During his rule, Montfort called two famous parliaments: theOxford Parliament stripped Henry of his unlimited authority, whilethe second included ordinary citizens from the towns.[5] For this reason, Montfort is regarded today as one of theprogenitors of modernparliamentary democracy.[6] As Earl of Leicester he expelled Jews fromthat city; as he became ruler of England he also cancelled debts owed to Jews through violent seizures of records. Montfort's party massacred the Jews ofLondon,Worcester andDerby, killing scores of Jews fromWinchester toLincoln.[7][8][9] After a rule of just over a year, Montfort was killed by forces loyal to the king in theBattle of Evesham.[5]
With the irrevocable loss of Normandy,King John refused to allow the elder Simon to succeed to the earldom of Leicester and instead placed the estates and title into the hands of Montfort senior's cousinRanulf, the Earl of Chester. The elder Simon had also acquired vast domains during theAlbigensian Crusade, but was killed during theSiege of Toulouse in 1218 and his eldest sonAmaury was not able to retain them. When Amaury was rebuffed in his attempt to get the earldom back, he agreed to allow his younger brother Simon to claim it in return for all family possessions in France.
Simon arrived in England in 1229, with some education but no knowledge of English, and received a sympathetic hearing from KingHenry III, who became well disposed towards foreigners speakingFrench, then the language of the English court. Henry was in no position to confront the powerful Earl of Chester, so Simon approached the older, childless man himself and persuaded him to cede him the earldom. It would take another nine years before Henry formally invested him with the title Earl of Leicester.
As a younger son, Simon de Montfort attracted little public attention during his youth, and the date of his birth remains unknown. He is first mentioned when his mother made a grant to him in 1217.[11] As a boy, Montfort accompanied his parents during his father's campaigns against theCathars. He was with his mother at theSiege of Toulouse in 1218, where his father died after being struck on the head by a stone pitched by amangonel. In addition toAmaury, Simon had another older brother,Guy, who was killed at the siege ofCastelnaudary in 1220. As a young man, Montfort probably took part in the Albigensian Crusades of the early 1220s. He and Amaury both took part in theBarons' Crusade.
In 1229 the two surviving brothers (Amaury and Simon) came to an arrangement with King Henry whereby Simon gave up his rights in France and Amaury gave up his rights in England. Thus freed from any allegiance to the king of France, Montfort successfully petitioned for the English inheritance, which he received the next year, although he did not take full possession for several years, and did not win formal recognition as Earl of Leicester until February 1239. Montfort became a favourite of King Henry III and even issued a charter as "Earl of Leicester" in 1236, despite having not yet been granted the title.[12]
Eleanor of England, who married Montfort in 1238, depicted in the early-fourteenth-centuryGenealogical Roll of the Kings of England
In January 1238, Montfort marriedEleanor of England, daughter of King John andIsabella of Angoulême and sister of King Henry III. While this marriage took place with the king's approval, the act itself was performed secretly and without consulting the great barons, as a marriage of such importance warranted. Eleanor had previously been married toWilliam Marshal, 2nd Earl of Pembroke, and she had sworn a vow of perpetualchastity upon his death, when she was sixteen, which she broke by marrying Montfort.
Thearchbishop of Canterbury,Edmund Rich, condemned the marriage for this reason. The English nobles protested the marriage of the king's sister to a foreigner of modest rank. Most notably, the king's and Eleanor's brotherRichard, 1st Earl of Cornwall, rose up in revolt when he learned of the marriage. King Henry eventually bought off Richard with 6,000 marks and peace was restored.
Relations between King Henry and Montfort were cordial at first. Henry lent him his support when Montfort embarked for Rome in March 1238 to seek papal approval for his marriage. When Simon and Eleanor's first son was born in November 1238 (despite rumours, more than nine months after the wedding), he was baptised Henry in honour of his royal uncle. In February 1239, Montfort was finally invested with the Earldom of Leicester. He also acted as the king's counsellor and was one of the nine godfathers of Henry's eldest son,Edward Longshanks.
As Earl ofLeicester, Montfort expelled the smallJewish community from Leicester city in 1231, banishing them "in my time or in the time of any of my heirs to the end of the world". He justified his action as being "for the good of my soul, and for the souls of my ancestors and successors".[14][15][16] Expelling the Jews enhanced Montfort's popularity in his new domains because it removed the practice ofusury, which was practised exclusively by Jews (it was forbidden to Christians).[17] Leicester's Jews were allowed to move to the eastern suburbs, which were controlled by Montfort's great-aunt Margaret, Countess of Winchester.[18][19]
His parents had shown a similar hostility to Jews in France, where his father had taken part in theAlbigensian Crusade, during which his mother had given the Jews ofToulouse a choice of conversion, expulsion or death.[20][21][22]Robert Grosseteste – thenArchdeacon of Leicester and, according toMatthew Paris, de Montfort's confessor[23] – may have encouraged the expulsion, though he is known to have argued that Jews' lives should be spared.[18][24][25][26]
Shortly after Prince Edward's birth in 1239, Montfort fell out with his brother-in-law, Henry III. Montfort owed a great sum of money toThomas, Count of Flanders,Queen Eleanor's uncle, and named King Henry as security for his repayment. The king evidently had not approved this, and was enraged when he discovered that Montfort had used his name. On 9 August 1239, he confronted Montfort, called him anexcommunicant and threatened to imprison him in theTower of London.Matthew Paris reported that Henry said "You seduced my sister and when I discovered this, I gave her to you, against my will, to avoid scandal."[27] Simon and Eleanor fled to France to escape Henry's wrath.
Having announced his intention to go oncrusade two years before, Simon raised funds and travelled to theHoly Land during theBarons' Crusade, but does not seem to have faced combat there. He was part of the crusading host which, underRichard of Cornwall, negotiated the release of Christian prisoners including Simon's older brother, Amaury. In autumn 1241, he leftSyria and joined King Henry's campaign against KingLouis IX inPoitou in July 1242.[28] The campaign was a failure, and an exasperated Montfort declared that Henry should be locked up like KingCharles the Simple. Like his father, Simon was a soldier as well as a capable administrator. His dispute with King Henry came about due to the latter's determination to ignore the swelling discontent within the country, caused by a combination of factors, including famine and a sense, among the English Barons, that King Henry was too quick to dispense favour to hisPoitevin relatives andSavoyard in-laws.[citation needed]
In 1248, Montfort again took the cross with the idea of following Louis IX of France toEgypt. However, at the repeated requests of King Henry, he gave up this project in order to act as the king'sLieutenant of the Duchy of Aquitaine (Gascony). Bitter complaints were excited by the rigour with which Montfort suppressed the excesses of the Seigneurs and of contending factions in the great communes. Henry yielded to the outcry and instituted a formal inquiry into Simon's administration. Simon was formally acquitted on the charges of oppression, but his accounts were disputed by Henry, and Simon retired to France in 1252. The nobles of France offered him the Regency of the kingdom, vacated by the death of QueenBlanche of Castile. The earl preferred to make his peace with Henry III, which he did in 1253, in obedience to the exhortations of the dyingRobert Grosseteste, Bishop of Lincoln. He helped the king deal with disaffection in Gascony, but their reconciliation was a hollow one. In the Parliament of 1254, Simon led the opposition in resisting a royal demand for a subsidy. In 1256–57, when the discontent of all classes was coming to a head, Montfort nominally adhered to the royal cause. He undertook, withPeter of Savoy, the Queen's uncle, the difficult task of extricating the king from the pledges which he had given to thePope with reference to the Crown ofSicily; and Henry's writs of this date mention Montfort in friendly terms. However, at the "Mad Parliament" ofOxford (1258) Montfort appeared with theEarl of Gloucester,[29][30] at the head of the opposition. He was part of theCouncil of Fifteen who were to constitute the supreme board of control over the administration. The king's success in dividing the barons and in fostering a reaction, however, rendered such projects hopeless. In 1261, Henry revoked his assent to theProvisions of Oxford and Montfort, in despair, left the country.[30]
Simon de Montfort returned to England in 1263, at the invitation of the barons who were now convinced of the king's hostility to all reform, and raised a rebellion with the avowed object of restoring the form of government which theProvisions had ordained.[30] Cancellation of debts (owed to Jews) was part of his call to arms.[31]
At the time, the King was periodically raising punitive taxation on the Jews, causing them to sell their debt bonds cheaply to raise cash to pay their taxes. The bonds were sold to the richest courtiers at cut down prices, leading many indebted middling landowners to lose their lands. This fed into rising anti-Semitic beliefs, fuelled by the church. Measures against the Jews and controls over debts and usury dominated debates about royal power and finances among the classes that were beginning to be involved in Parliament.
The debt "cancellations" however involved massacres of Jews by his followers, to obtain their financial records, for instance inWorcester[32] andLondon.[8] The Worcester attack and killings were led by de Montfort's sonHenry, andRobert Earl Ferrers.[33] In London, one of his key followersJohn FitzJohn led the attack, and is said to have killed leading Jewish figures Isaac fil Aaron and Cok fil Abraham with his bare hands. He allegedly shared the loot with Montfort. Five hundred Jews died.[9]
Each attack was aimed at the seizure of the records of debts, stored in locked chests within each community, called 'archae'. Archae were legally mandated by the king for Jews to be allowed to conduct any business.[citation needed] They were destroyed or gathered for instance atEly by the rebels.[37][36]
Henry quickly gave in and allowed Montfort to take control of the council. His son Edward, however, began using patronage and bribes to win over many of the barons. Their disruption of parliament in October led to a renewal of hostilities, which saw the royalists able to trap Simon in London. With few other options available, Montfort agreed to allowLouis IX of France to arbitrate their dispute. Simon was prevented from presenting his case to Louis directly on account of a broken leg, but few suspected that the king of France, known for his innate sense of justice, would completely annul the Provisions in hisMise of Amiens in January 1264. Civil war broke out almost immediately, with the royalists again able to confine the reformist army in London. In early May 1264, Simon marched out to give battle to the king and scored a spectacular triumph at theBattle of Lewes on 14 May 1264, capturing the king, together with Prince Edward andRichard of Cornwall, Henry's brother and the titular King of Germany.
Montfort announced after the Battle of Lewes that all debts owed to the Jews were cancelled, as he had promised.[36]
Montfort used his victory to set up a government based on the provisions first established at Oxford in 1258. Henry retained the title and authority of King, but all decisions and approval now rested with his council, led by Montfort and subject to consultation withparliament. His Great Parliament of 1265 (Montfort's Parliament) was a packed assembly to be sure, but it can hardly be supposed that the representation which he granted to the towns was intended to be a temporary expedient.[30]
Montfort sent his summons, in the king's name, to eachcounty and to a select list ofboroughs, asking each to send two representatives. This body was not the first elected parliament in England. In 1254, Henry was in Gascony and in need of money. He gave instructions for his regent, Queen Eleanor, to summon a parliament consisting of knights elected by their shires to ask for this 'aid'. Montfort, who was in that parliament, took the innovation further by including ordinary citizens from the boroughs, also elected, and it was from this period that parliamentary representation derives. The list of boroughs which had the right to elect a member grew slowly over the centuries as monarchs granted charters to more English towns. (The last charter was given to Newark in 1674.)
The right to vote in Parliamentary elections for county constituencies was uniform throughout the country, related to land ownership. In the Boroughs, the electoral franchise varied and individual boroughs had varying arrangements.[citation needed]
The reaction against Montfort's government was baronial rather than popular.[30] TheWelsh marcher lords were friends and allies of Prince Edward, and when he escaped in May 1265, they rallied around his opposition. The final nail was the defection of Gilbert de Clare, the Earl of Gloucester, the most powerful baron and Simon's ally at Lewes. Clare had grown resentful of Simon's fame and growing power. When he and his brother Thomas fell out with Simon's sons Henry,Simon the Younger, andGuy, they deserted the reforming cause and joined Edward.
Though boosted by Welsh infantry sent by Montfort's allyLlywelyn ap Gruffudd, Simon's forces were severely depleted. Prince Edward attacked his cousin, his godfather's son Simon's forces atKenilworth, capturing more of Montfort's allies. Montfort himself had crossed theSevern with his army, intending to rendezvous with his son Simon the Younger. When he saw an army approachingEvesham, Montfort initially thought it was his son's forces. It was, however, Edward's army flying the Montfort banners they had captured at Kenilworth. At that point, Simon realised he had been out-manoeuvred by Edward.
A 13th-century depiction on parchment of the mutilation of Montfort's body after theBattle of Evesham inWorcestershire in 1265
An ominous black cloud hung over the field of Evesham on 4 August 1265 as Montfort led his army in a desperate uphill charge against superior forces, described by one chronicler as the "murder of Evesham, for battle it was none".[38] On hearing that his son Henry had been killed, Montfort replied, "Then it is time to die."[39] Before the battle, Prince Edward had appointed a twelve-man death squad to stalk the battlefield, their sole aim being to find the earl and cut him down. Montfort was hemmed in;Roger Mortimer killed Montfort by stabbing him in the neck with a lance.[40] Montfort's last words were said to have been "Thank God".[39] Also slain with Montfort were other leaders of his movement, includingPeter de Montfort andHugh Despenser.
Montfort's body was mutilated in a frenzy by the royalists. News reached the mayor and sheriffs of London that "the head of the earl of Leicester ... was severed from his body, and his testicles cut off and hung on either side of his nose";[40] and in such guise the head was sent toWigmore Castle by Roger Mortimer, 1st Baron Mortimer, as a gift to his wife,Maud.[41] His hands and feet were also cut off and sent to diverse places to enemies of his as a great mark of dishonour to the deceased.[42] Such remains as could be found were buried before the altar ofEvesham Abbey church by the canons. The grave was visited as holy ground by many commoners until King Henry caught wind of it. He declared that Montfort deserved no spot on holy ground, and had his remains reburied in another "secret" location, probably in the crypt.[43] The remains of some of Montfort's soldiers who had fled the battlefield were found in the nearby village ofCleeve Prior.
Montfort's niece,Margaret of England, later killed one of the soldiers responsible for his death, purposely or inadvertently.[citation needed]
Matthew Paris reports that theBishop of Lincoln, Robert Grosseteste, once said to Montfort's eldest son, Henry, "My beloved child, both you and your father will meet your deaths on one day, and by one kind of death, but it will be in the name of justice and truth."[citation needed]
Montfort bears responsibility forpersecution of Jews. In addition to his expulsion of Jews from Leicester, his faction in the Second Baron's War initiatedpogroms killing perhaps the majority of Jews in Derby and Worcester and around 500 in London.[7][48] The violence and killings unleashed by the war targeting Jews carried on after his death.[49] Jews were living in such terror that King Henry appointed burgesses and citizens of certain towns to protect and defend them because "they fear[ed] grave peril" and were in a "deplorable state."[50]Leicester City Council made a formal statement in 2001[51] that "rebuked De Montfort for his blatant anti-Semitism".[52]
Montfort's banner, known as the "Arms of Honour of Hinckley", blazonedParty per pale indented argent and gules, and displayed in stained glass inChartres Cathedral, is used in the coat of arms of the town ofHinckley, part of his earldom inLeicestershire, and by many of its local organisations. Combined with his personal coat of arms, the banner forms part of the club crest for the town's football clubHinckley A.F.C.[53]
A school[54] and a bridge on the north-east stretch of theA46 in Evesham are named after him.
Joanna de Montfort (born and died in Bordeaux between 1248 and 1251).
Richard de Montfort (d.1266). Date of death is not certain.
Eleanor de Montfort (1252–1282). She marriedLlywelyn ap Gruffudd,Prince of Wales, honouring an agreement that had been made between Earl Simon and Llywelyn. Eleanor, Lady of Wales, died on 19 June 1282 at the royal Welsh home atAbergwyngregyn, on the north coast of Gwynedd, giving birth to a daughter,Gwenllian of Wales. After Llywelyn's death on 11 December 1282, Gwenllian was captured by King Edward I and spent the rest of her life in a convent.
^Montfort's father (Simon de Montfort, 5th Earl of Leicester) is also sometimes known as Simon V. The discrepancy in numbering arises from confusion betweenSimon III de Montfort (died 1181) and his sonSimon de Montfort (died 1188). The latter was historically unknown, and Simon III was believed to be the father (not the grandfather)[2] of the 5th Earl, who is therefore known as Simon IV in some sources.[3] and Simon V in others.[4]
^Mundill 2002, p. 254, says "Simon de Montfort ... used the cancellation of Jewish debts to his own advantage and had managed to convince followers that it was worth rebelling for."
^Robert of Gloucester,Chronicle translated by Stevenson, Rev. Joseph, ed. (1858) inThe Church Historians of England: Prereformation series, Volume 5, Part 1; Seeleys; p. 375.
^Napoleon Bonaparte,Napoleon's Notes on English History made on the Eve of the French Revolution, illustrated from Contemporary Historians and referenced from the findings of Later Research by Henry Foljambe Hall (New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1905), 12, 56.
Blaauw, William Henry (1871).The Barons War: Including the Battles of Lewes and Evesham (2nd ed.). Baxter and Son.
Brand, Paul (2003).Kings, Barons and Justices, The Making and Enforcement of Legislation in Thirteenth Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Church, Stephen (2019).Henry III. Penguin Monarchs. London: Penguin Books.
Hillaby, Joe; Hillaby, Caroline (2013).The Palgrave Dictionary of Medieval Anglo-Jewish History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.ISBN978-0-230-27816-5.; especially "Leicester", pp. 196–199 and "Montfort, Simon de (1208–65) and the English Jewry", pp. 273–275
Richmond, Colin (1992). "Englishness and Medieval Anglo-Jewry". In Kushner, Tony (ed.).The Jewish Heritage in British History. Frank Cass. pp. 42–59.ISBN0714634646.OL1710943M.
Southern, R. W. (1992).Robert Grosseteste: the growth of an English mind in medieval Europe (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-820310-0.
Tolan, John (2023).England's Jews: Finance, Violence, and the Crown in the Thirteenth Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.ISBN978-1512823899.OL39646815M.
Treharne, RF, E.B. Fryde ed, Simon de Montfort and Baronial Reform: Thirteenth-Century Essays (London: Hambledon Press, 1986).
Wasserstein, D. J. (1995). "Grosseteste, the Jews and medieval Christian Hebraism". InMcEvoy, James (ed.).Robert Grosseteste: new perspectives on his thought and scholarship. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 357–376.ISBN2-503-50541-4.
Willis-Bund, J W; Page, William, eds. (1924)."The city of Worcester: Introduction and borough".A History of the County of Worcester: Volume 4. London: British History Online. pp. 376–390. Retrieved20 May 2018.
Zerner, Monique (1992). "Lépouse de Simon de Montfort et la croisade albigeoise". In Dufournet, Jean; Joris, André; Toubert, Pierre (eds.).Femmes: mariages-lignages, XIIe–XIVe siècles: mélanges offerts à Georges Duby. Brussels: De Boeck Université. pp. 449–470.ISBN2-8041-1542-9.