17 February 2026

• 19:3319:33, 17 February 2026diffhist+364Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: r
• 19:1219:12, 17 February 2026diffhist+365Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: Sartre is worth looking into
• 19:0319:03, 17 February 2026diffhist+280User talk:Wolfcruiser→February 2026: add
• 19:0219:02, 17 February 2026diffhist+2,227User talk:Wolfcruiser→February 2026: CT noticeTag:contentious topicsalert
• 19:0019:00, 17 February 2026diffhist+646User talk:WolfcruiserCaution: Refactoring others' talk page comments.Tag:Twinkle
• 18:5918:59, 17 February 2026diffhist−479Talk:Men Going Their Own WayReverted 1 edit byWolfcruiser (talk): Don't alter previous commenrs, and don't alter the sequenceTags:TwinkleUndo
• 18:4218:42, 17 February 2026diffhist+1,231User talk:HIPPITYHOPITYGETOFFMYPROPERTYYou have been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account is beingused only for vandalism.currentTag:Twinkle
• 15:0915:09, 17 February 2026diffhist+1Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: indent
• 15:0815:08, 17 February 2026diffhist+484Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: r
• 15:0315:03, 17 February 2026diffhist+75Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: slightly clarified wording
• 14:4314:43, 17 February 2026diffhist+1,071Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: cmt
• 13:3413:34, 17 February 2026diffhist+341User talk:EchoPoint→February 2026: rcurrent
• 13:2113:21, 17 February 2026diffhist+398NUser talk:~2026-10666-28→Talkpages: new sectionTag:New topic
• 13:2013:20, 17 February 2026diffhist−526mUser talk:ApokryltarosReverted edit by~2026-10666-28 (talk) to last version by ApokryltaroscurrentTag:Rollback
• 13:1913:19, 17 February 2026diffhist−512Talk:CreationismReverted 1 edit by~2026-10666-28 (talk): Appreciated, but not what talkpages are forcurrentTags:TwinkleUndo
• 13:1813:18, 17 February 2026diffhist−245Offshore oil and gas in the United StatesRestored revision 1338549370 byAjanotak gaszagI (talk): We're not putting all that into every article that mentions the GulfcurrentTags:TwinkleUndo
• 13:1313:13, 17 February 2026diffhist+651User talk:Upendrasharma9718Only warning: Using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion.Tag:Twinkle
• 13:1313:13, 17 February 2026diffhist+670NUser talk:EchoPointOnly warning: Using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion.Tag:Twinkle
• 02:0702:07, 17 February 2026diffhist+464User talk:PageTheEditor→February 2026: cmt
• 01:4901:49, 17 February 2026diffhist0mSideroxylon spinosumProtected "Sideroxylon spinosum": persistent weird nationalist removals of anywhere that isn't Morocco, again ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 01:49, 17 February 2027 (UTC)) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 01:49, 17 February 2027 (UTC)))
• 01:4801:48, 17 February 2026diffhist+1,166User talk:~2026-10509-20You have been blocked from editing.currentTag:Twinkle
• 01:4801:48, 17 February 2026diffhist−1,268mUser talk:~2026-10509-20Reverted edit byAcroterion (talk) to last version by ~2026-10509-20Tag:Rollback
• 01:4701:47, 17 February 2026diffhist+1,268User talk:~2026-10509-20You have been blocked from editing fordisruptive editing.Tags:TwinkleReverted
• 01:4601:46, 17 February 2026diffhist+444Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents→PageTheEditor: r
• 01:4301:43, 17 February 2026diffhist−10Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: actaully, that would just be worse
• 01:3701:37, 17 February 2026diffhist+97Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: add
• 01:3601:36, 17 February 2026diffhist+177Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: add
• 01:3401:34, 17 February 2026diffhist+315Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: agree
• 01:2901:29, 17 February 2026diffhist+699Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents→PageTheEditor: cmt
• 01:1501:15, 17 February 2026diffhist+288Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: add
• 01:1201:12, 17 February 2026diffhist0Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: move
• 01:0801:08, 17 February 2026diffhist+1,097Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)→Should we have an essay or something on "Jew tagging"? continuation of archived discussion: r
• 00:5500:55, 17 February 2026diffhist−145mTalk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shootingReverted edit byBloksmasher82 (talk) to last version by AcroterioncurrentTag:Rollback

16 February 2026

• 22:3022:30, 16 February 2026diffhist+232Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting→Change article name to Murder of Nancy Lanza and the Sandy Hook shootings: again, what?
• 22:2222:22, 16 February 2026diffhist+261User talk:Malcolmxl5→Why did you change the abortion activist article to private? I feel that is very undemocratic of you plus it’s shady.: cmt
• 22:1722:17, 16 February 2026diffhist+118User talk:Carl 1937→Susan Wicklund: add important note
• 22:1522:15, 16 February 2026diffhist+296User talk:Carl 1937→Susan Wicklund: that's what the talkpage is for
• 22:1222:12, 16 February 2026diffhist+325Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting→Change article name to Murder of Nancy Lanza and the Sandy Hook shootings: no
• 22:0922:09, 16 February 2026diffhist0User talk:Carl 1937→Susan Wicklund: fix
• 22:0922:09, 16 February 2026diffhist+1,183User talk:Carl 1937→Introduction to contentious topics: reply here
• 22:0222:02, 16 February 2026diffhist+528User talk:Carl 1937→Introduction to contentious topics: r
• 20:5320:53, 16 February 2026diffhist+263User talk:Malcolmxl5→Why did you change the abortion activist article to private? I feel that is very undemocratic of you plus it’s shady.: r
• 20:5220:52, 16 February 2026diffhist+445User talk:Carl 1937→Introduction to contentious topics: r
• 20:2420:24, 16 February 2026diffhist+2,257User talk:Carl 1937CT noticeTag:contentious topicsalert
• 20:2320:23, 16 February 2026diffhist+2,233NUser talk:Carl 1937Welcome to Wikipedia!Tag:Twinkle
• 20:2020:20, 16 February 2026diffhist0User talk:Malcolmxl5→Why did you change the abortion activist article to private? I feel that is very undemocratic of you plus it’s shady.: sp
• 20:2020:20, 16 February 2026diffhist+459User talk:Malcolmxl5→Why did you change the abortion activist article to private? I feel that is very undemocratic of you plus it’s shady.: looks entirely justified to me
• 20:1220:12, 16 February 2026diffhist+410User talk:Malcolmxl5→Why did you change the abortion activist article to private? I feel that is very undemocratic of you plus it’s shady.: really?
• 19:4519:45, 16 February 2026diffhist−362Kennedy curseReverted 1 edit by~2026-10520-20 (talk): Yes, he was, but is this described as part of the "curse" in sources?currentTags:TwinkleUndo
• 18:0418:04, 16 February 2026diffhist+409User talk:Joyous!→Please don’t protect ped0, Herschel Weingrod: OP blockedTag:Reverted