Socket preservation oralveolar ridge preservation is a procedure to reducebone loss aftertooth extraction.[1][2] After tooth extraction, the jaw bone has a natural tendency to becomenarrow, and lose its original shape because the bone quicklyresorbs, resulting in 30–60% loss in bone volume in the first six months.[3] Bone loss, can compromise the ability to place a dental implant (to replace the tooth), or its aesthetics and functional ability.
Socket preservation attempts to prevent bone loss by bone grafting the socket immediately after extraction. With the procedure, thegum is retracted, thetooth is removed, material (usually abone substitute) is placed in the tooth socket, it is covered with abarrier membrane, andsutured closed.[2] Roughly 30 days after socket preservation, the barrier membrane is either removed, or itresorbs, and thecallous of bone covers with newgingiva. While there is good evidence that socket preservation prevents bone loss, there is no definitive proof that this leads to higher implants success or long-term health.[4]
After tooth extraction, thealveolar ridge has a mean loss of width of 3.8 mm, and a height loss of 1.24 mm within six months.[1] This loss of bone volume, can cause a denture to be loose, or an inadequate amount of bone width to place an implant.[5] Historically, alveolar preservation was used to provide a base to retain conventionaldentures. Advances inosseointegration have expanded the need of the procedure to maintainridge width and height fordental implant placement. In some cases, where a tooth requires removal when other teeth still need toerupt, socket preservation may be used to maintain bone for the formative tooth to erupt into.[5]
While there are no absolute contraindications to socket preservation, many of the same cautions that apply to surgery on the jaws still apply to this procedure. Significant caution is required in an area previously exposed toradiation treatment, or in an area that has previously hadosteomyelitis. Other considerations to bone healing include the concurrent use ofbisphosphonate, anddenosumab,smoking,diabetes,immunocompromise, andinfection.[5]
Another consideration is the risk of bone and soft tissue loss on the subsequent implant in the long-term. Socket preservation has been associated with a greater risk ofmarginal bone loss[6]
Socket preservation is completed at the time of extraction. After removal of the tooth, thegum is elevated away from the bone, the socket is thoroughly cleansed, and antibiotic powder may be used. A barrier membrane is then fastened to thegum, the socket is packed withbone grafting material and the wound closed over the barrier membrane. Where thebarrier membrane does not dissolve, it is removed approximately 30 days after placement,[5] and the graft becomes incorporated into the healing bone 3–9 months later.
Bone grafting materials can be divided into several categories.Autograft (bone harvested from patient's own body) is considered thegold standard, and all other materials are generally compared to it.[5] Other types of grafting material includexenograft (bone grafts or collagen frombovine orporcine origin),allograft (block bone graft from acadaver), and alloplast (synthetic biomaterials such asfibrin scaffolds,PLGA,synthetic biodegradable polymer, hydroxyapatite,tricalcium phosphate,bioglass).
Barrier membranes can be either resorbable, or non-resorbable. The standard non-resorbable membrane is expandedpolytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) which was first used in 1984, when it was found to bebiocompatible. There are a variety of resorbable membranes, including collagen,[7] and synthetic resorbable (lactic acid or glycolic acid).
Socket preservation procedure prevents immediatebone resorption after extraction thus keeping the contour and integrity of the socket with a successful and natural-looking appearance for tooth restorative procedures.[citation needed] Alldental prosthesis requires good jaw bone support for it to be successful in the long run. Without socket preservation, residual bones could lose volume resulting in loss of facial vertical and horizontal dimension and changes in facial soft tissues aesthetics.
Socket preservation does indeed improve the height and width, compared to extraction without socket preservation, but there is insufficient data to conclude that it decreases implant failures, improves aesthetics, or that one grafting material is any better than another.[4]
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)