TheMagellan-Elcano circumnavigation—the first circumnavigation of the Earth—laid the foundation for Spain'sPacific empire and for Spanish control over theEast Indies. The influx of gold and silver from the mines inZacatecas andGuanajuato in Mexico andPotosí in Bolivia enriched the Spanish crown and financed military endeavors and territorial expansion. Spain was largely able to defend its territories in the Americas, with theDutch,English, andFrench taking only small Caribbean islands and outposts, using them to engage incontraband trade with the Spanish populace in the Indies. Another crucial element of the empire's expansion was the financial support provided byGenoese bankers, who financed royal expeditions and military campaigns.[12]
The Bourbon monarchy implementedreforms like theNueva Planta decrees, which centralized power and abolished regional privileges. Economic policies promoted trade with the colonies, enhancing Spanish influence in the Americas. Socially, tensions emerged between the ruling elite and the rising bourgeoisie, as well as divisions between peninsular Spaniards and Creoles in the Americas.[13] These factors ultimately set the stage for the independence movements that began in the early 19th century, leading to the gradual disintegration of Spanish colonial authority.[14] By the mid-1820s, Spain had lost its territories in Mexico, Central America, and South America. By 1900, it had also lostCuba,Puerto Rico, thePhilippine Islands, andGuam in theMariana Islands following theSpanish–American War in 1898.[15]
With the marriage of the heirs apparent to their respective thronesFerdinand of Aragon andIsabella of Castile created apersonal union that most scholars[citation needed] view as the foundation of the Spanish monarchy. The union of the Crowns ofCastile andAragon joined the economic and military power of Iberia under one dynasty, theHouse of Trastámara. Their dynastic alliance was important for a number of reasons, ruling jointly over a number of kingdoms and other territories, mostly in the western Mediterranean region, under their respective legal and administrative status. They successfully pursued expansion in Iberia in the Christian conquest of the MuslimEmirate of Granada, completed in 1492, for which Valencia-born PopeAlexander VI gave them the title of theCatholic Monarchs. Ferdinand of Aragon was particularly concerned with expansion in France and Italy, as well as conquests in North Africa.[16]
With theOttoman Turks controlling the choke points of the overland trade from Asia and the Middle East, both Spain and Portugal sought alternative routes. TheKingdom of Portugal had an advantage over theCrown of Castile, having earlier retaken territory from the Muslims. Following Portugal's earlier completion of the reconquest and its establishment of settled boundaries, it began to seek overseas expansion, first to the port ofCeuta (1415) and then by colonizing the Atlantic islands ofMadeira (1418) and theAzores (1427–1452); it also began voyages down the west coast of Africa in the fifteenth century.[17] Its rival Castile laid claim to theCanary Islands (1402) and retook territory from the Moors in 1462. The Christian rivals Castile and Portugal came to formal agreements over the division of new territories in theTreaty of Alcaçovas (1479), as well as securing the crown of Castile for Isabella whose accession was challenged militarily by Portugal.
Following the voyage ofChristopher Columbus in 1492 and first major settlement in theNew World in 1493, Portugal and Castile divided the world by theTreaty of Tordesillas (1494), which gave Portugal Africa and Asia, and the Western Hemisphere to Spain.[18] The voyage of Columbus, aGenoese mariner, obtained the support of Isabella of Castile, sailing west in 1492, seeking a route to the Indies. Columbus unexpectedly encountered theNew World, populated by peoples he named "Indians". Subsequent voyages and full-scale settlements of Spaniards followed, with gold beginning to flow into Castile's coffers. Managing the expanding empire became an administrative issue. The reign of Ferdinand and Isabella began the professionalization of the apparatus of government in Spain, which led to a demand for men of letters (letrados) who were university graduates (licenciados), ofSalamanca,Valladolid,Complutense andAlcalá. These lawyer-bureaucrats staffed the various councils of state, eventually including theCouncil of the Indies andCasa de Contratación, the two highest bodies in metropolitan Spain for the government of the empire in the New World, as well as royal government in the Indies.
Portugal obtained severalpapal bulls that acknowledged Portuguese control over the discovered territories, but Castile also obtained from the Pope the safeguard of its rights to theCanary Islands with the bullsRomani Pontifex dated 6 November 1436 andDominatur Dominus dated 30 April 1437.[19] Theconquest of the Canary Islands, inhabited byGuanche people, began in 1402 during the reign ofHenry III of Castile, byNorman noblemanJean de Béthencourt under a feudal agreement with the crown. The conquest was completed with the campaigns of the armies of theCrown of Castile between 1478 and 1496, when the islands ofGran Canaria (1478–1483),La Palma (1492–1493), andTenerife (1494–1496) were subjugated.[18] By 1504, more than 90 percent of the indigenous Canarians had been killed or enslaved.[20]
The Portuguese tried in vain to keep secret their discovery of theGold Coast (1471) in theGulf of Guinea, but the news quickly caused a huge gold rush. ChroniclerPulgar wrote that the fame of the treasures of Guinea "spread around the ports ofAndalusia in such way that everybody tried to go there".[21] Worthless trinkets, Moorish textiles, and above all, shells from the Canary andCape Verde islands were exchanged for gold, slaves, ivory and Guinea pepper.
TheWar of the Castilian Succession (1475–79) provided the Catholic Monarchs with the opportunity not only to attack the main source of the Portuguese power, but also to take possession of this lucrative commerce. The Crown officially organized this trade with Guinea: every caravel had to secure a government license and to pay a tax on one-fifth of their profits (a receiver of the customs of Guinea was established inSeville in 1475—the ancestor of the future and famousCasa de Contratación).[22]
Iberian 'mare clausum' in the Age of Discovery
Castilian fleets fought in the Atlantic Ocean, temporarily occupying theCape Verde islands (1476), conquering the city ofCeuta in theTingitan Peninsula in 1476 (but retaken by the Portuguese),[e][f] and even attacked theAzores islands, being defeated atPraia.[g][h] The turning point of the war came in 1478, however, when a Castilian fleet sent by King Ferdinand to conquerGran Canaria lost men and ships to the Portuguese who expelled the attack,[23] and a large Castilian armada—full of gold—was entirely captured in the decisiveBattle of Guinea.[24][i]
TheTreaty of Alcáçovas (4 September 1479), while assuring the Castilian throne to the Catholic Monarchs, reflected the Castilian naval and colonial defeat:[25] "War with Castile broke out waged savagely in the Gulf [of Guinea] until the Castilian fleet of thirty-five sail was defeated there in 1478. As a result of this naval victory, at the Treaty of Alcáçovas in 1479 Castile, while retaining her rights in the Canaries, recognized the Portuguese monopoly of fishing and navigation along the whole west African coast and Portugal's rights over theMadeira, Azores and Cape Verde islands [plus the right to conquer theKingdom of Fez ]."[26] The treaty delimited thespheres of influence of the two countries,[27] establishing the principle of theMare clausum.[28] It was confirmed in 1481 by thePope Sixtus IV, in the papal bullÆterni regis (dated on 21 June 1481).[29]
However, this experience would prove to be profitable for future Spanish overseas expansion, because as the Spaniards were excluded from the lands discovered or to be discovered from the Canaries southward[30]—and consequently from theroad to India around Africa[31]—they sponsored the voyage of Columbus towards the west (1492) in search of Asia to trade in itsspices, encounteringthe Americas instead.[32] Thus, the limitations imposed by the Alcáçovas treaty were overcome and a new and more balanced division of the world would be reached in theTreaty of Tordesillas between both emerging maritime powers.[33]
Ferdinand and Isabella defeated the last Muslim king out of Granada in 1492 after aten-year war. The Catholic Monarchs then negotiated withChristopher Columbus, aGenoese sailor attempting to reachCipangu (Japan) by sailing west. Castile was already engaged in arace of exploration with Portugal to reach the Far East by sea when Columbus made his bold proposal to Isabella. In theCapitulations of Santa Fe, dated on 17 April 1492, Christopher Columbus obtained from the Catholic Monarchs his appointment as viceroy and governor in the landsalready discovered[35] and that he might discover thenceforth;[36][37] thereby, it was the first document to establish an administrative organization in the Indies.[38] Columbus' discoveries began theSpanish colonization of the Americas. Spain's claim[39] to these lands was solidified by theInter caeterapapal bull dated 4 May 1493, andDudum siquidem on 26 September 1493.
Since the Portuguese wanted to keep the line of demarcation of Alcaçovas running east and west along a latitude south ofCape Bojador, a compromise was worked out and incorporated in theTreaty of Tordesillas, dated on 7 June 1494, in which the world was split into two dividing Spanish and Portuguese claims. These actions gave Spain exclusive rights to establish colonies in all of the New World from north to south (later with the exception of Brazil, which Portuguese commanderPedro Álvares Cabral encountered in 1500), as well as the easternmost parts of Asia. The Treaty of Tordesillas was confirmed byPope Julius II in the bullEa quae pro bono pacis on 24 January 1506.[40]
The Treaty of Tordesillas[41] and the treaty of Cintra (18 September 1509)[42] established the limits of the Kingdom of Fez for Portugal, and the Castilian expansion was allowed outside these limits, beginning with theconquest of Melilla in 1497. Other European powers did not see the treaty between Castile and Portugal as binding on themselves.Francis I of France observed "The sun shines for me as for others and I should very much like to see the clause in Adam's will that excludesme from a share of the world."[43]
Spanish territories in theNew World around 1515. The island of Hispaniola belonged entirely to Spain until 1605, when Spain lost the western part of the island due to thedevastations of Osorio.[44][45]
Spanish settlement in the New World was based on a pattern of a large, permanent settlements with the entire complex of institutions and material life to replicate Castilian life in a different venue. Columbus's second voyage in 1493 had a large contingent of settlers and goods to accomplish that.[46] On Hispaniola, the city ofSanto Domingo was founded in 1496 by Christopher Columbus's brotherBartholomew Columbus and became a stone-built, permanent city. Non-Castilians, such asCatalans andAragonese, were often prohibited from migrating to the New World.
Following the settlement of Hispaniola, Europeans began searching elsewhere to begin new settlements, since there was little apparent wealth and the numbers of indigenous were declining due to theTaíno genocide. Those from the less prosperous Hispaniola were eager to search for new success in a new settlement. From thereJuan Ponce de León conqueredPuerto Rico (1508) andDiego Velázquez tookCuba. The Spanish enslaved and deported the entireLucayan population of the Bahamas by around 1520, leading to their complete extinction.
Columbus encountered the mainland in 1498,[47] and the Catholic Monarchs learned of his discovery in May 1499. The first settlement on the mainland wasSanta María la Antigua del Darién inCastilla de Oro (nowNicaragua,Costa Rica,Panama andColombia), settled byVasco Núñez de Balboa in 1510. In 1513, Balboa crossed theIsthmus of Panama, and led the first European expedition to see the Pacific Ocean from the West coast of the New World. In an action with enduring historical import, Balboa claimed the Pacific Ocean and all the lands adjoining it for the Spanish Crown.[48]
The Catholic Monarchs had developed a strategy of marriages for their children to isolate their rival, France. The Spanish princesses married the heirs of Portugal, England and theHouse of Habsburg. Following the same strategy, the Catholic Monarchs decided to support the Aragonese house of the Kingdom of Naples againstCharles VIII of France in theItalian Wars beginning in 1494. Following Spanish victories at the Battles ofCerignola andGarigliano in 1503, France recognized Ferdinand's sovereignty over Naples through a treaty.[49]
After the death of Queen Isabella in 1504, and her exclusion of Ferdinand from a further role in Castile, Ferdinand marriedGermaine de Foix in 1505, cementing an alliance with France. Had that couple had a surviving heir, probably theCrown of Aragon would have been split from Castile, which was inherited by Charles, Ferdinand and Isabella's grandson.[50] Ferdinand joined theLeague of Cambrai againstVenice in 1508. In 1511, he became part of theHoly League against France, seeing a chance at taking bothMilan—to which he held a dynastic claim—andNavarre. In 1516, France agreed to a truce that left Milan in its control and recognized Spanish control ofUpper Navarre, which had effectively been a Spanish protectorate following a series of treaties in 1488, 1491, 1493, and 1495.[51]
With the Christian reconquest completed in the Iberian peninsula, Spain began trying to take territory in Muslim North Africa. It had conqueredMelilla in 1497, and further expansionism policy in North Africa was developed during the regency of Ferdinand the Catholic in Castile, stimulated byCardinal Cisneros. Several towns and outposts in the North African coast were conquered and occupied by Castile between 1505 and 1510:Mers El Kébir,Peñón de Vélez de la Gomera,Oran,Bougie,Tripoli, andPeñón of Algiers. On the Atlantic coast, Spain took possession of the outpost ofSanta Cruz de la Mar Pequeña (1476) with support from theCanary Islands, and it was retained until 1525 with the consent of the Treaty of Cintra (1509).
As a result of the marriage politics of theCatholic Monarchs (in Spanish,Reyes Católicos), theirHabsburg grandsonCharles inherited the Castilian empire in the Americas and the possessions of the Crown of Aragon in the Mediterranean (including all ofsouthern Italy), lands in Germany, theLow Countries,Franche-Comté, andAustria, starting the rule of the Spanish Habsburgs. The Austrian hereditary Habsburg domains were transferred toFerdinand, brother of Holy Roman EmperorCharles V, whereas Spain and the remaining possessions were inherited by Charles's son,Philip II of Spain, at the abdication of the former in 1556.
The Habsburgs pursued several goals:
Undermining the power of France and containing it in its eastern borders
Spreading (Catholic) Christianity to the unconverted indigenous of theNew World and thePhilippines
Exploiting the resources of the Americas (gold, silver, sugar) and trading with Asia (porcelain, spices, silk)
Excluding other European powers from the possessions it claimed in the New World
"I learnt a proverb here", said a French traveler in 1603: "Everything is dear in Spain except silver".[52] The problems caused by inflation were discussed by scholars at theSchool of Salamanca and thearbitristas. The natural resource abundance provoked a decline in entrepreneurship as profits from resource extraction are less risky.[53] The wealthy preferred to invest their fortunes inpublic debt (juros). The Habsburg dynasty spent the Castilian and American riches inwars across Europe on behalf of Habsburg interests, and declared moratoriums (bankruptcies) on their debt payments several times. These burdens led to a number of revolts across the Spanish Habsburg's domains, including their Spanish kingdoms.
During the Habsburg rule, the Spanish Empire significantly expanded its territories in the Americas, beginning with the conquest of theAztec Empire; these conquests were achieved not by the Spanish army, but by small groups of adventurers—artisans, traders, gentry, and peasants—who operated independently under the crown'sencomienda system.[54]
Defying the opposition ofDiego Velázquez de Cuéllar, the governor of Hispaniola,Hernán Cortés organized an expedition of 550conquistadors and sailed for the coast of Mexico in March 1519. The Castilians defeated a 10,000-strongChontal Mayan army atPotonchán on 24 March and emerged triumphant against a larger force of 40,000Mayans three days later. On 2 September, 360 Castilians and 2,300Totonac Indigenous allies defeated a 20,000-strongTlaxcalan army. Three days later, a 50,000-strongOtomi-Tlaxcalan force was defeated by Spanish arquebusier and cannon fire, and a Castilian cavalry charge. Thousands of Tlaxcalans joined the invaders against their Aztec rulers. Cortés's forces sacked the city ofCholula, massacring 6,000 inhabitants,[55] and later entered EmperorMoctezuma II's capital,Tenochtitlan, on 8 November. Velázquez sent a force led by Pánfilo de Narváez to punish the insubordinate Cortés for his unauthorized invasion of Mexico, but they were defeated at theBattle of Cempoala on 29 May 1520. Narváez was wounded and captured and 17 of his troops were killed; the rest joined Cortés. Meanwhile,Pedro de Alvarado triggered an Aztec uprising following themassacre in the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan, during which 400 Aztec nobles and 2,000 onlookers were killed. The Castilians were driven out of the Aztec capital, suffering heavy losses and losing all of their gold and guns duringLa Noche Triste.
On 8 July 1520, atOtumba, the Castilians and their allies, without artillery or arquebusiers, repelled 100,000 Aztecs armed with obsidian-bladed clubs. In August, 500 Castilians and 40,000 Tlaxcalans conquered the hilltop town ofTepeaca, an Aztec ally. Most of the inhabitants were either branded on the face with the letter "G" (for guerra, the Spanish word for "war") and enslaved by the Spanish, or sacrificed and eaten by the Tlaxcalans.[56] Cortés returned to Tenochtitlan in 1521 with a new invasion force and laid siege to the Aztec capital in May, which was suffering from asmallpox epidemic that killed thousands. The new emperor,Cuauhtémoc, defended Tenochtitlan with 100,000 warriors armed with slings, bows, andobsidian clubs. The first military encounter occurred after an advance along the causeway atTlacopan by the armies of Alvarado andCristóbal de Olid. While fighting on the causeway, the Spanish and their allies came under attack from both sides by Aztecs firing arrows from canoes. Thirteen Spanish brigantines sank 300 out of 400 enemy war canoes sent against them. The Aztecs tried to damage the Spanish vessels by hiding spears beneath the shallow water. The attackers breached the city and engaged in fighting with the Aztec defenders in the streets.
The Aztecs defeated the Spanish-Tlaxcalan forces at theBattle of Colhuacatonco on 30 June 1521. Following this Aztec victory, 53 Spanish prisoners were paraded to the tops ofTlatelolco's highestpyramids and publiclysacrificed.[57] In late July, the attackers resumed their assaults, resulting in the massacre of 800 Aztec civilians. By 29 July, the Spanish had reached Tlatelolco's center, raising their new flag atop the city's twin towers. Having exhausted their gunpowder, they attempted a catapult breach but failed. On 3 August, 12,000 more civilians were killed in another city section.[58] Alvarado's destruction of the aqueducts forced the Aztecs to drink from the lake, causing disease and thousands of deaths. Another major assault occurred on 12 August, during which many thousands of non-combatants were massacred in their shelters.[59] The following day, the city fell and Cuauhtémoc was captured. At least 100,000 Aztecs died during the siege, while 100 Spaniards and up to 30,000 of their Indigenous allies were killed or died from disease.
Thefall of Tenochtitlan marked the beginning of Spanish colonial rule in Mexico, leading to the establishment of theViceroyalty of New Spain in 1535. Following the conquest of the Aztec Empire in 1521, Spanish conquistador Pedro de Alvarado commenced the conquest of northern Central America in 1523. By 1528, most of the majorMaya kingdoms had been subjugated, with only thePetén Basin remaining outside Spanish control. The last independent Maya kingdoms were finally defeated in 1697 during theSpanish conquest of Petén.
In 1532,Francisco Pizarro conquered theInca Empire by capturing its leaderAtahualpa during a surprise attack inCajamarca that resulted in the massacre of thousands of Incas.[60] This conquest facilitated the establishment of theViceroyalty of Peru in 1542, allowing Spain to exert control over territories in western South America, comprising present-day Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, and parts of Chile and Argentina. In southern Chile, the Spanish faced resistance from the Mapuche people for centuries (Arauco War, lasting from the 1540s into the 1800s).
By the mid-17th century, Spain's global empire burdened its economic, administrative, and military resources. Over the preceding century, Spanish troops had fought in France, Germany, and the Netherlands, suffering heavy casualties.[63] Despite its vast holdings, Spain's military lacked essential modernization and heavily relied on foreign suppliers.[63] Nevertheless, Spain possessed abundant bullion from the Americas, which played a crucial role in both sustaining its military endeavors and meeting the needs of its civilian population. During this period, Spain displayed limited military interest in its overseas colonies. TheCriollo elites (colonial-born Spaniards) andmestizo andmulatto militia (of mixed Indigenous-Spanish and African-Spanish descent) provided only minimal protection, often assisted by more influential allies with vested interests in maintaining the balance of power and safeguarding the Spanish Empire from falling into enemy hands.[63]
Spain's economic and demographic recovery had begun slowly in the last decades of the Habsburg reign, as was evident from the growth of its trading convoys and the much more rapid growth of illicit trade during the period. (This growth was slower than the growth of illicit trade by northern rivals in the empire's markets.) However, this recovery was not then translated into institutional improvement, rather the "proximate solutions to permanent problems."[65] This legacy of neglect was reflected in the early years of Bourbon rule in which the military was ill-advisedly pitched into battle in theWar of the Quadruple Alliance (1718–20). Spain was defeated in Italy by an alliance of Britain, France, Savoy, and Austria. Following the war, the new Bourbon monarchy took a much more cautious approach to international relations, relying on a family alliance with Bourbon France, and continuing to follow a program of institutional renewal.
The crown program to enact reforms that promoted administrative control and efficiency in the metropole to the detriment of interests in the colonies, undermined creole elites' loyalty to the crown. When French forces ofNapoleon Bonaparteinvaded the Iberian peninsula in 1808, Napoleon ousted the Spanish Bourbon monarchy, placing his brotherJoseph Bonaparte on the Spanish throne. There was a crisis of legitimacy of crown rule in Spanish America, leading to theSpanish American wars of independence (1808–1826).
The Spanish Bourbons' broadest intentions were to reorganize the institutions of empire to better administer it for the benefit of Spain and the crown. It sought to increase revenues and to assert greater crown control, including over the Catholic Church. Centralization of power (beginning with theNueva Planta decrees against the realms of theCrown of Aragon) was to be for the benefit of the crown and the metropole and for the defense of its empire against foreign incursions.[66] From the viewpoint of Spain, the structures of colonial rule under the Habsburgs were no longer functioning to the benefit of Spain, with much wealth being retained in Spanish America and going to other European powers. The presence of other European powers in the Caribbean, with the English inBarbados (1627),St Kitts (1623–25), andJamaica (1655); the Dutch inCuraçao, and the French in Saint Domingue (Haiti) (1697),Martinique, andGuadeloupe had broken the integrity of the closed Spanish mercantile system and established thriving sugar colonies.[67][43]
At the beginning of his reign, the first Spanish Bourbon, King Philip V, reorganized the government to strengthen the executive power of the monarch as was done in France, in place of the deliberative,Polysynodial System of Councils.[68]
In 1717–18, the structures for governing the Indies, theConsejo de Indias and theCasa de Contratación, which governed investments in the cumbersomeSpanish treasure fleets, were transferred fromSeville toCádiz, where foreign merchant houses had easier access to the Indies trade.[69] Cádiz became the one port for all Indies trading (seeflota system). Individual sailings at regular intervals were slow to displace the traditional armed convoys, but by the 1760s there were regular ships plying the Atlantic from Cádiz toHavana andPuerto Rico, and at longer intervals to theRío de la Plata, where an additionalviceroyalty was created in 1776. The contraband trade that was the lifeblood of the Habsburg empire declined in proportion to registered shipping (a shipping registry having been established in 1735).
Two upheavals registered unease within Spanish America and at the same time demonstrated the renewed resiliency of the reformed system: theTupac Amaru uprising in Peru in 1780 and therebellion of thecomuneros ofNew Granada, both in part reactions to tighter, more efficient control.
The 18th century was a century of prosperity for the overseas Spanish Empire as trade within grew steadily, particularly in the second half of the century, under the Bourbon reforms. Spain's victory in theBattle of Cartagena de Indias against a British expedition in the Caribbean port ofCartagena de Indias helped Spain secure its dominance of its possessions in the Americas until the 19th century. But different regions fared differently under Bourbon rule, and even while New Spain was particularly prosperous, it was also marked by steep wealth inequality. Silver production boomed in New Spain during the 18th century, with output more than tripling between the start of the century and the 1750s. The economy and the population both grew, both centered around Mexico City. But while mine owners and the crown benefited from the flourishing silver economy, most of the population in the rural Bajío faced rising land prices, falling wages. Eviction of many from their lands resulted.[70]
With a Bourbon monarchy came a repertory of Bourbonmercantilist ideas based on a centralized state, put into effect in the Americas slowly at first but with increasing momentum during the century. Shipping grew rapidly from the mid-1740s until theSeven Years' War (1756–63), reflecting in part the success of the Bourbons in bringing illicit trade under control. With the loosening of trade controls after the Seven Years' War, shipping trade within the empire once again began to expand, reaching an extraordinary rate of growth in the 1780s.
The end of Cádiz's monopoly of trade with the American colonies brought about very important changes, particularly a rebirth of Spanish manufactures. Most notable of those changes were both the beginning ofCatalan participation in the Spanishslave trade, and the rapidly growing textile industry of Catalonia which by the mid-1780s saw the first signs of industrialization. This saw the emergence of a small, politically active commercial class inBarcelona. This isolated pocket of advanced economic development stood in stark contrast to the relative backwardness of most of the country. Most of the improvements were in and around some major coastal cities and the major islands such as Cuba, with its tobaccoplantations, and a renewed growth ofprecious metals mining in South America.
Agricultural productivity remained low despite efforts to introduce new techniques to what was for the most part an uninterested, exploited peasant and laboring groups. Governments were inconsistent in their policies. Though there were substantial improvements by the late 18th century, Spain was still an economic backwater. Under themercantile trading arrangements it had difficulty in providing the goods being demanded by the strongly growing markets of its empire, and providing adequate outlets for the return trade.
From an opposing point of view according to the "backwardness" mentioned above the naturalist and explorerAlexander von Humboldt traveled extensively throughout the Spanish Americas, exploring and describing it for the first time from a modern scientific point of view between 1799 and 1804. In his workPolitical essay on the kingdom of New Spain containing researches relative to the geography of Mexico he says that the Amerindians ofNew Spain were wealthier than any Russian or German peasant in Europe.[71] According to Humboldt, despite the fact that Indian farmers were poor, under Spanish rule they were free and slavery was non-existent, their conditions were much better than any other peasant or farmer innorthern Europe.[72]
Humboldt also published a comparative analysis of bread and meat consumption in New Spain compared to other cities in Europe such as Paris.Mexico City consumed 189 pounds of meat per person per year, in comparison to 163 pounds consumed by the inhabitants of Paris, the Mexicans also consumed almost the same amount of bread as any European city, with 363 kilograms of bread per person per year in comparison to the 377 kilograms consumed in Paris.Caracas consumed seven times more meat per person than in Paris. Von Humboldt also said that the average income in that period was four times the European income and also that the cities of New Spain were richer than many European cities.[71]
During most of the 18th century, Spanish privateers, particularly fromSanto Domingo, were the scourge of theAntilles, with Dutch, British, French and Danish vessels as theirprizes.[75]
Spanish territorial claims on the West Coast of North America in the 18th century, contested by theRussians and the British. Most of what Spain claimed in Nootka was not directly occupied or controlled.
Spain claimed all of North America in the Age of Discovery, but claims were not translated into occupation until a major resource was discovered and Spanish settlement and crown rule put in place. The French had established anempire in northern North America and took some islands in the Caribbean. The English established colonies on the eastern seaboard of North America and in northern North America and some Caribbean islands as well. In the eighteenth century, the Spanish crown realized that its territorial claims needed to be defended, particularly in the wake of its visible weakness during the Seven Years' War when Britain captured the important Spanish ports of Havana and Manila. Another important factor was that the Russian Empire hadexpanded into North America from the mid-eighteenth century, withfur trading settlements in what is nowAlaska and forts as far south asFort Ross, California. Great Britain was also expanding into areas that Spain claimed as its territory on the Pacific coast. Taking steps to shore up its fragile claims to California, Spain began planningCalifornia missions in 1769. Spain also began a series of voyages to the Pacific Northwest, where Russia and Great Britain were encroaching on claimed territory. TheSpanish expeditions to the Pacific Northwest, withAlessandro Malaspina and others sailing for Spain, came too late for Spain to assert its sovereignty in the Pacific Northwest.[76]
TheNootka Crisis (1789–1791) nearly brought Spain and Britain to war. It was a dispute over claims in the Pacific Northwest, where neither nation had established permanent settlements. The crisis could have led to war, but without French support Spain capitulated to British terms and negotiations took place with theNootka Convention. Spain and Great Britain agreed to not establish settlements and allowed free access to Nootka Sound on the west coast of what is nowVancouver Island. Nevertheless, the outcome of the crisis was a humiliation for Spain and a triumph for Britain, as Spain had practically renounced all sovereignty on the North Pacific coast.[77]
Spanish Empire in 1790. In North America, Spain claimed lands west of the Mississippi River and the Pacific coast from California to Alaska, but it did not control them on the ground. The crown constructed missions andpresidios in coastal California and sent maritime expeditions to the Pacific Northwest to assert sovereignty.
The growth of trade and wealth in the colonies caused increasing political tensions as frustration grew with the improving but still restrictive trade with Spain.Alessandro Malaspina's recommendation to turn the empire into a looserconfederation to help improve governance and trade so as to quell the growing political tensions between the élites of the empire's periphery and center was suppressed by a monarchy afraid of losing control. All was to be swept away by the tumult that was to overtake Europe at the turn of the 19th century with theFrench Revolutionary andNapoleonic Wars.
The first major territory Spain was to lose in the 19th century was the vastLouisiana Territory, which had few European settlers. It stretched north to Canada and was ceded by France in 1763 under the terms of theTreaty of Fontainebleau. The French, under Napoleon, took back possession as part of theTreaty of San Ildefonso in 1800 and sold it to the United States in theLouisiana Purchase of 1803. Napoleon's sale of the Louisiana Territory to the United States in 1803 caused border disputes between the United States and Spain that, with rebellions inWest Florida (1810) and in the remainder of Louisiana at the mouth of theMississippi River, led to their eventual cession to the United States.
Spanish American Wars of Independence
The Americas towards the year 1800, the colored territories were considered provinces in some maps of the Spanish Empire.
In 1808,Napoleon managed to place the Spanish king under his control, effectively seizing power without facing resistance. This action sparked resistance from the Spanish people, leading to thePeninsular War. This conflict created a power vacuum lasting nearly a decade, followed by civil wars, transitions to a republic, and eventually the establishment of a liberal democracy. Spain lost all the colonial possessions in the first third of the century, except for Cuba, Puerto Rico and, isolated on the far side of the globe, the Philippines, Guam and nearby Pacific islands, as well as Spanish Sahara, parts of Morocco, and Spanish Guinea.
The wars of independence in Spanish America were triggered by anotherfailed British attempt to seize Spanish American territory, this time in theRío de la Plata estuary in 1806. The viceroy retreated hastily to the hills when defeated by a small British force. However, when theCriollos' militias and colonial army decisively defeated the now reinforced British force in 1807, they promptly embarked on the path to securing their own independence, igniting independence movements across the continent. A long period of wars followed in the Americas, and the lack of Spanish troops in the colonies led to war betweenpatriotic rebels and local Royalists. In South America this period of wars led to the independence ofArgentina (1810),Gran Colombia (1810),Chile (1810),Paraguay (1811) andUruguay (1815, but subsequently ruled by Brazil until 1828).José de San Martín campaigned for independence in Chile (1818) and inPeru (1821). Further north,Simón Bolívar led forces that won independence between 1811 and 1826 for the area that becameVenezuela,Colombia,Ecuador,Peru andBolivia (thenUpper Peru).Panama declared independence in 1821 and merged with the Republic of Gran Colombia (from 1821 to 1903).Mexico gained independence in 1821 after more than a decade of struggle, following the War of Independence that began in 1810. Mexico's independence led to the independence of Central American provinces—Guatemala,Honduras,El Salvador,Nicaragua, andCosta Rica—by 1823.
As in South America, theMexican War of Independence was a struggle between Latin Americans fighting for independence and Latin Americans fighting to remain loyal to Spanish rule under KingFerdinand VII. Throughout the eleven years of fighting, Spain sent only 9,685 troops to Mexico.[79] Over the course of nine years, 20,000 Spanish soldiers were sent to reinforce the Spanish American Royalists in northern South America. However, disease and combat claimed the lives of 16,000–17,000 of these soldiers. Even within the Viceroyalty of Peru, the center of Spanish power in South America, the majority of the Royalist army consisted of Americans. After theBattle of Ayacucho in 1824, the captured Royalist army consisted of 1,512 Spanish Americans and only 751 Spaniards. Only 6,000 troops were sent to Peru directly from Spain, although others arrived from neighboring theaters of operation.[80] In 1829, Spain attempted toreconquer Mexico with only 3,000 troops.[81] In contrast, Spain demonstrated a greater military commitment in the Caribbean, sending 30,000 troops toSanto Domingo in 1861 and maintaining a force of 100,000 soldiers in Cuba in 1876.[82]
Last territories in the Americas and the Pacific (1833–1898)
Towns controlled by the Spanish Army in Santo Domingo on 1 December 1864 (solid red), and towns occupied earlier in November 1864 (red outline).
In the 1850s and 1860s, Spain engaged in colonial activities around the world, including on the west coast of South America (Chincha Islands War), in Vietnam (Cochinchina campaign), and in Mexico. In 1861, Spainannexed Santo Domingo, which had been independent fromSpain since 1821[83][84] and fromHaiti since 1844.[85][86] This led to a guerrilla war in 1863. By the time Spain withdrew from Santo Domingo in 1865, it had spent over 33 million pesos fighting insurgents, with 10,888 Spanish soldiers killed or wounded in action and 18,000 dead from all causes.[87] Dominicans who had sided with Spain relocated to Cuba, where they later played a key role in helping Cuban rebels defeat Spanish detachments and gain control of much of eastern Cuba during theTen Years' War.[82]
In Cuba, the First War for Independence was fought from 1868 to 1878, resulting in between 100,000 and 150,000 Cuban deaths.[88] TheSecond War for Independence occurred between 1895 and 1898, during which approximately 300,000 Cubans died, with around 200,000 civilian deaths attributed to disease and famine caused bySpanish concentration camps.[89] Two contemporary sources estimated that by December 1895, the rebel army had lost between 29,850 and 42,800 men, and many Cuban generals were killed in combat.[89]
American sympathy for Cuban revolutionaries grew due to reports of atrocities and the sinking ofUSSMaine. On 25 April 1898, the U.S. declared war on Spain, marking the start of theSpanish-American War. The destruction of Spain's Pacific and Caribbean fleets atManila Bay andSantiago de Cuba severed supply lines, leading to the surrender of Spanish garrisons in the Philippines, Cuba, and Puerto Rico, the last two of which were theremaining territories of the empire in theAmericas. The war ended with theTreaty of Paris (1898), which cededCuba,Puerto Rico, andGuam to the U.S. and sold the Philippines for US$20 million.[90] The following year, Spain then sold its remaining Pacific Ocean possessions to Germany in theGerman–Spanish Treaty, retaining only its African territories. On 2 June 1899, the second expeditionary battalionCazadores of Philippines, the last Spanish garrison in the Philippines, which had beenbesieged inBaler, Aurora at war's end, was pulled out, effectively ending around 300 years of Spanish hegemony in the archipelago.[91]
In 1778,Fernando Pó (now Bioko), adjacent islets, and commercial rights to the mainland between theNiger andOgooué rivers were ceded to Spain by the Portuguese in exchange for territory in South America (Treaty of El Pardo). In the 19th century, some Spanish explorers and missionaries would cross this zone, among themManuel Iradier. In 1848, Spanish troops occupied the uninhabitedChafarinas Islands, anticipating a French move on the rocks located off the North-African coast.
In 1860, after theTetuan War,Morocco paid Spain 100 million pesetas aswar reparations and cededSidi Ifni to Spain as a part of theTreaty of Tangiers, on the basis of the old outpost of Santa Cruz de la Mar Pequeña, thought to be Sidi Ifni. The following decades of Franco-Spanish collaboration resulted in the establishment and extension of Spanish protectorates south of the city, and Spanish influence obtained international recognition in theBerlin Conference of 1884: Spain administered Sidi Ifni andSpanish Sahara jointly. Spain claimed aprotectorate over the coast ofGuinea fromCape Bojador toCap Blanc, too, and even try to press a claim over theAdrar andTiris regions inMauritania.Río Muni became a protectorate in 1885 and a colony in 1900. Conflicting claims to the Guinea mainland were settled in 1900 by theTreaty of Paris, because of which Spain was left with a mere 26,000 km2 out of the 300,000 stretching east to theUbangi River which they initially claimed.[92]
Spanish territories in Africa (1914)
Following abrief war in 1893, Morocco paid war reparations of 20 million pesetas and Spain expanded its influence south from Melilla. In 1912, Morocco wasdivided between the French and Spanish. TheRiffians rebelled, led byAbdelkrim, a former officer for the Spanish administration. TheBattle of Annual (1921) during theRif War was a major military defeat suffered by the Spanish army against Moroccan insurgents. A leading Spanish politician emphatically declared: "We are at the most acute period of Spanish decadence".[93] After the disaster of Annual, Spain beganusing German chemical weapons against the Moroccans. In September 1925, theAlhucemas landing by the Spanish Army and Navy with a small collaboration of an allied French contingent put an end to the Rif War. It is considered the first successful amphibious landing in history supported by seaborne air power and tanks.[94]
Spanish officers in Africa in 1920
In 1923,Tangier was declared an international city under French, Spanish, British, and later Italianjoint administration. In 1926, Bioko and Rio Muni were united as the colony ofSpanish Guinea, a status that would last until 1959. In 1931, following the fall of the monarchy, the African colonies became part of theSecond Spanish Republic. In 1934, during the government of Prime MinisterAlejandro Lerroux, Spanish troops led by General Osvaldo Capaz landed in Sidi Ifni and carried out the occupation of the territory, cededde jure by Morocco in 1860. Two years later,Francisco Franco, a general of theArmy of Africa, rebelled against the republican government and started theSpanish Civil War (1936–39). During the Second World War theVichy French presence in Tangier was overcome by that ofFrancoist Spain.
Spain lacked the wealth and the interest to develop an extensive economic infrastructure in its African colonies during the first half of the 20th century. However, through apaternalistic system, particularly onBioko Island, Spain developed largecocoa plantations for which thousands of Nigerian workers were imported as laborers.
In 1956, whenFrench Morocco became independent, Spain surrenderedSpanish Morocco to the new nation, but retained control of Sidi Ifni, theTarfaya region andSpanish Sahara. MoroccanSultan (later King)Mohammed V was interested in these territories and unsuccessfully invaded Spanish Sahara in 1957, in theIfni War, or in Spain, the Forgotten War (la Guerra Olvidada). In 1958, Spain ceded Tarfaya to Mohammed V and joined the previously separate districts ofSaguia el-Hamra (in the north) andRío de Oro (in the south) to form the province ofSpanish Sahara.
In 1959, the Spanish territory on theGulf of Guinea was established with a status similar to the provinces of metropolitan Spain. As the Spanish Equatorial Region, it was ruled by agovernor general exercising military and civilian powers. The first local elections were held in 1959, and the first Equatoguinean representatives were seated in theSpanish parliament. Under the Basic Law of December 1963, limited autonomy was authorized under a joint legislative body for the territory's two provinces. The name of the country was changed toEquatorial Guinea. In March 1968, under pressure from Equatoguinean nationalists and the United Nations, Spain announced that it would grant the country independence.
In 1969, under international pressure, Spain returned Sidi Ifni to Morocco. Spanish control of Spanish Sahara endured until the 1975Green March prompted a withdrawal, under Moroccan military pressure. The future of this former Spanish colony remains uncertain.
TheCanary Islands and Spanish cities in the African mainland are considered an equal part of Spain and theEuropean Union but have a different tax system.
Morocco still claims Ceuta, Melilla, andplazas de soberanía even though they are internationally recognized as administrative divisions of Spain.Isla Perejilwas occupied on 11 July 2002 by Moroccan Gendarmerie and troops, who were evicted bySpanish naval forces in a bloodless operation.
Cerro de Potosí, discovered in 1545, the rich, sole source of silver from Peru, worked by compulsory indigenous labor calledmit'a.Main trade routes of the Spanish Empire
The Spanish Empire benefited from favorablefactor endowments from its overseas possessions with their large, exploitable indigenous populations and rich mining areas.[95] Thus the crown attempted to create and maintain a classic closedmercantile system, warding off competitors and keeping wealth within the empire, specifically within the Crown of Castile. While in theory the Habsburgs were committed to maintaining a state monopoly, the reality was that the empire was a porous economic realm with widespread smuggling. In the 16th and 17th centuries under the Habsburgs, Spain's economic conditions gradually declined, especially in regards to the industrial development of its French, Dutch, and English rivals. Many of the goods being exported to the Empire originated from manufacturers in northwest Europe rather than in Spain. Illicit commercial activities became a part of the Empire's administrative structure. Supported by large flows of silver from the Americas, trade prohibited by Spanish mercantilist restrictions flourished as it provided a source of income to both crown officials and private merchants.[96] The local administrative structure inBuenos Aires, for example, was established through its oversight of both legal and illegal commerce.[97] The crown's pursuit of wars to maintain and expand territory, defend the Catholic faith, stamp out Protestantism, and beat back the Ottoman Turkish strength outstripped its ability to pay for it all, despite the huge production of silver in Peru and New Spain. Most of that flow paid mercenary soldiers in the European religious wars of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and paid foreign merchants for the consumer goods manufactured in northern Europe. Paradoxically, the wealth of the Indies impoverished Spain and enriched northern Europe, a course theBourbon monarchs would later attempt to reverse in the eighteenth century.[98]
This was well acknowledged in Spain, with writers on political economy, thearbitristas, sending the crown lengthy analyses in the form of "memorials, of the perceived problems and with proposed solutions."[99][100] According to these thinkers, "Royal expenditure must be regulated, the sale of office halted, the growth of the church checked. The tax system must be overhauled, special concessions be made to agricultural laborers, rivers be made navigable and dry lands irrigated. In this way alone could Castile's productivity increase, its commerce restored, and its humiliating dependence on foreigners, on the Dutch and the Genoese, be brought to an end."[101]
From 1715 to 1759, a third of Spanish ship production was from theHavana shipyard. In 1735, its expansion, in the same port, meant an increase in construction capacity. This shipyard in the 18th century developed the most complete dockyard in the New World.[102]
Since the early days of the Caribbean and conquest era, the crown attempted to control trade between Spain and the Indies with restrictive policies enforced by the House of Trade (est. 1503) inSeville. Shipping was through particular ports in Castile: Seville, and subsequently Cádiz, Spanish America:Veracruz,Acapulco, Havana,Cartagena de Indias, andCallao/Lima, and the Philippines:Manila. There were very few Spanish settlers in the Indies in the very early period and Spain could supply sufficient goods to them. But as the Aztec and Inca empires were conquered in the early sixteenth century, and large deposits of silver found in both Mexico and Peru, Spanish immigration increased and the demand for goods rose far beyond Spain's ability to supply it. Since Spain had little capital to invest in the expanding trade and no significant commercial group, bankers and commercial houses inGenoa, Germany, theNetherlands,France, andEngland supplied both investment capital and goods in a supposedly closed system. Even in the sixteenth century, Spain recognized that the idealized closed system did not function in reality. Since the crown did not alter its restrictive structure or advocate fiscal prudence, despite the pleas of thearbitristas, the Indies trade remained nominally in the hands of Spain, but in fact enriched the other European countries.
TheSpanish dollar, natively called Peso, was the main coin of the Spanish Empire, this coin is from 1739.
The crown established the system oftreasure fleets (Spanish:flota) to protect the conveyance of silver to Seville (later Cádiz). Produced in other European countries, Sevillian merchants conveyed consumer goods that were registered and taxed by the House of Trade, and then sent to the Indies. Other European commercial interests came to dominate supply, with Spanish merchant houses and their guilds (consulados) in both Spain and the Indies acting as mere middlemen, reaping a slice of the profits. However, those profits did not promote a manufacturing sector in Spain's economic development, and its economy continued to be based in agriculture. The wealth of the Indies led to prosperity in northern Europe, particularly in the Netherlands and England, which were both Protestant. As Spain's power weakened in the seventeenth century, England, the Netherlands, and the French took advantage overseas by seizing islands in the Caribbean, which became bases for a burgeoning contraband trade in Spanish America. Crown officials, who were supposed to suppress contraband trade, were quite often in cahoots with the foreigners, since it was a source of personal enrichment. In Spain, the crown itself participated in collusion with foreign merchant houses, since they paid fines "meant to establish a compensation to the state for losses through fraud." It became a calculated risk for merchant houses doing business, and for the crown it gained income that would have otherwise been lost. Foreign merchants were part of the supposed monopoly system of trade. The transfer of the House of Trade from Seville to Cádiz meant foreign merchant houses had even easier access to the Spanish trade.[103]
The Spanish imperial economy's majorglobal impact wassilver mining. The mines in Peru and Mexico were in the hands of a few elite mining entrepreneurs with access to capital and a stomach for the risk that mining entailed. They operated under a system of royal licensing, since the crown held the rights to subsoil wealth. Mining entrepreneurs assumed all the risk of the enterprise, while the crown gained a 20% slice of the profits, theroyal fifth ("quinto real"). Further adding to the crown's revenues in mining was that it held a monopoly on the mercury supply, used for separating pure silver from silver ore in thepatio process. The crown kept the price high, thereby depressing the volume of silver production.[104] Protecting its flow from Mexico and Peru as it transited to ports for shipment to Spain resulted early on in a convoy system (the flota) sailing twice a year. Its success can be judged by the fact that the silver fleet was captured only once, in 1628 by Dutch privateerPiet Hein. That loss resulted in the bankruptcy of the Spanish crown and an extended period of economic depression in Spain.[105]
One practice the Spanish used to gather workers for the mines was calledrepartimiento. This was a rotational forced labor system where indigenous pueblos were obligated to send laborers to work in Spanish mines and plantations for a set number of days out of the year. Repartimiento was not implemented to replaceslave labor, but instead existed alongside free wage labor, slavery, andindentured labor. It was, however, a way for the Spanish to procure cheap labor, thus boosting the mining-driven economy.
The men who worked as repartimiento laborers were not always resistant to the practice. Some were drawn to the labor as a way to supplement the wages they earned cultivating fields so as to support their families and, of course, paytributes. At first, a Spaniard could get repartimiento laborers to work for them with permission from a crown official, such as aviceroy, only on the basis that this labor was absolutely necessary to provide the country with important resources. This condition became laxer as the years went on, and various enterprises had repartimiento laborers who would work in dangerous conditions for long hours and low wages.[106]
Cover of the English translation of the Asiento contract signed by Britain and Spain in 1713 as part of the Utrecht treaty that ended the War of Spanish Succession. The contract broke the monopoly of Spanish slave traders to sell slaves in Spanish America.
During the Bourbon era, economic reforms sought to reverse the pattern that left Spain impoverished with no manufacturing sector and its colonies' need for manufactured goods supplied by other nations. It attempted to establish a closed trading system, but it was hampered by the terms of the 1713Treaty of Utrecht. The treaty ending theWar of the Spanish Succession, with a victory for the Bourbon French candidate for the throne, had a provision for British merchants to legally sell slaves with a license (Asiento de Negros)slaves to Spanish America. The provision undermined the possibility of a revamped Spanish monopoly system. The merchants also used the opportunity to engage in contraband trade of their manufactured goods. Crown policy sought to make legal trade more appealing than contraband by instituting free commerce (comercio libre) in 1778, whereby Spanish American ports could trade with each other, and they could trade with any port in Spain. It was aimed at revamping a closed Spanish system and outflanking the increasingly powerful British. Silver production revived in the eighteenth century, with production far surpassing the earlier output. The crown reduced the taxes on mercury, meaning that a greater volume of pure silver could be refined. Silver mining absorbed most of the available capital in Mexico and Peru, and the crown emphasized the production of precious metals, which were sent to Spain. There was some economic development in the Indies to supply food, but a diversified economy did not emerge.[104] The economic reforms of the Bourbon era both shaped and were themselves impacted by geopolitical developments in Europe. TheBourbon Reforms arose out of the War of the Spanish Succession. In turn, the crown's attempt to tighten its control over its colonial markets in the Americas led to further conflict with other European powers who were vying for access to them. After a sparking a series of skirmishes throughout the 1700s over its stricter policies, Spain's reformed trade system led to war with Britain in 1796.[107] In the Americas, meanwhile, economic policies enacted under the Bourbons had different impacts in different regions. On one hand, silver production in New Spain greatly increased and led to economic growth. But much of the profits of the revitalized mining sector went to mining elites and state officials, while in rural areas of New Spain conditions for rural workers deteriorated, contributing to social unrest that would impact subsequent revolts.[70]
TheSpanish American Enlightenment produced a huge body of information on Spain's overseas empire via scientific expeditions. The most famous traveler in Spanish America was Prussian scientist Alexander von Humboldt, whose travel writings, especiallyPolitical Essay on the Kingdom of New Spain and scientific observations remain important sources for the history of Spanish America. Humboldt's expedition was authorized by the crown, but was self-funded from his personal fortune. The Bourbon crown promoted state-funded scientific work prior to the famous Humboldt expedition. Eighteenth-century clerics contributed to the expansion of scientific knowledge.[108] These includeJosé Antonio de Alzate y Ramírez,[109] andJosé Celestino Mutis.
Much of the research done in the eighteenth century was never published or otherwise disseminated, in part due to budgetary constraints on the crown. Starting in the late twentieth century, research on thehistory of science in Spain and the Spanish empire has blossomed, with primary sources being published in scholarly editions or reissued, as well the publication of a considerable number of important scholarly studies.[113]
Although the Spanish Empire declined from its apogee in the late seventeenth century, it remained a wonder for other Europeans for its sheer geographical span.Writing in 1738, English authorSamuel Johnson questioned, "Has heaven reserved, in pity to the poor,/No pathless waste or undiscovered shore,/No secret island in the boundless main,/No peaceful desert yet unclaimed by Spain?"[114]
The Spanish Empire left a huge linguistic, religious, political, cultural, and urban architectural legacy in theWestern Hemisphere. With over 470 million native speakers today, Spanish is the secondmost spoken native language in the world, as result of the introduction of the language of Castile—Castilian, "Castellano" —from Iberia to Spanish America, later expanded by the governments of successor independent republics. In the Philippines, theSpanish–American War (1898) brought the islands under U.S. jurisdiction, with English being imposed in schools and Spanish becominga secondary official language. Many indigenous languages throughout the empire were often lost either as indigenous populations were decimated by war and disease, or as indigenous people mixed with colonists, and the Spanish language was taught and spread over time.[115]
An important cultural legacy of the Spanish empire overseas isRoman Catholicism, which remains the main religious faith in Spanish America and the Philippines. Christian evangelization of indigenous peoples was a key responsibility of the crown and a justification for its imperial expansion. Although indigenous were considered neophytes and insufficiently mature in their faith for indigenous men to be ordained to the priesthood, the indigenous were part of the Catholic community of faith. Catholic orthodoxy was enforced by theInquisition, particularly targetingcrypto-Jews and Protestants. Not until after their independence in the nineteenth century did Spanish American republics allowreligious toleration of other faiths. Observances of Catholic holidays often have strong regional expressions and remain important in many parts of Spanish America. Observances includeDay of the Dead,Carnival,Holy Week,Corpus Christi,Epiphany, and national saints' days, such as theVirgin of Guadalupe in Mexico.
Politically, the colonial era has strongly influenced modern Spanish America. The territorial divisions of the empire in Spanish America became the basis for boundaries between new republics after independence and for state divisions within countries. It is often argued that the rise ofcaudillismo during and after Latin American independence movements created a legacy of authoritarianism in the region.[116] There was no significant development of representative institutions during the colonial era, and the executive power was often made stronger than the legislative power during the national period as a result.
This has led to a popular misconception that the colonial legacy has caused the region to have an extremely oppressed proletariat. Revolts and riots are often seen as evidence of this supposed extreme oppression. However, the culture of revolting against an unpopular government is not simply a confirmation of widespread authoritarianism. The colonial legacy did leave a political culture of revolt, but not always as a desperate last act. The civil unrest of the region is seen by some as a form of political involvement. While the political context of the political revolutions in Spanish America is understood to be one in which liberal elites competed to form new national political structures, so too were those elites responding to mass lower-class political mobilization and participation.[117]
Hundreds of towns and cities in the Americas were founded during the Spanish rule, with the colonial centers and buildings of many of them now designated asUNESCO World Heritage Sites attracting tourists. The tangible heritage includes universities, forts, cities, cathedrals, schools, hospitals, missions, government buildings and colonial residences, many of which still stand today. A number of present-day roads, canals, ports or bridges sit where Spanish engineers built them centuries ago. The oldest universities in the Americas were founded by Spanish scholars and Catholic missionaries. The Spanish Empire also left a vastcultural and linguistic legacy. The cultural legacy is also present in themusic,cuisine, and fashion, some of which have been granted the status ofUNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage.
The long colonial period inSpanish America resulted in a mixing of indigenous peoples, Europeans, and Africans that wereclassified by race and hierarchically ranked, which created a markedly different society than the European colonies of North America. In concert with thePortuguese, the Spanish Empire laid the foundations of a truly global trade by opening up the great trans-oceanictrade routes and the exploration of unknown territories and oceans for the western knowledge. TheSpanish dollar became the world's first global currency.[118]
One of the features of this trade was the exchange of a great array of domesticated plants and animals between theOld World and theNew in theColumbian Exchange. Some cultivars that were introduced to the Americas included grapes, wheat, barley, apples and citrous fruits; animals that were introduced to the New World were horses, donkeys, cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, and chickens. The Old World received from the Americas such things as maize, potatoes, chili peppers, tomatoes, tobacco, beans, squash, cacao (chocolate), vanilla, avocados, pineapples, chewing gum, rubber, peanuts, cashews, Brazil nuts, pecans, blueberries, strawberries, quinoa, amaranth, chia, agave and others. The result of these exchanges was to significantly improve the agricultural potential of not only in the Americas, but also that of Europe and Asia. Diseases brought by Europeans and Africans, such as smallpox, measles, typhus, and others, devastated almost all indigenous populations that had no immunity.
There were also cultural influences, which can be seen in everything from architecture to food, music, art and law, from southern Argentina and Chile to the United States of America together with the Philippines. The complex origins and contacts of different peoples resulted in cultural influences coming together in the varied forms evident today in the former colonial areas.
Gallery
A photo ofCathedral of Mexico City. It is one of the largest cathedrals in Americas, built on the ruins of the Aztec main square.
The clock ofComayagua Cathedral's bell tower inHonduras is one of the oldest clocks in Americas and the oldest still working in the world.[119] It was brought from theAlhambra Arab palace to the Spanish colonies during the 17th century.
^... In August, the Duke besieged Ceuta [The city was simultaneously besieged by the moors and a Castilian army led by theDuke of Medina Sidónia]and took the whole city except the citadel, but with the arrival ofAfonso V in the same fleet which led him to France, he preferred to leave the square. As a consequence, this was the end of the attempted settlement of Gibraltar by converts from Judaism ... which D. Enrique de Guzmán had allowed in 1474, since he blamed them for the disaster. See Ladero Quesada, Miguel Ángel (2000), "Portugueses en la frontera de Granada" inEn la España Medieval, vol. 23 (in Spanish), p. 98,ISSN0214-3038.
^A dominated Ceuta by the Castilians would certainly have forced a share of the right to conquer theKingdom of Fez (Morocco) between Portugal and Castile instead of the Portuguese monopoly recognized by the treaty of Alcáçovas. See Coca Castañer (2004), "El papel de Granada en las relaciones castellano-portuguesas (1369–1492)", inEspacio, tiempo y forma (in Spanish), Serie III, Historia Medieval, tome 17, p. 350:... In that summer,D. Enrique de Guzmán crossed the Strait with five thousand men to conquer Ceuta, managing to occupy part of the urban area on the first thrust, but knowing that the Portuguese King was coming with reinforcements to the besieged [Portuguese],he decided to withdraw ...
^A Castilian fleet attacked thePraia's Bay inTerceira Island but the landing forces were decimated by a Portuguese counter-attack because the rowers panicked and fled with the boats. See chroniclerFrutuoso, Gaspar (1963)-Saudades da Terra (in Portuguese), Edição do Instituto Cultural de Ponta Delgada, volume 6, chapter I, p. 10. See alsoCordeiro, António (1717)-Historia Insulana (in Portuguese), Book VI, Chapter VI, p. 257
^This was a decisive battle because after it, in spite of the Catholic Monarchs' attempts, they were unable to send new fleets to Guinea, Canary or to any part of the Portuguese empire until the end of the war. ThePerfect Prince sent an order to drown any Castilian crew captured in Guinea waters. Even the Castilian navies which left to Guinea before the signature of the peace treaty had to pay the tax ("quinto") to the Portuguese crown when returned to Castile after the peace treaty. Isabella had to ask permission to Afonso V so that this tax could be paid in Castilian harbors. Naturally all this caused a grudge against the Catholic Monarchs in Andalusia.
^Italian financiers from Milan and Genoa managed the crown's credit, while Italian generals, soldiers, and ships played a crucial role in supporting Spain's army and naval power. The Duchy of Milan served as Spain's main military base in Europe, blocking French expansion and facilitating troop movements via theSpanish Road. Milan's armaments industry provided war materials, and the Kingdom of Naples contributed recruits and taxes, which many Italians saw as exploitation for Spain's imperial ambitions, although Philip II insisted that the monarchy did not intend to exploit them.[62]
^Lynch, John. "Spanish American Independence" inThe Cambridge Encyclopedia of Latin America and the Caribbean 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press 1992, p. 218.
^The Canary's campaign:Alfonso de Palencia,Decada IVArchived 22 November 2022 at theWayback Machine, Book XXXI, Chapters VIII and IX ("preparation of 2 fleets" [to Guinea and to Canary, respectively]"so that with them King Ferdinand crush its enemies" [the Portuguese] ...). Palencia wrote that the conquest of Gran Canary was a secondary goal to facilitate the expeditions to Guinea (the real goal), a means to an end.
Alfonso de Palencia,Decada IV, book XXXII, chapter III: in 1478 a Portuguese fleet intercepted the armada of 25 navies sent by Ferdinand to conquer Gran Canary—capturing 5 of its navies plus 200 Castilians—and forced it to fled hastily and definitively from the Canary waters. This victory allowedPrince John to use the Canary Islands as an "exchange coin" in the peace treaty of Alcáçovas.
^Laughton, Leonard (1943)."Reviews".The Mariner's Mirror.29 (3). London: Society for Nautical Research: 184.Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved25 October 2015.... For four years the Castilians traded and fought; but the Portuguese were the stronger. They defeated a large Spanish fleet off Guinea in 1478, besides gaining other victories. The war ended in 1479 by Ferdinand resigning his claims to Guinea ...
... More important, Castile recognized Portugal as the sole proprietor of the Atlantic islands (excepting the Canaries) and of the African coast in the Treaty of Alcáçovas in 1479. This Treaty clause, secured by Portuguese naval successes off Africa during an otherwise unsuccessful war, eliminated the only serious rival. In Richardson, Patrick,The expansion of Europe, 1400–1660Archived 22 November 2022 at theWayback Machine (1966), Longmans,p. 48Archived 23 May 2020 at theWayback Machine
^... Castile undertakes not to allow any his subject navigate waters reserved to the Portuguese. From theCanary'sParallel onwards, the Atlantic Ocean would be aMare clausum to the Castilians. Thetreaty of Alcáçovas represented a huge victory for Portugal and resulted tremendously damaging to Castile. In Espina Barrio, Angel (2001),Antropología en Castilla y León e iberoamérica: FronterasArchived 10 April 2023 at theWayback Machine, vol. III (In Spanish), Universidad de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas de Castilla y León, p. 118,ISBN8493123110
^... Castile accepted a Portuguese monopoly on new discoveries in the Atlantic from the Canaries southward and toward the African coast. InBedini 1992, p. 53
^... With an eye to the Treaty of Alcáçovas which only permitted westerly expansion by Castile, the Crown accepted the proposals of the Italian adventurer [Christopher Columbus]because if, contrary to all expectation, he were to prove successful, a great opportunity would arise to outmanoeuvre Portugal ..., in Emmer, Piet (1999),General History of the CaribbeanArchived 22 November 2022 at theWayback Machine, vol. II, UNESCO,p. 86Archived 23 May 2020 at theWayback Machine,ISBN0333-724550
^abCollier, Simon (1992). "The non-Spanish Caribbean Islands to 1815".The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Latin America and the Caribbean (second ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 212–213.
^Frank Moya Pons ,Manual de Historia Dominicana , 11ᵃ Edición , Editora Centenario, Año 1997 (ISBN84-399-7681-X )Capítulo VIː La ganadería, el contrabando y las devastaciones (Pág. 5-Pág. 62)
^Kozlowski, Darrell J. (2010).Colonialism. Infobase Publishing. p. 84.ISBN978-1438128900.Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved21 November 2020.
^Fisher, John R. "The Spanish American empire, 1580–1808" inThe Cambridge Encyclopedia of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press 1992, pp. 204–205.
^abTutino, John (2016).New countries capitalism, revolutions, and nations in the Americas, 1750–1870. Duke University Press.ISBN978-0822361145.OCLC1107326871.
^William Gervase Clarence-Smith, 1986 "Spanish Equatorial Guinea, 1898–1940", inThe Cambridge History of Africa: From 1905 to 1940 Ed. J. D. Fage, A. D. Roberts, & Roland Anthony Oliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press>"The Cambridge History of Africa, Volume 7~ from 1905 to 1940 (0521225051, 1986)". Archived fromthe original on 20 February 2014. Retrieved23 September 2013.
^Stein, Stanley J. (2003).Silver, Trade, and War : Spain and America in the Making of early modern Europe. Johns Hopkins Univ Press.ISBN0801877555.OCLC173164546.
^Moutoukias, Zacarias (1988). "Power, Corruption, and Commerce: The Making of the Local Administrative Structure in Seventeenth-Century Buenos Aires".The Hispanic American Historical Review.68 (4):771–801.doi:10.2307/2515681.ISSN0018-2168.JSTOR2515681.
^Tutino, John (2018).In The Mexican Heartland: How Communities Shaped Capitalism, a Nation, and World History, 1500–2000. Princeton University Press. pp. 57–90.
Aldridge, Alfred Owen (1971).The Ibero-American Enlightenment. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
^Saladino García, Alberto (1990).Dos científicos de la Ilustración hispanoamericana: J.A. Alzate y F.J. de Caldas (in Spanish). Mexico: UNAM.
Codding, Mitchell A. (1994). "Perfecting the geography of New Spain: Alzate and the Cartographic legacy of Sigüenza y Góngora".Colonial Latin American Review.2 (1–2):185–219.doi:10.1080/10609169408569828.
^Pérez Arbeláez, Enrique (1983) [1967].José Celestino Mutis y la real expedición botánica del Nuevo Reyno de Granada (in Spanish) (2nd. ed.). Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Cultura Hispánica.
^Rickett, Harold W. (1947). "The Royal Botanical Expedition to New Spain".Chronica Botanica.11 (1):1–81.
de Solano, Francisco, ed. (1987).La Real Expedición Botánica a Nueva España, 1787–1800 (in Spanish). Madrid: CSIC.
^Engstrand, Iris H. W. (1981).Spanish Scientists in the New World: The Eighteenth-Century Expeditions. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Bleichmar, Daniela (2012).Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions & Visible Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
De Vos, Paula S. (June 2006). "Research, Development, and Empire: State Support of Science in Spain and Spanish America, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries".Colonial Latin America Review.15 (1):55–79.doi:10.1080/10609160600607432.S2CID218576951.
^Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge (2006).Nature, Empire, and Nation: Explorations in the History of Science in the Iberian World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bleichmar, Daniela, ed. (2008).Science in the Spanish and Portuguese Empires, 1500–800. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Peset, José Luis, ed. (1989).Ciencia, vida, y espacio en Iberoamérica (in Spanish). Madrid: CSIC.
Franklin Safier, Neil (2008).Measuring the New World: Enlightenment Science and South America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
^quoted in Simon Collier, "The Spanish Conquests, 1492–1580" inThe Cambridge Encyclopedia of Latin America and the Caribbean. New York: Cambridge University Press 1992, p. 194.
^Hamel, Rainer Enrique (1995), "Indigenous education in Latin America: policies and legal frameworks",Linguistic Human Rights, De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 271–288,doi:10.1515/9783110866391.271,ISBN978-3110866391
^Chiaramonte, José Carlos (1 August 2010). "The "Ancient Constitution" after Independence (1808–1852)".Hispanic American Historical Review.90 (3):455–488.doi:10.1215/00182168-2010-003.ISSN0018-2168.
Brading, D.A. (1993).The First America: Spanish Monarchy, Creole Patriots, and the Liberal State, 1492–1866. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0521447966.
Bushnell, Amy (1981).The King's Coffer: Proprietors of the Spanish Florida Treasury 1565–1702. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.ISBN978-0813006901.
Lynch, John (1989).Bourbon Spain, 1700–1808. New York.ISBN978-0631192459.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
McAmis, Robert Day (2002).Malay Muslims: The History and Challenge of Resurgent Islam in Southeast Asia. Eerdmans.ISBN978-0802849458.
Mecham, J. Lloyd (1966).Church and State in Latin America: A History of Politico-Ecclesiastical Relations (revised ed.). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Stein, Stanley J.; Stein, Barbara H. (2000).Silver, Trade, and War: Spain and America in the Making of Early Modern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Victoria, Pablo (2005).El día que España derrotó a Inglaterra : de cómo Blas de Lezo, tuerto, manco y cojo, venció en Cartagena de Indias a la otra "Armada Invencible" (in Spanish) (1st ed.). Barcelona: Áltera.ISBN978-8489779686.
Marley, David (2008).Wars of the Americas: A Chronology of Armed Conflict in the New World, 1492 to the Present [2 ed.]
Scheina, Robert L. (2003).Latin America's Wars Volume I: The Age of the Caudillo, 1791–1899. Brassey's.
Padilla Angulo, Fernando J. (12 January 2023).Volunteers of the Empire: War, Identity, and Spanish Imperialism, 1855–1898. Bloomsbury.ISBN978-1-350-28120-2.
Anderson, James Maxwell (2000).The History of Portugal. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood.ISBN978-0313311062.
Black, Jeremy (1996).The Cambridge illustrated atlas of warfare: Renaissance to revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University.ISBN978-0521470339.
Boyajian, James C. (2007).Portuguese Trade in Asia Under the Habsburgs, 1580–1640. Johns Hopkins University.ISBN978-0801887543.
Farriss, N.M. (1968).Crown and Clergy in Colonial Mexico, 1759–1821. London: Athlone Press.
Fisher, John (1985).Commercial Relations Between Spain and Spanish America in the Era of Free Trade, 1778–1796. Liverpool.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Kagan, Richard L.; Parker, Geoffrey (1995).Spain, Europe and the Atlantic: Essays in Honour of John H. Elliott. Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0521525114.
Kamen, Henry (1998).Philip of Spain. New Haven: Yale University.ISBN978-0300078008.
Kamen, Henry.Empire: How Spain Became a World Power, 1493–1763. New York: HarperCollins 2003.ISBN978-0060194765
Lach, Donald F.; Van Kley, Edwin J. (1994).Asia in the Making of Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago.ISBN978-0226467344.
Lynch, John (1964).Spain Under the Hapsburgs. New York.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Lynch, John (1983).The Spanish American Revolutions, 1808–1826. New York.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Marichal, Carlos; Mantecón, Matilde Souto (1994). "Silver and Situados: New Spain and the Financing of the Spanish Empire in the Caribbean in the Eighteenth Century".Hispanic American Historical Review.74 (4):587–613.doi:10.2307/2517493.JSTOR2517493.
Paquette, Gabriel B (17 January 2008).Enlightenment, governance, and reform in Spain and its empire, 1759–1808. New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2008.ISBN978-0230300521.
Parker, Geoffrey (1997).The Thirty Years' War (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.ISBN978-0415128834.
Parker, Geoffrey (1972).The Army of Flanders and the Spanish Road, 1567–1659; the logistics of Spanish victory and defeat in the Low Countries' Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0521084628.
Parker, Geoffrey (1977).The Dutch revolt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0801411366.
Parker, Geoffrey (1997).The General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century. New York: Routledge.ISBN978-0415165181.
Restall, Matthew (2007). "The Decline and Fall of the Spanish Empire?".The William and Mary Quarterly.64 (1):183–194.JSTOR4491607.
Schmidt-Nowara, Christopher; Nieto Phillips, John M., eds. (2005).Interpreting Spanish Colonialism: Empires, Nations, and Legends. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Stein, Stanley J.; Stein, Barbara H. (2003).Apogee of Empire: Spain and New Spain in the Age of Charles III, 1759–1789. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Stradling, R. A. (1988).Philip IV and the Government of Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0521323338.
Studnicki-Gizbert, Daviken (2007).A Nation upon the Ocean Sea: Portugal's Atlantic Diaspora and the Crisis of the Spanish Empire, 1492–1640. Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0198039112.