 Rendering of a future Starship HLS on the Moon | |
| Manufacturer | SpaceX |
|---|---|
| Country of origin | United States |
| Operator | SpaceX |
| Applications | Lunar lander |
| Specifications | |
| Spacecraft type | Crewed, reusable |
| Crew capacity |
|
| Volume | 614 m3 (21,700 cu ft)[1] |
| Regime | Cislunar space |
| Dimensions | |
| Height | ~52.3 m (172 ft) |
| Diameter | 9 m (30 ft) |
| Capacity | |
| Payload tolunar surface | |
| Mass | 100,000 kg (220,000 lb)[2] |
| Production | |
| Status | In development |
| Maiden launch | 2026 (planned) |
| Related spacecraft | |
| Derived from | SpaceX Starship (spacecraft) |
| Flown with | SpaceX Super Heavy |
| Starship HLS | |
| Powered by |
|
| Propellant | CH4 /LOX |
.png) | |
Starship HLS (Human Landing System) is alunar lander variant of theStarship spacecraft that is slated to transfer astronauts from a lunar orbit to the surface of theMoon and back. It is being designed and built bySpaceX under theHuman Landing System contract toNASA as a critical element of NASA'sArtemis program to land a crew of astronauts on the Moon.
The mission plan calls for aStarship launch vehicle to launch a Starship HLS intoEarth orbit, where it will be refueled by multiple Starship tanker spacecraft before boosting itself into a lunarnear-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO). There, it will rendezvous with a crewedOrion spacecraft that will be launched from Earth by a NASASpace Launch System (SLS) launcher. A crew of two astronauts will transfer from Orion to HLS, which will then descend to the lunar surface for a stay of approximately seven days, including at least fiveEVAs. It will then return the crew to Orion in NRHO.
In the third phase of its HLS procurement process, NASA awarded SpaceX a contract in April 2021 to develop, produce, and demonstrate Starship HLS. An uncrewed test flight was planned for 2025 to demonstrate a successful landing on the Moon which has since been delayed. Following that test, a crewed flight is expected to occur as part of theArtemis III mission, no earlier than mid-2027.[3] NASA later contracted for an upgraded version of Starship HLS to be used on theArtemis IV mission.[4]
Starship itself has been in privately funded development by SpaceX since the mid-2010s, but development of the HLS variant is being funded under NASA's Human Landing System contracts.[5]
The Starship Human Landing System program includes the development and operational use of severalStarship spacecraft variants by SpaceX, including the Starship HLS ship—optimized to operate on and in the vicinity of the Moon—as well as a Starship depot that will store propellant in Earth orbit, and the Starship tanker designed to fly multiple trips to orbit from Earth's surface to transport the necessary fuel and oxygen to the on-orbit depot. The concept of operations for a single lunar human landing mission will involve all three ship variants, as well as docking with another NASA-supplied spacecraft innear-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO) nearer the Moon.[6]
Unlike the standard Starship spacecraft, both the Starship HLS and Starship depot ships do notre-enterEarth's atmosphere, which allows for the removal of the spacecraft's atmosphericheat shield andflight control surfaces.[6] This reduction in mass[6] allows for a smaller number of Starship tanker launches required for refueling once the spacecraft is in orbit.[6] Like other Starship variants, Starship HLS and Starship depot are equipped with sixRaptor engines, which are used during launch and the majority of the landing and ascent phases.[6]
When within 100 meters of the lunar surface, the HLS variant is planned to use high‑thrust landing engines located in the mid‑body section of the spacecraft to avoidplume impingement with thelunar regolith,[7] though these engines may not be needed.[8] The landing engines burn gaseous oxygen and methane instead of the liquid oxygen and methane used by the Raptors.[7][9]: 50:30 Electrical power is supplied by a band ofsolar panels around the circumference of the vehicle.[10][11] HLS has the capability toloiter inlunar orbit for 100 days.[10]
According to NASA, minimizing changes in vehicle configuration and making the design and development of Starship HLS as common as possible will benefit future Starship HLS builds by eliminating the need for additional testing, evaluation, and verification of different vehicle designs.[6] NASA added this will also allow SpaceX to accelerate vehicle builds to help ensure availability and on time delivery for mission integration.[6]
Both the Starship HLS ship and the Starship depot—propellant depot that will remain in Earth orbit and collect/store the requisite propellant to refill the HLS ship before departure on atrans-lunar trajectory—will use a special purpose insulating tile that will providemicrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) protection as well as insulate the depot fromsolar andEarth-thermal radiation in order to retain thecryogenic liquid oxygen and liquid methane for long-duration orbital storage. These in-space insulation tiles are different from the ceramic tiles used on Starships that must reenter Earth's atmosphere, such as the tiles on the Starship propellant tankers that will transport fuel/oxidizer cargo to fill the Starship depot.[12]: 7:58–8:18
In April 2024, NASA reported that work was underway on the cargo specific variant of the lander. NASA expects this variant to be ready and in service by Artemis VII.[13] The cargo variant will be referred to by NASA as Human-class Delivery Landers (HDL) and represent, as of June 2024, the highest capacity landers available to NASA under the current lunar exploration push.[14]
As of 2024[update], NASA expected that SpaceX will begin a propellant transfer test campaign in approximately March 2025, and complete it during summer 2025 but this has since been delayed. This will require multiple starship launches, and should culminate with a ship-to-ship propellant transfer demonstration prior to the NASA-required Starship HLSCritical Design Review (CDR). That was planned for late-summer 2025, but has been delayed. The test campaign will aim for a biweekly launch cadence from a single launch mount, with a stretch goal to obtain weekly launches using two pads.[12]: 4:21–5:44
Prior to the launch of the HLS vehicle from Earth, a Starship configured as a propellant depot would be launched into anEarth orbit and then be partially or fully filled by between four to fourteen[a] Starship tanker flights carrying propellant.[15] As such, this spacecraft will be used in conjunction with the Starship booster (calledSuper Heavy) and two additional Starship spacecraft variants, "tanker" and "propellant depot", that were already planned prior to the NASA HLS contract.[16]
Musk said in 2021 that between "four and eight" tanker launches would be required.[17] The same year, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said that SpaceX would "require 16 launches overall",[18] and in 2023, a NASA official estimated the number of Starship launches required for one lunar landing to be "in the high teens".[18] In 2024, SpaceX vice president of customer operations estimated that the number of tanker launches would be "10-ish", though this number is subject to change.[19] The launches will need to be in rapid succession in order to maintain schedule constraints and limit the loss of liquid cryogenic propellants due to boiloff.[20]
The Starship HLS vehicle would then launch and rendezvous with the already-loaded propellant depot and refuel beforetransiting from Earth orbit to Lunar orbit.[21]
Once HLS is in anear-rectilinear halo orbit around the moon, anOrion spacecraft would be launched by aSpace Launch System rocket and dock with the waiting Starship HLS lander[21][22]: 4, 5 or NASAlunar Gatewayspace station, in order to take on passengers before descending to the lunar surface and return them after ascent.[22]After two to four of the crew had transferred into the HLS, it would depart and descend to the lunar surface.[22]: 4, 5 After lunar surface operations, Starship HLS will lift off from the Moon and return to lunar orbit to rendezvous with Orion.[22]: 4, 5 The crew then transfers back to Orion and departs for Earth. Although not confirmed yet, Starship HLS could, in theory, be refueled in orbit to carry more crews and cargo to the surface.[23][24]
In the early 2010s, NASA originally planned to use theOrion spacecraft and theSpace Launch System (SLS) to land astronauts on the Moon. The design of the Orion capsule was inherited from theConstellation program, a defunct crewed lunar program of the 2000s.[25] The SLS is a launch vehicle NASA developed as replacement for theSpace Shuttle following its retirement in 2011, and to bolster Shuttle-related jobs that would otherwise have been lost.[26][27] The SLS is unable to launch Orion into low lunar orbit like theSaturn V rocket did during theApollo program.[28]
The closest to the Moon SLS can launch Orion is intonear-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO), an elliptical orbit that approaches the Moon.[29] NASA's plannedLunar Gateway station is also slated to be loitered in that orbit in order to be serviceable by Orion.[30] Descending to the Moon from NRHO requires considerably more energy than from a low lunar orbit[28] and only allows a descent once every 6.5 days.[31]
To address these challenges, NASA issued a request for proposals to commercial companies to develop aHuman Landing System (HLS) in 2018.[32][28] HLS lunar landing vehicles should be able to travel from Earth to NRHO, where they would meet with Orion, land on the Moon, and later return to NRHO to dock with Orion once again.[33]
SpaceX had in its plan to develop a large interplanetary vehicle since the 2000s to fulfilltheir goal of colonizing Mars.[34] In response to NASA's request for Human Landing System proposals, SpaceX adapted the design of their base Starship vehicle into a variant suited to carry NASA's mission of landing two astronauts on the Moon from NRHO: the Starship HLS.[35]
The initial NASA-contracted design work for a NASA-specific Starship variant started in May 2020 when SpaceX was selected for anArtemis III program award called "Option A", with selection and funding for full-development occurring in April 2021, when Starship HLS was selected by NASA to land"the first woman and the next man" on the Moon for theArtemis III mission.[5]
In 2021, NASA entered into a firm fixed-price contract with SpaceX valued atUS$2.89 billion, spread over a number of years to develop and manufacture the Starship HLS lunar lander,[5] as well as the execution of two operational flights: an uncrewed demonstration mission and a crewed lunar landing.[36][21]
Starship HLS was first made public when it was initially selected by NASA in April 2020 for a design study as part of theirArtemis program, which aims to land humans on the Moon. SpaceX was one of three teams selected to develop competing lunar lander designs for the Artemis program over a year-long[37] period starting in May 2020.[37]
The other landers in consideration wereDynetics HLS, proposed by aerospace manufacturerDynetics, and theIntegrated Lander Vehicle, proposed by a team led byBlue Origin.[23] NASA intended to later select and fund at most two of these landers to continue to perform initial demonstration flights.[38][24]
On 16 April 2021, NASA selected only Starship HLS for crewed lunar lander development[5] plus two lunar demonstration flights – one uncrewed and one crewed – no earlier than 2024. The contract was valued atUS$2.89 billion over a number of years.[36][21] Two NASAArtemis astronauts are to land on the first crewed Starship HLS landing.[39] NASA had previously stated that it preferred to fund development of multiple Human Landing System proposals with dissimilar capabilities; however, "only one design was selected for an initial uncrewed demonstration and the first crewed landing, due to significant budget constraints" for the human landing system program imposed by theUS Congress.[21] NASA stated that the unselected proposals – Dynetics HLS and Blue OriginIntegrated Lander Vehicle – as well as landers from other companies would be eligible for later lunar landing contracts.[21]
On 26 April 2021, Blue Origin and Dynetics separately filed formal protests of the award to SpaceX at theUS Government Accountability Office (GAO).[40] On 30 July 2021, the GAO rejected both protests and found that "NASA did not violate procurement law" in awarding the contract to SpaceX, who bid a much lower cost and more capable human and cargo lunar landing capability for NASA Artemis.[40][41] Soon after GAO rejected the appeal, NASA made the initial $300 million contract payment to SpaceX.[42] The protest action delayed NASA from authorizing work on the contract, and thus delayed the start of work by SpaceX for 95 days.[43] Blue Origin produced infographic posters that highlight the complexity of Starship HLS, for example the fact thaton orbit refuelling withcryogenic fuels like that Starship HLS uses has never been demonstrated, while stating that its design uses "proven technology".[44]
On 13 August 2021,[45]Blue Origin filed a lawsuit in theUS Court of Federal Claims challenging "NASA's unlawful and improper evaluation of proposals".[43][46] Blue Origin asked the court for an injunction to halt further spending by NASA on the existing contract with SpaceX,[47] and NASA stopped work on the contract on 19 August, after SpaceX had been allowed to work on the NASA-specific parts of Starship HLS for just three weeks since the work had been previously halted in April.[45] Reactions to the lawsuit were negative, with many criticizing Blue Origin for causing unnecessary delays to the Artemis program.[48][49][50]
On 4 November 2021, the court granted the federal government's motion to dismiss the case,[51][52][53] and NASA announced that it would resume work with SpaceX as soon as possible.[54]
On 23 March 2022, NASA announced it would be exercising an option under the initial SpaceX HLS contract, known as Option B, that would allow a second-generation Starship HLS design to conduct a demonstration mission after Artemis III.[55]
On 15 November 2022, NASA announced it had awarded SpaceX the Option B contract modification, worthUS$1.15 billion, and that this crewed landing is to occur as part ofArtemis IV.[4] The flight will include docking with theLunar Gateway.[4] The Option B HLS will meet NASA's requirements for a "sustainable" HLS. These include the ability to support four crew members and delivering more mass to the surface.[4]
After NASA awarded the Option A contract to SpaceX, Congress subsequently directed NASA to extend the HLS program[when?] for a second sustainable HLS design, with the requirement that it must be from a second company, and not SpaceX. NASA responded by creating "Appendix P", and specified a lander that would be used forArtemis V as its crewed demonstration flight. In May 2023, Blue Origin was awarded $3.4 billion by NASA to develop theirBlue Moon lunar lander.[56][57] NASA intends to allow Starship HLS option B and the Blue Moon lander to compete for Artemis missions after Artemis V.
In 2021, theNASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) warned that the HLS development schedule was unrealistic when compared to other major NASA space flight programs.[22]: 14–15 Stating that space flight programs in the prior 15 years had taken on average 8.5 years from contract award to first operational flight, while the HLS Program was attempting to do so in about half that time.[22]: 14–15 By contrast, NASA OIG noted that theApollo Lunar Lander took approximately 6 years from contract award to its launch on theApollo 11 mission while receiving "substantially higher levels of funding" adjusted for inflation.[22]: 14 Based on the HLS base period contract award date (May 2020) and the average delay for recent major NASA space flight programs, they estimated that the HLS Program could face up to 3.4 years of delays before operational flights.[22]: 16
In June 2023, NASA's chief of exploration systems development in the HLS development office, Jim Free, said that the Starship HLS's critical design review, required before further funds from the contract could be released to SpaceX, had been delayed until SpaceX completes an in orbital refueling demonstration mission.[58] The head of NASA's moon and Mars exploration strategy said that the delay ofArtemis III from 2025 to 2026 was partly due to "development challenges" with their contractors (SpaceX andLockheed Martin).[59]
In November 2023, the United States Government Accountability Office, in their report to Congress, outlined several challenges that the Artemis program was facing in development.[60] They noted that as of September 2023 the [NASA] HLS program had delayed 8 out of 13 key events by at least 6 months,[60] with 2 events being delayed to the year of launch (2025 at the time).[60] The GAO also identified the development of theRaptor engine as a "top risk" for the program and its 2025 timeline, although SpaceX considered the technology behind the Raptor engine to be relatively mature.[60] The GAO noted that SpaceX had made limited progress maturing the technologies needed for in-orbit refueling andcryogenic propellant storage.[60] The GAO concluded in their report to Congress that the Artemis III crewed lunar landing is unlikely to occur in 2025, and that a launch date in early 2027 is more likely.[60][61]
NASA astronauts tested the elevator concept (crew transfer between the cabin of Starship HLS and the lunar surface) in December 2023.[62]
In January 2024, NASA and SpaceX said that the uncrewed Starship HLS lunar landing and ascent test, was expected to take place in 2025, with Artemis III being delayed to no earlier than September 2026.[63][needs update] The delay was in part due to issues with Orion's heatshield duringArtemis I.[64]
In February 2024, SpaceX had fully tested the life support system,[65] and NASA performed a full-scale test of the Starship HLS to Orion – and later Gateway – docking transfer system.[66] The same month, NASA said SpaceX had accomplished over 30 HLS-specific milestones by defining and testing hardware needed for power generation, communications, guidance and navigation, propulsion, life support, and space environments protection.[66]
On 14 March 2024, SpaceX successfully tested ship-internal cryogenic propellant transfer onIntegrated Flight Test 3.[67] In April 2024, NASA reported that work was underway on a cargo-specific variant of the lander. NASA expects this variant to be ready and in service by Artemis VII.[68]
In a meeting of theUnited States House Science Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics on 10 September 2024,Brian Babin andHaley Stevens expressed concerns that the pace of license processing under the FAA's Part 450 commercial launch and reentry regulations could impact the Artemis program since both Blue Origin and SpaceX HLS landers will launch using commercial licenses.[69] Following a further two-month delay by the FAA ofStarship flight test 5, SpaceX said government paperwork prevented it from flying Starship quickly to meet commitments to the Artemis program.[70]
In October 2024, NASA stated that the flight test campaign for the ship-to-shippropellant transfer demonstration was slated to start around March 2025 with test completion over the summer when thedesign certification review by NASA is to take place.[12]: 3:56–4:24 [needs update]
In October 2025, NASA plans on reopening the contract for theArtemis III mission due to the several delays to Starship's development.[71][72]
NASA is using a different approach in contracting for Starship HLS from the legacycost-plus program process NASA has used on most programs before, including on theSpace Launch System also planned to be used with Artemis. Kent Chojnacki, the deputy program manager for NASA's human spaceflight office, said the contract structure is different and "two completely different approaches." On the SpaceX contract for the initial landing, there are just 27 system requirements. NASA has kept it "as loose as possible while going through and dictating all the safety standards we'd want, we agreed to all the design and construction standards up front, we agreed to all of the things they would do to ensure the safety of the human element up front, and then we let them go and run." SpaceX is working to afirm fixed price contract and is only paid when the program criteria are met.[12]: 0:55–3:51
... for the terminal descent of Starship, a few tens of meters before we touch down on the lunar surface, we actually use a high-thrust RCS system, so that we don't impinge on the surface of the Moon with the high-thrust Raptor engines. ... uses the same methane and oxygen propellants as Raptor.
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.42 USC 18322. SEC. 302 SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM AS FOLLOW-ON LAUNCH VEHICLE TO THE SPACE SHUTTLE [...] (c) MINIMUM CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS (1) IN GENERAL – The Space Launch System developed pursuant to subsection (b) shall be designed to have, at a minimum, the following: (A) The initial capability of the core elements, without an upper stage, of lifting payloads weighing between 70 tons and 100 tons into low-Earth orbit in preparation for transit for missions beyond low Earth orbit [...] (2) FLEXIBILITY [...](Deadline) Developmental work and testing of the core elements and the upper stage should proceed in parallel subject to appro-priations. Priority should be placed on the core elements with the goal for operational capability for the core elements not later than December 31, 2016 [...] 42 USC 18323. SEC. 303 MULTI-PURPOSE CREW VEHICLE (a) INITIATION OF DEVELOPMENT (1) IN GENERAL – The Administrator shall continue the development of a multi-purpose crew vehicle to be available as soon as practicable, and no later than for use with the Space Launch System [...] (2) GOAL FOR OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY. It shall be the goal to achieve full operational capability for the transportation vehicle developed pursuant to this subsection by not later than December 31, 2016. For purposes of meeting such goal, the Administrator may undertake a test of the transportation vehicle at the ISS before that date.
protest prevented SpaceX from starting its contract for 95 days while the GAO adjudicated the case.
| Missions |
| .svg) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agencies | ||||||
| Facilities | ||||||
| Rockets | ||||||
| Crewed spacecraft | ||||||
| Robotic spacecraft | ||||||
| Launch vehicles |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spacecraft |
| ||||||||
| Test vehicles |
| ||||||||
| Rocket engines | |||||||||
| Lists of missions | |||||||||
| Launch facilities | |||||||||
| Landing sites |
| ||||||||
| Other facilities | |||||||||
| Support |
| ||||||||
| Contracts | |||||||||
| R&D programs | |||||||||
| Key people |
| ||||||||
| Related | |||||||||
* denotes unflown vehicles or engines, and future missions or sites. † denotes failed missions, destroyed vehicles, and abandoned sites. | |||||||||
Crewed lunar spacecraft | ||
|---|---|---|
| Orbiters |  | |
| Landers | ||
| Proposed | ||
| Related | ||
