State-recognized tribes in the United States areNative American tribes or heritage groups that do not meet the criteria forfederally recognized Indian tribes but have been recognized bystate government through laws, governor's executive orders, joint or concurrent resolutions by house and senate, or state commissions legally granted the power to recognize tribes for varying purposes.
Individual states confer state-recognition for various purposes.[1] State recognition confers few benefits under federal law; it is not the same asfederal recognition. Members of a state-recognized tribe are still subject to state law and government, and the tribe does not have sovereign control over its affairs. Some states have provided laws related to state recognition that provide some protection of autonomy for tribes that are not recognized by the federal government. For example, in Connecticut, state law recognizing certain tribes also protects reservations and limited self-government rights for state-recognized tribes.
Non-recognized tribes is a term for "groups that have no federal designation and are not accepted as sovereign entities under U.S. law," which includes state-recognized tribes. Within this category are "federally non-recognized" tribes, which includes tribes that were previously recognized by the federal government or other governments that preceded the U.S., and tribes that no longer meet the criteria for federal recognition.[2] Other groups that identify as being Native American tribes but lack federal or state recognition are listed in theList of organizations that self-identify as Native American tribes.
Some federally recognized tribes, such as theCherokee Nation, have opposed state recognition, either in the case of individual tribes or as a whole.[3][4]
Sources disagree on how many states have state-recognized tribes. No government agency or nonprofit organization tracks the total of state-recognized tribes in the United States.[8] In late 2007, about 16 states had recognized 62 tribes.[9] According to theNational Conference of State Legislatures, only 13 states recognized tribes at the state level in 2022.[10] Likewise in 2022, theReference Encyclopedia of the American Indian reported that there were 66 state-recognized tribes among 13 states, which includes 8 tribes that are also federally recognised (7 in Virginia and 1 in New York).[11]
As of 2024[update], the Native Nations Institute of theUniversity of Arizona lists 15 states as having state-recognized tribes.[12] In 2025, journalist Bill Donahue wrote in Boston'sCity Life that more than 100 organizations are state-recognized as tribes.[8]
State recognition can vary in meaning and impact, from granting a tribe legitimacy within the state to simply recognizing its existence as a state might recognize a business.[13][14] According to Alexa Koenig and Jonathan Stein, state recognition may serve "as a means for states to acknowledge the longstanding existence of tribes within their borders and to establish a government-to-government relationship to coordinate and communicate with tribes".[15][14]
Processes for state-recognition of tribes include state legislation, executive orders by a state governor, joint orconcurrent resolution by the house and senate, or recognition by state commissions vested with the authority to recognize tribes.[16][17] Typically, the state legislature or state agencies involved in cultural or Native American affairs make the formal recognition by criteria they establish, often with Native American representatives, and sometimes based on federal criteria.[18] Statutes that clearly identify criteria for recognition or that explicitly recognize certain tribes remove ambiguity from their status.[9]
The Supreme Court has determined that the United States Constitution gives ultimate authority over matters affecting American Indian tribes to the United States federal government. Under US federal law and regulations, an American Indian tribe is a group of Native Americans with self-government authority, and this is the basis for federal recognition.[19] As of 2021[update], the federal government had recognized 574 tribes, often as a result of treaties setting up reservations in the 19th century.[citation needed]
Under the United StatesIndian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 (IACA), members of certain state-recognized tribes may exhibit as identified "Native American" or "American Indian" artists.[23] In addition to citizens of federally recognized tribes and tribally designated artisans, IACA says that members of "any Indian group that has been formally recognized as an Indian tribe by a State legislature or by a State commission or similar organization legislatively vested with State tribal recognition authority" can exhibit or sell art as a "Native American" or "American Indian" artist.[24]
TheAdministration for Native Americans, a program office within the Department of Health and Human Services, may confer benefits to state-recognized tribes under the Native American Programs Act (NAPA).[25] Members of state-recognized tribes are unable to access support from theIndian Health Service, and may have additional healthcare needs as a result.[26]
TheNative American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) does not require the federal government or museums to consult with state-recognized tribes. State-recognized tribes may request the repatriation of cultural items or human remains only in cooperation with federally recognized tribes.[27] Other federal Indian legislation does not apply to state-recognized tribes. For example,Indian Preference in hiring and theIndian Child Welfare Act of 1978 do not apply to these organizations.[28][29]
Some federally-recognized tribes object to state recognition.[30][4] Journalists Adam Elmahrek andPaul Pringle wrote, "Many Native Americans have long opposed allowing states to recognize tribes, arguing that the federal government should make the decision because states often fail to properly screen groups."[3] TheCherokee Nation opposes state-recognized tribes, as well asCherokee heritage groups and others with no documented descent who claim Cherokee identity.[4]
August Joseph Darbonne suggests that state-recognized tribes are underrepresented in research and have been "accused of claiming fraudulent Native American identity to gain access to state benefits and programs". He also says that the "limited representation of state-recognized tribes contributes to negative stereotypes against Native Americans".[30] In an address to the Alliance for Colonial Era Tribes, Professor Patty Ferguson Bohnee and Blair Tarman argued that tribal sovereignty should not be tied to federal recognition, since this is based on the needs of colonial rather than tribal governments, and undermines the inherent rights of all tribes.[31]
The following is a list of tribes recognized by various states but not by the U.S.Bureau of Indian Affairs. Tribes originally recognized by states that have since gained federal recognition have been deleted from the list below. The list does include state-recognized tribes that have petitioned for federal recognition.
By the Davis-Strong Act of 1984, the state established the Alabama Indian Affairs Commission to acknowledge and represent Native American citizens in the state. At that time, it recognized seven tribes that did not have federal recognition. The commission members, representatives of the tribes, have created rules for tribal recognition, which were last updated in 2003, under which three more tribes have been recognized.[32]
Cherokee Tribe of Northeast Alabama (formerlyCherokees of Jackson County, Alabama).[10] Letter of Intent to Petition 09/23/1981;[34] certified letter returned "not known" 11/19/1997.
Cherokees of Southeast Alabama.[10] Letter of Intent to Petition 05/27/1988;[34] certified letter returned marked "deceased" 11/5/1997.
Ma-Chis Lower Creek Indian Tribe of Alabama.[10] Letter of Intent to Petition 06/27/1983. Declined to Acknowledge 08/18/1988 52 FR 34319,[10] Denied federal recognition.[34][35]
MOWA Band of Choctaw Indians.[10] Letter of Intent to Petition 05/27/1983. Final Determination to Decline to Acknowledge published 12/24/1997 62FR247:67398-67400; petitioner requested reconsideration from BIA 3/23/1998,[10] denied federal recognition;[35] decision effective 11/26/1999.[34]
Star Clan of Muscogee Creeks[10] (formerly Lower Creek Muscogee Tribe East, Star Clan, Southeastern Mvskoke Nation, and Yufala Star Clan of Lower Muscogee Creeks).
United Cherokee Ani-Yun-Wiya Nation[10] (formerlyUnited Cherokee Intertribal). Letter of Intent to Petition 11/08/2001.[34]
Eastern Pequot Indians of Connecticut. Letter of Intent to Petition 06/28/1978;[34] Reconsidered final determination not to acknowledge became final and effective 10/14/2005 70 FR 60099.[34]
Paucatuck Eastern Pequot Indians of Connecticut. Letter of Intent to Petition 06/20/1989.[34] Reconsidered final determination not to acknowledge became final and effective 10/14/2005 70 FR 60099.[34]
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation.[10] Letter of Intent to Petition 9/27/2001.[34][36] Letter of Intent to Petition 12/14/1981; Declined to acknowledge in 2002; Reconsidered final determination not to acknowledge became final and effective 10/14/2005 70 FR 60101. Also known as theSchaghticoke Indian Tribe.[34]
Georgia established a liaison, the Georgia Council on American Indian Concerns, in 2001, under the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, State Parks and Historic Sites Division.[42][43] In 2007, the state legislature formally recognized the following as American Indian tribes of Georgia:[44]
Georgia Tribe of Eastern Cherokees.[10] (I). Letter of Intent to Petition 01/09/1979;[34] last submission February 2002; ready for Acknowledge review. Unrecognized organizations with the same name asGeorgia Tribe of Eastern Cherokees, Inc. (II) and (III) exist.
Lower Muskogee Creek Tribe.[10] Letter of Intent to Petition 02/02/1972; Declined to Acknowledge 12/21/1981 (46 FR 51652).[34] Denied federal recognition.[45] Also known asLower Muskogee Creek Tribe East of the Mississippi, Inc.
TheLouisiana Office of Indian Affairs oversees state–tribal relations.[46] They maintain a list of federally and state-recognized tribes headquartered in Louisiana.[47]
Bayou Lafourche Band of Biloxi-Chitimache Confederation of Muskogees,[47] also Biloxi-Chitimacha Confederation of Muskogee,[10] Denham Springs, LA. Separated fromUnited Houma Nation, Inc. Letter of Intent to Petition 10/24/1995.[34] Recognized by the State of Louisiana in 2005.[48]
Clifton-Choctaw,[10] also the Clifton Choctaw Tribe of Louisiana, Clinton, LA.[47] Recognized by the State of Louisiana in 1978.[48] Letter of Intent to Petition 03/22/1978.[34] Also known as Clifton Choctaw Reservation Inc.
Four Winds Tribe, Louisiana Cherokee Confederacy,[10] also the Four Winds Cherokees, Oakdale, LA.[47] Recognized by the State of Louisiana in 1997.[10][48]
Grand Caillou/Dulac Band,[10] also the Grand Caillou/Dulac Band of Biloxi Chitimacha Choctaw, Chauvin, LA.[47]
Isle de Jean Charles Band,[10] also the Jean Charles Choctaw Nation, Montegut, LA[47]
Louisiana Choctaw Tribe,[10] as the Louisiana Band of Choctaw, Ferriday, LA[47]
Natchitoches Tribe of Louisiana, Campti, LA[47] Recognized by the State of Louisiana in 2017 Regular Session, HR227.
United Houma Nation.[10] Recognized by the State of Louisiana in 1972.[48] Letter of Intent to Petition 07/10/1979; Proposed Finding 12/22/1994, 59 FR 6618.[34] Denied federal recognition.[49]
On January 9, 2012, for the first time the state-recognized two American Indian tribes under a process developed by the General Assembly; these were bothPiscataway groups,[50] historically part of the largeAlgonquian languages family along the Atlantic Coast. The Governor announced it to the Assembly by executive order.[50][51]
The Massachusetts Commission on Indian Affairs was created by a legislative act of theGeneral Court of Massachusetts in 1974, to advise the Commonwealth on how best to establish positive relationships with its Indigenous Tribes.[54][55]
On November 19, 2024, GovernorMaura Healey issued Executive Order No. 637, which recognized theHerring Pond Wampanoag Tribe alongside the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, and the Hassanamisco Nipmuc Tribe. The order also recognized Tribal Council of the Herring Pond as its governing body, all in accordance with Dukakis' Executive Order No. 126, for all relevant purposes.[60][61][62]
The Massachusetts Commission on Indian Affairs lacks the authority to recognize any group, as recognition is beyond the scope of the duties of the commission outlined in Executive Order 126[56] and in the administration of the Massachusetts government.[63] The Massachusetts Commission on Indian Affairs announced in August 2023 that it would be establishing a process for state recognition to ensure protections for Native artisans under theIndian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990.[64]
Hassanamisco Nipmuc.[10] Letter of Intent to Petition 04/22/1980; Declined to acknowledge on 6/25/2004, 69 FR 35667.[65] The Hassanamisco Nipmuc Band petitioned for federal acknowledgment in 1980. After receiving preliminary approval, they were ultimately denied due to its failure to meet criteria for federal acknowledgment. The Hassanamisco Nipmuc Band retains a government-to-government relationship with the state of Massachusetts under the leadership of their Sonskq (female leader), Cheryll Toney Holley, sub-chiefs, and the elders council.[65][66]
The state of Mississippi has offeredcongratulatory resolutions tounrecognized organizations identifying as Native American descendants, such as the MS HR50 in which the legislators "commend and congratulate"Vancleave Live Oak Choctaw Tribe for recognition;[67] however, no laws outline formal state-recognition for this or any other group by the State of Mississippi.
Mississippi has no office to manage Indian affairs[68] and no state-recognized tribes.[10][12]
Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina.[33] Letter of Intent to Petition 01/07/1980; determined ineligible to petition (SOL opinion of 10/23/1989).[34] In 2009, Senate Indian Affairs Committee endorsed a bill that would grant federal recognition.[74]
Ohio has no office to manage Indian affairs[68] and no state-recognized tribes.[10]
In 1979 and 1980, the Ohio state legislature held hearings about state recognition of theUnited Remnant Band of the Shawnee Nation of Bellefontaine Ohio.[75] The band filed historical and genealogical documents with the state to support their claim of descent from the historical Shawnee.TheOhio General Assembly held hearings and heard testimony from numerous groups.[76] In 1980, the113th Ohio General Assembly passed a "Joint Resolution to recognize the Shawnee Nation United Remnant Band", as adopted by the Ohio Senate, 113thGeneral Assembly, Regular Session, Am. Sub. H.J.R. No. 8, 1979–1980.[77] This is acongratulatory resolution, and Ohio attorney general's office spokesperson Leo Jennings said: "The resolution has no force of law in the state Ohio.… It was basically a ceremonial resolution."[77]
South Carolina recognizes three entities: "state-recognized tribes", "state-recognized groups", and "special interest organizations."[78][79] As of 2025, South Carolina recognizes ten tribes that are not recognized by the federal government.[79]
Edisto Natchez Kusso Tribe of South Carolina.[79][10] State-recognized tribe in 2010.[80][82] Also known asEdisto Natchez-Kusso Indians (Four Holes Indian Organization).
Pee Dee Indian Nation of Upper South Carolina.[79][10] Letter of Intent to Petition 12/14/2005.[34] State-recognized tribe in 2005.[80][81][82]
Pee Dee Indian Tribe.[79] Letter of Intent to Petition 01/30/1995.[83] State recognized in 2006.[80] FormerlyPee Dee Indian Tribe of South Carolina (2005).[10] FormerlyPee Dee Indian Association (1978).[80]
Piedmont American Indian Association, alsoPiedmont American Indian Association Lower Eastern Cherokee Nation.[79]
The South Carolina Commission for Minority Affairs' Native American Affairs Division also has recognized "state-recognized groups" and "special interest organizations" but these are not the same as the state-recognized tribes. In 2018, South Carolina GovernorHenry McMaster signed legislation that stops the state from recognizing any additional Native American "groups."[84] As of 2023, South Carolina recognizes three "state-recognized groups" and one "special interest organization."[79] They are:Chaloklowa Chickasaw Indian People;[85]Natchez Tribe of South Carolina;[86] and the Pee Dee Indian Nation of Beaver Creek.[86] The special interest organization is the Pine Hill Indian Community Development Initiative.[79][87]
From 1965 until its abolition in 1989, Texas maintained the Texas Indian Commission as the state office responsible for relations with the Alabama‑Coushatta, Tigua, and Kickapoo tribes.[88][89][90] After the commission was abolished on 1 September 1989, Texas did not create a replacement Indian‑affairs agency or a codified administrative procedure for state recognition of additional tribes.[91][92]
In the absence of a standing commission, Texas has issued resolutions to congratulate certain tribal entities but these have stopped short of recognizing them as sovereign governments.[93] TheLipan Apache Tribe of Texas is generally considered a state-recognized tribe.[94][95] In lieu of any formal process, the Texas government has recognized the Tribe byconcurrent resolution, a type of legislative recognition which is official but does not carry the force of law.[96][97]
In practice, Texas has also relied on legislative and executive practice to identify other Native communities as state‑recognized for various purposes, such as consultation, education and program-planning.[98][99][100] For example, the State of Texas 2022–2025 STOP Violence Against Women Act Implementation Plan, issued by the Office of the Governor, states that the Texas Band of Yaqui Indians has been "state recognized" since 2015.[99] A 2024–2025 consultation summary by the U.S. Department of the Interior regarding the Safeguard Tribal Objects of Patrimony (STOP) Act andTexas Tech University have also described the tribe as "state‑recognized".[100][101]
Several bills to establish or formalize state‑recognized tribes in Texas, including measures to extend legal recognition to the Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas and Tap Pilam Coahuiltecan Nation, have been introduced but not enacted.[102][103][104] As of 2026[update], a bill recognizing the Texas Band of Yacqui Indians has cleared the House and passed to the Senate for reading.[105]
As of May 3, 2006, Vermont law1 V.S.A §§ 851–853 recognizesAbenakis as Native American Indians,not the tribes or bands. However, on April 22, 2011, Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed legislative bills officially recognizing two Abenaki Bands. The four Abenaki state-recognized tribes are also known as the "Abenaki Alliance".
Virginia has an office to manage Indian affairs: the Virginia Council on Indians. It is composed of 13 members - eight from Virginia tribes officially recognized by the Commonwealth, two members at-large from Indian population in Virginia, one from House of Delegates, one from Senate, and one from Commonwealth at-large.[68]
Virginia has the following state-recognized tribes:
Cheroenhaka (Nottoway) Indian Tribe.[10] Letter of Intent to Petition 12/30/2002.[34] Receipt of Petition 12/30/2002.[108] State-recognized 2010; in Courtland, Southampton County.[109] Letter of intent to file for federal recognition 2017. Currently a bill is being sponsored.
Mattaponi Indian Nation (a.k.a.Mattaponi Indian Reservation). Letter of Intent to Petition 04/04/1995. State-recognized 1983; in Banks of the Mattaponi River, King William County. The Mattaponi and Pamunkey have reservations based in colonial-era treaties ratified by the Commonwealth in 1658. Pamunkey Tribe's attorney told Congress in 1991 that the tribes state reservation originated in a treaty with the crown in the 17th century and has been occupied by Pamunkey since that time under strict requirements and following the treaty obligation to provide to the Crown a deer every year, and they've done that (replacing Crown with Governor of Commonwealth since Virginia became a Commonwealth).
Washington has not formally recognized any tribes by statute.[12] However, the state or preceding territorial government has been a party to treaties involving a number of tribes that are not federally recognized.[citation needed]
^Greer, Caroline (October 26, 2020)."Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama".Encyclopedia of Alabama. Retrieved10 January 2025.There are more than 32,000 members across the state ...
^Williams, Jade; Wetzel, Addie."The Lost Bayou: The United Houma Nation".GradeVoirCi. Retrieved10 January 2025.The six parishes where most of the 19,000-member tribe now lives line the Gulf of Mexico...
^In the absences—state recognition of American Indian nations and U.S. racial and legal consciousnesses (PhD thesis). Riall, Rebecca L. Indiana University ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2014. 3611166.
^Ferguson Bohnee, Prof Patty; Tarman, Blair (10 March 2021)."De-colonizing the Mindset"(PDF).Arizona State University -Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law. pp. 2, 20. Retrieved12 February 2026.The modern concept of federal acknowledgement inadvertently perpetuates colonial policies by allowing the government to define the scope of a tribe's sovereignty. It operates as a threshold inquiry and places non-BIA listed tribes at the mercy of a government that formalized definitions with the primary goal of eliminating tribal authority all together.
^abConnecticut Law on Indian Tribes (2007-R-0475). Christopher Reinhart, Senior Attorney, on behalf of State of Connecticut General Assembly (Accessible as of July 15, 2014here).
^Filby, Max; King, Danae (9 October 2023)."What does it mean to be a Native American tribe? In Ohio, the answer is complicated".The Columbus Dispatch. Archived fromthe original on 27 November 2023. Retrieved12 January 2024.She now considers herself to be a tribal elder with the East of the River Shawnee, a non-federally recognized group that broke off from the United Remnant Band of Shawnee years ago.
^"American Indians in Ohio",Ohio Memory: An Online Scrapbook of Ohio History. The Ohio Historical Society, retrieved October 10, 2006[dead link]
^University of Texas--Pan American. Community Historical Archaeology Project with Schools Program (CHAPS); Lovett, Bobbie; Gonzalez, Juan; Bacha-Garza, Roseann; Skowronek, Russell (2014-01-01)."Native American Peoples of South Texas".Community Historical Archaeology Project with Schools (CHAPS) Publications: 66.On March 18, 2009, the Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas was recognized by both the Texas Senate and House of Representatives for their historical presence in Texas. In this acknowledgement, the tribe was also recognized by the state, making the Lipan Apache the only state recognized tribe in Texas.Leal, Ashley S. (2024).The Lipan Apache (Ndé) Tribe of Texas Powwow: A Curriculum of Culture(s) and Pedagogy of Place (Thesis). The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. p. 4.With a significant historical presence in Texas and obtaining state recognition in 2009, the tribe [Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas] has continued to preserve their culture through community gatherings such as the powwow...Wilson, Khrystye H. (2023)."Eagle Permits, RFRA, and American Indian Religious Freedom: Legal Avenues for First Amendment Protection"(PDF).The Indigenous Peoples' Journal of Law, Culture, & Resistance.8: 87.JSTOR48758184.2018 Petition to Fish and Wildlife Service "Pastor Robert Soto, a member of the state-recognized Lipan Apache tribe..."Breslin, Beau; Cavanaugh, Kathrine (2014).Case 1: A.A. v. Needville Independent School District. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society. Vol. 65. p. 144.Rodriguez, Oscar; Seymour, Deni J. (2017). "6. Embracing a Mobile Heritage: Federal Recognition and Lipan Apache Enclavement". In Seymour, Deni J. (ed.).Fierce and indomitable: the protohistoric non-Pueblo world in the American Southwest. Salt Lake city: University of Utah press. p. 77.ISBN978-1-60781-521-1.
^ab"STOP Violence Against Women Act Program Implementation Plan for the State of Texas 2022–2025"(PDF). Office of the Governor, Public Safety Office. 2 March 2022. pp. 15–16. Retrieved1 February 2026.Lipan Apache – The Lipan Apache are a "state recognized" tribe [...] Yaqui – The Texas Band of Yaqui Indians are headquartered in Lubbock... and became a state recognized tribe in 2015.
Koenig, Alexa and Jonathan Stein (2008).Federalism and the State Recognition of Native American Tribes: A survey of State-Recognized Tribes and State Recognition Processes Across the United States. University of Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 48.
Sheffield, Gail (1998).Arbitrary Indian: The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.ISBN0-8061-2969-7.
Miller, Mark Edwin.Forgotten Tribes: Unrecognized Indians and the Federal Acknowledgment Process. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004. Discusses the state recognition process, the experiences of several state-recognized tribes (the United Houma Nation of Louisiana, and the Tigua/Pueblo of Ysleta Del Sur and Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas- the latter two are federally recognized), and the problems of non-federally acknowledged indigenous communities.
Bates, Denise.The Other Movement: Indian Rights and Civil Rights in the Deep South. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2011. Details state recognition and the functioning of state Indian commissions in Alabama and Louisiana.
