Sharks range in size from the smalldwarf lanternshark (Etmopterus perryi), a deep sea species that is only 17 centimetres (6.7 in) in length, to thewhale shark (Rhincodon typus), the largest fish in the world, which reaches approximately 12 metres (40 ft) in length.[4] They are found in all seas and are common to depths up to 2,000 metres (6,600 ft). They generally do not live in freshwater, although there are a few known exceptions, such as thebull shark and theriver sharks, which can be found in both seawater and freshwater, and theGanges shark, which lives only in freshwater.[5] Sharks have a covering ofplacoid scales (denticles) that protects the skin from damage andparasites in addition to improving theirfluid dynamics. They havenumerous sets of replaceable teeth.[6]
Sharks are caught by humans forshark meat orshark fins. Many shark populations are threatened by human activities. Since 1970, shark populations have been reduced by 71%, mostly fromoverfishing[7] and mutilating practice such asshark finning.[8][9]
Etymology
Until the 16th century,[10] sharks were known to mariners as "sea dogs".[11] This is still evidential in several species termed "dogfish", or theporbeagle.
The etymology of the wordshark is uncertain. The most likely etymology states that the original sense of the word was that of "predator, one who preys on others" from theDutchschurk, meaning 'villain, scoundrel' (cf.card shark,loan shark, etc.), which was later applied to the fish due to its predatory behaviour.[12]
Fossil shark tooth (size over 9 cm or 3.5 inches) with crown, shoulder, root and root lobeA collection ofCretaceousshark teeth
The oldesttotal-group chondrichthyans, known asacanthodians or "spiny sharks", appeared during the EarlySilurian, around 439 million years ago.[15] The oldest confirmed members ofElasmobranchiisensu lato (the group containing all cartilaginous fish more closely related to modern sharks and rays than tochimaeras) appeared during theDevonian.[16]Anachronistidae, the oldest probable representatives of Euselachii, the group containing modern sharks (Selachii) and rays (Batomorphi) to the exclusion of most extinct elasmobranch groups, date to theCarboniferous.[17] Selachii and Batomorphi are suggested by some to have diverged during theTriassic.[18] Fossils of the earliest true sharks may have appeared during thePermian, based on remains of "synechodontiforms" found in the Early Permian of Russia,[19] but if remains of "synechodontiforms" from the Permian and Triassic are true sharks, they only had low diversity. Modern sharkorders first appeared during the Early Jurassic, and during the Jurassic true sharks underwent great diversification.[20] Sharks largely replaced thehybodonts, which had previously been a dominant group of shark-like fish during the Triassic and Early Jurassic.[21]
Sharks belong to the division Selachii in thesubclassElasmobranchii in theclassChondrichthyes. The Elasmobranchii also includerays andskates; the Chondrichthyes also includeChimaeras. It was thought that the sharks form apolyphyletic group: some sharks are more closely related to rays than they are to some other sharks,[23] but current molecular studies support monophyly of both groups of sharks and batoids.[24][25]
The division Selachii is divided into the superordersGaleomorphi (or Galea), andSqualomorphi (or Squalea). The galeomorphs are theHeterodontiformes,Orectolobiformes,Lamniformes, andCarcharhiniformes. Lamnoids and carcharhinoids are usually placed in oneclade, but recent studies show that Lamnoids and orectoloboids are a clade. Some scientists now think that Heterodontoids may be squalomorphs. The squalomorphs are divided intoHexanchiformes and Squalomorpha. The former includescow shark andfrilled shark, though some authors propose that both families be moved to separate orders. The Squalomorpha contains theSqualiformes and the Hypnosqualea. The Hypnosqualea may be invalid. It includes theSquatiniformes, and the Pristorajea, which may also be invalid, but includes thePristiophoriformes and theBatomorphi.[23][26]
There are more than 500 species of sharks split across thirteen orders, including several orders of sharks that have gone extinct:[26][27]
Echinorhiniformes: This group includes theprickly shark andbramble shark. Phylogenetic placement of this group has been ambiguous in scientific studies.[28] They are sometimes given their own order, Echinorhiniformes.[27]
The teeth oftiger sharks are oblique and serrated to saw through flesh
Shark teeth are embedded in thegums rather than directly affixed to the jaw, and are constantly replaced throughout life. Multiple rows of replacement teeth grow in a groove on the inside of the jaw and steadily move forward in comparison to aconveyor belt; some sharks lose 30,000 or more teeth in their lifetime. The rate of tooth replacement varies from once every 8 to 10 days to several months. In most species, teeth are replaced one at a time as opposed to the simultaneous replacement of an entire row, which is observed in thecookiecutter shark.[29]
Tooth shape depends on the shark's diet: those that feed onmollusks andcrustaceans have dense and flattened teeth used for crushing, those that feed on fish have needle-like teeth for gripping, and those that feed on larger prey such asmammals have pointed lower teeth for gripping and triangular upper teeth withserrated edges for cutting. The teeth of plankton-feeders such as the basking shark are small and non-functional.[30]
Skeleton
Shark skeletons are very different from those ofbony fish andterrestrial vertebrates. Sharks and othercartilaginous fish (skates andrays) have skeletons made ofcartilage andconnective tissue. Cartilage is flexible and durable, yet is about half the normal density of bone. This reduces the skeleton's weight, saving energy.[31] Because sharks do not have rib cages, they can easily be crushed under their own weight on land.[32]
Jaw
Thejaws of sharks, like those of rays and skates, are not attached to thecranium. The jaw's surface (in comparison to the shark's vertebrae and gill arches) needs extra support due to its heavy exposure to physical stress and its need for strength. It has a layer of tiny hexagonal plates called "tesserae", which are crystal blocks of calcium salts arranged as a mosaic.[33] This gives these areas much of the same strength found in the bony tissue found in other animals.
Generally sharks have only one layer of tesserae, but the jaws of large specimens, such as the bull shark, tiger shark, and the great white shark, have two to three layers or more, depending on body size. The jaws of a large great white shark may have up to five layers.[31] In therostrum (snout), the cartilage can be spongy and flexible to absorb the power of impacts.[citation needed]
Fins
Fin skeletons are elongated and supported with soft and unsegmented rays named ceratotrichia, filaments of elastic protein resembling the horny keratin in hair and feathers.[34] Most sharks have eight fins. Sharks can only drift away from objects directly in front of them because their fins do not allow them to move in the tail-first direction.[32]
Unlike bony fish, sharks have a complex dermal corset made of flexible collagenous fibers and arranged as a helical network surrounding their body. This works as an outer skeleton, providing attachment for their swimming muscles and thus saving energy.[35] Their dermal teeth give themhydrodynamic advantages as they reduce turbulence when swimming.[36] Some species of shark have pigmented denticles that form complex patterns like spots (e.g.Zebra shark) and stripes (e.g.Tiger shark). These markings are important forcamouflage and help sharks blend in with their environment, as well as making them difficult for prey to detect.[37] For some species, dermal patterning returns to healed denticles even after they have been removed by injury.[38]
Tails
Tails provide thrust, making speed and acceleration dependent on tail shape.Caudal fin shapes vary considerably between shark species, due to their evolution in separate environments. Sharks possess aheterocercal caudal fin in which thedorsal portion is usually noticeably larger than theventral portion. This is because the shark'svertebral column extends into that dorsal portion, providing a greater surface area for muscle attachment. This allows more efficientlocomotion among these negatively buoyant cartilaginous fish. By contrast, most bony fish possess ahomocercal caudal fin.[39]
Tiger sharks have a large upperlobe, which allows for slow cruising and sudden bursts of speed. The tiger shark must be able to twist and turn in the water easily when hunting to support its varied diet, whereas theporbeagle shark, which hunts schooling fish such asmackerel andherring, has a large lower lobe to help it keep pace with its fast-swimming prey.[40] Other tail adaptations help sharks catch prey more directly, such as the thresher shark's usage of its powerful, elongated upper lobe to stun fish and squid.
Physiology
Buoyancy
Unlike bony fish, sharks do not have gas-filled swim bladders for buoyancy. Instead, sharks rely on a large liver filled with oil that containssqualene, and their cartilage, which is about half the normal density of bone.[35] Their liver constitutes up to 30% of their total body mass.[41] The liver's effectiveness is limited, so sharks employdynamic lift to maintain depth while swimming.Sand tiger sharks store air in their stomachs, using it as a form of swim bladder. Bottom-dwelling sharks, like thenurse shark, have negative buoyancy, allowing them to rest on the ocean floor.
Some sharks, if inverted or stroked on the nose, enter a natural state oftonic immobility. Researchers use this condition to handle sharks safely.[42]
Respiration
Like other fish, sharks extract oxygen from seawater as it passes over theirgills. Unlike other fish, shark gill slits are not covered, but lie in a row behind the head. A modified slit called aspiracle lies just behind the eye, which assists the shark with taking in water duringrespiration and plays a major role in bottom–dwelling sharks. Spiracles are reduced or missing in activepelagic sharks.[30] While the shark is moving, water passes through the mouth and over the gills in a process known as "ram ventilation". While at rest, most sharks pump water over their gills to ensure a constant supply of oxygenated water. A small number of species have lost the ability to pump water through their gills and must swim without rest. These species areobligate ram ventilators and would presumablyasphyxiate if unable to move. Obligate ram ventilation is also true of some pelagic bony fish species.[43][44]
Therespiratory andcirculatory process begins when deoxygenatedvenous blood travels to the shark's two-chamberedheart. Here, the shark pumps blood to its gills via the ventralaorta where it branches intoafferentbranchial arteries.Gas exchange takes place in the gills and the reoxygenated blood flows into theefferent branchial arteries, which come together to form thedorsal aorta. The blood flows from the dorsal aorta throughout the body. The deoxygenated blood from the body then flows through theposterior cardinal veins and enters the posterior cardinalsinuses. From there venous blood re-enters the heartventricle and the cycle repeats.[45]
Larger species, like the whale shark, are able to conserve their body heat through sheer size when they dive to colder depths. Thescalloped hammerhead closes its mouth and gills when diving to depths of around 800 metres, holding its breath until it reaches warmer waters again.[47]
Osmoregulation
In contrast to bony fish, with the exception of thecoelacanth,[48] the blood and other tissue of sharks andChondrichthyes is generallyisotonic to their marine environments because of the high concentration ofurea (up to 2.5%[49]) andtrimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), allowing them to be inosmotic balance with the seawater. This adaptation prevents most sharks from surviving in freshwater, and they are therefore confined tomarine environments. A few exceptions exist, such as thebull shark, which has developed a way to change itskidney function to excrete large amounts of urea.[41] When a shark dies, the urea is broken down to ammonia by bacteria, causing the dead body to gradually smell strongly of ammonia.[50][51]
Research in 1930 byHomer W. Smith showed that sharks' urine does not contain sufficient sodium to avoidhypernatremia, and it was postulated that there must be an additional mechanism for salt secretion. In 1960 it was discovered at theMount Desert Island Biological Laboratory inSalsbury Cove, Maine that sharks have a type ofsalt gland located at the end of the intestine, known as the "rectal gland", whose function is the secretion of chlorides.[52]
Digestion
Digestion can take a long time. The food moves from the mouth to a J-shaped stomach, where it is stored and initial digestion occurs.[53] Unwanted items may never get past the stomach, and instead the shark either vomits or turns its stomachs inside out and ejects unwanted items from its mouth.[54]
One of the biggest differences between the digestive systems of sharks and mammals is that sharks have much shorter intestines. This short length is achieved by thespiral valve with multiple turns within a single short section instead of a long tube-like intestine. The valve provides a long surface area, requiring food to circulate inside the short gut until fully digested, when remaining waste products pass into thecloaca.[53]
The shape of thehammerhead shark's head may enhance olfaction by spacing the nostrils further apart.
Sharks have keenolfactory senses, located in the short duct (which is not fused, unlike bony fish) between the anterior and posterior nasal openings, with some species able to detect as little as onepart per million of blood in seawater.[56] The size of the olfactory bulb varies across different shark species, with size dependent on how much a given species relies on smell or vision to find their prey.[57] In environments with low visibility, shark species generally have larger olfactory bulbs.[57] In reefs, where visibility is high, species of sharks from the familyCarcharhinidae have smaller olfactory bulbs.[57] Sharks found in deeper waters also have larger olfactory bulbs.[58]
Sharks have the ability to determine the direction of a given scent based on the timing of scent detection in each nostril.[59] This is similar to the method mammals use to determine direction of sound.
They are more attracted to the chemicals found in the intestines of many species, and as a result often linger near or insewage outfalls. Some species, such asnurse sharks, have externalbarbels that greatly increase their ability to sense prey.
Sharkeyes are similar to the eyes of othervertebrates, including similarlenses,corneas andretinas, though their eyesight is well adapted to themarine environment with the help of a tissue calledtapetum lucidum. This tissue is behind theretina and reflects light back to it, thereby increasing visibility in the dark waters. The effectiveness of the tissue varies, with some sharks having strongernocturnal adaptations. Many sharks can contract and dilate theirpupils, like humans, something noteleost fish can do. Sharks have eyelids, but they do not blink because the surrounding water cleans their eyes. To protect their eyes some species havenictitating membranes. This membrane covers the eyes while hunting and when the shark is being attacked. However, some species, including thegreat white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), do not have this membrane, but instead roll their eyes backwards to protect them when striking prey. The importance of sight in shark hunting behavior is debated. Some believe thatelectro- andchemoreception are more significant, while others point to the nictating membrane as evidence that sight is important, since presumably the shark would not protect its eyes were they unimportant. The use of sight probably varies with species and water conditions. The shark's field of vision can swap betweenmonocular andstereoscopic at any time.[60] Amicro-spectrophotometry study of 17 species of sharks found 10 had onlyrod photoreceptors and no cone cells in theirretinas giving them good night vision while making themcolorblind. The remaining seven species had in addition to rods a single type ofcone photoreceptor sensitive to green and, seeing only in shades of grey and green, are believed to be effectively colorblind. The study indicates that an object's contrast against the background, rather than colour, may be more important for object detection.[61][62][63]
Hearing
Although it is hard to test the hearing of sharks, they may have a sharpsense of hearing and can possibly hear prey from many miles away.[64] The hearing sensitivity for most shark species lies between 20 and 1000 Hz.[65]A small opening on each side of their heads (not the spiracle) leads directly into theinner ear through a thin channel. Thelateral line shows a similar arrangement, and is open to the environment via a series of openings called lateral linepores. This is a reminder of the common origin of these two vibration- and sound-detecting organs that are grouped together as the acoustico-lateralis system. In bony fish andtetrapods the external opening into the inner ear has been lost.
Electromagnetic field receptors (ampullae of Lorenzini) and motion detecting canals in the head of a shark
Theampullae of Lorenzini are the electroreceptor organs. They number in the hundreds to thousands. Sharks use the ampullae of Lorenzini to detect theelectromagnetic fields that all living things produce.[66] This helps sharks (particularly thehammerhead shark) find prey. The shark has the greatest electrical sensitivity of any animal. Sharks find prey hidden in sand by detecting theelectric fields they produce.Ocean currents moving in themagnetic field of the Earth also generate electric fields that sharks can use for orientation and possibly navigation.[67]
This system is found in most fish, including sharks. It is a tactile sensory system which allows the organism to detect water speed and pressure changes near by.[68] The main component of the system is the neuromast, a cell similar tohair cells present in the vertebrate ear that interact with the surrounding aquatic environment. This helps sharks distinguish between the currents around them, obstacles off on their periphery, and struggling prey out of visual view. The shark can sense frequencies in the range of 25 to 50 Hz.[69]
Shark lifespans vary by species. Most live 20 to 30 years. Thespiny dogfish has one of the longest lifespans at more than 100 years.[70]Whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) may also live over 100 years.[71] Earlier estimates suggested theGreenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) could reach about 200 years, but a recent study found that a 5.02-metre-long (16.5 ft) specimen was 392 ± 120 years old (i.e., at least 272 years old), making it thelongest-lived vertebrate known.[72][73]
Reproduction
Unlike mostbony fish, sharks areK-selected reproducers, meaning that they produce a small number of well-developed young as opposed to a large number of poorly developed young.Fecundity in sharks ranges from 2 to over 100 young per reproductive cycle.[74] Sharks mature slowly relative to many other fish. For example,lemon sharks reach sexual maturity at around age 13–15.[75]
Mating has rarely been observed in sharks.[78] The smallercatsharks often mate with the male curling around the female. In less flexible species the two sharks swim parallel to each other while the male inserts a clasper into the female'soviduct. Females in many of the larger species have bite marks that appear to be a result of a male grasping them to maintain position duringmating. The bite marks may also come from courtship behavior: the male may bite the female to show his interest. In some species, females have evolved thicker skin to withstand these bites.[77]
Asexual
There have been a number of documented cases in which a female shark who has not been in contact with a male has conceived a pup on her own throughparthenogenesis.[79][80] The details of this process are not well understood, butgenetic fingerprinting showed that the pups had no paternal genetic contribution, ruling outsperm storage. The extent of this behavior in the wild is unknown. Mammals are now the only majorvertebrate group in whichasexual reproduction has not been observed.
Scientists say that asexual reproduction in the wild is rare, and probably a last-ditch effort to reproduce when a mate is not present. Asexual reproduction diminishesgenetic diversity, which helps build defenses against threats to the species. Species that rely solely on it risk extinction. Asexual reproduction may have contributed to theblue shark's decline off theIrish coast.[81]
Most sharks areovoviviparous, meaning that the eggs hatch in theoviduct within the mother's body and that the egg'syolk and fluids secreted by glands in the walls of the oviduct nourishes the embryos. The young continue to be nourished by the remnants of the yolk and the oviduct's fluids. As in viviparity, the young are born alive and fully functional.Lamniforme sharks practiceoophagy, where the first embryos to hatch eat the remaining eggs. Taking this a step further,sand tiger shark pups cannibalistically consume neighboring embryos. The survival strategy for ovoviviparous species is tobrood the young to a comparatively large size before birth. Thewhale shark is now classified as ovoviviparous rather than oviparous, because extrauterine eggs are now thought to have been aborted. Most ovoviviparous sharks give birth in sheltered areas, including bays, river mouths and shallow reefs. They choose such areas for protection from predators (mainly other sharks) and the abundance of food.Dogfish have the longest knowngestation period of any shark, at 18 to 24 months.Basking sharks andfrilled sharks appear to have even longer gestation periods, but accurate data are lacking.[82]
Oviparity
Some species areoviparous, laying their fertilized eggs in the water. In most oviparous shark species, anegg case with the consistency ofleather protects the developing embryo(s). These cases may be corkscrewed into crevices for protection. The egg case is commonly called amermaid's purse. Oviparous sharks include thehorn shark,catshark,Port Jackson shark, andswellshark.[82][84]
Viviparity
Viviparity is the gestation of young without the use of a traditional egg, and results in live birth.[85] Viviparity in sharks can be placental or aplacental.[85] Young are born fully formed and self-sufficient.[85] Hammerheads, therequiem sharks (such as thebull andblue sharks), andsmoothhounds are viviparous.[74][82]
Behavior
The classic view describes a solitary hunter, ranging the oceans in search of food. However, this applies to only a few species. Most live far more social, sedentary,benthic lives, and appear likely to have their own distinct personalities.[86] Even solitary sharks meet for breeding or at rich hunting grounds, which may lead them to cover thousands of miles in a year.[87] Shark migration patterns may be even more complex than in birds, with many sharks covering entireocean basins.
When approached too closely some sharks perform athreat display. This usually consists of exaggerated swimming movements, and can vary in intensity according to the threat level.[88]
Speed
In general, sharks swim ("cruise") at an average speed of 8 kilometres per hour (5.0 mph), but when feeding or attacking, the average shark can reach speeds upwards of 19 kilometres per hour (12 mph). Theshortfin mako shark, the fastest shark and one of the fastest fish, can burst at speeds up to 50 kilometres per hour (31 mph).[89] Thegreat white shark is also capable of speed bursts. These exceptions may be due to thewarm-blooded, orhomeothermic, nature of these sharks' physiology. Sharks can travel 70 to 80 km in a day.[90]
Intelligence
Sharks possess brain-to-body mass ratios that are similar to mammals and birds,[91] and have exhibited apparent curiosity and behavior resembling play in the wild.[92][93]
There is evidence that juvenile lemon sharks can use observational learning in their investigation of novel objects in their environment.[94]
Sleep
All sharks need to keep water flowing over their gills in order for them to breathe; however, not all species need to be moving to do this. Those that are able to breathe while not swimming do so by using their spiracles to force water over their gills, thereby allowing them to extract oxygen from the water. It has been recorded that their eyes remain open while in this state and actively follow the movements of divers swimming around them[95] and as such they are not truly asleep.
Species that do need to swim continuously to breathe go through a process known as sleep swimming, in which the shark is essentially unconscious. It is known from experiments conducted on thespiny dogfish that itsspinal cord, rather than its brain, coordinates swimming, sospiny dogfish can continue to swim while sleeping, and this also may be the case in larger shark species.[95] In 2016 agreat white shark was captured on video for the first time in a state researchers believed was sleep swimming.[96]
Ecology
Feeding
This section is about shark feeding. For the sport of shark feeding, seeShark baiting.
A great white shark attacking bait atIsla Guadalupe, Mexico
Most sharks arecarnivorous.[97]Basking sharks,whale sharks, andmegamouth sharks have independently evolved different strategies for filter feedingplankton: basking sharks practiceram feeding, whale sharks use suction to take in plankton and small fishes, and megamouth sharks makesuction feeding more efficient by using theluminescent tissue inside of their mouths to attract prey in the deep ocean. This type of feeding requiresgill rakers—long, slender filaments that form a very efficientsieve—analogous to thebaleen plates of thegreat whales. The shark traps the plankton in these filaments and swallows from time to time in huge mouthfuls. Teeth in these species are comparatively small because they are not needed for feeding.[97]
Other highly specialized feeders includecookiecutter sharks, which feed on flesh sliced out of other larger fish andmarine mammals. Cookiecutter teeth are enormous compared to the animal's size. The lower teeth are particularly sharp. Although they have never been observed feeding, they are believed to latch onto their prey and use their thick lips to make a seal, twisting their bodies to rip off flesh.[41]
Some seabed–dwelling species are highly effective ambush predators.Angel sharks andwobbegongs use camouflage to lie in wait and suck prey into their mouths.[98] Manybenthic sharks feed solely oncrustaceans which they crush with their flatmolariform teeth.
Other sharks feed onsquid or fish, which they swallow whole. Theviper dogfish has teeth it can point outwards to strike and capture prey that it then swallows intact. Thegreat white and other large predators either swallow small prey whole or take huge bites out of large animals.Thresher sharks use their long tails to stun shoaling fishes, andsawsharks either stir prey from the seabed or slash at swimming prey with their tooth-studdedrostra.
Thebonnethead shark is the only known omnivorous species. Its main prey is crustaceans and mollusks, but it also eats a large amount of seagrass, and is able to digest and extract nutrients from about 50% of the seagrass it consumes.[99]
Many sharks, including thewhitetip reef shark are cooperative feeders and hunt in packs to herd and capture elusive prey. These social sharks are often migratory, traveling huge distances aroundocean basins in large schools. These migrations may be partly necessary to find new food sources.[100]
Range and habitat
Sharks are found in all seas. They generally do not live in fresh water, with a few exceptions such as thebull shark and theriver shark which can swim both in seawater and freshwater.[101] Sharks are common down to depths of 2,000 metres (7,000 ft), and some live even deeper, but they are almost entirely absent below 3,000 metres (10,000 ft). The deepest confirmed report of a shark is aPortuguese dogfish at 3,700 metres (12,100 ft).[102]
A sign warning about the presence of sharks inSalt Rock, South AfricaSnorkeler swims near ablacktip reef shark. In rare circumstances involving poor visibility, blacktips may bite a human, mistaking it for prey. Under normal conditions they are harmless and shy.
In 2006 theInternational Shark Attack File (ISAF) undertook an investigation into 96 alleged shark attacks, confirming 62 of them as unprovoked attacks and 16 as provoked attacks. The average number of fatalities worldwide per year between 2001 and 2006 from unprovoked shark attacks is 4.3.[103]
Contrary to popular belief, only a few sharks are dangerous to humans. Out of more than 470 species, only four have been involved in a significant number of fatal, unprovoked attacks on humans: thegreat white,oceanic whitetip,tiger, andbull sharks.[104][105] These sharks are large, powerful predators, and may sometimes attack and kill people. Despite being responsible for attacks on humans they have all been filmed without using a protective cage.[106]
The perception of sharks as dangerous animals has been popularized by publicity given to a few isolated unprovoked attacks, such as theJersey Shore shark attacks of 1916, and through popular fictional works about shark attacks, such as theJaws film series.Jaws authorPeter Benchley, as well asJaws directorSteven Spielberg, later attempted to dispel the image of sharks as man-eating monsters.[107]
To help avoid an unprovoked attack, humans should not wear jewelry or metal that is shiny and refrain from splashing around too much.[108]
In general, sharks show little pattern of attacking humans specifically, part of the reason could be that sharks prefer the blood of fish and other common preys.[109] Research indicates that when humans do become the object of a shark attack, it is possible that the shark has mistaken the human for species that are its normal prey, such as seals.[110][111] This was further proven in a recent study conducted by researchers at the California State University's Shark Lab. According to footage caught by the Lab's drones, juveniles swam right up to humans in the water without any bites incidents. The lab stated that the results showed that humans and sharks can co-exist in the water.[112]
Until recently, only a fewbenthic species of shark, such ashornsharks,leopard sharks andcatsharks, had survived in aquarium conditions for a year or more. This gave rise to the belief that sharks, as well as being difficult to capture and transport, were difficult to care for. More knowledge has led to more species (including the largepelagic sharks) living far longer in captivity, along with safer transportation techniques that have enabled long-distance transportation.[113] The great white shark had never been successfully held in captivity for long periods of time until September 2004, when theMonterey Bay Aquarium successfully kept a young female for 198 days before releasing her.
Most species are not suitable for home aquaria, and not every species sold bypet stores are appropriate. Some species can flourish in home saltwater aquaria.[114] Uninformed or unscrupulous dealers sometimes sell juvenile sharks like thenurse shark, which upon reaching adulthood is far too large for typical home aquaria.[114] Public aquaria generally do not accept donated specimens that have outgrown their housing. Some owners have been tempted torelease them.[114] Species appropriate to home aquaria represent considerable spatial and financial investments as they generally approach adult lengths of 3 feet (90 cm) and can live up to 25 years.[114]
In culture
Shark-themednose art, made popular by theFlying Tigers (pictured), is commonly seen on military aircraft.
In Hawaii
Sharks figure prominently inHawaiian mythology. Stories tell of men with shark jaws on their back who could change between shark and human form. A common theme was that a shark-man would warn beach-goers of sharks in the waters. The beach-goers would laugh and ignore the warnings and get eaten by the shark-man who warned them.Hawaiian mythology also includes many sharkgods. Among a fishing people, the most popular of allaumakua, or deified ancestor guardians, are shark aumakua.Kamaku describes in detail how to offer a corpse to become a shark. The body transforms gradually until thekahuna can point the awe-struck family to the markings on the shark's body that correspond to the clothing in which the beloved's body had been wrapped. Such a shark aumakua becomes the family pet, receiving food, and driving fish into the family net and warding off danger. Like all aumakua it had evil uses such as helping kill enemies. The ruling chiefs typically forbade such sorcery. Many Native Hawaiian families claim such an aumakua, who is known by name to the whole community.[115]
Kamohoali'i is the best known and revered of the shark gods, he was the older and favored brother ofPele,[116] and helped and journeyed with her to Hawaii. He was able to assume all human and fish forms. A summit cliff on the crater ofKilauea is one of his most sacred spots. At one point he had aheiau (temple or shrine) dedicated to him on every piece of land that jutted into the ocean on the island ofMolokai. Kamohoali'i was an ancestral god, not a human who became a shark and banned the eating of humans after eating one herself.[117][118] In Fijian mythology,Dakuwaqa was a shark god who was the eater of lost souls.
In American Samoa
On the island ofTutuila inAmerican Samoa (aU.S. territory), there is a location calledTurtle and Shark (Laumei ma Malie) which is important inSamoan culture—the location is the site of a legend calledO Le Tala I Le Laumei Ma Le Malie, in which two humans are said to have transformed into a turtle and a shark.[119][120][121] According to theU.S. National Park Service, "Villagers from nearbyVaitogi continue to reenact an important aspect of the legend at Turtle and Shark by performing a ritual song intended to summon the legendary animals to the ocean surface, and visitors are frequently amazed to see one or both of these creatures emerge from the sea in apparent response to this call."[119]
In contrast to the complex portrayals by Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders, the European and Western view of sharks has historically been mostly of fear and malevolence.[122] Sharks are used in popular culture commonly as eating machines, notably in theJaws novel and thefilm of the same name, along with itssequels.[123] Sharks are threats in other films such asDeep Blue Sea,The Reef, andothers, although they are sometimes used for comedic effect such as inFinding Nemo and theAustin Powers series. Sharks tend to be seen quite often in cartoons whenever a scene involves the ocean. Such examples include theTom and Jerry cartoons,Jabberjaw, and other shows produced by Hanna-Barbera. They also are used commonly as a clichéd means of killing off a character that is held up by a rope or some similar object as the sharks swim right below them, or the character may be standing on aplank above shark infested waters.[citation needed]
Popular misconceptions
A popular myth is that sharks are immune to disease andcancer, but this is not scientifically supported. Sharks have been known to get cancer.[124][125] Both diseases andparasites affect sharks. The evidence that sharks are at least resistant to cancer and disease is mostlyanecdotal and there have been few, if any, scientific orstatistical studies that show sharks to have heightened immunity to disease.[126]Other apparently false claims are that fins preventcancer[127] and treatosteoarthritis.[128] No scientific proof supports these claims; at least one study has shown shark cartilage of no value in cancer treatment.[129]
The annual shark catch has increased rapidly over the last 60 years.The value of shark fins forshark fin soup has led to an increase in shark catches where only the fins are taken, while the rest of the shark is discarded, typically into the sea. The presence ofBMAA in the fins raises health concerns.A 4.3-metre (14 ft), 540-kilogram (1,200 lb)tiger shark caught inKāne'ohe Bay,Oahu, in 1966
Fishery
In 2008, it was estimated that nearly 100 million sharks were being killed by people every year, due to commercial and recreational fishing.[130][131] In 2021, it was estimated that the population of oceanic sharks and rays had dropped by 71% over the previous half-century.[7]
Shark finning yields are estimated at 1.44 million metric tons (1.59 million short tons) for 2000, and 1.41 million metric tons (1.55 million short tons) for 2010. Based on an analysis of average shark weights, this translates into a total annual mortality estimate of about 100 million sharks in 2000, and about 97 million sharks in 2010, with a total range of possible values between 63 and 273 million sharks per year.[132][133] Sharks are a common seafood in many places, includingJapan andAustralia. In southern Australia, shark is commonly used infish and chips,[134] in which fillets are battered anddeep-fried or crumbed and grilled. In fish and chip shops, shark is calledflake. InIndia, small sharks or baby sharks (called sora inTamil language,Telugu language) are sold in local markets. Since the flesh is not developed, cooking the flesh breaks it into powder, which is then fried in oil and spices (called sora puttu/sora poratu). The soft bones can be easily chewed, they are considered a delicacy in coastalTamil Nadu.Icelanders fermentGreenland sharks to produce a delicacy calledhákarl.[135] During a four-year period from 1996 to 2000, an estimated 26 to 73 million sharks were killed and traded annually in commercial markets.[136]
Sharks are often killed forshark fin soup. Fishermen capture live sharks, fin them, and dump the finless animal back into the water.Shark finning involves removing the fin with a hot metal blade.[131] The resulting immobile shark soon dies from suffocation or predators.[137] Shark fin has become a major trade within black markets all over the world. Fins sell for about $300/lb in 2009.[138] Poachers illegally fin millions each year. Few governments enforce laws that protect them.[133] In 2010 Hawaii became the first U.S. state to prohibit the possession, sale, trade or distribution of shark fins.[139] From 1996 to 2000, an estimated 38 million sharks had been killed per year for harvesting shark fins.[136] It is estimated byTRAFFIC that over 14,000 tonnes of shark fins were exported into Singapore between 2005–2007 and 2012–2014.[140]
Shark fin soup is astatus symbol in Asian countries and is erroneously considered healthy and full of nutrients. Scientific research has revealed, however, that high concentrations ofBMAA are present in shark fins.[141] Because BMAA is aneurotoxin, consumption ofshark fin soup and cartilage pills, therefore, may pose a health risk.[142] BMAA is under study for its pathological role in neurodegenerative diseases such asALS,Alzheimer's disease, andParkinson's disease.
Sharks generally reachsexual maturity only after many years and produce few offspring in comparison to other harvested fish. Harvesting sharks before they reproduce severely impacts future populations. Capture induced premature birth and abortion (collectively called capture-induced parturition) occurs frequently in sharks/rays when fished.[76] Capture-induced parturition is rarely considered in fisheries management despite being shown to occur in at least 12% of live bearing sharks and rays (88 species to date).[76]
The majority of shark fisheries have little monitoring or management. The rise in demand for shark products increases pressure on fisheries.[42] Major declines in shark stocks have been recorded—some species have been depleted by over 90% over the past 20–30 years with population declines of 70% not unusual.[144] A study by theInternational Union for Conservation of Nature suggests that one quarter of all known species of sharks and rays are threatened by extinction and 25 species were classified as critically endangered.[145][146]
In 2014, ashark cull in Western Australia killed dozens of sharks (mostlytiger sharks) usingdrum lines,[147] until it was cancelled after public protests and a decision by the Western Australia EPA; from 2014 to 2017, there was an "imminent threat" policy in Western Australia in which sharks that "threatened" humans in the ocean were shot and killed.[148] This "imminent threat" policy was criticized by senator Rachel Siewart for killing endangered sharks.[149] The "imminent threat" policy was cancelled in March 2017.[150] In August 2018, the Western Australia government announced a plan to re-introduce drum lines (though, this time the drum lines are "SMART" drum lines).[151]
From 1962 to the present,[152] the government ofQueensland has targeted and killed sharks in large numbers by usingdrum lines, under a "shark control" program—this program has also inadvertently killed large numbers of other animals such asdolphins; it has also killed endangeredhammerhead sharks.[153][154][155][156] Queensland's drum line program has been called "outdated, cruel and ineffective".[156] From 2001 to 2018, a total of 10,480 sharks were killed on lethal drum lines in Queensland, including in theGreat Barrier Reef.[157] From 1962 to 2018, roughly 50,000 sharks were killed by Queensland authorities.[158]
The government ofNew South Wales has a program that deliberately kills sharks usingnets.[155][159] The current net program in New South Wales has been described as being "extremely destructive" to marine life, including sharks.[160] Between 1950 and 2008, 352tiger sharks and 577great white sharks were killed in the nets in New South Wales—also during this period, a total of 15,135 marine animals were killed in the nets, including dolphins, whales, turtles, dugongs, and critically endangeredgrey nurse sharks.[161] There has been a very large decrease in the number of sharks in eastern Australia, and the shark-killing programs in Queensland and New South Wales are partly responsible for this decrease.[158]
Kwazulu-Natal, an area ofSouth Africa, has a shark-killing program using nets and drum lines—these nets and drum lines have killed turtles and dolphins, and have been criticized for killing wildlife.[162] During a 30-year period, more than 33,000 sharks have been killed in KwaZulu-Natal's shark-killing program—during the same 30-year period, 2,211 turtles, 8,448 rays, and 2,310 dolphins were killed in KwaZulu-Natal.[162] Authorities on the French island ofRéunion kill about 100 sharks per year.[163]
Killing sharks negatively affects the marine ecosystem.[164][165] Jessica Morris ofHumane Society International calls shark culling a "knee-jerk reaction" and says, "sharks are top order predators that play an important role in the functioning of marine ecosystems. We need them for healthy oceans."[166]
George H. Burgess, the former[167] director of theInternational Shark Attack File, "describes [shark] culling as a form of revenge, satisfying a public demand for blood and little else";[168] he also said shark culling is a "retro-type move reminiscent of what people would have done in the 1940s and 50s, back when we didn't have an ecological conscience and before we knew the consequences of our actions."[168] Jane Williamson, an associate professor in marine ecology at Macquarie University, says "There is no scientific support for the concept that culling sharks in a particular area will lead to a decrease in shark attacks and increase ocean safety."[169]
Other threats
Other threats include habitat alteration, damage and loss from coastal development, pollution and the impact of fisheries on the seabed and prey species.[170] The 2007 documentarySharkwater exposed how sharks are being hunted to extinction.[171]
In 1991,South Africa was the first country in the world to declare Great White sharks a legally protected species[172] (however, theKwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board is allowed to kill great white sharks in its "shark control" program in eastern South Africa).[162]
In 2003, the European Union introduced a general shark finning ban for all vessels of all nationalities in Union waters and for all vessels flying a flag of one of its member states.[177] This prohibition was amended in June 2013 to close remaining loopholes.[178]
In 2010, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) rejected proposals from theUnited States andPalau that would have required countries to strictly regulate trade in several species ofscalloped hammerhead,oceanic whitetip andspiny dogfish sharks. The majority, but not the required two-thirds of voting delegates, approved the proposal.China, by far the world's largest shark market, andJapan, which battles all attempts to extend the convention to marine species, led the opposition.[181][182] In March 2013, three endangered commercially valuable sharks, thehammerheads, the oceanic whitetip andporbeagle were added to Appendix 2 ofCITES, bringing shark fishing and commerce of these species under licensing and regulation.[183]
In July 2013, New York state, a major market and entry point for shark fins, banned the shark fin trade joining seven other states of the United States and the three Pacific U.S. territories in providing legal protection to sharks.[186]
In April 2020 researchers reported to have traced the origins ofshark fins of endangeredhammerhead sharks from a retail market in Hong Kong back to their source populations and therefore the approximate locations where the sharks were first caught usingDNA analysis.[192][193]
In July 2020 scientists reported results of a survey of 371 reefs in 58 nations estimating theconservation status of reef sharks globally. No sharks have been observed on almost 20% of the surveyed reefs and shark depletion was strongly associated with both socio-economic conditions and conservation measures.[194][195] Sharks are considered to be a vital part of the oceanecosystem.
^Rees, J. A. N., and Underwood, C. J., 2008, Hybodont sharks of the English Bathonian and Callovian (Middle Jurassic): Palaeontology, v. 51, no. 1, p. 117–147.
^Pavan-Kumar, A.; Gireesh-Babu, P.; Babu, P. P. Suresh; Jaiswar, A. K.; Hari Krishna, V.; Prasasd, K. Pani; Chaudhari, Aparna; Raje, S. G.; Chakraborty, S. K. (January 2014). "Molecular phylogeny of elasmobranchs inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear markers".Molecular Biology Reports.41 (1):447–457.doi:10.1007/s11033-013-2879-6.PMID24293104.S2CID16018112.
^Hamlett, W. C. (1999f).Sharks, Skates and Rays: The Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes. Johns Hopkins University Press.ISBN978-0-8018-6048-5.OCLC39217534.
^abPratt, H. L. Jr; Gruber, S. H.; Taniuchi, T (1990).Elasmobranchs as living resources: Advances in the biology, ecology, systematics, and the status of the fisheries. NOAA Tech Rept.
^Bennetta, William J. (1996)."Deep Breathing". Archived from the original on 2007-08-14. Retrieved2007-08-28.
^Martin, R. Aidan."Smell and Taste". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research.Archived from the original on 2009-12-07. Retrieved2009-08-21.
^abcYopak, Kara E.; Lisney, Thomas J.; Collin, Shaun P. (2015-03-01). "Not all sharks are "swimming noses": variation in olfactory bulb size in cartilaginous fishes".Brain Structure and Function.220 (2):1127–1143.doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0705-0.ISSN1863-2661.PMID24435575.S2CID2829434.
^abcLeonard J. V. Compagno (1984).Sharks of the World: An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.ISBN978-92-5-104543-5.OCLC156157504.
^Gruber, Samuel H. (February 21, 2000)."LIFE STYLE OF SHARKS". Archived from the original on July 27, 2011. RetrievedJune 20, 2010.
^Johnson, Richard H. & Nelson, Donald R. (1973-03-05). "Agonistic Display in the Gray Reef Shark,Carcharhinus menisorrah, and Its Relationship to Attacks on Man".Copeia.1973 (1):76–84.doi:10.2307/1442360.JSTOR1442360.
^Worm, Boris; Davis, Brendal; Kettemer, Lisa; Ward-Paige, Christine A.; Chapman, Demian; Heithaus, Michael R.; Kessel, Steven T.; Gruber, Samuel H. (2013). "Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks".Marine Policy.40:194–204.Bibcode:2013MarPo..40..194W.doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.034.
^abNicholas K Dulvy; Sarah L Fowler; John A Musick; Rachel D Cavanagh; Peter M Kyne; Lucy R Harrison; John K Carlson; Lindsay NK Davidson; Sonja V Fordham; Malcolm P Francis; Caroline M Pollock; Colin A Simpfendorfer; George H Burgess; Kent E Carpenter; Leonard JV Compagno; David A Ebert; Claudine Gibson; Michelle R Heupel; Suzanne R Livingstone; Jonnell C Sanciangco; John D Stevens; Sarah Valenti; William T White (2014)."Extinction risk and conservation of the world's sharks and rays".eLife.3 e00590.doi:10.7554/eLife.00590.PMC3897121.PMID24448405.eLife 2014;3:e00590
^Fields, A. T.; Fischer, G. A.; Shea, S. K. H.; Zhang, H.; Feldheim, K. A.; Chapman, D. D. (2020). "DNA Zip-coding: identifying the source populations supplying the international trade of a critically endangered coastal shark".Animal Conservation.23 (6):670–678.Bibcode:2020AnCon..23..670F.doi:10.1111/acv.12585.S2CID218775112.
^MacNeil, M. Aaron; Chapman, Demian D.; Heupel, Michelle; Simpfendorfer, Colin A.; Heithaus, Michael; Meekan, Mark; Harvey, Euan; Goetze, Jordan; Kiszka, Jeremy; Bond, Mark E.; Currey-Randall, Leanne M.; Speed, Conrad W.; Sherman, C. Samantha; Rees, Matthew J.; Udyawer, Vinay; Flowers, Kathryn I.; Clementi, Gina; Valentin-Albanese, Jasmine; Gorham, Taylor; Adam, M. Shiham; Ali, Khadeeja; Pina-Amargós, Fabián; Angulo-Valdés, Jorge A.; Asher, Jacob; Barcia, Laura García; Beaufort, Océane; Benjamin, Cecilie; Bernard, Anthony T. F.; Berumen, Michael L.; et al. (July 2020)."Global status and conservation potential of reef sharks".Nature.583 (7818):801–806.Bibcode:2020Natur.583..801M.doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2519-y.hdl:10754/664495.ISSN1476-4687.PMID32699418.S2CID220696105. Retrieved17 August 2020.
^Pacoureau, Nathan; Rigby, Cassandra L.; Kyne, Peter M.; Sherley, Richard B.; Winker, Henning; Carlson, John K.; Fordham, Sonja V.; Barreto, Rodrigo; Fernando, Daniel; Francis, Malcolm P.; Jabado, Rima W.; Herman, Katelyn B.; Liu, Kwang-Ming; Marshall, Andrea D.; Pollom, Riley A.; Romanov, Evgeny V.; Simpfendorfer, Colin A.; Yin, Jamie S.; Kindsvater, Holly K.; Dulvy, Nicholas K. (2021). "Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays".Nature.589 (7843):567–571.Bibcode:2021Natur.589..567P.doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03173-9.hdl:10871/124531.PMID33505035.S2CID231723355.
Musick, John A and Musick, Susanna (2011)"Sharks"Archived 2016-03-03 at theWayback Machine In:Review of the state of world marine fishery resources, pages 245–254, FAO Fisheries technical paper 569, FAO, Rome.ISBN978-92-5-107023-9.