Stanley Wolpert | |
|---|---|
| Born | (1927-12-23)December 23, 1927 |
| Died | February 19, 2019(2019-02-19) (aged 91) |
| Education | City College of New York (BA) University of Pennsylvania (MA,PhD) |
| Occupation | Indologist |
| Notable work | Morley and India Nineteen Six to Nineteen Ten (1967) Jinnah of Pakistan (1984) |
Stanley Albert Wolpert (December 23, 1927 – February 19, 2019)[1] was an American historian,Indologist, and author on the political and intellectual history of modernIndia andPakistan[2][3] and wrote fiction and nonfiction books on the topics. He taught at theUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), from 1959 to 2002.[4]
Stanley Albert Wolpert was born on December 23, 1927, inBrooklyn,New York,[4] toRussian Jewish parents. While serving as an engineer aboard aU.S. Merchant Marine ship,[5] he arrived inBombay,India for the first time on February 12, 1948. Upon arriving, he was both fascinated and overwhelmed by the extraordinary outpouring of grief over the death ofMahatma Gandhi—whom he then knew very little about—just two weeks earlier.[6] On returning home, he abandoned his career in marine engineering for the study ofIndian history.[6][7][8][9] He received aB.A. fromCity College in 1953,[4] and anM.A. andPh.D. from theUniversity of Pennsylvania in 1955 and 1959, respectively.[2][4] Hisdissertation (published asTilak and Gokhale)[8] was on the revolutionary and reform wings of theIndian National Congress.[6] The dissertation was one of the two books selected for the now discontinued biennialWatumull Prize of theAmerican Historical Association in 1962, a prize recognizing "the best book on the history of India originally published in the United States."[10]
Wolpert began his academic career in 1959, when he took a job as an instructor in the Department of History at UCLA. He was promoted in 1960–63 toassistant professor;[4] 1963-66associate professor;[4] 1967full professor.[4] In 1968 he was appointed department chair.[4] He was later anemeritus professor.
In 1975 Wolpert was awarded UCLA's Distinguished Teaching Award.[4]
Wolpert was a guest onConnie Martinson Talks Books in 2011, promoting his 2010 book,India and Pakistan: Continued Conflict or Cooperation.[11][12]
He married Dorothy Wolpert (née Guberman) on June 12, 1953. They met in an American government class at City College of New York. She went on to become a senior partner in aCentury City law firm, and made several visits to India with her husband. They had two sons and three grandchildren.[9] His bookNine Hours to Rama was adapted to a feature film in 1963. Wolpert died on February 19, 2019.
Among Wolpert's famed works isJinnah of Pakistan (1982), a biography compiled onMuhammad Ali Jinnah, the founding father ofPakistan. Wolpert described his subject thus:
Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with creating a nation-state. Muhammad Ali Jinnah did all three.
The book is regarded as one of the best biographical books on the life of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
Wolpert served as editor alongsideRichard Sisson of the volume of papers presented at theUniversity of California, Los Angeles March 1984 international conference on the pre Independent phase of theIndian National Congress and published by theUniversity of California Press.[13][14][15][16][17]
Participating scholars in the conference includeDilip K. Basu,Judith M. Brown,Basudev Chatterji,Walter Huser,Stephen Northrup Hay,Eugene Irschick,Raghavan N. Iyer,D. A. Low,James Manor,Claude Markovits,John R. McLane,Thomas R. Metcalf,W. H. Morris Jones,V. A. Narain,Norman D. Palmer,Gyanendra Pandey,Bimal Prasad,Barbara N. Ramusack,Rajat Kanta Ray,Peter Reeves,Damodar Sardesai,Sumit Sarkar,Lawrence L. Shrader,William Vanderbok andEleanor Zelliot.[13]
Published in 2001,Gandhi's Passion is a biography of Mahatma Gandhi. Wolpert describes the subject thus:
"Mahatma Gandhi proved the strength of invisible soul-force. By so passionately embracing suffering all his mature life and fearlessly following his inner voice wherever it led him, Gandhi lived the message of Love and Truth he believed to be twin faces of God. His greatest luxury was to serve those who needed him: the sick, the hungry, people without work or pride or hope. He never gave up his quest to liberate India from imperial bonds of exploitation and to liberate humankind from the shackles of prejudice, fear, and hatred, and from the terrors of brutal racial and religious, class and caste conflict. He courted pain as most men did pleasure, welcomed sorrow as others greeted joy, and was always ready to face any opponent or his own death with a disarming smile of love. He lived to the full his mantra, “Do or die!” Still, he failed to convert most of modern India to his faith in the ancient yogic powers of Tapas and Ahimsa as superior to the atom bomb. He was not, of course, the first or only prophet of peace murdered by a self-righteous killer, nor, most unfortunately, would he be the last. But he was the greatest Indian since the fifth-century B.C. “Enlightened One,” the Buddha."[18]
Delhi University historian Shahid Amin in his review for theOutlook, called it an "empathetic and meticulous biography". He observed, "Wolpert's attempt is to demonstrate through a close reading of Gandhi's own voluminous writings the unique combination of yogic tapas and Christian passion (the suffering of Jesus Christ on the cross") that the Mahatma embodied in his body-polity."[19] The biography was severely criticised by columnistSwapan Dasgupta, who wrote inIndia Today, "Wolpert's biography is not the work of a professional historian.... it is essentially a sympathetic assessment, a study of Gandhi the saint that only tangentially — and with some glaring factual inaccuracies (like describing theJallianwala Bagh meeting inAmritsar as a gathering of peasants 'celebrating their spring harvest') and sweeping over-generalisations takes into account the environment he operated in."[20]
Pankaj Mishra, in his review forThe New York Times, described it as a "somewhat perfunctory biography". He wrote, "the best that can be said about Wolpert's book is that while it tells you nothing about Gandhi that hasn't been said before, it doesn't oversimplify its subject." Further adding, "Wolpert mentionsMartin Luther King Jr. andNelson Mandela as having drawn inspiration from Gandhi's methods. Disappointingly, he doesn't go into the manifold ways Gandhi's distrust of modernity has found echoes among many political and environmental movements around the world."[21]
Ahmed Abbas in his review forISSI, called the book "a valuable addition to the literature on the contemporary history of the Indian subcontinent".[22] Diplomat and author,Shashi Tharoor in his review forThe Washington Post called it " a smooth, highly readable but flawed book." He added, "Wolpert's narrative is rather bloodless; the characters on its pages are largely just names, with little physical description, social background or political context provided. Two skimpy chapters on Gandhi's legacy are all that justify the book's subtitle.... the book is riddled with minor errors unworthy of a historian of Wolpert's eminence, ranging from the description ofAhmedabad in 1887 as the capital ofGujarat, a state that did not come into existence till the 1950s, to placing theBritish Viceroy in 1925 inCalcutta, thoughBritish India had moved its capital toDelhi in 1911.... Wolpert gives us the saint, but the shrewd politician is little in evidence in this book. And yet Wolpert gets all the essentials right, and he does so in lucid and lively prose."[23]
Published in 2006,Shameful Flight is a chronological study of the last days of theBritish Empirein India from the fall ofSingapore in 1942 to theJammu and Kashmir war of 1947–48.[24][25]
ColumnistSwapan Dasgupta in his review forThe Times Of India criticised Wolpert's 'central argument' for mirroring 'the misgivings of the relics of the pre-War Conservative Party to the management of decolonization.' Yet, he refused to lump him with the Tory "revisionist" historians such asAndrew Roberts andNiall Ferguson and called his central thesis 'intriguing'. He observed, 'The problem is that Wolpert's own narrative doesn't justify singling outMountbatten for all the opprobrium'. Furthermore, 'On Wolpert's suggestion that aunited, independentBengal would have prevented the tragedy in the east ignores cruel ground realities'.[26]
