Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Sobekneferu

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Earliest confirmed female Egyptian pharaoh c. 1800 BC
Sobekneferu
Neferusobek
Greek:Σκεμίοφρις,romanizedSkemiophris
Partially defaced statue of a female
Statue of Sobekneferu (Berlin ÄM 14475) which was lost duringWorld War II
Pharaoh
Reign3 years, 10 months, and 24 days according to theTurin Canon in the 18th century BC[1][a]
PredecessorAmenemhat IV
SuccessorSobekhotep I orWegaf
Horus name
mryt-rꜥ
Meryt-re
Beloved of Re[20][21]
G5X1
N5U6M17M17X1

G5X1
N5Z1U6
X1
Nebty name
sꜣt-sḫm-nbt-tꜣwy
Sat-sekhem-nebet-tawy
The daughter of the powerful one is Mistress of the Two Lands[20][21]
G16
X1
G39
S42V30
X1
N16
N16
Golden Horus
ḏdt-ḫꜥw
Djedet-khau
Stable of appearances[20][21]
G8
X1
R11N28G43
S12
Prenomen
kꜣ-sbk-rꜥ /sbk-kꜣ-rꜥ
Ka-sobek-re /Sobek-ka-re
Theka of Sobek-Re[20][21]
or
Sobek is theka of Re[12]
M23
X1
L2
X1
N5I4D28
Nomen
sbk-nfrw
Sobek-neferu /Neferu-sobek
Beauty of Sobek[20][21]
H_SPACE
X1
G39N5
F35F35F35I5A

sbk-šdt-nfrw
Sobek-shedet-neferu
Beauty of Sobek, lord ofShedyt[22][21]
H_SPACE
X1
G39N5
I5AF30
X1
F35F35F35
ConsortAmenemhat IV?
FatherAmenemhat III?
BurialMazghuna?
DynastyTwelfth Dynasty

Sobekneferu orNeferusobek (Egyptian:Sbk-nfrw,lit.'Beauty of Sobek') was the first confirmedqueen regnant (or 'female king') ofancient Egypt and the last pharaoh of theTwelfth Dynasty and of theMiddle Kingdom. Her reign was brief, lasting three years, 10 months, and 24 days according to theTurin Canon in the18th century BC. She distinguished herself from any potential prior female rulers by adopting the fullroyal titulary which were often had modified to acknowledge her womanhood such as by the titles 'daughter of Re' and 'female Horus'. She was also the first ruler to be associated with the crocodile godSobek in hernomen (birth name) and is the only known one to have associated herself with him through herpraenomen (throne name).

Sobekneferu ascended to the throne following the death ofAmenemhat IV, her presumed brother and husband, albeit the relationship is unsubstantiated. The reasons for her accession are debated. One possibility is that her predecessor had no male heir to bestow the throne to, thus leaving his sister to take the mantle of king. Yet, there are two candidate sons,Sobekhotep I andSonbef, that are stated through their filiative nomen to be 'Amenemhat's son'. If Amenemhat IV is meant, then it may be that she usurped the throne from them, perhaps because she perceived them to be illegitimate. She also never associated herself with Amenemhat IV, instead asserting her legitimacy through their presumptive father,Amenemhat III. It appears though, that Sokebhotep I modelled his praenomen after Sobekneferu'sNebty name, indicating that he may have sought legitimacy from his predecessor and also demonstrating the esteem she was held in.

Contemporary evidence from her reign is scant. There are a few partial statues –one with her face, now lost – and a small corpus of seals and inscriptions that have been preserved. These mainly originate fromFaiyum where she is credited with the completion of 'the Labyrinth' – the mortuary temple of Amenemhat III's pyramid atHawara. One important inscription is agraffito recording the level of theNile inundation at the fortress atKumma in her third regnal year indicating that she maintained authority across Egypt. Her funerary monument remains unidentified. Apapyrus discovered inHarageh mentions a site calledSekhem Sobekneferu which may refer to her monument. Her rule is also attested to on several later king lists from theThutmosid andRamesside periods and inManetho'sAegyptiaca.

Family

[edit]
See also:Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt family tree
Statue of Amenemhat III (Pushkin 4757), presumed father of Sobekneferu

The link betweenAmenemhat III and his two successors,Amenemhat IV and Sobekneferu, is uncertain,[23] though they are usually presumed to be his son and daughter.[24] For Amenemhat IV, this identification is not universal. Kim Ryholt has proposed that because Amenemhat IV's mother,Hetepti, only has themw.t-nsw[i] title and notḥm.t-nsw,[ii] that this indicates that Amenemhat IV is of non-royal lineage.[25] Aidan Dodson and Dyan Hilton note that while Amenemhat IV does refer to Amenemhat III as his father in inscriptions, this may simply be referring to him as a predecessor, and also notes the lack of theḥm.t-nsw title for Hetepti.[26] It also possible that Amenemhat IV was his grandson rather than his son.[27] For Sobekneferu, her mother's identity is unknown.[28] The relationship between Amenemhat IV and Sobekneferu is also unclear. The ancient historianManetho inAegyptiaca states that they were brother and sister.[29] This filial identification is the norm and there is speculation on a potential marriage between them.[30] There is no contemporary evidence for this as neithersn.t-nsw[iii] norḥm.t-nsw are attested for Sobekneferu.[31]

Amenemhat III had two known wives,Aat andKhenemetneferhedjet III, who died early in his reign and were buried in his firstpyramid at Dahshur.[32] He had at least one daughter,Neferuptah, who had a burial at hissecond pyramid at Hawara that was eventually moved toher own pyramid.[33] The enclosure of Neferuptah's name in a cartouche suggests that she may have been groomed for the throne.[34] The burials of three other princesses –Hathorhotep,Nubhotepet, and Sithathor – were found at the Dahshur complex, but it is unclear whether these princesses were his daughters because the complex was used for royal burials throughout theThirteenth Dynasty.[35]

Sobekneferu's accession may have been motivated by a lack of a male heir for Amenemhat IV;[36] though there are two kings of the Thirteenth Dynasty,Amenemhat [Sa] Sobekhotep (Sobekhotep I) andAmenemhat [Sa] Senebef (Sonbef),[37] that have the filiative nomenỉmn-m-hꜣt sꜣ[iv] indicating they may be his sons.[38] Kim Ryholt proposes that in this case, Sobekneferu may have taken the throne following Amenemhat IV's death because she perceived them to be illegitimate.[39] Barbara Bell has questioned the premise of a dynastic split following Sobekneferu and has proposed that Sobekhotep I may have been a son of Amenemhat III from a secondary queen that legitimately ascended the throne.[40] Julien Siesse and Robyn Gillam note that Sobekhotep I's praenomensḫm-rꜥ-ḫw-tꜣwy[v] bears a distinct resemblance to Sobekneferu'sNebty namesꜣt-sḫm-nbt-tꜣwy[41][b][vi] which Gillam additionally notes indicates that Sobekhotep I appears to have sought legitimacy through his predecessor and reflects the esteem held by Sobekenferu.[43]

History

[edit]

Late Twelfth Dynasty

[edit]

TheMiddle Kingdom attained its military and economic zenithon during the reigns ofSenusret III and Amenemhat III respectively.[44] Senusret III's reign was an inflection point in the domestic and foreign policy of Egypt.[45] On the domestic front, he reorganized the administration displacing authority away from thenomarchs and condensing it into the hands of his appointedviziers and their councils.[46][c] Yet, it is his foreign policy that forms the most significant component of his legacy and is defined by the military campaigns he led into Nubia and Syria–Palestine.[48] These contributed the basis of the Greek legendary figure ofSesostris described by Manetho and Herodotus.[49] Following 19 years of sole reign, he passed the throne to his son, Amenemhat III, with whom he seems to have shared it for a further 20 years.[50][d] In turn, Amenemhat III presided over a peaceful Egypt enabling him to direct his attention to the economic development of the nation.[52] His building programme spanned all of Egypt, but its nexus was atFaiyum to which he contributedtwo colossi of himself at Biahmu, temples toSobek andRenenutet, a pyramid at Dahshur and another at Hawara which is most noted for its mortuary temple known by the epithet 'the Labyrinth', and expanded the agricultural potential ofLake Moeris.[53] To provide the materials for these projects, the natural deposits of Egypt from the Sinai Peninsula to Nubia were extensively exploited.[54] His reign lasted for at least 45 years, possibly longer,[55] and may have ended with a coregency with his successor.[56] Amenemhat IV ruled for nine or ten years,[57] but there is scant information regarding his reign,[58] and by the end of it the dynasty was in decline.[59]

Accession

[edit]

Sobekneferu ascended to the throne following Amenemhat IV.[e] The reasons for the accession of a 'female king' are obscure,[64] but may have been motivated by the lack of a male heir for Amenemhat IV[65] or a dispute over their legitimacy.[66] She is the earliest confirmed woman to rule over Egypt as a king[67] and the first to adopt the full royal titulary.[68][f] The traditional titles preceding her names were modified to note Sobekneferu's womanhood by appending the feminine markert to them:sꜣ.t-rꜥ;[vii]ḥr.t.[viii] Though this was an inconsistent practice that was not done to all namesbỉk-nbw[ix] or even in all casessꜣ-rꜥ.[75][x]

She was the first ruler to have a theophoric association with the crocodile god Sobek, whose identity appears in both her given nomen Sobekneferu and her chosen praenomen Sobekkare.[76] The cult of Sobek had risen to prominence during the Twelfth Dynasty, particularly as successive kings directed their energy towards the development of Faiyum where Sobek was revered.[77] This culminated in the incorporation of Sobek into the sun deity from whence he became a manifestation of that god as Sobek-Re in a process beginning in the Middle Kingdom and lasting through to the New Kingdom.[78] Many of Sobekneferu's successors in the Second Intermediate Period also bore nomen invoking the god, further testifying to his elevated status.[79][g]

Reign

[edit]

Her comparatively brief reign of about four years has left, much as with her predecessor, a paucity of surviving contemporary records.[81] Her efforts were concentrated on the Faiyum region – much like Amenemhat III earlier – indicating its retained import.[82] In Faiyum, she is credited with the completion of 'the Labyrinth' of Amenemhat III's pyramid at Hawara.[83] A group of statues of Sobekneferu found atTell el-Dab'a, but bearing the epithetsbk-šdt,[xi] also suggest a Faiyum origin.[84] Further south, she is attested in inscriptions from 'the temple of Kom el-Akareb' inHeracleopolis Magna.[85] That agraffito was left atKumma in her third year indicates that she was able to effect her authority across Egypt.[86] Her funerary monument has not been positively identified. The two pyramids atMazghuna have been proposed as potential candidates;[87] however, there is no conclusive evidence to confirm their assignment and they may date to the Thirteenth Dynasty.[88] Sobekneferu's death brought a close to the Twelfth Dynasty[89] and began theSecond Intermediate Period.[90][h] This transition appears to have been smooth as there is no evidence to suggest a violent collapse.[92]

Early Thirteenth Dynasty

[edit]

The Second Intermediate Period is poorly understood owing to the paucity of attestations for individual rulers of the time.[93] The early Thirteenth Dynasty was characterised by a rapid succession of ephemeral rulers,[94] the first of whom remains debated, though the principal candidates areKhutawyre Wegaf (Wegaf) andSekhemre Khutawy Sobekhotep (Sobekhotep I).[95] The sheer numerosity of kingships and the brevity of their rule suggests that the throne may have been held by a rotating succession of members of the most influential families.[96] This initial phase was brief owing to the exceptionally short reigns of the kings and was followed by a more stable succession with better attested rulers.[97]

Attestations

[edit]

Contemporary sources

[edit]

Graffiti and seals

[edit]

Only a small collection of sources attest to Sobekneferu's rule as king of Egypt.[98] In Nubia, a graffito in the fortress of Kumma records the height of theNile inundation at 1.83 m (6.0 ft) during her third regnal year.[99] Another inscription discovered in the Eastern Desert records 'year 4, second month of theSeason of the Emergence'.[100]

TheBritish Museum has a fine cylinder seal (EA 16581) bearing her name androyal titulary in its collection.[101] The glazedsteatite seal measures 4.42 cm (1.74 in) long with a diameter of 1.55 cm (0.61 in).[102] There is a 4.5 cm (1.8 in) long faded green faience cylinder from Faiyum in the collection ofFarouk I carrying two columns of inscriptions. The first bears her name and titles and the second contains formulaic writing.[103] There is another cylinder seal (JE 72663) from the collection ofFuad I, now in the Cairo Museum, which curiously placesnsw-bỉty[xii] before Sobekneferu's nomensbk-šdt-nfrw[xiii] instead of her praenomenkꜣ-sbk-rꜥ.[xiv] Sydney Aufrère notes that by the reign of Senusret II the kingly title had rigidified in presentation before the praenomen and proposes that Sobekneferu's may rather have beensbk-šdt-nfrw considering that there are several instances of that pairing.[104] There is record of a further partial cylinder seal with Sobekneferu's titles in the private collection of a 'Mr. Nash from Margate'.[105]

The British Museum also possesses an inscribed scarab (EA 66159) bearing Sobekneferu's name. The glazed steatite scarab measures 2.03 cm (0.80 in) by 1.32 cm (0.52 in) and 0.86 cm (0.34 in) in height.[106] There is also a second scarab from the Grant Collection recorded inHistorical scarabs[107] andHistory[108] byFlinders Petrie.[109]

Statuary

[edit]
Quartzite statue of Sobekneferu (E 27135) in theLouvre, Paris

Several headless statues of Sobekneferu have been identified.[111] One is a quartzite torso (E 27135) of an originally life-size statue, held by theLouvre in Paris.[112] It was purchased by the Louvre Museum in 1973, but its provenance is unknown.[113] The remnant – which is missing the head, arms, and lower body[63] – measures 0.48 m (1 ft 7 in) vertically, 0.33 m (1 ft 1 in) frontally, and 0.215 m (8.5 in) sagitally.[114] In its iconography it blends feminine and masculine dress:[115] She wears the typical female sheath dress, with straps attached reaching over the shoulders and covering her breasts,[116] over which she has ašnḏwt kilt[117] held by an inscribed belt and a strip of apron covering the genital region usually worn by men.[118] On her chest rests a bivalve shell pendant like those that appear on statues of Senusret III and Amenemhat III.[119] Finally, the statue bears the royalnms, of which only the striated lappets survive, identifying the subject as a ruler.[120] Owing to the condition of the statue it is impossible to determine the depicted pose, though it may have been the subject in prayer with her hands laid flat upon the kilt.[121]

Three apparently life-sizedbasalt orgreywacke statues of Sobekneferu were found in Tell el-Dab'a:[122] two depict her in a seated posture trampling theNine Bows, representing the subjugation of Egypt's enemies, while the third depicts her kneeling.[123] The two seated statues were probably originally identical, though they were severely damaged by the time of their discovery. The better preserved 0.73 m (2 ft 5 in) tall statue retains the lower half, while the less preserved 0.64 m (2 ft 1 in) tall statue has additionally lost the subject's feet and pedestal.[124] The surviving inscriptions commend her to Sobek of Shedyt,[125] an important centre since Amenemhat III[126] and an indicator that they might originate from Faiyum.[127] The kneeling statue is also partial, retaining the lower 0.85 m (2 ft 9 in) of the whole, but displays the great ability of the work's executor to capture the motion of subject: She is planted firmly upon the plinth in the ball of her feet and knees, her mass resting on her heels and hands in her lap, before an inscription run right-to-left commending her to 'Sobek of Shedyt' and 'Horus residing in Shedyt, foremost of the Palace Lake', and wishing that she, the King of theTwo Lands, may live.[128] These statues were probably moved to Tell el-Dab'a by theHyksos during their rule.[129] Their current location is unknown.[130] There is also a headless black basalt, granite, or granodiorite sphinx originally discovered byÉdouard Naville inQantir bearing a damaged inscription determined to bekꜣ-sbk-rꜥ the praenomen of Sobekneferu.[131] The sphinx's current location is also unknown.[132]

One statuette (Berlin ÄM 14475) of Sobekneferu with her visage is known.[133] It was bequeathed to theEgyptian Museum of Berlin by 'Dr. Deibel' in 1899 but lost duringWorld War II, yet its existence is assured by photographs and a plaster cast made in 1905.[134] The fragment is made of greywacke[i] and measures 0.09 m (3.5 in) wide by 0.062 m (2.4 in) deep and is 0.14 m (5.5 in) tall.[137] It depicts a woman wearing a Hathor wig with a hole in her skull apparently there to receive a headdress, possibly a crown. It is uninscribed, and thus unidentifiable alone, but can be dated to the late Twelfth to Thirteenth Dynasty by its style.[138] Biri Fay proposed the possible identification with Sobekneferu in 1988 writing '[o]ne such example, the bust of a queen of the late Middle Kingdom ... with the features of Amenemhat III, is perhaps a representation of Nofrusobek'.[139] The upper fragment connects with the lower part of a seated statuette (MFA 24.742), discovered byGeorge Andrew Reisner in the temple ofTaharqa, of theTwenty-Fifth Dynasty, atSemna and held at theMuseum of Fine Arts, Boston.[140] The greywacke[j] lower fragment measures 0.085 m (3.3 in) wide by 0.175 m (6.9 in) deep and rising 0.214 m (8.4 in) high.[143] It depicts a woman with her hands on her lap seated upon a throne bearing the royal symbolsmꜣ tꜣwy[xv] flanked by plants representing Upper and Lower Egypt on each side.[144] The identity of the subject was confirmed on connecting the two pieces. The upper half depicts a woman of the Twelfth to Thirteenth Dynasty, whilst the lower half with itssmꜣ tꜣwy inscription designates a seated pharaoh, which in combination leaves a single potential candidate: Sobekneferu.[145]

Buildings

[edit]

Sobekneferu invariably related herself to Amenemhat III, suggesting that she was a royal daughter, whilst never mentioning her predecessor Amenemhat IV, indicating they may have only been step-siblings and that his mother may not have been a member of the royal family.[146] One such association comes from a limestone block (LDUCE-UC 14337) from 'the Labyrinth' of the pyramid at Hawara bearing both Amenemhat III and Sobekneferu's names that also contains the only known reference to a goddessDḥdḥt.[147] Further inscriptions from Hawara include: Three blocks (including Berlin 1164) found by Karl Richard Lepsius containing fragmentary cartouches reconstructed with Sobekneferu's name,[148] a granite block discovered by Flinders Petrie bearing no name, but connected to Sobekneferu by its content which reads '... her monument to her father forever',[149][k] and a 0.4 m (1 ft 4 in) section of an up to 7 m (23 ft 0 in) tall red granite column bearing the serekhs of Amenemhat III and Sobekneferu with a Horus falcon atop each. The Horus of Amenemhat III carries a composite of anꜥnḫ sign andḏd pillar, representing life and stability respectively, that it presents to the Horus of Sobekneferu.[151] This imagery indicates that Amenemhat III was deified before the column was built and reflects Sobekneferu's intent to legitimise her reign by securing his favour.[152] The evidence from Hawara suggests that 'the Labyrinth' was completed during Sobekneferu's reign.[153] By contrast, Amenemhat IV's name does not appear at Hawara and with the exception of the temple of Renenutet atMedinet Madi he is unattested in the Faiyum region.[154]

TheStaatliche Museen zu Berlin possesses an alabaster fragment (Berlin 38/66) acquired in 1966 that bears the names of Amenemhat III and Sobekneferu enclosed in rectangles and in association with Sobek.[155] The provenance of this item is unknown, but it too may originally have come from Hawara.[156] Marco Zecchi comments that the contents of the inscription suggest a dual purpose to draw a connection between Sobekneferu and Amenemhat III via Sobek and then to employ the god's authority over Egypt, shown by his titleḥqꜣ idbwy,[xvi] to grant legitimacy to Sobekneferu as Amenemat III's successor.[157]

There is evidence that she built in Heracleopolis Magna[98] from a destroyed 'temple of Kom el-Akareb',[158] south of the temple of Haryshef,[159] which remains unidentified.[160] It appears to be oriented towards thepyramid of Senusret II which may indicate a Middle Kingdom origin.[161] The portico of this temple is partially preserved.[162] In 1915,Georges Daressy discovered a pair of colossi thatRamesses II – and laterMerneptah[163] – had appropriated from an earlier Twelfth Dynasty pharaoh[164] – potentially Senusret III, based on a third colossus from this king that was found in 2011, or Amenemhat IV.[161] Whilst excavating, Daressy found a red granite architrave bearing Sobekneferu's names reused in the temple's pillars.[165] Four more granitepapyriform columns bear Sobekneferu's inscriptions, while a further ten granite beams may originate from the same source.[160]

  • Columns inscribed with the names of Amenemhat III and Sobekneferu, from the Egyptian Museum, Cairo
    Columns inscribed with the names of Amenemhat III and Sobekneferu, from theEgyptian Museum, Cairo

Uncertain attestations

[edit]

A possible reference to Sobekneferu before her accession was found on a statue base discovered inGezer in 1971,[166] but its current whereabouts is unknown.[167] The statue fragment made of granite gneiss measured 0.117 m (4.6 in) wide by 0.102 m (4.0 in) deep and rose to a height of 0.056 m (2.2 in).[168] It is partial, preserving only the pedestal and feet of the subject with identical, albeit very fragmentary, inscriptions on either side.[169] These bear Sobekneferu's nomen and identify her as asꜣ.t-nsw.[170][xvii] Nevertheless, there are multiple candidate subjects available: Sobekneferu, daughter of Senusret I;[l] Sobekneferu, presumed daughter of Amenemhat III; or even a third as yet unknown Sobekneferu.[179]

A damaged statuette (MET 65.59.1) of a woman in theMetropolitan Museum of Art (The MET) in New York has been suggested to represent Sobekneferu.[180] The schist statuette measures 0.163 m (6.4 in) vertically, 0.11 m (4.3 in) frontally, and 0.75 m (30 in) sagitally.[181] The woman's face is badly damaged, retaining only the features of her brow, left eye, cheek, and traces of her nose.[182] She wears a shoulder-length globular wig which frames her ears,[182] and a crown composed of auraeus – now headless – flanked by two vultures with outstretched wings which is of unknown iconography.[183] She was probably seated, her arms were crossed across her chest with the left hand alone protruding from beneath herḥb-sd cloak pulled taught revealing her chest and shoulders.[184] This posture and garb are known from a handful of Third and Fourth Dynasty images of royal women.[185] The omission of the symbols of royal authority – thewꜣs scepter andḥḏt crown – suggests the subject may be a royal mother rather than a pharaoh.[186] It proves equally difficult to place in context: The style of the ears and eyelids preclude a dating earlier than the reign of Senusret III; however, the presence of archaic features from the Old Kingdom is unattested in the late Middle Kingdom suggesting a later date when both Old and Middle Kingdom styles were in vogue, particularly between theTwenty-Second andTwenty-Sixth Dynasties.[187] It has a companion in a granite statuette head (ÆIN 595) found in theNy Carlsberg Glyptotek in Copenhagen that, though substantially worn, bears the same style globular wig and uraeus – whether it also shares the vulture iconography is indeterminable – placing the two statuettes as contemporaneous which is easier to explain with a late Middle Kingdom date.[188]

A statue-head (MET 08.200.2) of a Twelfth Dynasty king[m] in the MET discovered in a burial shaft south of the causeway of the pyramid of Amenemhat I at El Lisht remains unassigned, though candidates include Amenemhat I,[190] III,[191] IV,[192] Senusret III,[193] and Sobekneferu.[194] The 0.14 m (5.5 in) tall limestone head's style is akin to those from late in Amenemhat III's reign. It may belong to a shrine from the same pyramid of which a partial limestone lintel (MET 22.1.12a, b), measuring 0.25 m (9.8 in) high by 0.65 m (2 ft 2 in) wide, bearing Amenemhat IV's name and titles has been recovered.[195][n] The image bears a striking resemblance to Amenemhat IV, but has softer, more feminine features and is free of the wrinkles and depressions that characterise the bridge of Amenemhat IV's nose, leading Simon Connor to propose that it might be Sobekneferu.[194]

A king's face from a statue (MET 29.100.150) of unknown provenance may speculatively represent Sobekneferu.[198] It was bequeathed to The MET by Louisine W. Havemeyer in 1929 at which time it was identified as bearing the likeness of Amenemhat III,[199] an attribution which remains the norm.[200] The statue is 1:3 scale[199] with a height of 0.089 m (3.5 in) carved into a grey marble.[201] Its face is remarkably intact[202] though only small fragments of the royalnms headdress are present and nothing below the neckline.[198] It is wrinkle-free, with a defined bone structure and slight traces of loose skin; the nose has a slight characteristic arch with a bulbous tip; the lower lip bears a distinct depression; and the eyes are formed into the hooded almond shape recognisable in late Twelfth Dynasty portraiture.[203] William Hayes assigned it to the 'expressive style' ofAmenemhat III's sculptural tradition for its idealistic presentation of the young subject and contrasted it against a much later statue-head in black granite that portrayed him with 'utter and unrelenting realism'.[204] Dorothea Arnold writes that the face displays 'an unmistakable femine character' making it 'tempting to identify the pharaoh represented as Queen Sobekneferu'.[198]

  • Damaged statuette of a late Middle Kingdom queen (MET 65.59.1) in theMetropolitan Museum of Art, New York, possibly Sobekneferu
  • The unique twin vultures with wings outstretched either side of a uraeus wound through the centre of the subject's head
  • The head of an undetermined Twelfth Dynasty king (MET 08.200.2), perhaps of Amenemhat IV or Sobekneferu

Historical sources

[edit]

In theThutmosid period, she is listed on theKarnak list of early Egyptian kings.[205] In theRamesside period, she is mentioned in theSaqqara Tablet,[206] andTurin Canon,[98] but is conspicuously excluded from theAbydos King List.[207] The Turin Canon – second entry of the sixth column[208] – credits her with a reign of 3 years, 10 months, and 24 days.[209] Her exclusion at Abydos, along with all other female kings, pharaohs of theFirst andSecond Intermediate Periods, and of theAmarna Period, indicates whoSeti I and Ramesses II viewed as legitimate rulers of Egypt.[207] In the Hellenistic period, Manetho gives her the nameΣκεμιoφρις ('Skemiophris') and credits her with a reign of four years.[29]

In the opening half of theEighteenth Dynasty, a visiting scribe(s) left a pair of inscriptions referencing Sobekneferu inTT60 belonging to Senet, mother or wife ofIntefiqer, vizier underSenusret I.[210] The tomb contains the largest corpus of graffito amongst those in theTheban necropolis,[211] indicating a pronounced interest in site driven by some combination of its prominent siting atop the hill atSheikh Abd el-Qurna, impeccable state of preservation, contemporaneously perceived ancientness – few monuments in the area originate from the period[212] –, and/or assumed affiliation with the royal house of the Twelfth Dynasty – perhaps inferred from the unique depiction of a seated king (Senusret I) by its entrance which do not otherwise appear in private tombs before the New Kingdom.[213] The two inscriptions appear to erroneously identify the tomb as either belonging to or belonging to the time of Sobekneferu – a portion of the first inscription is now illegible casting doubt on its precise reading.[214]

Burial

[edit]
Map of the El Lisht pyramid field by Karl Richard Lepsius.Northern Mazghuna pyramid (middle, top).

Sobekneferu's tomb has not yet been positively identified.[215] There is aSekhem Sobekneferu mentioned on a papyrus (LDUCE-UC 32778) found atHarageh which may identify her monument.[216] On a Thirteenth Dynasty funerary stela (Marseille 223) from Abydos, now in Marseille, there is mention of aỉr.y-ꜥ.t[xviii] of Sobekneferu named Heby attesting to an ongoing funerary cult.[217]

Mazghuna

[edit]

Two pyramids atMazghuna were cleared and excavated byErnest Mackay in 1910–1911 who attributed them to the final two suzerains of the Twelfth Dynasty, Amenemhat IV and Sobekneferu.[218][o] No name was recovered from either site, so Mackay based his assignment on its similarity to the Hawara pyramid, proposing that '[t]he northern pyramid, being the largest, was probably intended for the former ruler, but it is practically certain that he must have been buried elsewhere, for the tomb had never been used'.[222][p] Since then, scholars have frequently[226] designated them to Amenemhat IV and Sobekneferu,[227] with the North Mazghuna pyramid typically assigned to Sobekneferu.[228]

Only the substructure of the pyramid was completed; construction of the superstructure and wider temple complex was never begun. The substructure passages had a complex plan: A stairway descended south from the east side of the pyramid leading to a square chamber connecting to a sloping westward passage up to aportcullis – consisting of a 42,000 kg (93,000 lb) quartzite block intended to slide into and block the passage – beyond which it wound through several more turns and a second, smaller portcullis before terminating at the antechamber. South of it lay the burial chamber which was near wholly occupied by a quartzite monolith vessel for the sarcophagus. In a deep recess lay a quartzite lid which was to be slid over the coffin and locked into place with a stone block. All of the exposed surfaces were painted red with additional lines of black paint. Though the burial place had been constructed, no burial was interred at the site. Outside lay a mudbrick causeway leading to the pyramid built to serve the workforce.[229]

Mackay's designation preceded the discoveries of the pyramids ofKhendjer[q] andAmeny Qemau[r] of the Thirteenth Dynasty which have been noted to resemble those in Mazghuna more than the one in Hawara.[232] Thus, some scholars have attributed the pyramids to the Thirteenth Dynasty instead.[233] They are proposed by Nabil Swelim and Aidan Dodson to follow a chronological order of Hawara, Ameny-Qemau, North Mazghuna, South Mazghuna, and Khendjer.[234] As to whom they might belong, Dodson proposes two rulers amongSekhemre Khutawy Sobekhotep,Hotepibre,Sewadjkare,Nedjemibre,Khaankhre Sobekhotep, andAmenemhat VII. For Amenemhat IV and Sobekneferu, Dodson instead proposes theSouth Dahshur A pyramid which he says 'should probably be placed within the twenty-five years following the death of [Amenemhat] III'.[235]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

General

  1. ^Proposed dates for the reign of Sobekeneferu: c. 1812–1809 BC,[2] c. 1805–1802 BC,[3][4] c. 1805–1801 BC,[5] c. 1799–1795 BC,[6] c. 1790–1786 BC,[7][8] c. 1790–1785 BC,[9] c. 1789–1786 BC (HC),[10] c. 1787–1783 BC,[11] c. 1785–1782 BC,[12] c. 1785–1781 BC,[13] c. 1782–1778 BC,[14] c. 1777–1773 BC,[15][16] c. 1763–1760 BC,[17] c. 1763–1759 BC (LC),[18] c. 1760–1755 BC.[19]
  2. ^Siesse also noted a similarity between the Horus name ofSekhemrekhutawy Khabaw (whom Siesse identifies with Sobekhotep I)ḫꜥ-bꜣw with that of Amenemhat III'sꜥꜣ-bꜣw.[42]
  3. ^There is debate as to whether this was a conscious effort by Senusret III to wrest power away from local governors, or moreso a consequence of centralization that occurred as officials moved to the capital and into the court of the regnant for work.[47]
  4. ^The topic of co-regencies during the Middle Kingdom remains fraught. Some Egyptologists obstinately refuse to entertain the idea of them, while others treat their existence as settled fact. The issue has thus occupied a substantial fraction of academic discourse on chronological issues for the period.[51]
  5. ^The proposition of a coregency between Sobekneferu and Amenemhat III, put forth byPercy Newberry[60] and laterAlan Gardiner,[61] is generally rejected.[62] Similarly, a coregency period between Sobekenefru and Amenehat IV is also unevidenced.[63]
  6. ^There is some evidence for other earlier female rulers. As early as theFirst Dynasty,Neithhotep has been proposed as a possible regent on the basis of a palace seal with royal insignia.[69] In the same dynasty,Merneith may have ruled as regent for her son.[70] In theFifth Dynasty,Setibhor has been proposed to have been a female king regnant based on the manner her monuments appeared to have been targeted for destruction.[71] In theSixth Dynasty,Nitocris is generally considered as a king,[72] though there is little proof of her historicity[71][73] and she is not mentioned prior to theEighteenth Dynasty.[72] The recounting of Nitocris' reign may be a Greek legend[73] and the name may originate from an incorrect translation ofNeitiqerty Siptah.[74]
  7. ^In the Thirteenth Dynasty, seven kings bore nomem invoking Sobek:Sobekhotep I,Sobekhotep II,Sobekhotep III,Sobekhotep IV,Sobekhotep V,Sobekhotep VI, andSobekhotep VII. In the Sixteenth Dynasty a further king bore such a nomen:Sobekhotep VIII. Finally in the Seventeenth Dynasty two more kings bore such nomen:Sobekemsaf I andSobekemsaf II.[80]
  8. ^There is no firm consensus across Egyptologists as to whether the Middle Kingdom period concludes with theTwelfth orThirteenth Dynasty. There is a continuation in the arts and culture following the transition between the two dynasties, but an immediate political change as the longevity of individual suzerains dissipates from decades-long to years- or months-long. Thus, academics focussing on the former subject tend to include the Thirteenth Dynasty in the Middle Kingdom, whereas those focussed on the latter subject identify it with theSecond Intermediate Period.[91]
  9. ^It is alternatively described as being steatite[135] orslate.[136]
  10. ^This too is described as being either steatite[141] or slate.[142]
  11. ^It is open to interpretation whether 'her father' refers to Amenemhat III or to a god.[150]
  12. ^This daughter is attested to on an inscribed syenite offering stand (MET 34.1.11) found in a rubbish pile at thepyramid of Senusret I at El-Lisht and thought to bearsꜣt-nsw sbk-nfrw.[171][172][173] In the vicinity an ivory wand (Cairo CG 9438 or JE 31046) inscribed forsꜣt-nsw nfrw-ptḥ (Neferuptah) was also found.[171][174][175] Ryholt notes that the pyramid complex was regularly visited well into the Thirteenth Dynasty and argues therefore that there is 'nothing to indicate' that this attestation refers to a contemporary of Senusret I.[176] Dodson and Hilton consider that the woman referred to is probably the daughter of Senusret I, but acknowledge the possibility of it being Sobekneferu.[177] The fragment is very partial preserving onlysꜣt-n... sbk-... which might even be...-n sꜣt-sbk (Sat-Sobek) thus further complicating identification.[178]
  13. ^The head bears the royal nemes and uraeus, establishing the subject as a ruler.[189]
  14. ^The lintel bears an inscription reading 'long live the good god,Mꜣꜥ-ḫrw-rꜥ (Maa-kheru-re), given life forever'.[196] Maa-kheru-re, meaning 'the righteous one of Ra' or 'the true of voice of Ra' is Amenemhat IV's praenomen.[197]
  15. ^TheNorthern Mazghuna pyramid, known previously, was apparently entered byJacques de Morgan in the late 19th century,[219] but the results of his work were evidently never published.[220][221] TheSouthern Mazghuna pyramid was discovered and cleared during that excavation season.[222]
  16. ^The two pyramids are discussed in chapters xiii (southern) and xiv (northern).[223] On attributing the southern pyramid: 'For whom was the southern pyramid of Mazghuneh built? The reply must be either Amenemhat IV, or his sister and successor Queen Sebek-neferu ... [t]he former king followed his father Amenemhat III ... [whose] tomb agrees in many important respects with the tomb I have just described, but is ... the earlier'.[224] On the northern: 'We cannot say for whom this tomb was intended, for no trace of a name was found in the building, but, as we have noted, the presumption is that it was for Amenemhat IV or his immediate successor. It is also difficult to decide whether the tomb was ever in use ... yet the fact that the wall ... was broken would suggest that plunderers found [the chamber] blocked up when they entered it ...'.[225]
  17. ^Discovered and excavated by Gustave Jéquier between 1929–1931.[230]
  18. ^Discovered byCharles Arthur Musès in 1957; investigated by Vito Maragioglio and Celeste Rinaldi in 1968.[231]

Titles, names, and epithets

  1. ^king's mother
  2. ^king's wife
  3. ^king's sister
  4. ^Amenemhat's son
  5. ^The powerful one of Re is Protector of the Two Lands
  6. ^The daughter of the powerful one is Mistress of the Two Lands
  7. ^daugher of Re
  8. ^female Horus
  9. ^Golden Falcon; orḥr-nbw Golden Horus
  10. ^son of Re
  11. ^Sobek ofShedyt
  12. ^He of the Sedge and Bee; King of Upper and Lower Egypt
  13. ^Beauty of Sobek of Shedyt
  14. ^Theka of Sobek-Re; Sobek is theka of Re
  15. ^union of the Two Lands
  16. ^ruler of the Two Banks
  17. ^king's daughter
  18. ^storeroom administrator

References

[edit]
  1. ^Schneider 2006, p. 174.
  2. ^Grajetzki 2013, p. 6.
  3. ^Keller 2005, p. 294.
  4. ^Oppenheim et al. 2015, p. xix.
  5. ^Berman & Letellier 1996, p. 47.
  6. ^Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 273.
  7. ^Gillam 2001, p. 301.
  8. ^Redford 2001, Egyptian King List.
  9. ^Grimal 1992, p. 391.
  10. ^Pignattari 2018, p. 12.
  11. ^Lehner 2008, p. 8.
  12. ^abClayton 1994, p. 84.
  13. ^Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 289.
  14. ^Hayes 1978, p. 170.
  15. ^Shaw 2003, p. 483.
  16. ^Cooney 2018, p. 6.
  17. ^Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 480 & 492.
  18. ^Pignattari 2018, pp. 2 & 12.
  19. ^Wilkinson 2011, p. xvii.
  20. ^abcdeLeprohon 2013, p. 60.
  21. ^abcdefvon Beckerath 1984a, p. 200.
  22. ^The British Museum n.d.b, Description.
  23. ^Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 95;Grajetzki 2006, pp. 61–62;Diamond 2020, p. 2;Pignattari 2018, pp. 5 & 12.
  24. ^Franke 1995, p. 746;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, pp. 28 & 273;Leprohon 2001, p. 69;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81;Grajetzki 2013, p. 6;Gillam 2018, p. 1.
  25. ^Ryholt 1997, pp. 209–210.
  26. ^Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 95.
  27. ^Callender 2003, p. 158–159;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81.
  28. ^Tyldesley 2009, p. 81, table bottom right;Zecchi 2010, p. 84.
  29. ^abWaddell & Manetho 1964, p. 69.
  30. ^von Beckerath 1984b, pp. 1050 & 1051;Grimal 1992, p. 171;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 273;Budka 2000, p. 17;Robins 2001, p. 108;Callender 2003, p. 158;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81;Gillam 2018, p. 1;Pignattari 2018, p. 13.
  31. ^Zecchi 2010, p. 84.
  32. ^Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 95;Grajetzki 2006, pp. 58 & 128.
  33. ^Dodson & Hilton 2004, pp. 93, 95–96 & 99;Grajetzki 2006, p. 58.
  34. ^Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 98;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81.
  35. ^Dodson & Hilton 2004, pp. 92, 95–98.
  36. ^von Beckerath 1984b;Budka 2000, p. 17;Gillam 2001, p. 301;Tyldesley 2009, pp. 80–81.
  37. ^Leprohon 2013, p. 61.
  38. ^Ryholt 1997, p. 209;Dodson & Hilton 2004, pp. 102 & 104.
  39. ^Ryholt 1997, p. 294.
  40. ^Bell 1975, pp. 262–263.
  41. ^Siesse 2016–2017, p. 176;Gillam 2018, p. 1.
  42. ^Siesse 2016–2017, p. 176.
  43. ^Gillam 2018, p. 1.
  44. ^Grimal 1992, pp. 166–170;Franke 1995, p. 743;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, pp. 28 & 259;Callender 2003, pp. 154–158;Canhão 2019, p. 18.
  45. ^Franke 1995, p. 743;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 259;Grajetzki 2006, p. 57.
  46. ^Grimal 1992, p. 167;Clayton 1994, pp. 84–85;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 259;Delia 2001, p. 268;Tyldesley 2009, p. 77;Wilkinson 2011, pp. 174–175.
  47. ^Callender 2003, p. 155;Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 90.
  48. ^Grimal 1992, pp. 168–169;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, pp. 259–260;Delia 2001, p. 268;Callender 2003, p. 154;Grajetzki 2006, pp. 52 & 54;Willems 2010, p. 95;Wilkinson 2011, p. 176;Grajetzki 2013, p. 5.
  49. ^Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 260;Delia 2001, p. 268;Callender 2003, p. 154;Grajetzki 2006, p. 52;Wilkinson 2011, p. 744.
  50. ^Franke 1995, p. 743;Delia 2001, p. 268;Simpson 2001, p. 455;Callender 2003, pp. 138–139 & 154;Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 91;Grajetzki 2013, p. 5.
  51. ^Murnane 2001, p. 308;Callender 2003, p. 138;Schneider 2006, pp. 170–171;Haney 2020, pp. 1–2.
  52. ^Grimal 1992, p. 170;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 28;Leprohon 2001, p. 69;Callender 2003, p. 156;Grajetzki 2013, pp. 5–6.
  53. ^Grimal 1992, p. 170;Clayton 1994, pp. 87–88;Franke 1995, p. 745;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 28;Callender 2003, p. 156;Grajetzki 2006, pp. 58–59;Tyldesley 2009, p. 78;Willems 2010, pp. 96–97.
  54. ^Grimal 1992, p. 170;Clayton 1994, pp. 87–88;Franke 1995, p. 745;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 28;Leprohon 2001, p. 69;Callender 2003, pp. 156–157;Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 91;Grajetzki 2006, pp. 59–60;Tyldesley 2009, p. 78.
  55. ^Schneider 2006, p. 173;Grajetzki 2013, p. 5.
  56. ^Grimal 1992, p. 170;Clayton 1994, p. 89;Franke 1995, p. 746;Ryholt 1997, p. 210;Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 91;Grajetzki 2006, p. 61;Schneider 2006, p. 173;Haney 2020, pp. 94–96.
  57. ^Grimal 1992, p. 171;Franke 1995, p. 746;Callender 2003, p. 158;Schneider 2006, p. 173;Grajetzki 2013, p. 6.
  58. ^Clayton 1994, p. 89;Callender 2003, p. 158;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81.
  59. ^Grimal 1992, p. 171;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 28;Wilkinson 2011, pp. 180–181.
  60. ^Newberry 1943, p. 74.
  61. ^Gardiner 1961, p. 141.
  62. ^Murnane 1977, pp. 20 & 23;Pignattari 2018, pp. 13 & 108.
  63. ^abBudka 2000, p. 17.
  64. ^Zecchi 2010, p. 84;Canhão 2019, p. 10.
  65. ^Budka 2000, p. 17;Landua-McCormack 2008, pp. 19–20;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81;Canhão 2019, pp. 7 & 10–11.
  66. ^Ryholt 1997, p. 212;Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 102;Wegner & Cahail 2014, p. 23;Pignattari 2018, pp. 99–103.
  67. ^Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 273;Robins 2001, p. 108;Grajetzki 2006, p. 61;Wilkinson 2011, p. 181;Gillam 2018, p. 1;Diamond 2020, p. 2.
  68. ^Grimal 1992, p. 171;Budka 2000, p. 17;Gillam 2001, p. 301;Cooney 2018, pp. 84 & 87;Gillam 2018, p. 1.
  69. ^Porter 2001, pp. 516–517.
  70. ^Cooney 2018, p. 30.
  71. ^abRoth 2005, p. 12.
  72. ^abRyholt 2000, p. 92.
  73. ^abCooney 2018, pp. 9–10.
  74. ^Ryholt 2000, pp. 92–93.
  75. ^Budka 2000, p. 17;Gillam 2001, p. 301;Callender 2003, p. 159;Grajetzki 2006, pp. 62–63;Diamond 2020, pp. 8–9.
  76. ^Budka 2000, p. 17;Zecchi 2010, pp. 84–85;Gillam 2018, p. 1;Pignattari 2018, p. 13;Diamond 2020, p. 7.
  77. ^Shaw & Nicholson 1995;Doxey 2001, pp. 300–301;Grajetzki 2006, p. 119.
  78. ^Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 273;Doxey 2001, p. 300.
  79. ^Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 273;Budka 2000, p. 17.
  80. ^Schneider 2006, pp. 176 & 185, Ryholt,Situation (1997).
  81. ^Clayton 1994, p. 89;Callender 2003, p. 159;Grajetzki 2006, p. 61;Gillam 2018, p. 1;Diamond 2020, pp. 2–3.
  82. ^Budka 2000, p. 17;Gillam 2001, p. 301;Wilfong 2001, p. 496;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81;Zecchi 2010, pp. 84 & 87–88;Willems 2010, pp. 96–97;Wilkinson 2011, p. 181.
  83. ^Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 273;Budka 2000, p. 17;Grajetzki 2006, p. 62;Pignattari 2018, p. 12.
  84. ^Gillam 2001, p. 301;Grajetzki 2006, p. 62;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81;Zecchi 2010, pp. 86–87.
  85. ^Callender 2003, p. 159;Diamond 2020, p. 3.
  86. ^Gillam 2001, p. 301;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81;Canhão 2019, p. 12.
  87. ^Petrie, Wainwright & Mackay 1912, pp. 37, 49, & 54;Edwards 1947, p. 193;Grimal 1992, p. 171;Clayton 1994, p. 89;Gillam 2001, p. 301.
  88. ^Fakhry 1969, pp. 232–233;Hayes 1978, pp. 196 & 341;Simpson 1980, p. 1196;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, pp. 28 & 273;Budka 2000, pp. 16 & 18;Verner 2001, p. 433;Arnold 2003, p. 141;Lehner 2008, pp. 184–185.
  89. ^Franke 1995, p. 746;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 273;Gillam 2001, p. 301;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81.
  90. ^Grimal 1992, pp. 171 & 182;Clayton 1994, pp. 89–90;Wilkinson 2011, p. 185;Canhão 2019, p. 18.
  91. ^Grajetzki 2013, p. 2.
  92. ^Clayton 1994, p. 90;Budka 2000, p. 18;Grajetzki 2006, p. 63;Tyldesley 2009, p. 81.
  93. ^Grimal 1992, p. 182;Ryholt 1997, p. 2;Quirke 2001a, p. 261;Callender 2003, p. 159;Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 100;Dodson 2012, p. 1.
  94. ^Grimal 1992, p. 183;Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 187;Budka 2000, p. 18;Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 100;Willems 2010, p. 98;Wilkinson 2011, p. 185;Dodson 2012, p. 1.
  95. ^Grimal 1992, pp. 182–183;Ryholt 1997, pp. 12–13 & 317;Callender 2003, pp. 159–160;Grajetzki 2006, pp. 65–66;Tyldesley 2009, p. 82, table.
  96. ^Franke 1995, p. 746;Callender 2003, p. 159;Wilkinson 2011, p. 185.
  97. ^Quirke 2001b, p. 395;Callender 2003, pp. 159–160;Grajetzki 2006, pp. 66–68.
  98. ^abcCallender 2003, p. 159.
  99. ^Callender 2003, p. 159;Schneider 2006, p. 173.
  100. ^Almásy & Kiss 2010, pp. 174–175.
  101. ^Callender 2003, p. 159;The British Museum n.d.b, Description.
  102. ^The British Museum n.d.b, Materials, Technique & Dimensions.
  103. ^Habachi 1954, pp. 463–464.
  104. ^Aufrère 1990, p. 13.
  105. ^Newberry 1943, pp. 74–75, fn. 1;Yoyotte 1957, p. 86, n.
  106. ^The British Museum n.d.c, Description & Dimensions.
  107. ^Petrie 1889b, p. 9, no. 276.
  108. ^Petrie 1894, pp. 197–198.
  109. ^Gauthier 1907, MIFAO vol. 17, GLR vol. 1, p. 342.
  110. ^Petrie 1917, pl. XIV.
  111. ^Berman & Letellier 1996, pp. 46–47;Gillam 2001, p. 301;Callender 2003, p. 159.
  112. ^Diamond 2022, p. 213.
  113. ^Connor 2020, p. 371, Paris E 27135.
  114. ^Louvre n.d.b, Caractéristiques matérielles.
  115. ^Berman & Letellier 1996, pp. 46–47;Robins 2001, p. 108;Callender 2003, p. 159.
  116. ^Berman & Letellier 1996, pp. 46–47;Diamond 2022, p. 9.
  117. ^Canhão 2019, p. 14;Diamond 2022, p. 8.
  118. ^Diamond 2022, pp. 10–12.
  119. ^Berman & Letellier 1996, pp. 46–47;Connor 2020, p. 46;Diamond 2022, pp. 9–10.
  120. ^Canhão 2019, p. 14;Diamond 2022, pp. 5–7.
  121. ^Diamond 2022, p. 5.
  122. ^Habachi 1954, pp. 458–460;Bietak 1999, p. 950;Connor 2020, pp. 380–381, Tell el-Dab'a 04, 05, & 06.
  123. ^Habachi 1954, pp. 458–461;Gillam 2001, p. 301;Grajetzki 2006, p. 62.
  124. ^Habachi 1954, pp. 459–460, pl. VIII.
  125. ^Habachi 1954, pp. 59–60.
  126. ^Diamond 2020, p. 3.
  127. ^Grajetzki 2006, p. 62.
  128. ^Habachi 1954, p. 59, pl. VII B.
  129. ^Pignattari 2018, p. 14.
  130. ^Connor 2020, pp. 380–381, Tell el-Dab'a 04, 05, & 06.
  131. ^Naville 1887, p. 21, pl. ix. c;Habachi 1954, p. 462;Connor 2020, p. 46.
  132. ^Connor 2020, p. 380, Tell el-Dab'a 03.
  133. ^Fay, et al. 2015, p. 89;Canhão 2019, p. 15.
  134. ^Fay, et al. 2015, pp. 89–91;Connor 2020, p. 274, Berlin ÄM 14475.
  135. ^Connor 2020, p. 274, Berlin ÄM 14475;MFA n.d..
  136. ^Fechheimer 1914, pl. 57–58.
  137. ^Fay, et al. 2015, p. 89.
  138. ^Fechheimer 1914, p. 44, pl. 57–58;Canhão 2019, p. 15;Connor 2020, p. 274, Berlin ÄM 14475.
  139. ^Fay 1988, p. 75, pl. 29c.
  140. ^Fay, et al. 2015, pp. 89–91;MFA n.d..
  141. ^Connor 2020, p. 280, Boston 24.742.
  142. ^Dunham & Janssen 1960, p. 33, 24-2-323 (MFA 24.742).
  143. ^Dunham & Janssen 1960, p. 33, pl. 40 A–C;Fay, et al. 2015, p. 89;MFA n.d..
  144. ^Dunham & Janssen 1960, p. 33, 24-2-323 (MFA 24.742), pl. 40 A–C;Connor 2020, p. 280, Boston 24.742;MFA n.d..
  145. ^Canhão 2019, p. 15.
  146. ^Ryholt 1997, pp. 212–213;Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 95.
  147. ^Petrie 1890, pl. XI, 1;Uphill 2010, pp. 33–34, H.57;The Petrie Museum n.d.b.
  148. ^Habachi 1954, p. 462, pl. 11 D & 12 A;Lepsius n.d., Bd. 4, Abth. II, Bl. 140, e, f, & k.
  149. ^Petrie 1889a, pp. 6, 23, pl. XXVII 12;Habachi 1954, p. 463, pl. XXIII B.
  150. ^Grajetzki 2006, p. 62;Pignattari 2018, p. 12.
  151. ^Habachi 1954, p. 464, pl. XV;Budka 2000, p. 17;Diamond 2020, pp. 6–7.
  152. ^Habachi 1954, p. 465–466;Callender 1998, p. 233;Budka 2000, p. 17.
  153. ^Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 273;Budka 2000, p. 17;Grajetzki 2006, p. 62.
  154. ^Zecchi 2010, pp. 84–85;Pignattari 2018, pp. 107–108.
  155. ^Kaiser 1967, p. 42;Murnane 1977, p. 21.
  156. ^Grajetzki 2006, pp. 62 & 183, fn. 257.
  157. ^Zecchi 2010, pp. 85 & 160.
  158. ^Perez Die 2016, p. 134.
  159. ^Porter & Moss 1968, p. 119.
  160. ^abArnold 1996, p. 46.
  161. ^abPerez Die 2016, p. 135.
  162. ^Perez Die 2016, pp. 134–135.
  163. ^Porter & Moss 1968, p. 121.
  164. ^Daressy 1917, pp. 33, 35;Kitchen 1975–1990, vol. II, pp. 501–502, JdE 45975–45976.
  165. ^Daressy 1917, pp. 33–34;Habachi 1954, pp. 462–463.
  166. ^Ryholt 1997, p. 213;Budka 2000, p. 17;Pignattari 2018, p. 12.
  167. ^Connor 2020, p. 380, Tell Gezer 3.
  168. ^Weinstein 1974, pp. 49–50.
  169. ^Weinstein 1974, pp. 49–51;Diamond 2020, p. 6.
  170. ^Weinstein 1974, p. 50.
  171. ^abHayes 1978, p. 194.
  172. ^MMA n.d.d.
  173. ^JGU 2018–2025,MMA 34.1.11.
  174. ^Gautier & Jéquier 1902, pp. 57–58, 60 (fig. 68).
  175. ^JGU 2018–2025,Cairo CG 9438 A-B.
  176. ^Ryholt 1997, p. 213.
  177. ^Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 97.
  178. ^Arnold 1992, p. 58, pl. 70–71a (23).
  179. ^Weinstein 1974, pp. 51–53;Ryholt 1997, p. 213;Pignattari 2018, p. 12;Diamond 2020, p. 6.
  180. ^Cooney 2018, p. 339;Connor 2020, pp. 46–47, planche 27 2.6.2d–e.
  181. ^MMA n.d.
  182. ^abFischer 1996, p. 112.
  183. ^Callender 2003, p. 159;MMA n.d..
  184. ^Fischer 1996, p. 111;Callender 2003, p. 159;Connor 2020, p. 46.
  185. ^Fischer 1996, pp. 112–114;MMA n.d..
  186. ^Connor 2020, p. 46.
  187. ^Fischer 1996, pp. 116–117.
  188. ^Fischer 1996, pp. 117–118.
  189. ^Hayes 1978, p. 175.
  190. ^Hayes 1978, pp. 175–176.
  191. ^Mace 1908, p. 187, fig. 4.
  192. ^MMA n.d.b.
  193. ^Aldred 1970, pp. 41–43, fig. 21–22.
  194. ^abConnor 2020, p. 46, planche 27 2.6.2c.
  195. ^MMA n.d.b;MMA n.d.c.
  196. ^Hayes 1978, p. 200.
  197. ^Leprohon 2013, pp. 59–60, note 45.
  198. ^abcFrelinghuysen, et al. 1993, p. 114, pl. 102.
  199. ^abLansing 1930, pp. 54, 75–76.
  200. ^Hayes 1978, p. 199;Aldred 1970, p. 46, figures 29–31;Wildung 1984, pp. 210, 245, Abb. 183;Connor 2020, p. 362;Haney 2020, p. 291, 5.2.4.3.1.
  201. ^Connor 2020, p. 362, New York MMA 29.100.150.
  202. ^Aldred 1970, p. 47.
  203. ^Aldred 1970, p. 47;Hayes 1978, p. 199;Frelinghuysen, et al. 1993, p. 114, pl. 102.
  204. ^Hayes 1978, pp. 199–200.
  205. ^Louvre n.d., Chambre des Ancêtres.
  206. ^Hawass 2010, pp. 154–157.
  207. ^abThe British Museum n.d., Curator's comments.
  208. ^Kitchen 1975–1990, vol. II, pp. 827 (Papyrus Turin N. 1874) & 834 (Verso, Col. VI).
  209. ^Málek 1982, p. 97, fig. 2, col. 10, row. 2;Schneider 2006, p. 173;Ryholt 1997, p. 15.
  210. ^Ragazzoli 2013, pp. 271, 290–291, 299–300 (No. 2 & No. 3);Heffernan 2017, pp. 108–113, 335–337 (G00T01 & GT00T02).
  211. ^Ragazzoli 2013, p. 271.
  212. ^Grajetzki 2006, p. 91.
  213. ^Fischer-Elfert 2003, pp. 131–132;Bács 2006, pp. 5–8;Doncker 2012, pp. 26–27 & 32–33 (fn. 33, 34).
  214. ^Davies & Gardiner 1920, pp. 8 & 27–28 (No. 2 & 3);Doncker 2012, p. 26 & 32–33 (fn. 34);Heffernan 2017, pp. 108–110, fn. 115.
  215. ^Bell 1975, p. 260;Grajetzki 2006, p. 63;Theis 2009a, p. 58;Pignattari 2018, pp. 95–97.
  216. ^Cooney 2018, p. 96;The Petrie Museum n.d..
  217. ^Grajetzki 2001, p. 24;Siesse 2019, p. 130;JGU 2018–2025.
  218. ^Firchow 1942, p. 48;Edwards 1947, p. 193;Fakhry 1969, pp. 232–233;Callender 1998, p. 229;Verner 2001, pp. 432–433;Hölzl 2005, pp. 570–571;Landua-McCormack 2008, pp. 217–218 & 226;Theis 2009b, pp. 314 & 317;Pignattari 2018, p. 95.
  219. ^Petrie, Wainwright & Mackay 1912, p. 50, s. 71.
  220. ^Landua-McCormack 2008, pp. 217–218.
  221. ^Theis 2009b, p. 317.
  222. ^abPetrie, Wainwright & Mackay 1912, p. 37, s. 46.
  223. ^Petrie, Wainwright & Mackay 1912, pp. 41–50, 50–55.
  224. ^Petrie, Wainwright & Mackay 1912, p. 49, s. 70.
  225. ^Petrie, Wainwright & Mackay 1912, p. 54, s. 78.
  226. ^Simpson 1980, p. 1196;Theis 2009b, p. 313;Pignattari 2018, p. 96.
  227. ^Edwards 1947, p. 193.
  228. ^Porter & Moss 1968, p. 76;Badawy 1966, p. 111;Grimal 1992, p. 171;Callender 1998, p. 229;Budka 2000, p. 18.
  229. ^Petrie, Wainwright & Mackay 1912;Badawy 1966, pp. 111–112;Fakhry 1969, pp. 232;Verner 2001, p. 433;Lehner 2008, pp. 184–185;Theis 2009b, pp. 317–319.
  230. ^Jéquier 1933, p. 1.
  231. ^Swelim & Dodson 1998, pp. 319–320;Verner 2001, p. 437–438;Schiestl 2012, p. 54.
  232. ^Jéquier 1933, p. 67, fn. 3;Hayes 1978, p. 341;Dodson 1987, pp. 40–41.
  233. ^Fakhry 1969, p. 232;Hayes 1978, p. 341;Arnold 2003, p. 121;Hölzl 2005, pp. 570–571;Grajetzki 2006, p. 128;Dodson 2013, p. 29, fn. 61.
  234. ^Swelim & Dodson 1998, p. 330.
  235. ^Dodson 1987, p. 43.

Bibliography

[edit]

Books

[edit]
  • Almásy, Adrienn; Kiss, Enikő (2010). "Catalogue by Adrienn Almásy and Enikő Kiss". In Luft, Ulrich; Adrienn, Almásy (eds.).Bi'r Minayh, Report on the Survey 1998-2004. Studia Aegyptiaca. Budapest: Archaeolingua. pp. 173–193.ISBN 978-9639911116.
  • Arnold, Dieter (1992).The South Cemeteries of Lisht Volume III: The Pyramid Complex of Senwosret I. Publications of The Metropolitan Museum of Art Egyptian Expedition. Vol. XXV. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.ISBN 0-87099-612-6.
  • Arnold, Dieter (1996). "Hypostyle Halls of the Old and Middle Kingdoms". In Der Manuelian, Peter (ed.).Studies in Honor of William Kelly Simpson. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Museum of Fine Arts. pp. 38–54.ISBN 0-87846-390-9.
  • Arnold, Dieter (2003).The Encyclopaedia of Ancient Egyptian Architecture. London: I.B. Tauris.ISBN 978-1-86064-465-8.
  • Badawy, Alexander (1966).A History of Egyptian Architecture: The First Intermediate Period, the Middle Kingdom, and the Second Intermediate Period. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Berman, Lawrence; Letellier, Bernadette (1996).Pharaohs : Treasures of Egyptian Art from the Louvre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN 0-19-521235-5.
  • Bietak, Manfred (1999). "Tell ed-Dab'a, Second Intermediate Period". InBard, Kathryn (ed.).Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. London; New York: Routledge. pp. 949–953.ISBN 978-0-203-98283-9.
  • Callender, Gae (1998). "Materials for the Reign of Sobekneferu". In Eyre, Christopher J. (ed.).Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Egyptologists, Cambridge, 3-9 September 1995. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta. Vol. 82. Leuven: Peeters. pp. 227–236.ISBN 9042900148.ISSN 0777-978X.
  • Callender, Gae (2003). "The Middle Kingdom Renaissance (c. 2055–1650 BC)". In Shaw, Ian (ed.).The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 137–171.ISBN 978-0-19-815034-3.
  • Clayton, Peter A. (1994).Chronicle of the Pharaohs. London: Thames & Hudson.ISBN 978-0-500-05074-3.
  • Connor, Simon (2020).Être et paraître, Statues royales et privées de la fin du Moyen Empire et de la Deuxième Période intermédiaire (1850-1550 av. J.-C.). Middle Kingdom Studies (in French). Vol. 10. London: Golden House Publications.ISBN 978-1-906137-66-3.ISSN 2515-0944.
  • Cooney, Kara (2018).When Women Ruled the World: Six Queens of Egypt. Washington, DC: National Geographic.ISBN 978-1-4262-1977-1.
  • Davies, Norman de Garis;Gardiner, Alan H. (1920).The tomb of Antefoḳer, vizier of Sesostris I, and of his wife, Senet (no. 60). London: George Allen & Unwin.
  • Delia, Robert D. (2001). "Senwosret III". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 268–269.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Dodson, Aidan (2012). "Second Intermediate Period". In Bagnall, R. S.; Broderson, K.; Champion, C.B.; Erskine, A.; Huebner, S. R. (eds.).The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. West Sussex, UK: Wiley. pp. 1–3.doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah15135.ISBN 9781444338386.
  • Dodson, Aidan (2013) [1994].The Canopic Equipment Of The Kings of Egypt. London: Routledge.ISBN 9781136158148.
  • Dodson, Aidan; Hilton, Dyan (2004).The Complete Royal Families of Ancient Egypt. London: Thames & Hudson.ISBN 0-500-05128-3.
  • Doncker, Alexis Den (2012). "Theban Tomb Graffiti during the New Kingdom. Research on the Reception of Ancient Egyptians Images by Ancient Egyptians". In Kóthay, Katalin Anna (ed.).Art and Society: Ancient and Modern Contexts of Egyptian Art. Proceedings of the International Conference held at the Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest, 13–15 May 2010. Budapest: Museum of Fine Arts. pp. 23–34.ISBN 978-963-7063-91-6.
  • Doxey, Denise M. (2001). "Sobek". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 300–301.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Dunham, Dows; Janssen, Jozef Marie Antoon (1960).Semna Kumma. Second Cataract Forts. Vol. 1. Boston: Museum of Fine Arts.OCLC 1419130756.
  • Edwards, Iorwerth Eiddon Stephen (1947).The Pyramids of Egypt. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
  • Fakhry, Ahmed (1969) [1961].The Pyramids. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fay, Biri; Freed, Rita; Schelper, Thomas; Seyfried, Friederike (2015). "Neferusobek Project: Part I". In Miniaci, Gianluci; Grajetzki, Wolfram (eds.).The World of Middle Kingdom Egypt (2000-1550 BC). Vol. I. London: Golden House Publications. pp. 89–91.ISBN 978-1906137434.
  • Firchow, Otto (1942).Studien zu den Pyramidenanlagen der 12. Dynastie. Hamburg: Buchdruckerei Broschek & Company.
  • Franke, Detlef (1995). "The Middle Kingdom in Egypt". In Sasson, Jack M. (ed.).Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. Vol. 2. New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan. pp. 735–748.ISBN 0-684-19721-9.
  • Fechheimer, Hedwig (1914).Die Plastik Der Ägypter. Die Kunst Des Ostens (in German). Vol. Band I. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlag.OCLC 838068961.
  • Fischer, Henry George (1996).Varia Nova. Egyptian Studies. Vol. III. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.ISBN 0-87099-755-6.
  • Fischer-Elfert, Hans W. (2003). "Representations of the Past in New Kingdom Literature". In Tait, John (ed.).'Never Had the Like Occurred': Egypt's view of its past. Encounters with Ancient Egypt. London: UCL Press Institute of Archaeology. pp. 119–138.ISBN 1-84472-007-1.
  • Frelinghuysen, Alice Cooney; Tinterow, Gary; Stein, Susan Alyson; Wold, Gretchen; Meech, Julia (1993).Splendid Legacy: The Havemeyer Collection. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.ISBN 0-87099-664-9.
  • Gardiner, Alan H. (1961).Egypt of the Pharaohs: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gautier, Joseph Étienne;Jéquier, Gustave (1902).Mémoire sur les Fouilles de Licht (in French). Le Caire: l'Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale.
  • Gauthier, Henri (1907).Le Livre Des Rois d’Égypte: Recueil de Titres et Protocoles Royaux, Suivi d’Un Index Alphabetique. Mémoires publiés par les membres de l'Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale du Caire (in French). Vol. 17–21. Le Caire: l'Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.OCLC 2712785.
  • Gillam, Robyn (2001). "Sobekneferu". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 301.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Gillam, Robyn (2018). "Sobekneferu". In Bagnall, R. S.; Broderson, K.; Champion, C.B.; Erskine, A.; Huebner, S. R. (eds.).The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. West Sussex, UK: Wiley. pp. 1–2.doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah15135.ISBN 9781444338386.
  • Grajetzki, Wolfram (2001).Two Treasurers of the Middle Kingdom. Oxford: BAR Publishing.ISBN 9781841712864.
  • Grajetzki, Wolfram (2006).The Middle Kingdom of Ancient Egypt: History, Archaeology and Society. London: Duckworth.ISBN 0-7156-3435-6.
  • Grimal, Nicolas (1992).A History of Ancient Egypt. Translated by Ian Shaw. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.ISBN 978-0-631-19396-8.
  • Habachi, Labib (1954). "Khatâ'na-Qantîr : Importance".Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte. Vol. 52. Le Caire: l'Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale. pp. 443–559.OCLC 851266710.
  • Haney, Lisa Saladino (2020).Visualising Coregency: An Exploration of the Link between Royal Image and Co-Rule during the Reign of Senwosret III and Amenemhet III. Harvard Egyptological Studies. Vol. 8. Boston: Brill.ISBN 9789004422155.ISSN 2352-7501.
  • Hawass, Zahi (2010).Inside the Egyptian Museum with Zahi Hawass. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.ISBN 978-977-416-364-7.
  • Hayes, William (1978) [1946].The Scepter of Egypt: A Background for the Study of the Egyptian Antiquities in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Part 1. From the Earliest Times to the End of the Middle Kingdom. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.ISBN 0-87099-190-6.
  • Heffernan, Gabrielle Mary (2017).Remembering Royalty in ancient Egypt: Shared Memories of 'Royal Ancestors' by Private Individuals in the Eighteenth Dynasty (Doctor of Philosophy thesis). Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Retrieved8 February 2026.
  • Hölzl, Christian (2005) [1999]. "Mazghuna". In Bard, Kathryn A. (ed.).Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt. London: Routledge. pp. 570–571.ISBN 0-203-98283-5.
  • Jéquier, Gustave (1933).Fouilles à Saqqarah: Deux Pyramides du Moyen Empire (in French). Le Caire: l'Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale.
  • Kaiser, Werner (1967).Ägyptisches Museum Berlin : östlicher Stülerbau am Schloss Charlottenburg (in German). Berlin: Staatliche Museen Preussischer Kulturbesitz.OCLC 17144805.
  • Keller, Cathleen (2005). "Hatshepsut's Reputation in History". In Roehrig, Catharine (ed.).Hatshepsut From Queen to Pharaoh. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. pp. 294–298.ISBN 1-58839-173-6.
  • Kitchen, Kenneth A. (1975–1990).Ramesside Inscriptions: Historical and Biographical. Oxford: Blackwell.ISBN 0-903563-08-8.OCLC 1340684401.
  • Krauss, Rolf; Warburton, David (2006). "Conclusions and Chronological Tables". In Hornung, Erik; Krauss, Rolf; Warburton, David (eds.).Ancient Egyptian Chronology. Leiden: Brill. pp. 473–498.ISBN 978-90-04-11385-5.
  • Landua-McCormack, Dawn (2008).Dynasty XIII Kingship in Ancient Egypt: A Study of Political Power and Administration through an Investigation of the Royal Tombs of the Late Middle Kingdom (Doctor of Philosophy thesis). Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services. Retrieved12 February 2026.
  • Lehner, Mark (2008) [1997].The Complete Pyramids. New York: Thames & Hudson.ISBN 978-0-500-28547-3.
  • Leprohon, Ronald J. (2001). "Amenemhat III". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 69–70.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Lepsius, Karl Richard (n.d.) [1849].Denkmaeler aus Aegypten und Aethiopien : Nach den Zeichnungen der von Seiner Majestät dem Koenige von Preussen Friedrich Wilhelm IV Nach Diesen Ländern Gesendeten und in den Jahren 1842–1845 Ausgeführten Wissenschaftlichen Expedition (in German). Berlin: Nicolaische Buchhandlung.OCLC 1284732397.
  • Murnane, William (1977).Ancient Egyptian Coregencies. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization. Vol. 40. Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute.OCLC 462126791.
  • Murnane, William (2001). "Coregency". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 307–311.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Naville, Édouard (1887).Goshen and The Shrine of Saft El-Henneh (1885). Memoir of the Egypt Exploration Fund. Vol. 5. London: Trübner & Co.OCLC 3737680.
  • Oppenheim, Adela;Arnold, Dorothea; Arnold, Dieter; Yamamoto, Kumiko, eds. (2015).Ancient Egypt Transformed: the Middle Kingdom. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.ISBN 9781588395641.
  • Petrie, William Matthew Flinders (1889a).Hawara, Biahmu, and Arsinoe. London: Field & Tuer : "The Leadenhall Press" : E.C. Trübner & Co.OCLC 37010618.
  • Petrie, William Matthew Flinders (1889b).Historical scarabs: A Series of Drawings from the Principal Collections: Arranged Chronologically. London: D. Nutt, 270.OCLC 3969698.
  • Petrie, William Matthew Flinders (1890).Kahun, Gurob, and Hawara. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, and Co.OCLC 247721143.
  • Petrie, William Matthew Flinders (1894).A History of Egypt: From the Earliest Times to the XVIth Dynasty. London: Methuen & Co.OCLC 697791485.
  • Petrie, William Matthew Flinders;Wainwright, Gerald Avery;Mackay, Ernest (1912).The Labyrinth, Gerzeh and Mazghuneh. Oxford: Bernard Quaritch.
  • Pignattari, Stefania (2018).Amenemhat IV and the End of the Twelfth Dynasty: Between the End and the Beginning. BAR International Series 2906. Oxford: BAR Publishing.doi:10.30861/9781407316352.ISBN 9781407316352.
  • Porter, Barbara A. (2001). "Neithhotep". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 517–518.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Porter, Bertha; Moss, Rosalind (1968) [1934].The Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Reliefs, and Paintings. Vol. IV (2nd ed.). Oxford: Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum.OCLC 503005977.
  • Quirke, Stephen (2001a). "Second Intermediate Period". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 260–265.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Quirke, Stephen (2001b). "Thirteenth Dynasty". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 394–398.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Redford, Donald B., ed. (2001). "Egyptian King List".The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 621–622.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Robins, Gay (2001). "Queens". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 105–109.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Roth, Ann Macy (2005). "Models of Authority : Hatshepsut's Predecessors in Power". In Roehrig, Catharine (ed.).Hatshepsut From Queen to Pharaoh. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.ISBN 1-58839-173-6.
  • Ryholt, Kim (1997).The Political Situation in Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period, c. 1800-1550 B.C. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.ISBN 87-7289-421-0.
  • Schneider, Thomas (2006). "The Relative Chronology of the Middle Kingdom and the Hyksos Period (Dyns. 12-17)". In Hornung, Erik; Krauss, Rolf; Warburton, David (eds.).Ancient Egyptian Chronology. Leiden: Brill. pp. 168–196.ISBN 978-90-04-11385-5.
  • Shaw, Ian; Nicholson, Paul (1995).British Museum Dictionary of Ancient Egypt. London: British Museum.ISBN 0-7141-0982-7.
  • Shaw, Ian, ed. (2003).The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN 978-0-19-815034-3.
  • Siesse, Julie (2019).La XIIIe Dynastie (in French). Paris: Sorbonne Université Presses.ISBN 979-10-231-0567-4.
  • Simpson, William Kelly (1980). "Masghuna". In Helck, Wolfgang; Westendorf, Wolfhart (eds.).Lexikon der Ägyptologie. Vol. III. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. p. 1196.ISBN 3-447-02100-4.
  • Simpson, William Kelly (2001). "Twelfth Dynasty". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 453–457.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Tyldesley, Joyce (2009).The Pharaohs. London: Quercus.ISBN 978-1-84724-495-6.
  • Uphill, Eric (2010).Pharaoh's Gateway to Eternity : The Hawara Labyrinth of Amenemhat III. London: Routledge.ISBN 978-0-7103-0627-2.
  • Verner, Miroslav (2001) [1999].The Pyramids: The Mystery, Culture and Science of Egypt's Great Monuments. New York: Grove Press.ISBN 978-0-8021-1703-8.
  • von Beckerath, Jürgen (1984b). "Sobeknofru". In Helck, Wolfgang; Westendorf, Wolfhart (eds.).Lexikon der Ägyptologie (in German). Vol. V. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.ISBN 3-447-02489-5.
  • Waddell, William Gillan; Manetho (1964) [1940]. Page, Thomas Ethelbert; Capps, Edward; Rouse, William Henry Denham; Post, Levi Arnold; Warmington, Eric Herbert (eds.).Manetho with an English Translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.OCLC 610359927.
  • Wildung, Dietrich (1984).Sesostris und Amenemhat: Ägypten im Mittleren Reich (in German). München: Hirmer.ISBN 9783777437200.
  • Wilfong, Terry G. (2001). "Faiyum". InRedford, Donald B. (ed.).The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 496–498.ISBN 0-19-510234-7.
  • Wilkinson, Toby (2011).The Rise and Fall of Ancient Egypt. London: Bloomsbury.ISBN 978-1-4088-1002-6.
  • Willems, Harco (2010). "The First Intermediate Period and the Middle Kingdom". In Lloyd, Alan B. (ed.).A Companion to Ancient Egypt. Vol. I. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 81–100.doi:10.1002/9781444320053.ISBN 978-1-4051-5598-4.
  • Zecchi, Marco (2010).Sobek of Shedet : The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period. Studi sull'antico Egitto. Todi: Tau Editrice.ISBN 978-88-6244-115-5.

Journal articles

[edit]
  • Aldred, Cyril (1970). "Some Royal Portraits of the Middle Kingdom in Ancient Egypt".Metropolitan Museum Journal.3:27–50.doi:10.2307/1512597.ISSN 2169-3072.JSTOR 1512957.
  • Aufrère, Sydney (1990). "Remarques sur la transmission des noms royaux par les traditions orale et écrite".Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale (in French).89. Le Caire: l'Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale:1–14.ISSN 2429-2869.
  • Bács, Tamás A. (2006). "The Tip of a Horn: The Possible Origin of an Iconographic Theme in the Elite Tombs of New Kingdom Thebes".Acta Antiqua: Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae.XLVI (1–2). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó:3–16.doi:10.1556/AAnt.46.2006.1-2.2.ISSN 0044-5975.
  • Bell, Barbara (1975). "Climate and the History of Egypt: The Middle Kingdom".American Journal of Archaeology.79 (3):223–269.ISSN 0002-9114.JSTOR 503481.
  • Canhão, Telo (2019). "The latter solution Neferusobek".Hapi (in Portuguese and English).7. Lisboa: Revista da Associação Cultural de Amizade Portugal-Egipto:26–53.ISSN 2183-0991.
  • Daressy, Georges (1917). "Deux Grandes Statues de Ramsès II d'Héracléopolis".Annales du Service de Antiquités de l'Égypte (in French).17. Le Caire: l'Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale:33–38.
  • Diamond, Kelly Anne (2020)."The Reign of King Sobekneferu and her Performance of Gender"(PDF).Birmingham Egyptology Journal.7:1–18.ISSN 2053-3586.
  • Diamond, Kelly Anne (2022). "The Sartorial Choices of Sobekneferu: Louvre Statue E 27135".The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology.108 (1–2):213–229.doi:10.1177/03075133221138861.ISSN 0307-5133.
  • Dodson, Aidan (1987). "The Tombs of the Kings of the Thirteenth Dynasty in the Memphite Necropolis".Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde.114 (1–2):36–45.doi:10.1524/zaes.1987.114.12.36.ISSN 0044-216X.
  • Fay, Biri (1988). "Amenemhat V – Vienna/Assuan".Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo.44. Mainz/Rhein: Philipp von Zabern:67–78, Tafeln 18–29.ISBN 3-8053-1039-0.ISSN 0342-1279.
  • Grajetzki, Wolfram (2013). Wendrich, Willeke (ed.). "Late Middle Kingdom".UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology:1–14.ISSN 2693-7425.
  • Lansing, Ambrose (1930). "The Exhibition of the H.O. Havemeyer Collection".Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.25 (3):53–76.doi:10.2307/3255898.
  • Mace, Arthur Cruttenden (1908). "The Egyptian Expedition: III. The Pyramid of Amenemhat".The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin.3 (10):184–188.doi:10.2307/3252551.ISSN 0026-1521.JSTOR 3252551.
  • Málek, Jaromír (1982). "The Original Version of the Royal Canon of Turin".The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology.68:93–106.doi:10.2307/3821628.JSTOR 3821628.
  • Newberry, Percy (1943). "Co-Regencies of Ammenemes III, IV, and Sebknofru".The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology.29:74–75.doi:10.2307/3855043.ISSN 0307-5133.JSTOR 3855043.
  • Perez Die, Carmen (2016). "The Herakleopolis Magna Project (Ehnasya el Medina). Summary and Results of Work 2000-2015".Trabajos de Egiptología: Papers on Ancient Egypt.7:131–160.doi:10.25145/j.TdE.2016.07.08.ISSN 1695-4750.
  • Ragazzoli, Chloé C.D. (2013). "The social creation of a scribal place: The visitors' inscriptions in the tomb attributed to Antefiqer (TT 60) (With newly recorded graffiti)".Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur. Bd. 42. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag GmbH:269–323.ISSN 0340-2215.JSTOR 44160213.
  • Reisner, George (1925). "Excavations in Egypt and Ethiopia 1922-1925".Museum of Fine Arts Bulletin.XXIII (137):17–29.JSTOR 4169946.
  • Ryholt, Kim (2000). "The Late Old Kingdom in the Turin King-list and the Identity of Nitocris".Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde.127 (1):87–119.doi:10.1524/zaes.2000.127.1.87.ISSN 0044-216X.S2CID 159962784.
  • Schiestl, Robert (2012). "Pottery from Pyramids of the 13th Dynasty in the Dahshur Region: Survey in Dahshur 2006".Bulletin de liaison de la céramique égyptienne.23. Le Caire: l'Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale:51–62.ISBN 978-2-7247-0635-2.ISSN 0255-0903.
  • Siesse, Julien (2016–2017). "L'identité du fondateur de la 13e dynastie : Amenemhat-Sobekhotep ou Ougaf?".Cahiers de Recherches de l’Institut de Papyrologie et d’Égyptologie de Lille (in French).31. Lille: Université de Lille:161–178.ISSN 0153-5021.
  • Swelim, Nabil; Dodson, Aidan (1998). "On the Pyramid of Ameny-Qemau and its Canopic Equipment".Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo.54. Mainz/Rhein: Philipp von Zabern:319–334, tafel 54–55.ISBN 9783805324175.ISSN 0342-1279.
  • Theis, Christoffer (2009b). "Die Pyramiden der. 13. Dynastie".Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur (in German). Bd. 38. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag GmbH:311–342.ISSN 0340-2215.JSTOR 27751379.
  • Weinstein, James (1974). "A Statuette of the Princess Sobeknefru at Tell Gezer".Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.213 (213):49–57.doi:10.2307/1356083.ISSN 2161-8062.JSTOR 1356083.S2CID 164156906.
  • Yoyotte, Jean (1957). "Le Soukhos de la Maréotide et d'autres cultes régionaux du Dieu-Crocodile d'après les cylindres du Moyen Empire".Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale (in French).56. Le Caire: l'Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale:81–95.ISSN 2429-2869.

Magazines

[edit]
  • Budka, Julia (2000). "Amen-em-hat IV, Neferu-Sobek und das Ende des Mittleren Reiches" [Amen-em-hat IV, Neferu-Sobek and the End of the Middle Kingdom].Kemet (in German). Weaverville, NC: Kmt Communications. pp. 16–19.
  • Theis, Christoffer (2009a). "Die chronologische Abfolge der Pyramiden der 13. Dynastie" [The chronological order of the Pyramids of the 13th Dynasty].Sokar (in German). Berlin: Michael Haase. pp. 52–61.
  • Wegner, Josef; Cahail, Kevin M. (2014). "Ancient Reuse: The Discovery of a Royal Sarchopagus Chamber".Expedition. Vol. 56, no. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Museum. pp. 19–23.

Museum catalogues

[edit]

Louvre

Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

  • General Administration (1969) [1913].Aegyptische Inschriften aus den Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (in German). Vol. Erster Band. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichssche Buchhandlung.OCLC 84147744.

Metropolitan Museum of Art

Museum of Fina Arts, Boston

The British Museum

  • "EA16581".The British Museum. n.d. Retrieved20 August 2021.
  • "EA117".The British Museum. n.d. Retrieved20 August 2021.
  • "EA66159".The British Museum. n.d. Retrieved8 August 2024.

The Petrie Museum

  • "LDUCE-UC14337".UCL Museums & Collections. The Petrie Museum. n.d. Retrieved17 January 2026.
  • "LDUCE-UC32778".UCL Museums & Collections. The Petrie Museum. n.d. Retrieved17 January 2026.

Online

[edit]

Royal titulary

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toSobekneferu.
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaohs
    • male
    • female
  • uncertain
Protodynastic
(pre-3150 BC)
Lower
Upper
Early Dynastic
(3150–2686 BC)
I
II
Old Kingdom
(2686–2181 BC)
III
IV
V
VI
1st Intermediate
(2181–2040 BC)
VII/VIII
IX
X
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaohs
    • male
    • female
  • uncertain
Middle Kingdom
(2040–1802 BC)
XI
Nubia
XII
2nd Intermediate
(1802–1550 BC)
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
Abydos
XVII
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaohs  (male
  • female)
  • uncertain
New Kingdom
(1550–1070 BC)
XVIII
XIX
XX
3rd Intermediate
(1069–664 BC)
XXI
High Priest of Amun
XXII
Lines of XXII/XXIII
XXIII
XXIV
XXV
Late toRoman Period(664 BC–313 AD)
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaohs
    • male
    • female
  • uncertain
Late
(664–332 BC)
XXVI
XXVII
XXVIII
XXIX
XXX
XXXI
Hellenistic
(332–30 BC)
Argead
Ptolemaic
Roman
(30 BC–313 AD)
XXXIV
Dynastic genealogies
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaoh
  • uncertain
Early Dynastic
(3150–2686 BC)
I
II
Old Kingdom
(2686–2181 BC)
III
IV
V
VI
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaoh
  • uncertain
Middle Kingdom
(2040–1802 BC)
XI
XII
2nd Intermediate
(1802–1550 BC)
XIII
XIV
XVI
XVII
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaoh
  • uncertain
New Kingdom
(1550–1070 BC)
XVIII
XIX
XX
3rd Intermediate
(1069–664 BC)
XXI
XXII
XXIII
XXV
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaoh
  • uncertain
Late
(664–332 BC)
XXVI
XXVII
XXXI
Hellenistic
(332–30 BC)
Argead
Ptolemaic
Dynastic genealogies
International
National
People
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sobekneferu&oldid=1338617709"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp