Lumet's parents,Baruch and Eugenia (née Wermus) Lumet, wereJewish and veterans of theYiddish theatre;[7] they had immigrated to the United States fromPoland. His father, an actor, director, producer and writer, was born inWarsaw.[8] Lumet's mother, who was a dancer, died when he was a child. He had an older sister.[9] Lumet made his professional debut on the radio at age four and his stage debut at theYiddish Art Theatre at age five.[10] As a child, he also appeared in manyBroadway productions,[7] including 1935'sDead End and Kurt Weill'sThe Eternal Road.
In 1935, aged 11, Lumet appeared in aHenry Lynn short filmPapirossen (meaning "Cigarettes" inYiddish), co-produced by radio starHerman Yablokoff. The film was shown in a theatrical play with the same title, based on the song "Papirosn". The play and short film appeared atthe Bronx's McKinley Square Theatre.[11] In 1939, at age 15, he made his only feature-length film appearance in...One Third of a Nation....[12][13]
World War II interrupted Lumet's early acting career and he spent four years in theU.S. Army.[14] After returning from service as aradar repairman stationed inIndia andBurma (1942–1946), he became involved with theActors Studio, then formed his own theater workshop. He organized anOff-Broadway group and became its director, and continued directing insummer stock theatre while teaching acting at theHigh School of Performing Arts.[12] He was the seniordrama coach at the new 46th Street building of "Performing Arts". The 25-year-old Lumet directed the drama department in a production ofThe Young and Fair.[citation needed]
Lumet began his directorial career with Off-Broadway productions and evolved into a highly efficient television director. He began directing television in 1950 after working as an assistant to friend and then-directorYul Brynner. He soon developed a "lightning quick" method for shooting due to the high turnover required by television. As a result, while working forCBS, he directed hundreds of episodes ofDanger (1950–1955),Mama (1949–1957) andYou Are There (1953–1957), the latter a weekly series that featuredWalter Cronkite in one of his early television appearances. Lumet chose Cronkite for the role of anchorman "because the premise of the show was so silly, was so outrageous, that we needed somebody with the most American, homespun, warm ease about him", he said.[15]
He also directed original plays forPlayhouse 90,Kraft Television Theatre andStudio One, directing approximately 200 episodes, which established him as "one of the most prolific and respected directors in the business", according toTurner Classic Movies. His ability to work quickly while shooting carried over to his film career.[16] Because the quality of many television dramas was so impressive, several of them were later adapted as motion pictures.
His first movie,12 Angry Men (1957), a courtroom drama centered on a tense jury deliberation that was based on aCBS live play, was an auspicious beginning for Lumet. It was a critical success and established him as a director skilled at adapting properties from other mediums to motion pictures. Fully half of Lumet's complement of films originated in the theater.[17]
Following his first film, Lumet divided his energies amongpolitical and social drama films, as well as adaptations of literary plays and novels, big stylish stories, New York-basedblack comedies and realisticcrime dramas (includingSerpico andPrince of the City). As a result of directing12 Angry Men, he was also responsible for leading the first wave of directors who made a successful transition from TV to movies.[18]
A controversial TV show that he directed in 1960 gained some notoriety:Sacco-Vanzetti Story onNBC. According toThe New York Times, the drama drew flack from the state ofMassachusetts (whereSacco and Vanzetti were tried and executed) because it was thought to postulate that the condemned murderers were, in fact, wholly innocent. However, the resulting controversy did Lumet more good than harm, sending several prestigious film assignments his way.[19]
Film criticOwen Gleiberman observed that Lumet was a "hardboiled straight-shooter" who, because he was trained during theGolden Age of Television in the 1950s, became noted for his energetic style of directing. The words, "Sidney Lumet" and "energy", he added, became synonymous. "The energy was there in the quietest moments. It was an inner energy, a hum of existence that Lumet observed in people and brought out in them...[when he] went into the New York streets...he made them electric."[21] He also wrote:
It was a working class outer-borough energy. Lumet's streets were just as mean as Scorsese's, but Lumet's seemed plain rather than poetic. He channeled that New York skeezy vitality with such natural force that it was easy to overlook what was truly involved in the achievement. He captured that New York vibe like no one else because he saw it, lived it, breathed it – but then he had to go out and stage it, or re-create it, almost as if he were staging a documentary, letting his actors square off like random predators, insisting on the most natural light possible, making offices look as ugly and bureaucratic as they were because he knew, beneath that, that they weren't just offices but lairs, and that there was a deeper intensity, almost a kind of beauty, to catching the coarseness of reality as it truly looked.[21]
When necessary, Lumet chose untrained actors, but he stated that "over ninety percent of the time, I want the best tools I can get: actors, writers, lighting men, cameramen, propmen".[22] Nonetheless, when he did use less experienced actors, he could still bring out superior and memorable acting performances. He did withNick Nolte,Anthony Perkins,Armand Assante,Jane Fonda,Faye Dunaway,Timothy Hutton andAli MacGraw, who referred to him as "every actor's dream".[24] In Jane Fonda's opinion, "He was a master. Such control of his craft. He had strong, progressive values and never betrayed them."[25]
While the goal of all movies is to entertain, the kind of film in which I believe goes one step further. It compels the spectator to examine one facet or another of his own conscience. It stimulates thought and sets the mental juices flowing.
Lumet believed that movies are an art, and "the amount of attention paid to movies is directly related to pictures of quality".[27] Because he started his career as an actor, he became known as an "actor's director" and worked with the best of them over the years, a roster probably unequaled by any other director.[28] Acting scholarFrank P. Tomasulo agreed and pointed out that many directors who are able to understand acting from an actor's perspective were all "great communicators".[29]
According to film historiansGerald Mast and Bruce Kawin, Lumet's "sensitivity to actors and to the rhythms of the city have made him America's longest-lived descendant of the 1950sNeorealist tradition and its urgent commitment to ethical responsibility".[30] They cited his filmThe Hill (1965) as "one of the most politically and morally radical films of the 1960s". They added that beneath the social conflicts of Lumet's films lies the "conviction that love and reason will eventually prevail in human affairs", and that "law and justice will eventually be served – or not".[30] His debut filmTwelve Angry Men was an acclaimed picture in its day, representing a model for liberal reason and fellowship during the 1950s.[31] The film and Lumet were nominated for Academy Awards, and he was nominated for theDirector's Guild Award.[12]
TheEncyclopedia of World Biography states that his films often featured actors who studied "Method acting", noted for portraying an earthy, introspective style. A leading example of such "Method" actors would beAl Pacino, who, early in his career, studied under Method acting guruLee Strasberg. Lumet also preferred the appearance of spontaneity in both his actors and settings, which gave his films an improvisational look by shooting much of his work on location.[32]
Lumet was a strong believer in rehearsal and felt that if an actor rehearsed correctly, the actor would not lose spontaneity. According to critic Ian Bernard, Lumet felt that it gives actors the "entire arc of the role", which gives them the freedom to find that "magical accident".[33] DirectorPeter Bogdanovich asked him whether he rehearsed extensively before shooting, and Lumet said that he liked to rehearse a minimum of two weeks before filming.[28] During those weeks, recallsFaye Dunaway, who starred inNetwork (1976), he also blocked the scenes with his cameraman. As a result, she added that "not a minute is wasted while he's shooting, and that shows not only on the studio's budget, but it shows on the impetus of performance".[34] She praised his style of directing inNetwork, in which she won her only Academy Award:
Sidney, let me say, is one of, if not,the most talented and professional men in the world...and acting inNetwork was one of the happiest experiences I have ever had...He's a really gifted man who contributed a good deal to my performance.[34]
Partly because his actors were well rehearsed, he could execute a production in rapid order, which kept his productions within their modest budgets. When filmingPrince of the City (1981), for example, although there were over 130 speaking roles and 135 different locations, he was able to coordinate the entire shoot in 52 days. As a result, wrote historiansCharles Harpole and Thomas Schatz, performers were eager to work with him, for they considered him to be an "outstanding director of actors". The film's starTreat Williams said that Lumet was known for being "energetic":
He was just a ball of fire. He had passion for what he did and he "came to work" with all barrels burning. He's probably the most prepared director I've ever worked with emotionally. His films always came in under schedule and under budget. And everybody got home for dinner.[35]
Harpole added that "whereas many directors disliked rehearsals or advising actors on how to build their character, Lumet excelled at both".[27] He could thereby more easily give his performers a cinematic showcase for their abilities and help them deepen their acting contribution. ActorChristopher Reeve, who co-starred inDeathtrap (1982), also pointed out that Lumet knew how to talk technical language: "If you want to work that way – he knows how to talk Method, he knows how to improvise, and he does it all equally well".[28]
As a movie goes on, it gets more and more grueling and you really need a director who will help remind you where your character is at all times. Sidney Lumet was like that. All wonderful directors will do that.
Joanna Rapf, writing about the filming ofThe Verdict (1982), states that Lumet gave plenty of personal attention to his actors, whether listening to them or touching them. She describes how Lumet and starPaul Newman sat on a bench secluded from the main set, where Newman had taken his shoes off, to privately discuss an important scene about to be shot. Lumet's actors walked through their scenes before the camera rolled. This preparation was done because Lumet liked to shoot a scene in one take or two at the most. Newman liked to call him "Speedy Gonzales", adding that Lumet did not shoot more than he had to. "He doesn't give himself any protection. I know I would," Newman said.[28]
Film critic Betsey Sharkey agreed, adding that "he was a maestro of one or two takes years before Clint Eastwood would turn it into a respected specialty". Sharkey recalls, "[Faye] Dunaway once told me that Lumet worked so fast it was as if he were on roller skates. A racing pulse generated by a big heart."[37]
Biographer Joanna Rapf observes that Lumet had always been an independent director, and liked to make films about "men who summon courage to challenge the system, about the little guy against the system".[28]: Intro This includes the women characters, as inGarbo Talks (1984). Its starAnne Bancroft embodied the kind of character portrayal that attracted him: "a committed activist for all kinds of causes, who stands up for the rights of the oppressed, who is lively, outspoken, courageous, who refuses to conform for the sake of convenience, and whose understanding of life allows her todie with dignity ...Garbo Talks in many ways is a valentine to New York".[28]
In an interview in 2006, Lumet said that he had always been "fascinated by the human cost involved in following passions and commitments, and the cost those passions and commitments inflict on others".[28] This theme is at the core of most of his movies, notes Rapf, such as his true-life films about corruption in theNew York City Police Department or in family dramas such asDaniel (1983).
Film historian Stephen Bowles believes that Lumet was most comfortable and effective as a director of seriouspsychodramas, as opposed to light entertainments. His Academy Award nominations, for example, were all for character studies of men in crisis, from his first film,Twelve Angry Men, toThe Verdict. Lumet excelled at putting drama on the screen.[17] Most of his characters are driven by obsessions or passions, such as the pursuit of justice, honesty and truth, or jealousy, memory or guilt.[17] Lumet was intrigued by obsessive conditions, writes Bowles.[17]
Lumet's protagonists tended to beantiheroes, isolated and unexceptional men who rebel against a group or institution. The most important criterion for Lumet was not simply whether the actions of the people are right or wrong, but whether they were genuine and justified by the individual's conscience. WhistleblowerFrank Serpico, for example, is the quintessential Lumet hero, who he described as a "rebel with a cause".[38]
An earlier example of psychodrama wasThe Pawnbroker (1964), starringRod Steiger. In it, Steiger plays aHolocaust survivor whose spirit has been broken and who lives day-to-day as apawn shop manager inHarlem. Lumet used the film to examine, with flashbacks, the psychological and spiritual scars with which Steiger's character lives, including his lost capacity to feel pleasure.[39] Steiger, who made nearly 80 films, said during a TV interview that the film was his favorite as an actor.[40]
It was the social realism which permeated his greatest work that truly defined Lumet – the themes of youthful idealism beaten down by corruption and the hopelessness of inept social institutions allowed him to produce several trenchant and potent films that no other director could have made.
Serpico (1973) was the first of four "seminal" films that Lumet made during the 1970s that marked him as "one of the greatest filmmakers of his generation".[16] It was the story of power and betrayal in the New York City police force, with an idealistic policeman battling impossible odds.[16]
Lumet was a child during theDepression, and grew up poor in New York City, witnessing poverty and corruption.[28] It instilled in him at an early age a belief in the importance of justice for ademocracy, a subject that he tried to put in his films. He admitted, however, that he did not believe that the movie business itself has the power to change anything. Rapf writes, "There is, as he says, a lot of 'shit' to deal with in the entertainment industry, but the secret of good work is to maintain your honesty and your passion."[28] Film historianDavid Thomson writes of his films:
He has steady themes: the fragility of justice, and the police and their corruption. Lumet quickly became esteemed ... [and he] got a habit for big issues –Fail Safe,The Pawnbroker,The Hill, – and seemed torn between dullness and pathos. ... He was that rarity of the 1970s, a director happy to serve his material – yet seemingly not touched or changed by it. ... His sensitivity to actors and to the rhythms of the city have made him America's longest-lived descendant of the 1950s Neorealist tradition and its urgent commitment to ethical responsibility.[31]
Lumet preferred to work in New York City and shunned the dominance ofHollywood.[28] As a director, he became strongly identified with New York City. "I always like being in Woody Allen's world," he said. He claimed that "the diversity of the City, its many ethnic neighborhoods, its art and its crime, its sophistication and its corruption, its beauty and its ugliness, all feed into what inspires him".[28] He felt that in order to create, it is important to confront reality on a daily basis. For Lumet, "New York is filled with reality; Hollywood is a fantasyland."[28]
He often used New York City as the backdrop—if not the symbol—of his "preoccupation with America's decline", according to film historiansScott and Barbara Siegel.[41] Lumet was attracted to crime-related stories in New York City urban settings, where the criminals get caught in a vortex of events that they can neither understand nor control but are forced to resolve.[17]
Like other Jewish directors from New York, such asWoody Allen,Mel Brooks andPaul Mazursky, Lumet's characters often speak overtly about controversial issues of the times. They felt unconstrained as filmmakers, and their art became "filtered through their Jewish consciousness", wrote film historianDavid Desser. Lumet, like the others, sometimes turned to Jewish themes to develop ethnic sensibilities that were characteristic of American culture,[42]: 3 by dynamically highlighting its "unique tensions and cultural diversity". This was partly reflected in Lumet's preoccupation with city life.[42]: 6 A Stranger Among Us (1992), for example, is the story of a woman undercover police officer and her experiences in aHasidic community in New York City.
The subject of "guilt", explains Desser, dominates many of Lumet's films. From his first feature film,12 Angry Men (1957), in which a jury must decide the guilt or innocence of a young man, toQ&A (1990), in which a lawyer must determine the question of guilt and responsibility of a maverick policeman, guilt is a common thread that runs through many of his films. InMurder on the Orient Express (1974), all of the suspects are guilty.[42]: 172
His films are also characterized by a strong emphasis on family life, often showing tensions within the family.[42]: 172 This emphasis on the family included "surrogate families", as in the police trilogy consisting ofSerpico (1973),Prince of the City (1981), andQ&A. An "untraditional family" is also portrayed inDog Day Afternoon (1975).[42]: 172
Sidney was a visionary film-maker whose movies made an indelible mark on our popular culture with their stirring commentary on our society. Future generations of film-makers will look to Sidney's work for guidance and inspiration but there will never be another who comes close to him.
Lumet preferred naturalism or realism, according to Joanna Rapf. He did not like the "decorator's look", for which the camera could call attention to itself. He edited his films so that the camera was unobtrusive. His cinematographerRon Fortunato said, "Sidney flips if he sees a look that's too artsy."[citation needed] Lumet dislikedCinemaScope and never filmed in an aspect ratio wider than 1.85:1.[citation needed]
Partly because he was willing and able to take on so many significant social issues and problems, he achieved strong performances from lead actors with fine work from character actors. He is "one of the stalwart figures of New York moviemaking. He abides by good scripts, when he gets them," said critic David Thomson.[31] Although critics gave varying opinions of his films, Lumet's body of work is generally held in high esteem.[12] Most critics have described him as a sensitive and intelligent director, having good taste, the courage to experiment with his style, and with a "gift for handling actors".[12]
In a quote from his book, Lumet emphasized the logistics of directing:
Someone once asked me what making a movie was like. I said it was like making a mosaic. Each setup is like a tiny tile (a setup, the basic component of a film's production, consists of one camera position and its associated lighting). You color it, shape it, polish it as best you can. You'll do six or seven hundred of these, maybe a thousand. (There can easily be that many setups in a movie.) Then you literally paste them together and hope it's what you set out to do.[44]
CriticJustin Chang adds that Lumet's skill as a director and in developing strong stories continued up to his last film in 2007, writing of his "nimble touch with performers, his ability to draw out great warmth and zesty humor with one hand and coax them toward ever darker, more anguished extremes of emotion with the other, was on gratifying display in his ironically titled final film,Before the Devil Knows You're Dead".[45][46]
In an interview withNew York magazine, Lumet said that he expects to see more directors from different ethnic backgrounds and communities telling their stories. "You know, I started out making films about Jews and Italians and Irish because I didn't know anything else."[47]
Lumet died fromlymphoma at age 86 on April 9, 2011, in his residence in Manhattan.[5][26] When asked in a 1997 interview about how he wanted to "go out", Lumet responded, "I don't think about it. I'm not religious. I do know that I don't want to take up any space. Burn me up and scatter my ashes overKatz's Delicatessen."[49] A few months after Lumet's death, a retrospective celebration of his work was held at New York'sLincoln Center with numerous speakers and film stars.[50] In 2015,Nancy Buirski directedBy Sidney Lumet, a documentary about his career[51][52] that aired in January 2017 as part ofPBS'sAmerican Masters series.[35][53][54]
According to film historian Stephen Bowles, Lumet succeeded in becoming a leading drama filmmaker partly because "his most important criterion [when directing] is not whether the actions of his protagonists are right or wrong, but whether their actions are genuine". And where those actions are "justified by the individual's conscience, this gives his heroes uncommon strength and courage to endure the pressures, abuses, and injustices of others". His films have thereby continually given us the "quintessential hero acting in defiance of peer group authority and asserting his own code of moral values".[17]
According toThe Encyclopedia of Hollywood, Lumet was one of the most prolific filmmakers of the modern era, directing, on average, more than one movie a year since his directorial debut in 1957.[41]Turner Classic Movies notes his "strong direction of actors", "vigorous storytelling" and the "social realism" in his best work.[16]Chicago Sun-Times film criticRoger Ebert described him as "one of the finest craftsmen and warmest humanitarians among all film directors".[55] Lumet was also known as an "actor's director", having worked with the best of them during his career, probably more than "any other director".[28]Sean Connery, who acted in five of his films, considered him one of his favorite directors, and one who had that "vision thing".[56]
Lumet's published memoir about his life in film,Making Movies (1996), is "extremely lighthearted and infectious in its enthusiasm for the craft of moviemaking itself", writes Bowles, "and is in marked contrast to the tone and style of most of his films. Perhaps Lumet's signature as a director is his work with actors – and his exceptional ability to draw high-quality, sometimes extraordinary performances from even the most unexpected quarters."[17] Jake Coyle, a writer for theAssociated Press, agreed: "While Lumet has for years gone relatively underappreciated, actors have consistently turned in some of their most memorable performances under his stewardship. FromKatharine Hepburn toFaye Dunaway,Henry Fonda toPaul Newman, Lumet is known as an actor's director,"[57] and to some, likeAli MacGraw, he was considered "every actor's dream".[24]
Lumet is one of the most important film directors in the history of American cinema, and his work has left an indelible mark on both audiences and the history of film itself.
In the belief that Lumet's "compelling stories and unforgettable performances were his strong suit", director and producerSteven Spielberg described Lumet as "one of the greatest directors in the long history of film".[59]Al Pacino, on hearing of Lumet's death, stated that with his films, "He leaves a great legacy, but more than that, to the people close to him, he will remain the most civilized of humans and the kindest man I have ever known."[59]Boston Herald writer James Verniere observed that "at a time when the American film industry is intent on seeing how low it can go, Sidney Lumet remains a master of the morally complex American drama".[60] Following his death, fellow New York directorsWoody Allen andMartin Scorsese both paid tribute to Lumet. Allen called him the "quintessential New York film-maker", while Scorsese said that "our vision of the city has been enhanced and deepened by classics likeSerpico,Dog Day Afternoon and, above all, the remarkablePrince of the City".[43] Lumet also drew praise from New York mayorMichael Bloomberg, who called him "one of the great chroniclers of our city".[43]
He did not win an individual Academy Award, although he did receive anAcademy Honorary Award in 2005, and 14 of his films were nominated for various Oscars, such asNetwork, which was nominated for 10, winning 4. In 2005, Lumet received an Academy Award for Lifetime Achievement for his "brilliant services to screenwriters, performers, and the art of the motion picture".[61]
A few months after Lumet's death in April 2011, TV commentatorLawrence O'Donnell aired a tribute to Lumet,[62] and a retrospective celebration of his work was held at New York's Lincoln Center, with the appearance of numerous speakers and film stars.[50] In October 2011, the organizationHuman Rights First inaugurated its "Sidney Lumet Award for Integrity in Entertainment" for the TV showThe Good Wife, along with giving awards to twoMiddle East activists who had worked for freedom and democracy. Lumet had worked with Human Rights First on a media project related to the depiction of torture and interrogation on television.[63]
^Garfield, David (1980). "Birth of The Actors Studio: 1947–1950".A Player's Place: The Story of the Actors Studio. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc. p. 52.ISBN0-02-542650-8.Lewis' class included Herbert Berghof, Marlon Brando, Montgomery Clift, Mildred Dunnock, Tom Ewell, John Forsythe, Anne Jackson, Sidney Lumet, Kevin McCarthy, Karl Malden, E.G. Marshall, Patricia Neal, William Redfield, Jerome Robbins, Maureen Stapleton, Beatrice Straight, Eli Wallach, and David Wayne.
^Bridge of Light (Yiddish Film Between Two Worlds), pp. 208, 209, J. Hoberman, Museum of Modern Art, Published by Shocken Books, 1991, YIVO translations
^abcdefKatz, Ephraim.The Film Encyclopedia (1998) Harper Collins, 856
