Age of oceanic lithosphere; youngest (light colour) is along spreading centers
Seafloor spreading, orseafloor spread, is a process that occurs atmid-ocean ridges, where newoceanic crust is formed throughvolcanic activity and then gradually moves away from the ridge.
Seafloor spreading helps explaincontinental drift in the theory ofplate tectonics. When oceanic platesdiverge, tensional stress causes fractures to occur in thelithosphere. The motivating force for seafloor spreading ridges is tectonic plateslab pull atsubduction zones, rather than magma pressure, although there is typically significant magma activity at spreading ridges.[3] Plates that are not subducting are driven by gravity sliding off the elevated mid-ocean ridges a process calledridge push.[4] At a spreading center,basaltic magma rises up the fractures and cools on the ocean floor to form newseabed.Hydrothermal vents are common at spreading centers. Older rocks will be found farther away from the spreading zone while younger rocks will be found nearer to the spreading zone.
Spreading rate is the rate at which an ocean basin widens due to seafloor spreading. (The rate at which new oceanic lithosphere is added to each tectonic plate on either side of a mid-ocean ridge is thespreading half-rate and is equal to half of the spreading rate). Spreading rates determine if the ridge is fast, intermediate, or slow. As a general rule, fast ridges have spreading (opening) rates of more than 90 mm/year. Intermediate ridges have a spreading rate of 40–90 mm/year while slow spreading ridges have a rate less than 40 mm/year.[5][6][7]: 2 The highest known rate was over 200 mm/yr during theMiocene on theEast Pacific Rise.[8]
In the 1960s, the past record ofgeomagnetic reversals of Earth's magnetic field was noticed by observing magnetic stripe "anomalies" on the ocean floor.[9][10] This results in broadly evident "stripes" from which the past magnetic field polarity can be inferred from data gathered with amagnetometer towed on the sea surface or from an aircraft. The stripes on one side of the mid-ocean ridge were the mirror image of those on the other side. By identifying a reversal with a known age and measuring the distance of that reversal from the spreading center, the spreading half-rate could be computed.
magnetic stripes formed during seafloor spreading
In some locations spreading rates have been found to be asymmetric; the half rates differ on each side of the ridge crest by about five percent.[11][12] This is thought due to temperature gradients in the asthenosphere frommantle plumes near the spreading center.[12]
Seafloor spreading occurs at spreading centers, distributed along the crests of mid-ocean ridges. Spreading centers end intransform faults or inoverlapping spreading center offsets. A spreading center includes a seismically active plate boundary zone a few kilometers to tens of kilometers wide, a crustal accretion zone within the boundary zone where the ocean crust is youngest, and an instantaneous plate boundary – a line within the crustal accretion zone demarcating the two separating plates.[13] Within the crustal accretion zone is a 1–2 km-wide neovolcanic zone where active volcanism occurs.[14][15]
Plates in the crust of the earth, according to theplate tectonics theory
In the general case, seafloor spreading starts as arift in acontinental land mass, similar to theRed Sea-East Africa Rift System today.[16] The process starts by heating at the base of the continental crust which causes it to become more plastic and less dense. Because less dense objects rise in relation to denser objects, the area being heated becomes a broad dome (seeisostasy). As the crust bows upward, fractures occur that gradually grow into rifts. The typical rift system consists of three rift arms at approximately 120-degree angles. These areas are namedtriple junctions and can be found in several places across the world today. The separated margins of thecontinents evolve to formpassive margins. Hess' theory was that new seafloor is formed when magma is forced upward toward the surface at a mid-ocean ridge.
If spreading continues past the incipient stage described above, two of the rift arms will open while the third arm stops opening and becomes a 'failed rift' oraulacogen. As the two active rifts continue to open, eventually the continental crust is attenuated as far as it will stretch. At this point basaltic oceanic crust and upper mantlelithosphere begins to form between the separating continental fragments. When one of the rifts opens into the existing ocean, the rift system is flooded with seawater and becomes a new sea. The Red Sea is an example of a new arm of the sea. The East African rift was thought to be a failed arm that was opening more slowly than the other two arms, but in 2005 theEthiopian Afar Geophysical Lithospheric Experiment[17] reported that in theAfar region, September 2005, a 60 km fissure opened as wide as eight meters.[18] During this period of initial flooding the new sea is sensitive to changes in climate andeustasy. As a result, the new sea will evaporate (partially or completely) several times before the elevation of the rift valley has been lowered to the point that the sea becomes stable. During this period of evaporation large evaporite deposits will be made in the rift valley. Later these deposits have the potential to become hydrocarbon seals and are of particular interest topetroleumgeologists.
Seafloor spreading can stop during the process, but if it continues to the point that the continent is completely severed, then a newocean basin is created. The Red Sea has not yet completely split Arabia from Africa, but a similar feature can be found on the other side of Africa that has broken completely free. South America once fit into the area of theNiger Delta. The Niger River has formed in the failed rift arm of thetriple junction.[19]
As new seafloor forms and spreads apart from the mid-ocean ridge it slowly cools over time. Older seafloor is, therefore, colder than new seafloor, and older oceanic basins deeper than new oceanic basins due to isostasy. If the diameter of the earth remains relatively constant despite the production of new crust, a mechanism must exist by which crust is also destroyed. The destruction of oceanic crust occurs at subduction zones where oceanic crust is forced under either continental crust or oceanic crust. Today, the Atlantic basin is actively spreading at theMid-Atlantic Ridge. Only a small portion of the oceanic crust produced in the Atlantic is subducted. However, the plates making up the Pacific Ocean are experiencing subduction along many of their boundaries which causes the volcanic activity in what has been termed theRing of Fire of the Pacific Ocean. The Pacific is also home to one of the world's most active spreading centers (the East Pacific Rise) with spreading rates of up to 145 ± 4 mm/yr between thePacific andNazca plates.[20] The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is a slow-spreading center, while the East Pacific Rise is an example of fast spreading. Spreading centers at slow and intermediate rates exhibit a rift valley while at fast rates an axial high is found within the crustal accretion zone.[6] The differences in spreading rates affect not only the geometries of the ridges but also the geochemistry of the basalts that are produced.[21]
Since the new oceanic basins are shallower than the old oceanic basins, the total capacity of the world's ocean basins decreases during times of active sea floor spreading. During the opening of theAtlantic Ocean, sea level was so high that aWestern Interior Seaway formed acrossNorth America from theGulf of Mexico to theArctic Ocean.
At the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (and in other mid-ocean ridges), material from the uppermantle rises through the faults between oceanic plates to form newcrust as the plates move away from each other, a phenomenon first observed as continental drift. WhenAlfred Wegener first presented a hypothesis of continental drift in 1912, he suggested that continents plowed through the ocean crust. This was impossible: oceanic crust is both more dense and more rigid than continental crust. Accordingly, Wegener's theory wasn't taken very seriously, especially in the United States.
At first the driving force for spreading was argued to be convection currents in the mantle.[22] Since then, it has been shown that the motion of the continents is linked to seafloor spreading by the theory of plate tectonics, which is driven by convection that includes the crust itself as well.[4]
The driver for seafloor spreading in plates withactive margins is the weight of the cool, dense, subducting slabs that pull them along, or slab pull. The magmatism at the ridge is considered to be passive upwelling, which is caused by the plates being pulled apart under the weight of their own slabs.[4][23] This can be thought of as analogous to a rug on a table with little friction: when part of the rug is off of the table, its weight pulls the rest of the rug down with it. However, the Mid-Atlantic ridge itself is not bordered by plates that are being pulled into subduction zones, except the minor subduction in theLesser Antilles andScotia Arc. In this case the plates are sliding apart over the mantle upwelling in the process of ridge push.[4]
The depth of the seafloor (or the height of a location on a mid-ocean ridge above a base-level) is closely correlated with its age (age of the lithosphere where depth is measured). The age-depth relation can be modeled by the cooling of a lithosphere plate[24][25][26][27] or mantle half-space in areas without significantsubduction.[28]
In the mantle half-space model,[28] the oceanic crust height is determined by theoceanic lithosphere and mantle temperature, due to thermal expansion. Note that the seabed height is not the same as the oceanic crust height, as there is also a layer of sediments over the oceanic crust, typically few hundreds meter thick (but can also be few kilometers thick and up to 20 kilometers thick on few near-shore locations).[29] The simple result is that the ridge height or ocean depth is proportional to the square root of its age.[28] Oceanic lithosphere is continuously formed at a constant rate at themid-ocean ridges. The source of the lithosphere has a half-plane shape (x = 0,z < 0) and a constant temperatureT1. Due to its continuous creation, the lithosphere atx > 0 is moving away from the ridge at a constant velocityv, which is assumed large compared to other typical scales in the problem. The temperature at the upper boundary of the lithosphere (z = 0) is a constantT0 = 0. Thus atx = 0 the temperature is theHeaviside step function. The system is assumed to be at a quasi-steady state, so that the temperature distribution is constant in time, i.e.
By calculating in the frame of reference of the moving lithosphere (velocityv), which has spatial coordinate and theheat equation is:
SinceT depends onx' andt only through the combination:
Thus:
It is assumed that is large compared to other scales in the problem; therefore the last term in the equation is neglected, giving a 1-dimensional diffusion equation:
Due to the large velocity, the temperature dependence on the horizontal direction is negligible, and the height at timet (i.e. of sea floor of aget) can be calculated by integrating the thermal expansion overz:
where is the effective volumetricthermal expansion coefficient, andh0 is the mid-ocean ridge height (compared to some reference).
The assumption thatv is relatively large is equivalent to the assumption that the thermal diffusivity is small compared to, whereL is the ocean width (from mid-ocean ridges tocontinental shelf) andA is the age of the ocean basin.
The effective thermal expansion coefficient is different from the usual thermal expansion coefficient due to isostasic effect of the change in water column height above the lithosphere as it expands or retracts. Both coefficients are related by:
where is the rock density and is the density of water.
By substituting the parameters by their rough estimates:
where the height is in meters and time is in millions of years. To get the dependence onx, one must substitutet =x/v ~Ax/L, whereL is the distance between the ridge to thecontinental shelf (roughly half the ocean width), andA is the ocean basin age.
Rather than height of the ocean floor above a base or reference level, the depth of the ocean is of interest. Because(with measured from the ocean surface):
; for the eastern Pacific for example, where is the depth at the ridge crest, typically 2600 m.
The depth predicted by the square root of seafloor age derived above is too deep for seafloor older than 80 million years.[27] Depth is better explained by a cooling lithosphere plate model rather than the cooling mantle half-space.[27] The plate has a constant temperature at its base and spreading edge. Analysis of depth versus age and depth versus square root of age data allowed Parsons and Sclater[27] to estimate model parameters (for the North Pacific):
~125 km for lithosphere thickness
at base and young edge of plate
Assuming isostatic equilibrium everywhere beneath the cooling plate yields a revised age depth relationship for older sea floor that is approximately correct for ages as young as 20 million years:
meters
Thus older seafloor deepens more slowly than younger and in fact can be assumed almost constant at ~6400 m depth. Parsons and Sclater concluded that some style of mantle convection must apply heat to the base of the plate everywhere to prevent cooling down below 125 km and lithosphere contraction (seafloor deepening) at older ages.[27] Their plate model also allowed an expression for conductive heat flow,q(t) from the ocean floor, which is approximately constant at beyond 120 million years:
^Hess, H. H. (November 1962)."History of Ocean Basins"(PDF). In A. E. J. Engel; Harold L. James; B. F. Leonard (eds.).Petrologic studies: a volume to honor A. F. Buddington. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America. pp. 599–620.
^abMacdonald, K. C. (1982). "Mid-Ocean Ridges: Fine Scale Tectonic, Volcanic and Hydrothermal Processes Within the Plate Boundary Zone".Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences.10 (1):155–190.Bibcode:1982AREPS..10..155M.doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.10.050182.001103.
^Wilson, Douglas S. (1996-10-15). "Fastest known spreading on the Miocene Cocos-Pacific Plate Boundary".Geophysical Research Letters.23 (21):3003–3006.Bibcode:1996GeoRL..23.3003W.doi:10.1029/96GL02893.
^Daignieres, Marc; Courtillot, Vincent; Bayer, Roger; Tapponnier, Paul (1975). "A model for the evolution of the axial zone of mid-ocean ridges as suggested by icelandic tectonics".Earth and Planetary Science Letters.26 (2):222–232.Bibcode:1975E&PSL..26..222D.doi:10.1016/0012-821x(75)90089-8.
^Makris, J.; Ginzburg, A. (1987-09-15). "Sedimentary basins within the Dead Sea and other rift zones The Afar Depression: transition between continental rifting and sea-floor spreading".Tectonophysics.141 (1):199–214.Bibcode:1987Tectp.141..199M.doi:10.1016/0040-1951(87)90186-7.S2CID129438029.
^Bastow, Ian D.; Keir, Derek; Daly, Eve (2011-06-01).The Ethiopia Afar Geoscientific Lithospheric Experiment (EAGLE): Probing the transition from continental rifting to incipient seafloor spreading. Geological Society of America Special Papers. Vol. 478. pp. 51–76.doi:10.1130/2011.2478(04).hdl:2158/1110145.ISBN978-0-8137-2478-2.ISSN0072-1077.{{cite book}}:|journal= ignored (help)
^Patriat, Philippe; Achache, José (1984). "India–Eurasia collision chronology has implications for crustal shortening and driving mechanism of plates".Nature.311 (5987): 615.Bibcode:1984Natur.311..615P.doi:10.1038/311615a0.S2CID4315858.