Since the first amateur investigations during the late 19th century numerous amateur and professional archaeologists have carried out excavations and removed all sediment deposits of the cave. In 1886 Neanderthal fossils of excellent quality were discovered, which contributed to the 19th century scientific community to occasion the paradigm shift and recognize the existing fossilsEngis 2 andNeanderthal 1 and embrace the notion of the mutability of species in an evolutionary context. The excavation was conducted byLiège-based archaeologistMarcel de Puydt and geologistMax Lohest. Paleontologist and zoologistJulien Fraipont published the specimen description in theAmerican Anthropologist journal.[3]
Theassemblages of the oldest excavations have been mixed, that makes the interpretation of the palaeoenvironment difficult.[4] In addition publications of de Puydt, Lohest and Fraipoint disagree on the number of layers ofknappedflints. Nonetheless, it is assumed that there existed seven, possibly more, Paleolithic occupation sequences, three are attributed to Neanderthals and theMousterian culture and four to Modern humanUpper Paleolithic presence.[5]
The hominid skeletons discovered during the first excavations have been namedSpy I, thought to be a female, andSpy 2, a young male. These were dated to around 36,000 yearsBP[4][6] (34,000 BC), although aBayesian analysis in 2014 concluded that they were probably more than 40,000 years old.[7] The identification of the remains of a Neanderthal child,Spy VI, was published in 2010. The identification was made from an analysis of the mandibular remains and the child is thought to have died at about 18 months, "making the Spy Neandertalremains the youngest ever directly dated in northwest Europe."[8] A paper inAnthropologica et Præhistorica states that the original excavators at Spy did not believe that the remains were deliberately buried in graves but that this hypothesis is "nowwidely accepted".[9]
In 2018, researchers succeeded in extracting DNA fromSpy94a, an upper right molar that has been directly dated to around 39,150-37,880 BP. Researchers believe thatSpy94a belongs toSpy 1. DNA analysis reveals thatSpy94a was male. Compared to other Neanderthals for whichnuclear DNA has been extracted,Spy94a is genetically closest toGoyet Q56-1 fromGoyet Caves and groups closest with other Late European Neanderthals.[10]
All levels contained mammoth remains, including an unusual (compared to other sites) number of molars. It has been suggested that the Neanderthal occupants brought mammoth heads to the site and ate the brains. Because many of the molars were unworn, these would have been very young or newborn calves, "killed in early spring, when plant food would not yet have been available."[11]
Evidence of occupation byUpper Paleolithicanatomically modern humans has also been found at Spy. A report published in 2013 states that "Based on cut-marked bones, remains withochre traces and anAurignacian spear point, it seems that AMH visited Spy at least three times: at around 34,500 BP, 33,000 BP and 26,000 BP."[12] Pendants and perforated beads made from mammoth ivory, presumably by modern humans, were found in the cave.[13]
^"Accéder".La grotte de Spy: le sommaire (in French). Archived fromthe original on 2007-03-12. Retrieved2007-03-15.
^abCamille Daujeard, Grégory Abrams, Mietje Germonpré, Jeanne-Marie Le Pape, Alicia Wampach, Kevin Di Modica, Marie-Hélène Moncel "Neanderthal and animal karstic occupations from southern Belgium and south-eastern France: Regional or common features?",Quaternary International Available online 27 May 2016, doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2016.02.009.[1]
^La race humaine de Neanderthal ou de Canstadt en Belgique: Recherches ethnographiques sur des ossements d'une grotte à Spy et détermination de leur âge géologique inAmerican Anthropologist, Vol. 1, No. 3 (Jul., 1888), pp. 286-287 (review consists of 2 pages).
^abStéphane Pirson, Damien Flas, Grégory Abrams, Dominique Bonjean, Mona Court-Picon, Kévin Di Modica, Christelle Draily, Freddy Damblon, Paul Haesaerts, Rebecca Miller, Hélène Rougier, Michel Toussaint, Patrick Semal, "Chronostratigraphic context of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition: Recent data from Belgium",Quaternary International 259:78-94 · May 2012, pp.78-94[2]
^Crevecoeur, I; Bayle, P; Rougier, H; Maureille, B; Higham, T; van der Plicht, J; et al. (2010). "The Spy VI child: A newly discovered Neandertal infant".Journal of Human Evolution.59 (6):641–656.doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.07.022.PMID20934740.
^Semal, P, Hauzeur, A, Rougier, H, Crevecoeur, I, Germonpré, M, Pirson, S, Haesaerts, P, Jungels, C, Flas, D, Toussaint, M, Maureille, B, Bocherens, H, Higham, T, van der Plicht, J, "Radiocarbon Dating Of Human Remains And Associated Archaeological Material",Anthropologica et Præhistorica, Vol. 123, 2012, pp.331-356
^Germonpré, Mietje; Udrescu, Mircea; Fiers, Evelyne (2013). "Possible evidence of mammoth hunting at the Neanderthal site of Spy (Belgium)".Quaternary International.337:28–42.doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.10.035.
^Germonpré, Mietje; Udrescu, Mircea; Fiers, Evelyne (2013)."The Fossil Mammals Of Spy".Anthropologica et Præhistorica.123:289–327. Retrieved4 August 2016.