Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Isotopes of seaborgium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSeaborgium-260)

Isotopes ofseaborgium (106Sg)
Main isotopes[1]Decay
abun­dancehalf-life(t1/2)modepro­duct
265Sgsynth8.5 sα261Rf
265mSgsynth14.4 sα261mRf
267Sgsynth9.8 minα263mRf
267mSgsynth100 sSF
268Sgsynth13 s[2]SF
269Sgsynth5 min[3]α265Rf
SF
271Sgsynth31 s[4]α73%267Rf
SF27%

Seaborgium (106Sg) is asynthetic element and so has nostable isotopes. Astandard atomic weight cannot be given. The firstisotope to be synthesized was263Sg in 1974. There are thirteen knownradioisotopes from258Sg to271Sg and five knownisomers (259mSg,261mSg,263mSg,265mSg, and267mSg). The longest-lived isotopes are267Sg with ahalf-life of 9.8 minutes and269Sg with a half-life of 5 minutes. Due to a low number of measurements, and the consequent overlapping measurement uncertainties at the confidence level corresponding to onestandard deviation, a definite assignment of the most stable isotope cannot be made.

List of isotopes

[edit]


Nuclide
[n 1]
ZNIsotopic mass(Da)
[n 2][n 3]
Half-life
Decay
mode

[n 4]
Daughter
isotope

Spin and
parity
[n 5]
Excitation energy[n 5]
258Sg[1]106152258.11298(44)#2.7(5) ms
[2.6+0.6
−0.4
 ms
]
SF(various)0+
259Sg[5]106153259.11440(13)#402(56) msα255Rf(11/2−)
β+ (<1%)259Db
SF (rare)(various)
259mSg87 keV226(27) msα (97%)261Sg(1/2+)
SF (3%)(various)
β+ (<1%)259Db
260Sg[1]106154260.114384(22)4.95(33) msSF (71%)(various)0+
α (29%)256Rf
261Sg[1]106155261.115949(20)183(5) msα (98.1%)257Rf(3/2+)
β+ (1.3%)261Db
SF (0.6%)(various)
261mSg100(50)# keV9.3(1.8) μs
[9.0+2.0
−1.5
 μs
]
IT261Sg7/2+#
262Sg[1]106156262.11634(4)10.3(1.7) msSF (94%)(various)0+
α (6%)258Rf
263Sg[1]106157263.11829(10)#940(140) msα (87%)259Rf9/2+#
SF (13%)(various)
263mSg51(19)# keV420(100) msα259Rf3/2+#
264Sg106158264.11893(30)#37 msSF(various)0+
265Sg[6]106159265.12109(13)#8.5+2.6
−1.6
 s
α261Rf
265mSg14.4+3.7
−2.5
 s
α261mRf
266Sg[n 6][1]106160266.12198(26)#390(110) msSF(various)0+
267Sg[n 7][7][8]106161267.12436(30)#9.8+11.3
−4.5
 min
α263mRf9/2#
267mSg[n 8][8]110 keV#100+92
−39
 s
SF(various)1/2#
268Sg[n 9][2]106162268.12539(50)#13+17
−4
 s
SF(various)0+
269Sg[n 10]106163269.12863(39)#5(2) min[1]α265Rf
SF[3](various)
271Sg[n 11]106165271.13393(63)#31+13
−7
 s
[4]
α (73%)267Rf3/2+#
SF (27%)(various)
This table header & footer:
  1. ^mSg – Excitednuclear isomer.
  2. ^( ) – Uncertainty (1σ) is given in concise form in parentheses after the corresponding last digits.
  3. ^# – Atomic mass marked #: value and uncertainty derived not from purely experimental data, but at least partly from trends from the Mass Surface (TMS).
  4. ^Modes of decay:
    SF:Spontaneous fission
  5. ^ab# – Values marked # are not purely derived from experimental data, but at least partly from trends of neighboring nuclides (TNN).
  6. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs asdecay product of270Hs
  7. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of271Hs
  8. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of275Ds
  9. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of276Ds
  10. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs in the decay chain of285Fl
  11. ^Not directly synthesized, occurs in the decay chain of287Fl

Nucleosynthesis

[edit]
TargetProjectileCNAttempt result
208Pb54Cr262SgSuccessful reaction
207Pb54Cr261SgSuccessful reaction
206Pb54Cr260SgFailure to date
208Pb52Cr260SgSuccessful reaction
209Bi51V260SgSuccessful reaction
238U30Si268SgSuccessful reaction
244Pu26Mg270SgReaction yet to be attempted
248Cm22Ne270SgSuccessful reaction
249Cf18O267SgSuccessful reaction

Cold fusion

[edit]

This section deals with the synthesis of nuclei of seaborgium by so-called "cold" fusion reactions. These are processes that create compound nuclei at low excitation energy (~10–20 MeV, hence "cold"), leading to a higher probability of survival from fission. The excited nucleus then decays to the ground state via the emission of one or two neutrons only.

208Pb(54Cr,xn)262−xSg (x=1,2,3)

[edit]

The first attempt to synthesise seaborgium in cold fusion reactions was performed in September 1974 by aSoviet team led byG. N. Flerov at theJoint Institute for Nuclear Research atDubna. They reported producing a 0.48 s spontaneous fission (SF) activity, which they assigned to the isotope259Sg. Based on later evidence it was suggested that the team most likely measured the decay of260Sg and its daughter256Rf. The TWG concluded that, at the time, the results were insufficiently convincing.[9]

The Dubna team revisited this problem in 1983–1984 and were able to detect a 5 ms SF activity assigned directly to260Sg.[9]

The team at GSI studied this reaction for the first time in 1985 using the improved method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. They were able to detect261Sg (x=1) and260Sg and measured a partial 1n neutron evaporation excitation function.[10]

In December 2000, the reaction was studied by a team atGANIL, France; they were able to detect 10 atoms of261Sg and 2 atoms of260Sg to add to previous data on the reaction.

After a facility upgrade, the GSI team measured the 1n excitation function in 2003 using a metallic lead target. Of significance, in May 2003, the team successfully replaced the lead-208 target with more resistantlead(II) sulfide targets (PbS), which will allow more intense beams to be used in the future. They were able to measure the 1n,2n and 3n excitation functions and performed the first detailed alpha-gamma spectroscopy on the isotope261Sg. They detected ~1600 atoms of the isotope and identified new alpha lines as well as measuring a more accurate half-life and new EC and SF branchings. Furthermore, they were able to detect the K X-rays from the daughterrutherfordium isotope for the first time. They were also able to provide improved data for260Sg, including the tentative observation of an isomeric level. The study was continued in September 2005 and March 2006. The accumulated work on261Sg was published in 2007.[11] Work in September 2005 also aimed to begin spectroscopic studies on260Sg.

The team at the LBNL recently restudied this reaction in an effort to look at the spectroscopy of the isotope261Sg. They were able to detect a new isomer,261mSg, decaying by internal conversion into theground state. In the same experiment, they were also able to confirm a K-isomer in the daughter257Rf, namely257m2Rf.[12]

207Pb(54Cr,xn)261−xSg (x=1,2)

[edit]

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in 1974 with identical results as for their first experiments with a lead-208 target. The SF activities were first assigned to259Sg and later to260Sg and/or256Rf. Further work in 1983–1984 also detected a 5 ms SF activity assigned to the parent260Sg.[9]

The GSI team studied this reaction for the first time in 1985 using the method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. They were able to positively identify259Sg as a product from the 2n neutron evaporation channel.[10]

The reaction was further used in March 2005 using PbS targets to begin a spectroscopic study of the even-even isotope260Sg.

206Pb(54Cr,xn)260−xSg

[edit]

This reaction was studied in 1974 by the team at Dubna. It was used to assist them in their assignment of the observed SF activities in reactions using Pb-207 and Pb-208 targets. They were unable to detect any SF, indicating the formation of isotopes decaying primarily by alpha decay.[9]

208Pb(52Cr,xn)260−xSg (x=1,2)

[edit]

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in their series of cold fusion reactions performed in 1974. Once again they were unable to detect any SF activities.[9] The reaction was revisited in 2006 by the team at LBNL as part of their studies on the effect of the isospin of the projectile and hence the mass number of the compound nucleus on the yield of evaporation residues. They were able to identify259Sg and258Sg in their measurement of the 1n excitation function.[13]

209Bi(51V,xn)260−xSg (x=2)

[edit]

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in their series of cold fusion reactions performed in 1974. Once again they were unable to detect any SF activities.[9]In 1994, the synthesis of seaborgium was revisited using this reaction by the GSI team, in order to study the new even-even isotope258Sg. Ten atoms of258Sg were detected and decayed by spontaneous fission.

Hot fusion

[edit]

This section deals with the synthesis of nuclei of seaborgium by so-called "hot" fusion reactions. These are processes that create compound nuclei at high excitation energy (~40–50 MeV, hence "hot"), leading to a reduced probability of survival from fission and quasi-fission. The excited nucleus then decays to the ground state via the emission of 3–5 neutrons.

238U(30Si,xn)268−xSg (x=3,4,5,6)

[edit]

This reaction was first studied by Japanese scientists at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) in 1998. They detected aspontaneous fission activity, which they tentatively assigned to the new isotope264Sg or263Db, formed by EC of263Sg.[14]In 2006, the teams at GSI and LBNL both studied this reaction using the method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. The LBNL team measured an excitation function for the 4n,5n and 6n channels, whilst the GSI team were able to observe an additional 3n activity.[15][16][17] Both teams were able to identify the new isotope264Sg, which decayed with a short lifetime byspontaneous fission.

248Cm(22Ne,xn)270−xSg (x=4?,5)

[edit]

In 1993, at Dubna, Yuri Lazarev and his team announced the discovery of long-lived266Sg and265Sg produced in the 4n and 5n channels of this nuclear reaction following the search for seaborgium isotopes suitable for a first chemical study.It was announced that266Sg decayed by 8.57 MeV alpha-particle emission with a projected half-life of ~20 s, lending strong support to the stabilising effect of theZ = 108,N = 162 closed shells.[18]This reaction was studied further in 1997 by a team at GSI and the yield, decay mode and half-lives for266Sg and265Sg have been confirmed, although there are still some discrepancies. In the synthesis of270Hs (seehassium),266Sg was found to undergo exclusively SF with a short half-life (TSF = 360 ms). It is possible that this is the ground state, (266gSg) and that the other activity, produced directly, belongs to a high spin K-isomer,266mSg, but further results are required to confirm this.

A recent re-evaluation of the decay characteristics of265Sg and266Sg has suggested that all decays to date in this reaction were in fact from265Sg, which exists in two isomeric forms. The first,265aSg has a principal alpha-line at 8.85 MeV and a calculated half-life of 8.9 s, while265bSg has a decay energy of 8.70 MeV and a half-life of 16.2 s. Both isomeric levels are populated when produced directly. Data from the decay of269Hs indicates that265bSg is produced during the decay of269Hs and that265bSg decays into the shorter-lived261gRf isotope. This contradicts the assignment of the long-lived alpha activity to266Sg, instead suggesting that266Sg undergoes fission in a short time.

Regardless of these assignments, the reaction has been successfully used in the recent attempts to study the chemistry of seaborgium (see below).

249Cf(18O,xn)267−xSg (x=4)

[edit]

The synthesis of seaborgium was first realized in 1974 by the LBNL/LLNL team.[19] In their discovery experiment, they were able to apply the new method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays to identify the new isotope263Sg. In 1975, the team at Oak Ridge were able to confirm the decay data but were unable to identify coincident X-rays in order to prove that seaborgium was produced. In 1979, the team at Dubna studied the reaction by detection of SF activities. In comparison with data from Berkeley, they calculated a 70% SF branching for263Sg. The original synthesis and discovery reaction was confirmed in 1994 by a different team at LBNL.[20]

Decay products

[edit]

Isotopes of seaborgium have also been observed in the decay of heavier elements. Observations to date are summarised in the table below:

Evaporation ResidueObserved Sg isotope
291Lv,287Fl,283Cn271Sg
285Fl269Sg
276Ds,272Hs268Sg
275Ds,271Hs267Sg
270Hs266Sg
277Cn,273Ds,269Hs265Sg
271Ds,267Hs263Sg
270Ds262Sg
269Ds,265Hs261Sg
264Hs260Sg

Chronology of isotope discovery

[edit]
IsotopeYear discovereddiscovery reaction
258Sg1994209Bi(51V,2n)
259Sg1985207Pb(54Cr,2n)
260Sg1985208Pb(54Cr,2n)
261gSg1985208Pb(54Cr,n)
261mSg2009208Pb(54Cr,n)
262Sg2001207Pb(64Ni,n)
263Sgm1974249Cf(18O,4n)[19]
263Sgg1994208Pb(64Ni,n)
264Sg2006238U(30Si,4n)
265Sga, b1993248Cm(22Ne,5n)
266Sg2004248Cm(26Mg,4n)
267Sg2004248Cm(26Mg,3n)
267mSg2024232Th(48Ca,5n)
268Sg2022232Th(48Ca,4n)[2]
269Sg2010242Pu(48Ca,5n)
270Sgunknown
271Sg2003242Pu(48Ca,3n)

Isomerism

[edit]

266Sg

[edit]

Initial work identified an 8.63 MeV alpha-decaying activity with a half-life of ~21 s and assigned to the ground state of266Sg. Later work identified a nuclide decaying by 8.52 and 8.77 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of ~21 s, which is unusual for an even-even nuclide. Recent work on the synthesis of270Hs identified266Sg decaying by SF with a short 360 ms half-life. The recent work on277Cn and269Hs has provided new information on the decay of265Sg and261Rf. This work suggested that the initial 8.77 MeV activity should be reassigned to265Sg. Therefore, the current information suggests that the SF activity is the ground state and the 8.52 MeV activity is a high spin K-isomer. Further work is required to confirm these assignments. A recent re-evaluation of the data has suggested that the 8.52 MeV activity should be associated with265Sg and that266Sg only undergoes fission.

265Sg

[edit]

The recent direct synthesis of265Sg resulted in four alpha-lines at 8.94, 8.84, 8.76 and 8.69 MeV with a half-life of 7.4 seconds. The observation of the decay of265Sg from the decay of277Cn and269Hs indicated that the 8.69 MeV line may be associated with an isomeric level with an associated half-life of ~ 20 s. It is plausible that this level is causing confusion between assignments of266Sg and265Sg since both can decay to fissioning rutherfordium isotopes.

A recent re-evaluation of the data has indicated that there are indeed two isomers, one with a principal decay energy of 8.85 MeV with a half-life of 8.9 s, and a second isomer that decays with energy 8.70 MeV with a half-life of 16.2 s.

263Sg

[edit]

The discovery synthesis of263Sg resulted in an alpha-line at 9.06 MeV.[19] Observation of this nuclide by decay of271gDs,271mDs and267Hs has confirmed an isomer decaying by 9.25 MeV alpha emission. The 9.06 MeV decay was also confirmed. The 9.06 MeV activity has been assigned to the ground state isomer with an associated half-life of 0.3 s. The 9.25 MeV activity has been assigned to an isomeric level decaying with a half-life of 0.9 s.

Recent work on the synthesis of271g,mDs was resulted in some confusing data regarding the decay of267Hs. In one such decay,267Hs decayed to263Sg, which decayed by alpha emission with a half-life of ~ 6 s. This activity has not yet been positively assigned to an isomer and further research is required.

Spectroscopic decay schemes

[edit]

261Sg

[edit]
This is the currently accepted decay scheme for261Sg from the study by Streicher et al. at GSI in 2003–2006

Retracted isotopes

[edit]

269Sg

[edit]

In the claimed synthesis of293Og in 1999 the isotope269Sg was identified as a daughter product. It decayed by 8.74 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of 22 s. The claim was retracted in 2001. This isotope was finally created in 2010.

Chemical yields of isotopes

[edit]

Cold fusion

[edit]

The table below provides cross-sections and excitation energies for cold fusion reactions producing seaborgium isotopes directly. Data in bold represents maxima derived from excitation function measurements. + represents an observed exit channel.

ProjectileTargetCN1n2n3n
54Cr207Pb261Sg
54Cr208Pb262Sg4.23 nb, 13.0 MeV500 pb10 pb
51V209Bi260Sg38 pb, 21.5 MeV
52Cr208Pb260Sg281 pb, 11.0 MeV

Hot fusion

[edit]

The table below provides cross-sections and excitation energies for hot fusion reactions producing seaborgium isotopes directly. Data in bold represents maxima derived from excitation function measurements. + represents an observed exit channel.

ProjectileTargetCN3n4n5n6n
30Si238U268Sg+9 pb, 40.0~ 80 pb, 51.0 MeV~30 pb, 58.0 MeV
22Ne248Cm270Sg~25 pb~250 pb
18O249Cf267Sg+

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghKondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021)."The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties"(PDF).Chinese Physics C.45 (3): 030001.doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae.
  2. ^abcOganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Shumeiko, M. V.; et al. (2023). "New isotope276Ds and its decay products272Hs and268Sg from the232Th +48Ca reaction".Physical Review C.108 (024611).doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024611.
  3. ^abIbadullayev, Dastan (2024)."Synthesis and study of the decay properties of isotopes of superheavy element Lv in Reactions238U +54Cr and242Pu +50Ti".jinr.ru.Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. Retrieved2 November 2024.
  4. ^abOganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Ibadullayev, D.; et al. (2022). "Investigation of48Ca-induced reactions with242Pu and238U targets at the JINR Superheavy Element Factory".Physical Review C.106 (24612).doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024612.S2CID 251759318.
  5. ^Antalic, S.; Heßberger, F. P.; Ackermann, D.; Heinz, S.; Hofmann, S.; Kindler, B.; Khuyagbaatar, J.; Lommel, B.; Mann, R. (14 April 2015)."Nuclear isomers in 259Sg and 255Rf".The European Physical Journal A.51 (4): 41.Bibcode:2015EPJA...51...41A.doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15041-0.ISSN 1434-601X.S2CID 254117522. Retrieved2 July 2023.
  6. ^Haba, H.; Kaji, D.; Kudou, Y.; Morimoto, K.; Morita, K.; Ozeki, K.; Sakai, R.; Sumita, T.; Yoneda, A.; Kasamatsu, Y.; Komori, Y.; Shinohara, A.; Kikunaga, H.; Kudo, H.; Nishio, K.; Ooe, K.; Sato, N.; Tsukada, K. (21 February 2012)."Production of ${}^{265}$Sg in the ${}^{248}$Cm(${}^{22}$Ne,5$n$)${}^{265}$Sg reaction and decay properties of two isomeric states in ${}^{265}$Sg".Physical Review C.85 (2): 024611.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024611. Retrieved2 July 2023.
  7. ^Dvorak, J.; Brüchle, W.; Chelnokov, M.; Düllmann, Ch. E.; Dvorakova, Z.; Eberhardt, K.; Jäger, E.; Krücken, R.; Kuznetsov, A.; Nagame, Y.; Nebel, F.; Nishio, K.; Perego, R.; Qin, Z.; Schädel, M.; Schausten, B.; Schimpf, E.; Schuber, R.; Semchenkov, A.; Thörle, P.; Türler, A.; Wegrzecki, M.; Wierczinski, B.; Yakushev, A.; Yeremin, A. (3 April 2008)."Observation of the 3n Evaporation Channel in the Complete Hot-Fusion Reaction 26Mg+248Cm Leading to the New Superheavy Nuclide 271Hs".Physical Review Letters.100 (13): 132503.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.132503.PMID 18517941. Retrieved2 July 2023.
  8. ^abOganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Shumeiko, M. V.; et al. (6 May 2024)."Synthesis and decay properties of isotopes of element 110: Ds 273 and Ds 275".Physical Review C.109 (5): 054307.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.054307.ISSN 2469-9985. Retrieved11 May 2024.
  9. ^abcdefBarber, R. C.; Greenwood, N. N.; Hrynkiewicz, A. Z.; Jeannin, Y. P.; Lefort, M.; Sakai, M.; Ulehla, I.; Wapstra, A. P.; Wilkinson, D. H. (1993)."Discovery of the transfermium elements. Part II: Introduction to discovery profiles. Part III: Discovery profiles of the transfermium elements (Note: for Part I see Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 879–886, 1991)".Pure and Applied Chemistry.65 (8): 1757.doi:10.1351/pac199365081757.S2CID 195819585.
  10. ^abMünzenberg, G.; Hofmann, S.; Folger, H.; Heßberger, F. P.; Keller, J.; Poppensieker, K.; Quint, B.; Reisdorf, W.; et al. (1985). "The isotopes259106,260106, and261106".Zeitschrift für Physik A.322 (2):227–235.Bibcode:1985ZPhyA.322..227M.doi:10.1007/BF01411887.S2CID 101992619.
  11. ^Streicher, B.; Antalic, S.; Aro, S. S.; Venhart, M.; Hessberger, F. P.; Hofmann, S.; Ackermann, D.; Kindler, B.; Kojouharov, I.; et al. (2007). "Alpha-Gamma Decay Studies of261Sg".Acta Physica Polonica B.38 (4): 1561.Bibcode:2007AcPPB..38.1561S.
  12. ^Berryman, J. S.; Clark, R.; Gregorich, K.; Allmond, J.; Bleuel, D.; Cromaz, M.; Dragojević, I.; Dvorak, J.; Ellison, P.; Fallon, P.; Garcia, M. A.; Gros, S.; Lee, I. Y.; Macchiavelli, A. O.; Nitsche, H.; Paschalis, S.; Petri, M.; Qian, J.; Stoyer, M. A.; Wiedeking, M. (2010). "Electromagnetic decays of excited states in261Sg (Z=106) and257Rf (Z=104)".Physical Review C.81 (6): 064325.Bibcode:2010PhRvC..81f4325B.doi:10.1103/PHYSREVC.81.064325.
  13. ^"Measurement of the208Pb(52Cr,n)259Sg Excitation Function", Folden et al.,LBNL Annual Report 2005. Retrieved 2008-02-29
  14. ^Ikezoe, H.; Ikuta, T.; Mitsuoka, S.; Nishinaka, I.; Tsukada, K.; Ohtsuki, T.; Kuzumaki, T.; Nagame, Y.; Lu, J. (1998). "First evidence for a new spontaneous fission decay produced in the reaction30Si +238U".The European Physical Journal A.2 (4):379–382.Bibcode:1998EPJA....2..379I.doi:10.1007/s100500050134.S2CID 121680462.
  15. ^"Production of seaborgium isotopes in the reaction of30Si +238U"Archived 2009-02-25 at theWayback Machine, Nishio et al.,GSI Annual Report 2006. Retrieved on 2008-02-29
  16. ^Nishio, K.; Hofmann, S.; Heßberger, F. P.; Ackermann, D.; Antalic, S.; Comas, V. F.; Gan, Z.; Heinz, S.; et al. (2006). "Measurement of evaporation residue cross-sections of the reaction30Si +238U at subbarrier energies".The European Physical Journal A.29 (3):281–287.Bibcode:2006EPJA...29..281N.doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-10091-y.S2CID 121653276.[dead link]
  17. ^"New isotope264Sg and decay properties of262-264Sg", Gregorich et al.,LBNL repositories. Retrieved 2008-02-29
  18. ^Lazarev, Yu. A.; Lobanov, YV; Oganessian, YT; Utyonkov, VK; Abdullin, FS; Buklanov, GV; Gikal, BN; Iliev, S; et al. (1994)."Discovery of Enhanced Nuclear Stability near the Deformed Shells N=162 and Z=108".Physical Review Letters.73 (5):624–627.Bibcode:1994PhRvL..73..624L.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.624.PMID 10057496.
  19. ^abcGhiorso, A., Nitschke, J. M., Alonso, J. R., Alonso, C. T., Nurmia, M., Seaborg, G. T., Hulet, E. K., Lougheed, R. W.; Nitschke; Alonso; Alonso; Nurmia; Seaborg; Hulet; Lougheed (1974)."Element 106".Phys. Rev. Lett.33 (25):1490–1493.Bibcode:1974PhRvL..33.1490G.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1490.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^Gregorich, K. E.; Lane, MR; Mohar, MF; Lee, DM; Kacher, CD; Sylwester, ER; Hoffman, DC (1994)."First confirmation of the discovery of element 106".Physical Review Letters.72 (10):1423–1426.Bibcode:1994PhRvL..72.1423G.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1423.PMID 10055605.S2CID 32580307.
Group12 3456789101112131415161718
PeriodHydrogen and
alkali metals
Alkaline
earth metals
Pnicto­gensChal­co­gensHalo­gensNoble gases
12
345678910
1112131415161718
192021222324252627282930313233343536
373839404142434445464748495051525354
55561 asterisk71727374757677787980818283848586
87881 asterisk103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118
119120
1 asterisk5758596061626364656667686970 
1 asterisk8990919293949596979899100101102
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isotopes_of_seaborgium&oldid=1255175716#Seaborgium-260"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp