According to the all-union military service law of September 1925, the Soviet Armed Forces consisted of theRed Army, theAir Forces, theNavy, theState Political Directorate (OGPU), and theconvoy guards.[5] The OGPU was later made independent and amalgamated with theNKVD in 1934, and thus itsInternal troops were under the joint management of the Defence and Interior Commissariats. In 1989, the Soviet Armed Forces consisted of theStrategic Rocket Forces, the Ground Forces, theAir Defence Forces, the Air Forces, and the Navy, listed in their official order of importance.[2]
In the Soviet Union, generalconscription applied, which meant that all able-bodied males aged eighteen and older were drafted into the armed forces.[6] International observers regarded the armed organizations as collectively one of the strongest such forces inworld history.[7] The relative advancement and development ofthe government's militaries was a key part of thehistory of the Soviet Union.
In the context of theCold War, an academic study by therivalU.S. Department of Defense in 1984 found that the Soviets maintained a notable reach across the world and particularly insideEurope. The analysis explicitly concluded that "Soviet armies have always been massive" while "they are also highly modernized, well-equipped, and have great firepower... [as well as] mobility", which meant that "manpower and materiel combined make the present Soviet ground forces a very formidable land army." Although Sovietmilitary strategy in general merited comment, "the ground forces constituted the largest of the five Soviet military services" as of the date the research ended.[7]
Russian:Вооружённые Силы Союза Советских Социалистических Республик,Vooruzhonnyye Sily Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik
Ukrainian:Збройні Сили Союзу Радянських Соціалістичних Республік,Zbroyni Syly Soyuzu Radyansʹkykh Sotsialistychnykh Respublik
Belarusian:Узброеныя Сілы Саюза Савецкіх Сацыялістычных Рэспублік,Uzbrojenyja Sily Sajuza Savieckich Sacyjalistyčnych Respublik
Uzbek:Совет Социалистик Республикалари Иттифоқининг қуролли кучлари,Sovet Sotsialistik Respublikalari Ittifoqining qurolli kuchlari
Kazakh:Кеңестік Социалистік Республикалар Одағы Қарулы Күштері,Keńestik Socıalistik Respýblıkalar Odaǵy Qarýly Kúshteri
Georgian:საბჭოთა სოციალისტური რესპუბლიკების კავშირის შეიარაღებული ძალები,Sabch’ota Sotsialist’uri Resp’ublik’ebis K’avshiris Sheiaraghebuli Dzalebi
Azerbaijani:Совет Сосиалист Республикалары Иттифагынын Силаһлы Гүввәләри,Sovet Sosialist Respublikaları İttifaqının Silahlı Qüvvələri
Lithuanian:Tarybų Socialistinių Respublikų Sąjungos Ginkluotosios Pajėgos
Romanian (called "Moldavian" in the USSR; also known asMoldovan language): Форцеле армате але Униуна Републичилори Сочиалисть Советичь,Forțele armate ale Uniuna Republicilori Socialisti Sovietici
Latvian:Padomju Sociālistisko Republiku Savienības Bruņotie Spēki
Kyrgyz:Советтик Социалисттик Республикалар Союзу Куралдуу Күчтөрү,Sovettik Sotsialisttik Respublikalar Soyuzu Kuralduu Küçtörü
At the beginning of its existence, the Red Army functioned as a voluntary formation, without ranks or insignia. Democratic elections selected the officers. However, a decree of May 29, 1918, imposed obligatory military service for men of ages 18 to 40. To service the massive draft, theBolsheviks formed regionalMilitary commissariats (voenkomats), which still carry out this function in Russia. They should not be confused with militarypolitical commissars. Democratic election of officers was also abolished by decree, while separate quarters for officers, special forms of address, saluting, and higher pay were all reinstated.
After GeneralAleksei Brusilov offered the Bolsheviks his professional services in 1920, they decided to permit the conscription offormer officers of theImperial Russian Army. The Bolshevik authorities set up a special commission under the chair ofLev Glezarov (Лев Маркович Глезаров), and by August 1920 had drafted about 315,000 ex-officers. Most often they held the position ofmilitary advisor (voyenspets: "военспец" an abbreviation of "военный специалист", i.e., "military specialist"). A number of prominent Red Army commanders had previously served as Imperial Russian generals. In fact, a number of former Imperial military men, notably a member of theSupreme Military Council,Mikhail Bonch-Bruevich, had joined the Bolsheviks earlier.
The Bolshevik authorities assigned to every unit of the Red Army a political commissar, orpolitruk, who had the authority to override unit commanders' decisions if they ran counter to the principles of theCommunist Party of the Soviet Union. Although this sometimes resulted in inefficient command, the Party leadership considered political control over the military necessary, as the Army relied more and more on experienced officers from the pre-revolutionaryTsarist period.
This articleappears to contradict the articleBattle of Khalkhin Gol. Please discuss at thetalk page and do not remove this message until the contradictions are resolved.(August 2009)
A soldier of the Red Army, 1926, wearing thebudenovka
In 1934,Mongolia and the USSR, recognising the threat from the mounting Japanese military presence inManchuria andInner Mongolia, agreed to co-operate in the field of defence. On March 12, 1936, the co-operation increased with the ten-year Mongolian-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, which included a mutual defence protocol.
In May 1939, a Mongoliancavalry unit clashed withManchukuoan cavalry in the disputed territory east of theHalha River (also known in Russian as Халхин-Гол, Halhin Gol). There followed a clash with a Japanesedetachment, which drove the Mongolians over the river. The Soviet troops quartered there in accordance with the mutual defence protocol intervened and obliterated the detachment. Escalation of the conflict appeared imminent, and both sides spent June amassing forces. On July 1 the Japanese force numbered 38,000 troops. The combined Soviet-Mongol force had 12,500 troops. The Japanese crossed the river, but after athree-day battle their opponents threw them back over the river. The Japanese kept probing the Soviet defences throughout July, without success.
On August 20Georgy Zhukov opened a major offensive with heavy air attack and three hours ofartillerybombardment, after which threeinfantrydivisions and fivearmouredbrigades, supported by afighterregiment and masses of artillery (57,000 troops in total), stormed the 75,000 Japanese force deeply entrenched in the area. On August 23 the entire Japanese force found itself encircled, and on August 31 largely destroyed. Artillery and air attacks wiped out those Japanese who refused to surrender. Japan requested acease-fire, and the conflict concluded with an agreement between the USSR, Mongolia and Japan signed on September 15 in Moscow. In the conflict, the Red Army losses were 9,703 killed in action (KIA) and missing in action (MIA) and 15,952 wounded. The Japanese lost 25,000 KIA; the grand total was 61,000 killed, missing, wounded and taken prisoner.
Shortly after the cease-fire, the Japanese negotiated access to the battlefields to collect their dead. Finding thousands upon thousands of dead bodies came as a further shock to the already shaken morale of the Japanese soldiers. The scale of the defeat probably became a major factor in discouraging a Japanese attack on the USSR during World War II, which allowed the Red Army to switch a large number of itsFar Eastern troops into theEuropean Theatre in the desperate autumn of 1941.
On September 17, 1939, the Red Army marched its troops into the eastern territories ofPoland (now part ofBelarus andUkraine), using the official pretext of coming to the aid of the Ukrainians and the Belarusians threatened by Germany,[8] which had attacked Poland on September 1, 1939. The Soviet invasion opened a second front for the Poles and forced them to abandon plans for defence in theRomanian bridgehead area, thus hastening the Polish defeat. The Soviet and German advance halted roughly at theCurzon Line.
TheMolotov–Ribbentrop Pact, which had included a secret protocol delimiting the "spheres of interest" of each party, set the scene for the remarkably smooth partition of Poland between Germany and the USSR. The defined Soviet sphere of interest matched the territory subsequently captured in the campaign. The Soviet and German troops met each other on a number of occasions. Most remarkably, on 22 September 1939, the GermanXIX Panzer Corps had occupied Brest-Litovsk, which lay within the Soviet sphere of interest. When the Soviet 29th Tank Brigade approached Brest-Litovsk, the commanders negotiated a German withdrawal, and ajoint parade was held.[9] Just three days earlier, however, the parties had a more damaging encounter nearLviv, when the German 137th Gebirgsjägerregimenter (mountain infantry regiment) attacked a Soviet reconnaissance detachment.[citation needed]; After a few casualties on both sides, the parties negotiated, the German troops left the area, and the Red Army troops entered L'viv on 22 September.
According to post-1991 Russian sources, the Red Army force in Poland numbered 466,516.[10] The Red Army troops faced little resistance, mainly due to the entanglement of the majority of the Polish forces in fighting Germans along the Western border, but partly due to an official order by the Polish Supreme Command not to engage in combat with the Soviet troops, and also partly because many Polish citizens in theKresy region—Ukrainians and Belarusians—viewed the advancing troops as liberators.[11]Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists rose against the Poles, and communist partisans organised local revolts, e.g. inSkidel, robbing and murdering Poles.[12] Nonetheless, the Red Army sustained losses of 1,475 killed and missing and 2,383 wounded.[13] The losses of the opposing Polish troops are estimated at 6,000–7,000.[14]
TheWinter War began when the Soviet Union attacked Finland on 30 November 1939, two months after the invasion of Poland by Germany that started World War II. Because the attack was judged as illegal, the Soviet Union was expelled from theLeague of Nations on 14 December.[15] The war ended on 13 March 1940.
TheContinuation War was the second of two wars fought between Finland and the Soviet Union during World War II. On 25 June 1941 the Soviet Union conducted an air raid on Finnish cities, prompting Finland to declare war and to allow German troops stationed in Finland to begin an offensive. By September 1941, Finland had regained its post–Winter War concessions to the Soviet Union: theKarelian Isthmus andLadoga Karelia. However, the Finnish Army continued the offensive past the 1939 border during theconquest of East Karelia, includingPetrozavodsk, and halted only around 30–32 km (19–20 mi) from the centre ofLeningrad. It participated inbesieging the city by cutting the northern supply routes and by digging in until 1944.[16]
InLapland,joint German-Finnish forces failed to captureMurmansk or to cut the Kirov (Murmansk) Railway, a transit route for Sovietlend-lease equipment. The conflict stabilised with only minor skirmishes until the tide of the war turned against the Germans and the Soviet strategicVyborg–Petrozavodsk Offensive occurred in June 1944. The attack drove the Finns from most of the territories that they had gained during the war, but the Finnish Army halted the offensive in August 1944. Hostilities between Finland and the USSR ended with a ceasefire, which was called on 5 September 1944, formalised by the signing of theMoscow Armistice on 19 September 1944.
By the autumn of 1940,Nazi Germany and its allies dominated most of the European continent. Only the United Kingdom (in the West) was actively challengingnational socialist andfascist hegemony. Nazi Germany and Britain had no common land border, but a state of war existed between them; the Germans had an extensive land border with the Soviet Union, but the latter remained neutral, adhering to anon-aggression pact and by numeroustrade agreements.
A Soviet junior political officer (Politruk) urges Soviet troops forward against German positions (12 July 1942)Soviet ski troops during World War II
ForAdolf Hitler, no dilemma ever existed in this situation.Drang nach Osten (German for "Drive towards the East") remained the order of the day. This culminated, on December 18, in the issuing of 'Directive No. 21 – CaseBarbarossa', which opened by saying "the German Armed Forces must be prepared to crush Soviet Russia in a quick campaign before the end of the war against England". Even before the issuing of the directive, the GermanGeneral Staff had developed detailed plans for a Soviet campaign. On February 3, 1941, the final plan of Operation Barbarossa gained approval, and the attack was scheduled for the middle of May, 1941. However, the events in Greece andYugoslavia necessitated a delay—to the second half of June.
At the time of the Nazi assault on the Soviet Union in June 1941, the Red Army had 303 divisions and 22 brigades (4.8 million troops), including 166 divisions and 9 brigades (2.9 million troops) stationed in the western military districts. Their Axis opponents deployed on theEastern Front 181 divisions and 18 brigades (3.8 million troops). The first weeks of the war saw the annihilation of virtually the entireSoviet Air Force on the ground, the loss of major equipment, tanks, artillery, and major Soviet defeats as German forces trapped hundreds of thousands of Red Army soldiers in vast pockets.
Soviet forces suffered heavy damage in the field as a result of poor levels of preparedness, which was primarily caused by a reluctant, half-hearted and ultimately belated decision by the Soviet Government and High Command to mobilize the army. Equally important was a general tactical superiority of the German army, which was conducting the kind of warfare that it had been combat-testing and fine-tuning for two years. The hasty pre-war growth and over-promotion of the Red Army cadres as well as the removal of experienced officers caused by thePurges offset the balance even more favourably for the Germans. Finally, the sheer numeric superiority of the Axis cannot be underestimated.
The Soviet government adopted a number of measures to improve the state and morale of the retreating Red Army in 1941. Soviet propaganda turned away from political notions ofclass struggle, and instead invoked the deeper-rooted patriotic feelings of the population, embracing Tsarist Russian history. Propagandists proclaimed the War against the German aggressors as the "Great Patriotic War", in allusion to thePatriotic War of 1812 againstNapoleon. References to ancient Russian military heroes such asAlexander Nevski andMikhail Kutuzov appeared. Repressions against theRussian Orthodox Church stopped, and priests revived the tradition of blessing arms before battle. The Communist Party abolished the institution ofpolitical commissars—although it soon restored them. The Red Army re-introduced military ranks and adopted many additional individual distinctions such as medals and orders. The concept of aGuard re-appeared: units which had shown exceptional heroism in combat gained the names of "Guards Regiment", "Guards Army", etc.
During theGerman–Soviet War, the Red Army drafted a staggering 29,574,900 in addition to the 4,826,907 in service at the beginning of the war. Of these it lost 6,329,600 KIA, 555,400 deaths by disease and 4,559,000 MIA (most captured). Of these 11,444,100, however, 939,700 re-joined the ranks in the subsequently re-took Soviet territory, and a further 1,836,000 returned from German captivity. Thus the grand total of losses amounted to 8,668,400. The majority of the losses were ethnic Russians (5,756,000), followed by ethnic Ukrainians (1,377,400).[17] The German losses on the Eastern Front consisted of an estimated 3,604,800 KIA/MIA (most killed) and 3,576,300 captured (total 7,181,100).
A U.S. government poster showing a friendly Soviet soldier as portrayed by the Allies during World War IILiberation of theAuschwitz concentration camp by Red Army soldiers, January 1945A giant poster ofStalin in Berlin, June 1945
In the first part of the war, the Red Army fielded weaponry of mixed quality. It had excellent artillery, but it did not have enough trucks to manoeuvre and supply it; as a result the Wehrmacht (which rated it highly) captured much of it. Red ArmyT-34 tanks outclassed any other tanks the Germans had when they appeared in 1941, yet most of the Soviet armoured units were less advanced models; likewise, the same supply problem handicapped even the formations equipped with the most modern tanks. The Soviet Air Force initially performed poorly against the Germans. The quick advance of the Germans into the Soviet territory made reinforcement difficult, if not impossible, since much of the Soviet Union's military industry lay in the west of the country.
After the end of the war in Europe, the Red Army attacked Japan andManchukuo (Japan'spuppet state inManchuria) on 9 August 1945, and in combination with Mongolian and Chinese Communist forces rapidly overwhelmed the outnumberedKwantung Army. Soviet forces also attacked inSakhalin, in theKuril Islands and in northernKorea. Japan surrendered unconditionally on 2 September 1945.
1958 stamp depicting the three main branches: Air Force, Navy and Army.
The Soviet Union only had Ground Forces, Air Forces, and the Navy in 1945.[18] The two ministries (Narkomats), one supervising the Ground Forces and Air Forces, and the other directing theNavy, were combined into the Ministry of the Armed Forces in March 1946. A fourth service, theTroops of National Air Defence, was formed in 1948. The Ministry was briefly divided into two again from 1950 to 1953, but then was amalgamated again as theMinistry of Defence. Six years later theStrategic Rocket Forces were formed. TheSoviet Airborne Forces, were also active by this time as aReserve of the Supreme High Command. Also falling within the Soviet Armed Forces were theTyl, or Rear Services.
Men within the Soviet Armed Forces dropped from around 11.3 million to approximately 2.8 million in 1948.[19] In order to control this demobilisation process, the number ofmilitary districts was temporarily increased to thirty-three, dropping to twenty-one in 1946.[20] The size of the Ground Forces during most of the Cold War remained between 4 million and 5 million, according to Western estimates. However, there was a large-scale reduction in force size in 1953–56; 1.1 million personnel were released from the armed forces.[21] Two military districts were disestablished in 1956. Soviet law required all able-bodied males of age to serve a minimum of two years. As a result, the Soviet Ground Forces remained the largest active army in the world from 1945 to 1991. Soviet units which had taken over the countries of Eastern Europe from German rule remained to secure the régimes in what becamesatellite states of the Soviet Union and to deter and to fend off pro-independence resistance and laterNATO forces. The greatest Soviet military presence was inEast Germany, in theGroup of Soviet Forces in Germany, but there were also smaller forces elsewhere, including theNorthern Group of Forces in Poland, theCentral Group of Forces inCzechoslovakia, and theSouthern Group of Forces in Hungary. In the Soviet Union itself, forces were divided by the 1950s among fifteen military districts, including theMoscow,Leningrad, andBaltic Military Districts.
The trauma of the devastatingGerman invasion of 1941 influenced the Soviet Cold War doctrine of fighting enemies on their own territory, or in a buffer zone under Soviet hegemony, but in any case preventing any war from reaching Soviet soil. In order to secure Soviet interests in Eastern Europe, the Soviet Army moved in to quell anti-Soviet uprisings in theGerman Democratic Republic (1953), Hungary (1956) and Czechoslovakia (1968).As a result of theSino-Soviet border conflict, a sixteenth military district was created in 1969, the Central Asian Military District, with headquarters atAlma-Ata.[20] To improve capabilities for war at a theatre level, in the late 1970s and early 1980s four high commands were established, grouping the military districts, groups of forces, and fleets.[22] The Far Eastern High Command was established first, followed by the Western and South-Western High Commands towards Europe, and the Southern High Command at Baku, oriented toward the Middle East.
Confrontation with the US and NATO during the Cold War mainly took the form of threatened mutual deterrence withnuclear weapons. But a number ofproxy wars took place. The Soviet Union and the United States supported loyalclient régimes or rebel movements inThird World countries. During theKorean War, theSoviet Air Forces directly fought against United States andUnited Nations Command (UNC) forces. Two Soviet air divisions flyingMiG-9 andMiG-15 fighter jets were sent against U.S.Boeing B-29 Superfortress bombers and their U.S. and allied fighter escorts[23] The Soviet Union invested heavily in nuclear capabilities, especially in the production of ballistic missiles and of nuclear submarines to deliver them.
During theVietnam War, Soviet ships in theSouth China Sea gave vital early warnings to PAVN/VC forces in South Vietnam. The Soviet intelligence ships would pick up AmericanB-52 bombers flying fromOkinawa andGuam. Their airspeed and direction would be noted and then relayed to theCentral Office for South Vietnam, North Vietnam's southern headquarters. Using airspeed and direction, COSVN analysts would calculate the bombing target and tell any assets to move "perpendicularly to the attack trajectory." These advance warnings gave them time to move out of the way of the bombers, and, while the bombing runs caused extensive damage, because of the early warnings from 1968 to 1970 they did not kill a single military or civilian leader in the headquarters complexes.[24]
The Soviet meaning ofmilitary doctrine was much different from U.S. military usage of the term. Soviet Minister of Defence MarshalAndrei Grechko defined it in 1975 as 'a system of views on the nature of war and methods of waging it, and on the preparation of the country and army for war, officially adopted in a given state and its armed forces.' Soviet theorists emphasised both the political and 'military-technical' sides of military doctrine, while from the Soviet point of view, Westerners ignored the political side. According to Harriet F Scott and William Scott, the political parts of Soviet military doctrine best explained the international moves that the Soviet Union undertook during the Cold War.[25]
In 1979, however, the Soviet Armyintervened in a civil war raging inAfghanistan. The Soviet Army came to back a Soviet-friendly communist government threatened by multinational, mainly Afghan, insurgent groups called the mujahideen. The insurgents received military training in neighboring Pakistan, China, and billions of dollars from the United States, Saudi Arabia, and other countries. Technically superior, the Soviets did not have enough troops to establish control over the countryside and to secure the border. This resulted from hesitancy in thePolitburo, which allowed only a "limited contingent", averaging between 80,000 and 100,000 troops. Consequently, local insurgents could effectively employ hit-and-run tactics, using easy escape-routes and good supply-channels. This made the Soviet situation hopeless from the military point of view (short of using "scorched earth" tactics, which the Soviets did not practice except in World War II in their own territory). The understanding of this made the war highly unpopular within the Army. With the coming ofglasnost, Soviet media started to report heavy losses, which made the war very unpopular in the USSR in general, even though actual losses remained modest, averaging 1670 per year. The war also became a sensitive issue internationally, which finally led General SecretaryMikhail Gorbachev to withdraw the Soviet forces from Afghanistan. The "Afghan Syndrome" suffered by the Army parallels the AmericanVietnam Syndrome trauma over their own unsuccessful war inVietnam. Tactically, both sides concentrated on attacking supply lines, but Afghan mujahideen were well dug-in with tunnels and defensive positions, holding out against artillery and air attacks. The decade long war resulted in millions of Afghans fleeing their country, mostly to Pakistan and Iran. At least half a million Afghan civilians were killed in addition to the rebels in the war.
From 1985 to 1991, the new leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, attempted to reduce the strain the Army placed on economic demands. His government slowly reduced the size of the army. By 1989 Soviet troops were leaving theirWarsaw Pact neighbors to fend for themselves. That same year Soviet forces left Afghanistan. By the end of 1990, the entire Eastern Bloc had collapsed in the wake of democratic revolutions. As a result, Soviet citizens quickly began to turn against the Soviet government as well. As the Soviet Union moved towards disintegration, the reduced military was rendered feeble and ineffective and could no longer prop up the ailing Soviet government. The military got involved in trying to suppress conflicts and unrest inCentral Asia and theCaucasus but it often proved incapable of restoring peace and order. On April 9, 1989, the army, together withMVD units, massacred about 190 demonstrators inTbilisi in Georgia. The next major crisis occurred inAzerbaijan, when the Soviet army forcibly enteredBaku on January 19–20, 1990, removing the rebellious republic government and allegedly killing hundreds of civilians in the process. On January 13, 1991, Soviet forces stormed the State Radio and Television Building and the television retranslation tower inVilnius,Lithuania, both under opposition control, killing 14 people and injuring 700. This action was perceived by many as heavy-handed and achieved little.
By mid-1991, the Soviet Union had reached a state of emergency. According to the official commission (the Soviet Academy of Sciences) appointed by theSupreme Soviet (the higher chamber of the Russian parliament) immediately after theevents of August 1991, the Army did not play a significant role in what some describe ascoup d'état of old-guard communists.[citation needed] Commanders sent tanks into the streets of Moscow, but (according to all the commanders and soldiers) only with orders to ensure the safety of the people. It remains unclear why exactly the military forces entered the city, but they clearly did not have the goal of overthrowing Gorbachev (absent on the Black Sea coast at the time) or the government. The coup failed primarily because the participants did not take any decisive action, and after several days of their inaction the coup simply stopped. Only one confrontation took place between civilians and the tank crews during the coup, which led to the deaths of three civilians. Although the victims became proclaimed heroes, the authorities acquitted the tank crew of all charges. Nobody issued orders to shoot at anyone.
Following the coup attempt of August 1991, the leadership of the Soviet Union retained practically no authority over the component republics. Nearly every Soviet Republic declared its intention to secede and began passing laws defying the Supreme Soviet. On December 8, 1991, the Presidents of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine declared the Soviet Union dissolved and signed the document setting up theCommonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Gorbachev finally resigned on December 25, 1991, and the following day the Supreme Soviet, the highest governmental body, dissolved itself, officially ending the Soviet Union's existence. For the next year and a half various attempts were made to keep the Soviet military in existence as theUnited Armed Forces of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Steadily, the units stationed inUkraine and some other breakaway republics swore loyalty to their new national governments, while a series of treaties between the newly independent states divided up the military's assets. Followingdissolution of the Soviet Union, the Soviet Army dissolved and the USSR's successor states shared out its assets among themselves. The share out mostly occurred on a regional basis, with Soviet soldiers from Russia becoming part of the new Russian Army, while Soviet soldiers originating from Kazakhstan became part of the newKazakh Army.
Soviet and Russian military expenditures in billions of 2015 US dollars
In mid-March 1992, Yeltsin appointed himself as the new Russian Minister of Defence, marking a crucial step in the creation of the newArmed Forces of the Russian Federation, comprising the bulk of what was still left of the military. The last vestiges of the old Soviet command structure were finally dissolved in June 1993. In the next few years, the former Soviet forces withdrew from central and Eastern Europe (including theBaltic states), as well as from the newly independent post-Soviet republics ofAzerbaijan,Georgia (partially),Moldova (partially),Turkmenistan andUzbekistan. In 2020, Russian forces remained inAbkhazia,Armenia,Belarus,Kazakhstan,Kyrgyzstan,South Ossetia,Tajikistan andTransnistria. While in many places the withdrawal and division took place without any problems, the Russian Navy's Black Sea Fleet remained in theCrimea, Ukraine, with the fleet division and a Russian leasehold for fleet facilities in Crimea finally achieved in 1997.
TheBaltic states (Estonia,Latvia andLithuania) became successful members ofNATO since 2004. Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine maintain cooperation with NATO as well.
The Soviet Armed Forces were controlled by theCommunist Party of the Soviet Union and theMinistry of Defence. At its head was theMinister of Defence, generally a full member of thePolitburo (the Politburo, in turn, was chaired by theGeneral Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, generally thede factoleader of the Soviet Union) and from 1934 onwards, aMarshal of the Soviet Union. Stalin was the last civilian/politician Minister of Defence; from 1947 onwards, the Minister of Defence was a serving general (though the last was an airman). Between 1934 and 1946, 1950 and 1953, a separate Ministry of the Navy existed and the Ministry of Defence was responsible only for land and air forces. In practice, the Navy Minister was a far more junior official and the Defence Ministry continued to dominate policymaking.
Beneath the Minister of Defence were two First Deputy Ministers of Defence; theChief of the General Staff, who was responsible for operations and planning, and the First Deputy Minister of Defence for General Affairs, who was responsible for administration. From 1955 theSupreme Commander of the Warsaw Pact also held the title of First Deputy Minister of Defence. By the 1980s there was another eleven Deputy Minister of Defence; including the commanders-in-chief of the five service branches.[26]
In 1989, the Soviet Armed Forces consisted of theStrategic Rocket Forces, the Ground Forces,Air Defence Forces, the Air Forces, and the Navy, listed in their official order of importance.[2] TheRear services, "Tyl", had their own deputy minister of defence. In 1970 the troops of the All-Union NationalCivil Defence Forces were added.
There were also a number of armed organisations beyond the Ministry of Defence; in 1989 these includedInternal Troops and theKGB Border Troops.
The early Red Army never adopted the idea of a professionalofficer corps. It was seen as a "heritage of tsarism.". In particular, the Bolsheviks condemned the use of the word "officer" and used the word "commander" instead. The Red Army never adoptedepaulettes andranks, using purely functional titles such as "Division Commander", "Corps Commander", and similar titles. In 1924 it supplemented this system with "service categories", from K-1 (lowest) to K-14 (highest). The service categories essentially operated as ranks in disguise: they indicated the experience and qualifications of a commander. The insignia now denoted the category, not the position of a commander. However, one still had to use functional titles to address commanders, which could become as awkward as "comrade deputy head-of-staff of corps". If one did not know a commander's position, one used one of the possible positions—for example: "Regiment Commander" for K-9.
On September 22, 1935, the Red Army abandoned service categories and introduced personal ranks. These ranks, however, used a unique mix of functional titles and traditional ranks. For example, the ranks included "Lieutenant" and "Komdiv" (Комдив, Division Commander). Further complications ensued from the functional and categorical ranks for political officers (e.g., "Brigade Commissar", "Army Commissar 2nd Rank"), for technical corps (e.g., "Engineer 3rd Rank", "Division Engineer"), for administrative, medical and other non-combatant branches. The year before (1934), the revival of personal ranks began with theMarshal of the Soviet Union rank bestowed upon 5 Army Commanders.
There were further modifications to the system. 1937 saw the Junior Lieutenant and Junior Military Technician ranks being added. On May 7, 1940, the ranks of "General" or "Admiral" replaced the senior functional ranks ofKombrig, Komdiv,Komkor,Komandarm; the other senior functional ranks ("Division Commissar", "Division Engineer", etc.) remained unaffected. On November 2, 1940, the system underwent further modification with the abolition of functional ranks fornon-commissioned officers (NCOs) and the introduction of the Podpolkovnik (Lieutenant Colonel) rank.
In early 1942 all the functional ranks in technical and administrative corps became regularised ranks (e.g., "Engineer Major", "Engineer Colonel", "Captain of the Intendant Service", etc.). On October 9, 1942, the authorities abolished the system of military commissars, together with the commissar ranks. The functional ranks remained only in medical, veterinary and legislative corps. By then the Naval rank of Midshipman was revived in theSoviet Navy as an NCO rank, a role lasting until the 1970s.
In early 1943 a unification of the system saw the abolition of all the remaining functional ranks. The word "officer" became officially endorsed, together with theepaulettes that superseded the previous rank insignia. The ranks and insignia of 1943 did not change much until the last days of the USSR; the contemporaryRussian Army uses largely the same system. The old functional ranks ofKombat (Battalion or Battery Commander), Kombrig (Brigade Commander) and Komdiv (Division Commander) continue in informal use.
By the end of the Second World War, theAdmiral of the Fleet rank (which, from 1945 was already equivalent to Marshal) was later renamedAdmiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union in 1955. In the 1960s however, it became a rank of its own when new regulations revived the Fleet Admiral rank in the Soviet Navy, thus becoming the naval equivalent to General of the Army.
By 1972, the final transformation of military ranks began as the rank of Praporshchik (Warrant officer) ranks being added in the Army and Air Force for contract NCOs since the rank of Starshina (Sergeant Major) was from now on for conscripts. But in the Soviet Navy, it meant that the Naval rank of Midshipman became a rank for Naval warrant officers since the Navy created the new rank of Ship Chief Sergeant Major for its NCOs in naval service. The year of 1974 saw the rank insignia changed for Army Generals and Navy Fleet Admirals in their parade dress and working and combat dress uniforms.
On September 22, 1935, the authorities renamed the RKKA Staff as theGeneral Staff, which essentially reincarnated the General Staff of theRussian Empire. Many of the former RKKA Staff officers had served as General Staff officers in the Russian Empire and became General Staff officers in the USSR. General Staff officers typically had extensive combat experience and solid academic training.
During theCivil War the commander cadres received training at theGeneral Staff Academy of the RKKA (Академия Генерального штаба РККА), an alias of the Nicholas General Staff Academy (Николаевская академия Генерального штаба) of the Russian Empire. On August 5, 1921, the academy became theMilitary Academy of the RKKA (Военная академия РККА), and in 1925 theFrunze (М.В. Фрунзе) Military Academy of the RKKA. The senior and supreme commanders received training at the Higher Military Academic Courses (Высшие военно-академические курсы), renamed in 1925 as the Advanced Courses for Supreme Command (Курсы усовершенствования высшего начальствующего состава); in 1931, the establishment of an Operations Faculty at the Frunze Military Academy supplemented these courses. On April 2, 1936, theGeneral Staff Academy was re-instated; it became a principal school for the senior and supreme commanders of the Red Army and a centre for advanced military studies.
Red Army (and laterSoviet Army) educational facilities called "academies" do not correspond to themilitary academies in Western countries. ThoseSoviet Academies were thepost-graduate schools, mandatory for officers applying for senior ranks (e.g., the rank ofcolonel since the 1950s). While a basicofficer education in the Red Army was provided by the facilities namedвоенная школа orвоенное училище–which may be generally translated as "school" and compared to Western "academies" likeWest Point orSandhurst.
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(June 2008)
The Soviet Armed Forces were manned through conscription, which had been reduced in 1967 from three to two years (with remaining three years service in naval forces). This system was administered through the thousands ofMilitary commissariats (voenkomats) located throughout the Soviet Union. Between January and May of every year, every young Soviet male citizen was required to report to the local voenkomat for assessment for military service, following a summons based on lists from every school and employer in the area. The voenkomat worked to quotas sent out by a department of the General Staff, listing how young men are required by each service and branch of the Armed Forces.[27] The new conscripts were then picked up by an officer from their future unit and usually sent by train across the country. On arrival, they would begin the Young Soldiers' course, and become part of the system of hazing and domination by an older class of draftees, known asdedovshchina, literally "rule by the grandfathers." The "..armed forces of the USSR and Warsaw Pact, working to a common Soviet model, ..relied on young officers to conduct in units [rather than in training depots] all the junior command and training tasks which in many Western armies are done in depots or by regular professional long-service NCOs."[28] There were only a very small number of professionalnon-commissioned officers (NCOs), as most NCOs were conscripts sent on short courses[29] to prepare them for section commanders' and platoon sergeants' positions. These conscript NCOs were supplemented bypraporshchik warrant officers, positions created in the 1960s to support the increased variety of skills required for modern weapons.[30]
For years, Soviet leadership argued that Soviet military played a role in decreasing ethnic tensions and nationalist loyalties. According to professor Deborah Yarsike Ball, Soviet historians, such as B. F. Klochkov, argued that, "the Red Army strengthened friendship between soldiers of various nationalities." The official view of the military was that it was a "school of internationalism," where all the various people of the Soviet Union could develop unity and respect for each other.[31] During theRussian Civil War, the Bolshevik government employed non-Slavic ethnic groups, who were known as national military units.
Despite the official view, the history of inter-ethnic relations in the military was more complicated. As the Bolsheviks consolidated power in the late 1910s and early 1920s, the central leadership became suspicious of the size of the national units. Their sizes were restricted, they were put under close supervision, and eventually disbanded by 1938. The national units were briefly brought back during World War II before being disbanded again in the mid-1950s. In 1956, when soldier were ordered to respond to protesters in the Georgian capital ofTbilisi, the ethnic-Georgian unit refused to follow orders from their Russian higher-ranking officers.[32]
Soviet minorities were not treated equally and many carried anti-regime views. According to a 1983RAND Corporation report by Alexander Alexiev and S. Enders Wimbush, theSecond World War saw the recruitment of 600,000 to 1,400,000 former Soviet citizens into the German military on theEastern Front. Interestingly, more than 50% of these auxiliaries came from non-Russian backgrounds, such asUkrainians,Lithuanians,Latvians, andEstonians. In addition, more than 250,000 volunteer nationals ofCentral Asian andCaucasian origin were organized in theOstlegionen. As the authors noted, "some Soviet nationalities may have been better represented in theWehrmacht than in the Red Army." At the height of World War II, infantry units in the armed forces were composed of Russians (62.95%), Ukrainians (14.52%), Belarusians (1.9%), and various other ethnicities (20.63%).[32] The war had shown that the integration of various ethnic groups was questionable and fragile.[33]
Inter-ethnic relations in the military did not improve after World War II. In fact, although theRussian language was crucial in the organization, many non-Slavic servicemen entered the military with "no previous to communicate in Russian." According to a 1980Time magazine article citing an analyst from theRAND Corporation,Soviet non-Slavs were also generally barred from joining elite or strategic positions (like theStrategic Rocket Forces,Soviet Air Force and the Soviet Navy) of the late-Cold War military because of suspicions of loyalty of ethnic minorities to the Kremlin.[34] Around 80% or more of combat units were staffed by Slavic nationalities while non-combat units usually contained 70% to 90% non-Slavs, especially Central Asians and Caucasians.[35] The military branches associated with high technology services, such as the Navy, Strategic Rocket Forces, and the Air Force, were disproportionately made up of Russians. In addition, Russians made up 69.4% of the officer corps, while the Slavic number is up to 89.7%.[31]
By 1990, Slavic troops still made a majority of Soviet soldiers. In total, 69.2% of all military members were ethnic Slavic (Russian, Ukrainian, Belorussian), 1.9% were Baltic people, 20.6% were Muslim-Turkic people and 8.3% were all other types of people.[32]
The late 1930s saw the "Purges of the Red Army cadres", occurring against the historical background of theGreat Purge. The Purges had the objective of cleansing the Red Army of "politically unreliable elements", mainly among the higher-ranking officers. This inevitably provided a convenient pretext for settling personal vendettas and eventually resulted in awitch-hunt. In 1937, the Red Army numbered around 1.3 million, and it grew to almost three times that number by June 1941. This necessitated quick promotion of junior officers, often despite their lack of experience or training, with obvious grave implications for the effectiveness of the Army in the coming war against Germany.
In the highest echelons of the Red Army the Purges removed 3 of the 5 marshals, 13 of 15 generals of the army, 8 of 9 admirals, 50 of 57 army corps generals, 154 out of 186 division generals, 16 of 16 army commissars, and 25 of 28 army corps commissars.
Soviet Army conscript's military service book.#1, Place of birth, #2 Nationality (i.e.ethnicity), #3 Party affiliation (i.e. the year of joining theCPSU), #4 Year of entering the VLKSM (Komsomol), #5 Education, #6 Main specialty, #7 Marital status. (Document number and the name are removed).
TheCommunist Party had a number of mechanisms of control over the country's armed forces. First, starting from a certain rank, only a Party member could be a military commander, and was thus subject to Party discipline. Second, the top military leaders had been systematically integrated into the highest echelons of the party. Third, the party placed a network ofpolitical officers throughout the armed forces to influence the activities of the military.
A political commander (zampolit) served as a political commissar of the armed forces. Azampolit supervised party organizations and conducted party political work within a military unit. He lectured troops on Marxism–Leninism, the Soviet view of international affairs, and the party's tasks for the armed forces. During World War II the zampolit lost veto authority over the commander's decisions but retained the power to report to the next highest political officer or organization on the political attitudes and performance of the unit's commander.
In 1989 over 20% of all armed forces personnel were party members orKomsomol members. Over 90% of all officers in the armed forces were party or Komsomol members.
The Soviet Union established an indigenous arms industry as part ofStalin's industrialization program in the 1920s and 1930s. The five-round,stripper clip-fed,bolt-actionMosin–Nagant rifle remained the primary shoulder firearm of the Red Army through World War II. Over 17 million model 91/30 Mosin–Nagant rifles were manufactured from 1930 to 1945 by various Soviet arsenals. In 1943 design started on the M44, designed to replace theM91/30. Full production began in 1944, and remained in production until 1948, when it was replaced by theSKSsemiautomatic rifle.[36]
The Red Army suffered from a shortage of adequatemachine guns and semiautomatic firearms throughout World War II. The semiautomatic TokarevSVT Model 38 and Model 40 were chambered for the same7.62×54mmR cartridge used by the Mosin–Nagants. The rifle, though of sound design, was never manufactured in the same numbers as the Mosin–Nagants and did not replace them. Soviet experimentation with small-arms began during the Second World War. In 1945 the Red Army adopted the Simonov SKS, a semi-automatic7.62×39mm carbine. In 1949 production of the 7.62×39mm KalashnikovAK-47 assault rifle began: planners envisaged troops using it in conjunction with the SKS, but it soon replaced the SKS completely. In 1959 theAKM came out as a modernised version of the AK-47, this was created to ease manufacture and improve aspects of the AK-47. In 1978 the5.45×39mmAK-74 assault rifle replaced the AKM: it utilized no less than 51% of the AKM's parts. Designers put together the new weapon as a counterpart to the American5.56×45mm cartridge used in theM16 assault rifle, and the Russian army continues[update] to use it today.
^Piotrowski, Tadeusz (1988)."Ukrainian Collaborators".Poland's Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918–1947. McFarland. pp. 177–259.ISBN0786403713.
Tsouras, Peter G. (1994).Changing Orders: The Evolution of the World's Armies, 1945 to the Present. New York: Facts on File.
Zickel, Raymond E; Keefe, Eugene K (1991).Soviet Union: a country study. Area handbook series. Washington, D.C.: Library Of Congress. Federal Research Division. For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
Lester W. Grau and Ali Ajmad Jalali, "The Campaign for the Caves: The Battles for Ahawar in the Soviet-Afghan War" Foreign Military Studies Office, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, reprinted fromJournal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol. 14, September 2001, Number 3.