TheSemantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) is a proposed language for theSemantic Web that can be used to express rules as well as logic, combiningOWL DL or OWL Lite with a subset of theRule Markup Language (itself a subset ofDatalog).[1]
The specification was submitted in May 2004 to theW3C by theNational Research Council of Canada, Network Inference (since acquired bywebMethods), andStanford University in association with the Joint US/EU ad hoc Agent Markup Language Committee. The specification was based on an earlier proposal for an OWL rules language.[2][3]
SWRL has the full power of OWL DL, but at the price of decidability and practical implementations.[4]However, decidability can be regained by restricting the form of admissible rules, typically by imposing a suitable safety condition.[5]
Rules are of the form of an implication between an antecedent (body) and a consequent (head). The intended meaning can be read as: whenever the conditions specified in the antecedent hold, then the conditions specified in the consequent must also hold.
hasParent(?x1,?x2) ∧ hasBrother(?x2,?x3) ⇒ hasUncle(?x1,?x3)
TheXML Concrete Syntax is a combination of theOWL Web Ontology Language XML Presentation Syntax with theRuleML XML syntax.
<ruleml:imp><ruleml:_rlabruleml:href="#example1"/><ruleml:_body><swrlx:individualPropertyAtomswrlx:property="hasParent"><ruleml:var>x1</ruleml:var><ruleml:var>x2</ruleml:var></swrlx:individualPropertyAtom><swrlx:individualPropertyAtomswrlx:property="hasBrother"><ruleml:var>x2</ruleml:var><ruleml:var>x3</ruleml:var></swrlx:individualPropertyAtom></ruleml:_body><ruleml:_head><swrlx:individualPropertyAtomswrlx:property="hasUncle"><ruleml:var>x1</ruleml:var><ruleml:var>x3</ruleml:var></swrlx:individualPropertyAtom></ruleml:_head></ruleml:imp>
It is straightforward to provide such anRDF concrete syntax for rules, but the presence of variables in rules goes beyond the RDF Semantics.[6] Translation from the XML Concrete Syntax toRDF/XML could be easily accomplished by extending theXSLT transformation for the OWL XML Presentation syntax.
Caveat: Reasoners do not support the full specification because the reasoning becomes undecidable. There can be three types of approach:
| Bossam | Hoolet | Pellet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWRL/OWLX Parser | Yes | ? | ? |
| SWRL/RDF Parser | Yes | ? | Yes |
| Math Built-Ins | Partial | ? | Yes |
| String Built-Ins | Partial | ? | Yes |
| Comparison Built-Ins | ? | ? | Yes |
| Boolean Built-Ins | ? | ? | Yes |
| Date, Time and Duration Built-Ins | ? | ? | No |
| URI Built-Ins | ? | ? | Yes |
| Lists Built-Ins | ? | ? | No |
| Licensing | Free/closed-source | Free/open-source | Free/open-source |
Description Logic Programs (DLPs) are another proposal for integrating rules and OWL.[7]Compared with Description Logic Programs, SWRL takes a diametrically opposed integration approach. DLP is the intersection ofHorn logic and OWL, whereas SWRL is (roughly) the union of them.[4] In DLP, the resultant language is a very peculiar looking description logic and rather inexpressive language overall.[4]
 | This sectionmay incorporate text from alarge language model. It may includehallucinated information,copyright violations, claims notverified in cited sources,original research, orfictitious references. Any such material should beremoved, and content with anunencyclopedic tone should be rewritten.(September 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
As the Semantic Web continues to evolve, the role of SWRL in enabling automated reasoning and decision-making processes will likely expand. While current implementations, such as those found in Protégé and Pellet, provide significant capabilities, ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence and knowledge representation may lead to even more sophisticated reasoning engines that better handle the computational complexities introduced by SWRL. Furthermore, as data integration across diverse domains becomes increasingly critical, SWRL could play a pivotal role in enhancing interoperability between systems that utilize OWL ontologies. The combination of rules with ontologies, as facilitated by SWRL, remains a powerful mechanism for drawing inferences and uncovering relationships in large, distributed datasets, offering broad applicability in fields such as healthcare, finance, and semantic data analytics.[8]
{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)