16 February 2026

• curprev13:3713:37, 16 February 2026Ganesha811talkcontribsm38,503 bytes0→History: capitalizeTag:Visual edit

14 February 2026

• curprev14:4214:42, 14 February 2026ToBeFreetalkcontribsm38,503 bytes+1Edit warring is not limited to violations of thethree-revert rule, and continuing to make the same edits that led to full protection is also just continuing the same edit war, possibly proving the need for ablock from editing at least this page here
• curprev14:4014:40, 14 February 2026ToBeFreetalkcontribs38,502 bytes−2Adding {{pp-extended}}Tag:Twinkle
• curprev14:3914:39, 14 February 2026ToBeFreetalkcontribsm38,504 bytes0Changed protection settings for "Feeding Our Future":Contentious topic restriction:WP:CT/AP ([Edit=Require extended confirmed access] (expires 14:39, 14 February 2027 (UTC)) [Move=Require extended confirmed access] (expires 14:39, 14 February 2027 (UTC)))Tag:Twinkle
• curprev13:3813:38, 14 February 2026Giovanni Potagetalkcontribs38,504 bytes+3Restored lost prot template.Tags:Manual revertMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
• curprev04:4904:49, 14 February 2026Protection Helper Bottalkcontribsm38,501 bytes0Protected "Feeding Our Future": Restoring protection byToBeFree: Persistentdisruptive editing and now alsosockpuppetry ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 21:10, 28 January 2027 (UTC)))

12 February 2026

• curprev04:4904:49, 12 February 2026EvergreenFirtalkcontribs38,501 bytes−3Adding {{pp-dispute}}Tags:TwinkleReverted
• curprev04:4904:49, 12 February 2026EvergreenFirtalkcontribsm38,504 bytes0Changed protection settings for "Feeding Our Future":Edit warring / content dispute ([Edit=Require administrator access] (expires 04:49, 14 February 2026 (UTC)) [Move=Require administrator access] (expires 04:49, 14 February 2026 (UTC)))Tag:Twinkle
• curprev04:4804:48, 12 February 2026EvergreenFirtalkcontribs38,504 bytes+226Admin action. Restoring status quo comment from before edit war.
• curprev04:2904:29, 12 February 2026Adg1034talkcontribs38,278 bytes−3,057Reverting again. Per the rules, consensus is required to add significant new content, and consensus hasn't been reached for the significant new content added in the bold edit reverted here, so reverting until it's reachedTag:Manual revert
• curprev03:4303:43, 12 February 2026Thrileytalkcontribs41,335 bytes+3,057There isn’t any consensus to remove this materialTags:UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
• curprev03:3103:31, 12 February 2026Adg1034talkcontribs38,278 bytes−3,057Reverting per the talk pageTags:Manual revertReverted

11 February 2026

• curprev17:5617:56, 11 February 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs41,335 bytes+28→Federal charges and legal proceedings: Some reorganization - move section, make table collapsed-by-defaultTags:RevertedVisual edit
• curprev16:2616:26, 11 February 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs41,307 bytes+399expand slightly with new sourceTags:RevertedVisual edit
• curprev16:1716:17, 11 February 2026Suriname0talkcontribs40,908 bytes+2,630Ganesha811's change looks like an unambiguous improvement to me. Do the additional details about Operation Metro Surge not address your concerns about potential dog whistles? - Undid revision1337779732 byEthiopian Epic (talk)Tags:UndoReverted
• curprev11:3911:39, 11 February 2026Ethiopian Epictalkcontribs38,278 bytes−2,630Revert improper restoration of disputed content that has no talk page consensusTags:Manual revertReverted
• curprev10:5410:54, 11 February 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs40,908 bytes+1,876Expand for greater clarity in lead and body - hopefully help resolve some concerns given on talkTags:RevertedVisual edit
• curprev10:3010:30, 11 February 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs39,032 bytes+754Undid revision1337754468 byLunarscarlet (talk) Given how many different editors have reverted this removal, consensus seems to favor inclusionTags:UndoReverted
• curprev07:1007:10, 11 February 2026Lunarscarlettalkcontribs38,278 bytes−754Undid revision1337705090 bySuriname0 (talk) Under discussion and according toWP:ONUS andWP:BLP shouldn't be restored until that discussion concludesTags:UndoReverted
• curprev00:4800:48, 11 February 2026Suriname0talkcontribs39,032 bytes+754Discuss on talk page, please - Undid revision1337693912 byLunarscarlet (talk)Tags:UndoReverted

10 February 2026

• curprev23:2423:24, 10 February 2026Lunarscarlettalkcontribs38,278 bytes−754Undid revision1337606677 byAstaire (talk) See talk page sectionTags:UndoReverted
• curprev13:3113:31, 10 February 2026Astairetalkcontribs39,032 bytes+754Undid revision1337583892 byLunarscarlet (talk) - the Magan content is not disputed on the talk page, there has been no alternate proposal for the wording of the lede sentence, and you don't understand what a dog whistle is.Tags:UndoReverted
• curprev09:2909:29, 10 February 2026Lunarscarlettalkcontribs38,278 bytes−754Undid revision1336904568 byAstaire (talk) Disputed on the talk page and there is not currently a consensus. I agree that it seems like adog whistleTags:UndoReverted

7 February 2026

• curprev23:1223:12, 7 February 2026GreenC bottalkcontribs39,032 bytes+75Reformat 1 URL (Wayback Medic 2.5). Notice:RFC Eliminate or Deprecate Archive.today from Wikipedia

6 February 2026

• curprev10:1110:11, 6 February 2026Astairetalkcontribs38,957 bytes+754Undid revision1336863000 byAssorted-Interests (talk) - unexplained removal of contentTags:UndoReverted
• curprev04:1804:18, 6 February 2026Assorted-Intereststalkcontribs38,203 bytes−754Undid revision1336694789 byThriley (talk)Tags:UndoReverted

5 February 2026

• curprev05:2205:22, 5 February 2026Thrileytalkcontribs38,957 bytes+754I see no strong reason to remove this.Tags:UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
• curprev03:3503:35, 5 February 2026Ethiopian Epictalkcontribs38,203 bytes−754Undid revision1336562322 byGanesha811 (talk) "no reason not to" flips ONUS, which is important not to do with opinion commentary concerning an ethnic group, sourced from an opinion piece written in a source in which no consensus on reliability exists. Also not sure how you see anything resembling a talk page consensusTags:UndoReverted

4 February 2026

• curprev13:4913:49, 4 February 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs38,957 bytes+754Undid revision1336558643 byEthiopian Epic (talk) There's no reason not to cite an opinion piece from a reliable source; Magan has credibility given his job and the sentences make clear it's his perspective, not wikivoice. The other sentence was already discussed and there appears to be consensus for inclusion on talk. Please make fixes instead of just removing things wholesale!Tags:UndoReverted
• curprev13:2013:20, 4 February 2026Ethiopian Epictalkcontribs38,203 bytes−754Undid revision1336547580 byGanesha811 (talk) PerWP:ONUS one is disputed on the talk page, and the other has been called out for being from an opinion pieceTags:UndoReverted
• curprev11:4611:46, 4 February 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs38,957 bytes+754Undid revision1336517426 byEthiopian Epic (talk) Those edits were originally made by me, not the sockpuppet, and have been in the article for monthsTags:UndoReverted
• curprev06:3906:39, 4 February 2026Ethiopian Epictalkcontribs38,203 bytes−754Revert sock edits byUser:Its a new trapTag:Reverted

3 February 2026

• curprev01:1301:13, 3 February 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs38,957 bytes+483Expand from new sourceTag:Visual edit

28 January 2026

• curprev21:1021:10, 28 January 2026ToBeFreetalkcontribs38,474 bytes+27Adding {{pp-protected}}Tag:Twinkle
• curprev21:1021:10, 28 January 2026ToBeFreetalkcontribsm38,447 bytes0Protected "Feeding Our Future": Persistentdisruptive editing and now alsosockpuppetry ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 21:10, 28 January 2027 (UTC)))Tag:Twinkle
• curprev19:0219:02, 28 January 2026Astairetalkcontribs38,447 bytes+227Undid revision1335339314 by~2026-32437-2 (talk) - This is a significant part of the story and merits inclusion in the lede. Please discuss alternate wording on talk page instead of wholesale removal of content.Tag:Undo
• curprev18:2518:25, 28 January 2026Daasktalkcontribs38,220 bytes−36→Responses: Change wikilink target fromCrime in Minnesota#Feeding Our Future and other fraud in the 2020s to2020s Minnesota fraud scandals.
• curprev18:1918:19, 28 January 2026~2026-32437-2talk38,256 bytes−227Undid revision1335334587 byIts a new trap (talk)WP:ONUSTags:UndoReverted
• curprev17:4717:47, 28 January 2026Its a new traptalkcontribs38,483 bytes+227Wikipedia is unbiased and uncensored.it should remain.Tags:UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
• curprev17:1417:14, 28 January 2026~2026-32437-2talk38,256 bytes−227Remove euphemism called out on the talk pageTag:Reverted
• curprev16:4916:49, 28 January 2026Its a new traptalkcontribs38,483 bytes+527For the same reason the other person revertedTags:UndoMobile editMobile web edit
• curprev16:4516:45, 28 January 2026~2026-32437-2talk37,956 bytes−527Undid revision1335319392 byIts a new trap (talk) UnexplainedTags:UndoReverted
• curprev15:5915:59, 28 January 2026Its a new traptalkcontribs38,483 bytes+527Undid revision1335319187 by~2026-32437-2 (talk)Tags:UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
• curprev15:5715:57, 28 January 2026~2026-32437-2talk37,956 bytes−527Undid revision1335286819 byAstaire (talk) Conservative talking point sourced from an opinion pieceTag:Reverted
• curprev14:3214:32, 28 January 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs38,483 bytes+609Add detail from new sourceTag:Visual edit
• curprev11:1711:17, 28 January 2026Astairetalkcontribs37,874 bytes+122→Defendants: add NYT article where Magan is quotedTag:Visual edit
• curprev11:1511:15, 28 January 2026Astairetalkcontribs37,752 bytes+509Undid revision1335249529 by~2026-32437-2 (talk) - Being a "right-wing talking point" (??) is not grounds for exclusion, and the article won an award from Minnesota's professional journalist society. https://www.mnspj.org/2025/06/26/mnspj-2025-page-one-awards-winners/Tag:Undo
• curprev05:2805:28, 28 January 2026~2026-32437-2talk37,243 bytes−509Right-wing talking point from weak sourceTag:Reverted

23 January 2026

• curprev01:1601:16, 23 January 2026Ganesha811talkcontribs37,752 bytes−324→Federal charges and legal proceedings: Rewrite sentence - $9 billion not related to FoF, keep to $350m connectedTag:Visual edit

16 January 2026

• curprev18:3518:35, 16 January 2026Agnieszka653talkcontribs38,076 bytes+701Added 350 million allegationTag:Visual edit