 | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
| Siouan | |
|---|---|
| Siouan–Catawban | |
| Geographic distribution | centralNorth America |
| Linguistic classification | One of the world's primarylanguage families |
| Subdivisions |
|
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-2 /5 | sio |
| ISO 639-3 | – |
| Linguasphere | 64-A |
| Glottolog | siou1252 |
_language_map_01.svg) Pre-contact distribution of the Siouan–Catawban languages | |
Siouan (/ˈsuːən/SOO-ən) orSiouan–Catawban, is alanguage family ofNorth America that is located primarily in theGreat Plains,Ohio andMississippi valleys and southeastern North America with a few other languages in the east.
 | This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(October 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Authors who call the entire familySiouan distinguish the two branches asWestern Siouan andEastern Siouan or as "Siouan-proper" and "Catawban". Others restrict the name "Siouan" to the western branch and use the nameSiouan–Catawban for the entire family. Generally, however, the name "Siouan" is used without distinction.
The Siouan family consists of some 20 languages and various dialects:
Siouan languages can be grouped intoWestern Siouan languages andCatawban.
The Western Siouan languages are typically subdivided into Missouri River languages (such asCrow andHidatsa),Mandan, Mississippi River languages (such asDakota,Chiwere-Winnebago, andDhegihan languages), andOhio Valley Siouan languages (Ofo,Biloxi, andTutelo). TheCatawban branch consists ofCatawban andWoccon.
Charles F. Voegelin established, on the basis of linguistic evidence, thatCatawban was divergent enough from the other Siouan languages, including neighboring Siouan languages of the Piedmont and Appalachia, to be considered a distinct branch.[1] Voegelin proposes that Biloxi, Ofo and Tutelo consistute one group which he termsOhio Valley Siouan. This group includes various historical languages spoken by Siouan peoples not only in the Ohio River Valley, but across the Appalachian Plateau and into the Piedmont regions of present-day Virginia and the Carolinas. Some of these groups migrated or were displaced great distances following European contact, ending up as far afield as present-day Ontario and southern Mississippi. Collectively, Siouan languages of Appalachia and the Piedmont are sometimes grouped under the termTutelo, Tutelo-Saponi, or Yesah (Yesa:sahį)[2] as the language historically spoken by theMonacan,Manahoac,Haliwa-Saponi, andOccaneechi peoples.[3]
| Proto-Siouan | |
|---|---|
| Reconstruction of | Siouan languages |
Proto-Siouan is thereconstructed ancestor of all modern Siouan languages.
There is a certain amount ofcomparative work in Siouan–Catawban languages. Wolff (1950–51) is among the first and more complete works on the subject. Wolff reconstructed the system of proto-Siouan, and this was modified by Matthews (1958). The latter's system is shown below:
| Labial | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Glottal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plosive | *p | *t | *k | *ʔ | |
| Fricative | *s | *ʃ | *x | *h | |
| Nasal | *m | *n | |||
| Approximant | *w | *r | *j |
With respect to vowels, five oral vowels are reconstructed:/*i,*e,*a,*o,*u/ and threenasal vowels/*ĩ,*ã,*ũ/. Wolff also reconstructed some consonantal clusters/*tk,*kʃ,*ʃk,*sp/.
Collaborative work involving a number of Siouanists started at the 1984 Comparative Siouan Workshop at the University of Colorado with the goal of creating a comparative Siouan dictionary that would include Proto-Siouan reconstructions.[4] This work yielded a different analysis of the phonemic system of Proto-Siouan, which appears below:[5]
| Labial | Coronal | Palatal | Velar | Glottal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plosive | plain | *p | *t | *k | *ʔ | |
| glottalized | *pʼ | *tʼ | *kʼ | |||
| preaspirated | *ʰp | *ʰt | *ʰk | |||
| postaspirated | *pʰ | *tʰ | *kʰ | |||
| Fricative | plain | *s | *ʃ | *x | *h | |
| glottalized | *sʼ | *ʃʼ | *xʼ | |||
| Sonorant | *w | *r | *j | |||
| Obstruent | *W | *R | ||||
In Siouanist literature (e.g., Rankin et al. 2015),Americanist phonetic transcriptions are the norm, so IPA *ʃ is Americanist *š, IPA *j is Americanist *y, and so on.
The major change to the previously-proposed system was accomplished by systematically accounting for the distribution of multiple stop series in modern Siouan languages by tracing them back to multiple stop series in the proto-language. Previous analysis posited only a single stop series.[6]
Many of the consonant clusters proposed by Wolff (1950–1951) can be accounted for due tosyncopation of short vowels before stressed syllables. For example, Matthews (1958: 129) gives *wróke as the proto-form for 'male.' With added data from a larger set of Siouan languages since the middle of the twentieth century, Rankin et al. (2015) give *waroː(-ka) as the reconstructed form for 'male.'
Unlike Wolff and Matthew's proposals, there are no posited nasal consonants in Proto-Siouan. Nasal consonants only arise in daughter languages when followed by a nasal vowel.[7] In addition, there is a set of sounds that represent obstruentized versions of their corresponding sonorants. These sounds have different reflexes in daughter languages, with *w appearing as [w] or [m] in most daughter languages, while *W has a reflex of [w], [b], [mb], or [p]. The actual phonetic value of these obstruents is an issue of some debate, with some arguing that they arise through geminated *w+*w or *r+*r sequences or a laryngeal plus *w or *r.[8]
Previous work on Proto-Siouan only posited single vowel length. However,phonemic vowel length exists in several Siouan languages such asHidatsa,Ho-Chunk, andTutelo. Rankin et al. (2015) analyze numerous instances of long vowels as present due to common inheritance rather than common innovation. The five oral vowels and three nasal vowels posited by earlier scholars is expanded to include a distinction between short and long vowels. The proposed Proto-Siouan vowel system appears below:
| Front | Central | Back | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| short | long | short | long | short | long | ||
| High | oral | *i | *iː | *u | *uː | ||
| nasal | *ĩ | *ĩː | *ũ | *ũː | |||
| Mid | *e | *eː | *o | *oː | |||
| Low | oral | *a | *aː | ||||
| nasal | *ã | *ãː | |||||
TheYuchi isolate may be the closest relative of Sioux–Catawban, based on both sound changes and morphological comparison.[9]
In the 19th century,Robert Latham suggested that the Siouan languages are related to theCaddoan andIroquoian languages. In 1931, Louis Allen presented the first list of systematic correspondences between a set of 25 lexical items in Siouan and Iroquoian. In the 1960s and 1970s,Wallace Chafe further explored the link between Siouan and Caddoan languages. In the 1990s,Marianne Mithun compared the morphology and syntax of all the three families. At present, thisMacro-Siouan hypothesis is not considered proven, and the similarities between the three families may instead be due to their protolanguages having been part of asprachbund.[10]
{{cite book}}:|journal= ignored (help)
