde Russell Wilson | New Shepard | 107 km | ![]() | Tenth crewed Blue Origin flight |
Private companies such asVirgin Galactic,Armadillo Aerospace (reinvented as Exos Aerospace),Airbus,[24]Blue Origin andMasten Space Systems are taking an interest in sub-orbital spaceflight, due in part to ventures like the Ansari X Prize.NASA and others are experimenting withscramjet-basedhypersonic aircraft which may well be used with flight profiles that qualify as sub-orbital spaceflight.Non-profit entities likeARCASPACE andCopenhagen Suborbitals also attemptrocket-based launches.