3 October 2012

• 16:5516:55, 3 October 2012diffhist−1Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Stimson's comments
• 16:4016:40, 3 October 2012diffhist+102Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Stimson's comments
• 16:3616:36, 3 October 2012diffhist+352Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Stimson's comments
• 16:2816:28, 3 October 2012diffhist−7Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasakihow is to judge what is MINOR - Coca Cola and the uneducated Americans

28 September 2012

• 09:3909:39, 28 September 2012diffhist+6mNuuk→Government and politics: 21 June 2009 Greenland went form Home Rule to Self Government
• 09:3109:31, 28 September 2012diffhist−8mNuukGreenland is not part of Northamerica

30 June 2012

• 08:2708:27, 30 June 2012diffhist+982Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 499880868 byLauraHale (talk)See: Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasakiv
• 07:5907:59, 30 June 2012diffhist+990Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Would you please specify why you consider the quote ‘incomplete, misleading’

29 June 2012

• 09:2709:27, 29 June 2012diffhist+825Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Would you please specify why you consider the quote ‘incomplete, misleading’
• 09:1009:10, 29 June 2012diffhist−1,434User talk:Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr→Would you please specify why you consider the quote ‘incomplete, misleading’: OK I take your advice TY
• 09:0909:09, 29 June 2012diffhist+1,855User talk:Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyrUndid revision 499880496 byLauraHale (talk) OK, I take your advice TY
• 09:0709:07, 29 June 2012diffhist+982Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 499874246 byLauraHale (talk) tried to ask Laura what was 'misleading and incomplete' on her talkpage, but she just deleted my question
• 09:0409:04, 29 June 2012diffhist+1,855User talk:Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyrUndid revision 499880002 byLauraHale (talk) at least you could give an answer before you delte
• 08:5108:51, 29 June 2012diffhist−4,936User talk:Robertmossing→June 2012
• 08:4808:48, 29 June 2012diffhist+1,434User talk:Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr→DYK for Emily Little
• 07:5107:51, 29 June 2012diffhist+581Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Seems to me that Binkernet deletes all opposition to the bomb. This is the 4th he deletes:
• 07:3307:33, 29 June 2012diffhist+982Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 499726403 byNick-D (talk) The quote is good and contains most of the opinions against the bombs

28 June 2012

• 09:1209:12, 28 June 2012diffhist+1,298Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→What Richard B. Frank said and did not say
• 08:5908:59, 28 June 2012diffhist+982Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 499639018 byBinksternet (talk)Cannot see what is 'cherry picked': Secretary, upon giving me the news of the successful bomb test in New Mexico, and of the plan for using

27 June 2012

• 18:1718:17, 27 June 2012diffhist+982Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Opposition

21 June 2012

• 07:2507:25, 21 June 2012diffhist+1,421Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Seems to me that Binkernet deletes all opposition to the bomb. This is the 3rd he deletes.
• 07:0007:00, 21 June 2012diffhist+798Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Seems to me that Binkernet deletes all opposition to the bomb. This is the 3rd he deletes.

20 June 2012

• 19:5119:51, 20 June 2012diffhist+117Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Militarily unnecessary: clearing a 'verification needed'
• 19:4619:46, 20 June 2012diffhist+878Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Militarily unnecessary
• 17:2817:28, 20 June 2012diffhist+984Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 498201113 byMdann52 (talk) Looked up the source and quoted correctly
• 16:3716:37, 20 June 2012diffhist+1,731Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Seems to me that Binkernet deletes all opposition to the bomb. This is the 3rd he deletes.

18 June 2012

• 15:4115:41, 18 June 2012diffhist+475Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Seems to me that Binkernet deletes all opposition to the bomb. This is the 3rd he deletes.
• 15:3415:34, 18 June 2012diffhist+340Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Support
• 15:1415:14, 18 June 2012diffhist−4Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Support: looked up source, quoted correctly and changed text accordingly
• 15:0915:09, 18 June 2012diffhist+291Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Preferable to invasion: looked up source, quoted correctly and modified text accordingly
• 14:4514:45, 18 June 2012diffhist+357Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 498061923 byBinksternet (talk)
• 14:4214:42, 18 June 2012diffhist+1,099Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Seems to me that Binkernet deletes all opposition to the bomb. This is the 3rd he deletes.

17 June 2012

• 16:4616:46, 17 June 2012diffhist+455Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→In search of a good quotation for the opposition to the use of the atomic bombs that will not be deleted
• 16:4016:40, 17 June 2012diffhist+288Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 498043278 byBinksternet (talk)Seems to me that Binkernet deletes all opposition to the bomb. This is the 3rd he deletes
• 16:3616:36, 17 June 2012diffhist+297Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Support
• 16:1616:16, 17 June 2012diffhist+110Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Support: Source substituted as the original source does not support the view
• 16:1116:11, 17 June 2012diffhist+289Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Opposition
• 15:3415:34, 17 June 2012diffhist+169Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→In search of a good quotation for the opposition to the use of the atomic bombs that will not be deleted

15 June 2012

• 18:2818:28, 15 June 2012diffhist+100Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→In search of a good quotation for the opposition to the use of the atomic bombs that will not be deleted
• 18:2718:27, 15 June 2012diffhist+894Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→In search of a good quotation for the opposition to the use of the atomic bombs that will not be deleted

13 June 2012

• 21:0221:02, 13 June 2012diffhist+234Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Edit request on 27 May 2012
• 20:4920:49, 13 June 2012diffhist+2,448Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→The caption
• 15:0615:06, 13 June 2012diffhist+977Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 497398051 byEdward321 (talk) No, he was dead. But the manhathan proceject was to be ahead of the nazi's
• 14:5414:54, 13 June 2012diffhist+100Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Estimated Japanese casualties/deaths from invasion
• 14:3114:31, 13 June 2012diffhist+1,969Talk:Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Estimated Japanese casualties/deaths from invasion
• 13:1113:11, 13 June 2012diffhist+977Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki→Opposition: Appeal of President Roosevelt

11 June 2012

• 19:4219:42, 11 June 2012diffhist+179User talk:Robertmossing→June 2012
• 19:2019:20, 11 June 2012diffhist+213User talk:Oda Mari→Uh what?
• 19:1219:12, 11 June 2012diffhist+253Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents→WP:POINT disruption at Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
• 19:0619:06, 11 June 2012diffhist−477Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiUndid revision 497095657 byOda Mari (talk) Quation fraud. Look it up, for Christ' sake!