 | |
| Nickname | Sentience |
|---|---|
| Formation | 2013; 12 years ago (2013) |
| Purpose | Reducing suffering ofnon-human animals |
| Location | |
Region |  Switzerland |
Official language | German French |
Co-Presidents | Katherine Hermans Naoki Peter |
Managing Director | Philipp Ryf |
| Website | sentience |
Sentience Politics is a Swissanti-speciesist political organization with the goal of reducing the suffering ofnon-human animals.[2] Founded in 2013,[3] their activities include political campaigns, such as ballot initiatives forsustainable food,[4][5]fundamental rights forprimates[6] or a ban onfactory farming.[7]
Sentience Politics was established as a project of the Effective Altruism Foundation, whose other projects includeRaising for Effective Giving and the Foundational Research Institute.[8] The project used to conduct research on how to most effectively reduce the suffering of human and non-human sentient beings.[9] This work is now being done by the independentSentience Institute, which was founded in 2017 while Sentience Politics continues to do primarily political work.[10]
Sentience Politics has been operating as an independent Swiss association since 2017.[11]
Sentience Politics advocates for the use ofcultured meat to meetanimal welfare,environmental sustainability, and human health challenges, arguing thatcultured meat inflicts significantly less pain on animals, has significantly lower land and water use and is healthier during production and consumption. To promote the use ofcultured meat Sentience Politics advocates for private and public funding of academic research and increasing awareness of the possibilities ofcultured meat.[12]
Sentience Politics considers humans one of manyprimate species and advocates to treat equal things equally while treating unequal things different based on the existing differences. The think tank describes non-human primates as highly intelligent, social beings, that can experience pain, remember past events, plan future events and have a fundamental interest to live and remain unharmed. Following this position Sentience Politics argues that non-human primates are equally deserving of the right to experience no harm and not being killed as human primates.[13]
Sentience Politics considers the animal industry to be a driver of environmental problems throughgreenhouse gas emissions andwater pollution, worldpoverty throughwater shortage, price increase forstaple foods,displacement of local farmers andfood waste, Swissfood insecurity through highland use, health issues throughantibiotic resistance,pandemic,cardiovascular disease,diabetes andobesity risks, andanimal welfare through slaughtering,cannibalism and behavioral disorders. To address these shortcomings Sentience Politics advocates for promoting plant-based cooking skills, increasing the range of plant-based product offers, and solidifying the basis of decision-making through recommendations and research.[14]
In June 2016, Sentience Politics began collecting signatures for a ballot initiative on fundamental rights forprimates inBasel, Switzerland.[15] With the submission of 3,080 valid signatures to the Basel State Chancellery, the initiative was officially handed in on September 16, 2017.[16] The proposed reforms would revise the cantonal constitution to include a "right to life and respect for the physical and mental integrity" for non-human primates. According to Sentience Politics, Basel's existing animal welfare regulations are not sufficient to protect primates from death and suffering, for example in pharmaceutical experiments and in confinement at theBasel Zoo.[6] If adopted, the reform would have allowed observational studies on primates but very few medical experiments, and would require the Basel Zoo to make significant changes in its primate breeding and enclosures.[17] According to Sentience Politics' former Managing Director Meret Schneider, the campaign is a first step in extending rights to non-human animals.[6]
The initiative was initially declared invalid by the Basel parliament because, as per their assessment, it violated higher-level law. The Basel Court of Appeal and, in second instance, theFederal Supreme Court, however, came to a different conclusion.[18]
The campaign was supported by Basel's Green andSocial Democratic Party.[19] English primatologistJane Goodall was the most prominent individual to support the proposal.[20]
The proposal was voted on by Basel's electorate on February 13, 2022, and rejected with 25.3% in favour of the constitutional amendment.[21] It was the first time in history that a region voted on fundamental rights fornon-human animals.[22]
On October 10, 2016, Sentience Politics, along with animal advocacy organizations Vebu and the Albert Schweitzer Foundation for Our Contemporaries began collecting signatures for a citizen’s initiative in Berlin Kreuzberg that would require all schools and the town hall to offer avegan option every day. This is the first vegan citizen’s initiative in Germany.[4] They need to collect signatures from 3% of the electorate (about 6,000) by April 2017.[23] There are about 95,000 vegans in Berlin,[24] and the city is considered the vegan capital of Europe with more than 50 vegan restaurants.[25]
Sentience Politics has launched similar initiatives inZurich,[19]Basel[26] andLucerne,[27] Switzerland.
Sentience Politics explained to House of Democracy and Human Rights that the vegan options will help mitigate climate change.[28] The initiative will also help reduce the suffering of farmed animals. There has been resistance from cafeteria directors, who fear that the vegan options would cost more. The District Office estimates that a vegan meal would cost 1.25 Euro more than a conventional meal.[29]
In 2018, Sentience Politics started gathering signatures for a people's initiative to ban factory farming in Switzerland.[20] In September 2019, the initiative committee submitted more than 100,000 verified signatures in the Swiss capital of Bern.[7] Initially, theSwiss Federal Council announced that they will present a direct counter proposal to the initiative.[30] In March 2022 theCouncil of States followed theNational Council's assessment and decided not to prepare a counter proposal to be voted on.[31] The initiative was rejected in September 2022 despite receiving over one million YES votes.[32]
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)