An editor has determined thatsufficient sources exist to establish the subject'snotability. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Smith v. Goguen" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(June 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Smith v. Goguen | |
|---|---|
| Argued November 12–13, 1973 Decided March 25, 1974 | |
| Full case name | Smith v. Goguen |
| Citations | 415U.S.566 (more) 94 S. Ct. 1242; 39L. Ed. 2d 605; 1974U.S. LEXIS 113 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Appeal from theUnited States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit |
| Holding | |
| Flag desecration laws that prohibit "contemptuous" treatment of the flag are overly broad. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Powell, joined by Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall |
| Concurrence | White |
| Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Burger |
| Dissent | Rehnquist, joined by Burger |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amends.I,XIV | |
Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 (1974), is a decision of theSupreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a Massachusettsflag desecration law that prohibited "publicly treat[ing] contemptuously the flag of the United States" was unconstitutionallyvoid for vagueness.[1]: 538–539
This article related to a case of theSupreme Court of the United States of theBurger Court is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it. |