Chess opening
Chess opening
Semi-Italian Opening
a b c d e f g h 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 a b c d e f g h
Moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6 ECO C50 Origin Rodzinski vs. Alekhine, Paris 1913 Named after Italian Opening (Giuoco Piano)Parent Italian Game Synonyms
TheSemi-Italian Opening (also known asHalf Giuoco Piano ,Lesser Giuoco Piano , andParis Defence ) is one ofBlack 's responses to theItalian Game .[ 6] [ 7] It begins with the moves:
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6 Black's intent is to play aHungarian Defense with an early ...Bg4, fighting for control of the d4-square.[ 6] [ 8] Theline was tried byAlexander Alekhine early in his career.[ 8] [ 9] The first recorded use in international competition was in 1846.[citation needed ] I. A. Horowitz called the defence "solid ", also writing: "It does not seem quite sufficient forequality ."[ 9]
TheEncyclopaedia of Chess Openings code for the Semi-Italian is C50.
After 4...exd4 5.Nxd4 Nf6 6.Nc3 White has the freer game according toPaul Keres , and instead of 5...Nf6,Larry Evans has suggested 5...g6!? [ 8] The move 4...Be7transposes to theHungarian Defense .
5.c3 and now:5...Qd7 and White has somespace advantage after either 6.d5 or 6.Bb5 (Keres), or 6.Be3 (Evans).[ 8] 5...Nf6 6.Qb3 with a clear advantage for White (Keres). 5...Qf6 6.Be3 Bxf3 7.Qxf3 with some advantage for White (Keres). 5...Qe7 transposes to the Main line. 5.h3! and White is slightly better,[ 7] for example 5...Bxf3 6.Qxf3 and now: White prevents Black's thematic ...Bg4. The reply 4.h3 leads to lines similar to the Hungarian Defense, for example 4...Be7 5.d4 and now:
5...Nf6 6.d5 Nb8 7.Bd3 0-0 8.Be3 a5 9.g4!? (Keres preferred 9.c4) Na6 10.Qd2 c6 11.c4 Nd7 12.Nc3 Ndc5 leading to asharp game with balanced chances inViktor Kupreichik –Podgayets, USSR 1970.[ 8] [ 12] 5...Nxd4 6.Nxd4 exd4 7.Qh5 g6 8.Qd5 Be6 9.Qxb7 Nf6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Qc6+ Kf7 12.Nd2 Qd7 13.Qc4 c5 14.0-0 d5 (Gyula Sax –Borislav Ivkov , Amsterdam 1976[ 13] ) with an even game (Unzicker).[ 14] This transposes to the game Maslov–Anatoly Lutikov , USSR 1963,[ 15] which continued 4...Bg4 5.h3 Bxf3 6.Qxf3 Nf6 7.Ne2 (or 7.d3) and White stands slightly better (Keres,Miroslav Filip ).[ 16] For 5...Bh5? , seeLégal Trap .
a b c d e f g h 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 a b c d e f g h
Position after 11.f3
Rodzinski vs. Alekhine, Paris 1913:[ 7] [ 8]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 d6 4. c3 Bg4 5. Qb3!?
5.d4, theMain line , is better. 5... Qd7 6. Ng5?!
6.Bxf7+ Qxf7 7.Qxb7 Kd7 8.Qxa8 Bxf3 9.gxf3 Qxf3 10.Rg1 Qxe4+ 11.Kd1 Qf3+ 12.Ke1 Qe4+ withperpetual check (Alekhine); or 12...e4 13.Na3 Ne5 14.Qxa7 Nd3+ 15.Kf1 with an even game according toVeniamin Sozin ,[ 8] [ 17] but Blackforces mate with 15...Qd1+ 16.Kg2 Nf4+ 17.Kg3 Qf3+ 18.Kh4 Qh3+ 19.Kg5 Ne6# . 6... Nh6 7. Nxf7 Nxf7 8. Bxf7+ Qxf7 9. Qxb7 Kd7 10. Qxa8 Qc4 11. f3 (diagram)Bxf3! 12. gxf3 Nd4 13. d3?
13.cxd4 Qxc1+ with clear advantage for Black. 13... Qxd3 14. cxd4 Be7 15. Qxh8 Bh4#0–1 [ 18]
^ Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 165.Half Giuoco Piano . ^a b Horowitz (1964), p. 39 ^ Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 223.Lesser Giuoco Piano . ^ Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 290.Paris Defence . ^ Kasparov & Keene (1982), p. 309. ^a b Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 365.Semi-Italian Opening . ^a b c d Kasparov & Keene (1982), pp. 308, 309. ^a b c d e f g h Harding & Botterill (1977), pp. 129–30. ^a b Horowitz (1964), pp. 39–41. ^ "Grigory Levenfish vs. Alexander Kazimirovich Tolush, USSR Championship 1939" .Chessgames.com .^ "Viktor Gavrikov vs. Evgeny Yuryevich Vladimirov, Vilnius 1978" .Chessgames.com .^ "Viktor Kupreichik vs. Mikhail Podgaets, USSR 1970" .Chessgames.com .^ "Gyula Sax vs. Borislav Ivkov, Amsterdam 1976" .Chessgames.com .^ Matanović (1981), p. 227, n. 1. ^ "Leonid P Maslov vs. Anatoly S Lutikov, Kharkov 1963" .Chessgames.com .^ Matanović (1981), p. 243, n. 8. ^ Matanović (1981), p. 242, n. 4. ^ "Rodzynski vs. Alexander Alekhine, Paris 1913" .Chessgames.com .Bibliography