| Language | Middle Persian |
|---|---|
| Subject | Geography |
| Publication place | Sasanian Empire, latest edit in theAbbasid period[1] |
Šahrestānīhā ī Ērānšahr[2] (lit. 'The Provincial Capitals of Iran') is a survivingMiddle Persian text ongeography, which was completed in the late eighth or early ninth centuries AD. The text gives a numbered list of the cities of Eranshahr and their history and importance for Persian history. The text itself has indication that it was also redacted at the time ofKhosrow II (r. 590–628) in 7th century as it mentions several places inAfrica andPersian Gulf conquered by theSasanians.[3]
The book serves as a source for works on Middle Iranian languages, a source on Sasanian administrative geography and history, as well as a source of historical records concerning names of the Sasanian kings as the builder of the various cities. The text provide information on the Persian epic, theXwadāy-nāmag (lit. “Book of Kings”).[4]
The book may be the same as "Ayādgār ī Šahrīhā" (lit. “Memoir of Cities") named in theBundahishn and said to have been written following an order ofKavad I.[3]

The terms Eranshahr (
) and Eran were in use inSasanianIran. From early Sasanian era (Ardashir I andShapur I's elaborations), as a designation of their land they adopted Ērānšahr “Land of the Aryans” and this served as the official name of their country.[5]
Ardashir I, who was the first king of the Sasanian Empire, had used the older word ērān (Parthianaryān) as part of his titles and in accordance withits etymology. AtNaqsh-e Rostam inFars province and the issued coins of the same period, Ardashir I calls himselfArdašīr šāhānšāh ērān in theMiddle Persian version andšāhānšāh aryān in its Parthian version both meaning “king of kings of the Aryans.” His sonShapur I referred to himself asšāhānšāh ērān ud anērān (lit. "king of kings of the Aryans and the Non-Aryans") in Middle Persian andšāhānšāh aryān ud anaryān in Parthian. Later kings used the same or similar phrases.[6] and these titles became the standard designations of the Sasanian sovereigns.[5]
However the major trilingual (Middle Persian, Parthian, andGreek) inscription of Shapur I at theKa'ba-ye Zartosht in Fars, introduces another termĒrānšahr in Middle Persian,Aryānxšahr in Parthian, andArianōn ethnos in Greek. Shapur's declaration readsan. . .ērānšahr xwadāy hēm.. (lit. “I am lord of the kingdom (Gk. nation) of the Aryans”). This follows his title “king of kings of the Aryans,” and thus makes it "very likely" that ērānšahr "properly denoted the empire".[6] Next toDarius's inscription, this inscription of Shapur at walls of Ka'ba-ye Zartosht is among the most important inscriptional records. It records parts ofPersian-Roman wars and gives "a clear picture of the extent of his empire" by naming of provinces, mentioning religious foundations and mentioning senior officials of the court ofPapak, Ardashir and Shapur I. According to the inscription, after death of Shapur's father and his accession, the Roman emperorGordianus III “marched on Assyria, against Ērānšahr and against us”.[7]
Beside the royal title, the term "Eran" was also used as an abbreviation of "Eranshahr" and referred to the empire in the early Sasanian era. In this case theRoman west was correspondingly referred to as “anērān”. As references to empires, Eran and Aneran occur already in a calendrical text fromMānī (dating back probably to Ardashir I's era.) This shorter term "Eran" appears in the names of the towns build by Shapur I and his successors as well as in the titles of several high-ranking administrative officials and military commanders. For the former there are examples such as "Eran-xwarrah-Shapur" (The glory of Eran (of) Shapur), "Eran-ashan-kard-kavad" (Kavad pacified Eran) and for the latter "Eran-amargar" (Accountant-General), ”Eran-dibīrbed" (Chief Secretary), ”Eran-drustbed“ (Chief Medical Officer), ”Eran-hambāragbed" (Commander of the Arsenal), and ”Eran-spāhbed“ (Commander-in-Chief).[6]

According to the book and as an ancient Iranian tradition, Ērānšahr is divided into four "mythologically and mentally"[8] defined regions or sides calledkusts. These parts/regions/sides of the state during and afterKhosrow I, on the pattern of the fourcardinal points, are (1) Xwarāsān “northeast”; (2) Xwarwarān “southwest”; (3) Nēmrōz “southeast”; and (4) Ādurbādagān “northwest”.[3]
The kusts were named diagonally beginning from northeast to southwest, and from southeast to northwest-a style likely following anOld Persian tradition in namingsatraps. The usual Middle Persian term "abāxtar" (loanword fromMIr.s:abāxtar,abarag <Av.:apāxtara) used for northern direction in ancient Iranian tradition has been avoided in this designation and replaced by the name of their province ādurbādagān. This is believed[9] to be because of "the Zoroastrian association of the north with the abode of evil"[10] which "would be evoked by use of abāxtar".[3]
{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)