Inmathematics, theSchwarz lemma, named afterHermann Amandus Schwarz, is a result in complex differential geometry that estimates the (squared) pointwise norm of a holomorphic map between Hermitian manifolds under curvature assumptions on and.
The Schwarz lemma has opened several branches of complex geometry, and become an essential tool in the use of geometric PDE methods in complex geometry.
The proof, which first appears in a paper byCarathéodory,[2] where it is attributed to Erhard Schmidt, is a straightforward application of themaximum modulus principle on the function
which is holomorphic on the whole of, including at the origin (because is differentiable at the origin and fixes zero). Now if denotes the closed disk of radius centered at the origin, then the maximum modulus principle implies that, for, given any, there exists on the boundary of such that
As we get.
Moreover, suppose that for some non-zero, or. Then, at some point of. So by the maximum modulus principle, is equal to a constant such that. Therefore,, as desired.
A variant of the Schwarz lemma, known as theSchwarz–Pick theorem (afterGeorg Pick), characterizes the analytic automorphisms of the unit disc, i.e.bijectiveholomorphic mappings of the unit disc to itself:
Let be holomorphic. Then, for all,
and, for all,
The expression
is the distance of the points, in thePoincaré metric, i.e. the metric in thePoincaré disk model forhyperbolic geometry in dimension two. The Schwarz–Pick theorem then essentially states that a holomorphic map of the unit disk into itselfdecreases the distance of points in the Poincaré metric. If equality holds throughout in one of the two inequalities above (which is equivalent to saying that the holomorphic map preserves the distance in the Poincaré metric), then must be an analyticautomorphism of the unit disc, given by aMöbius transformation mapping the unit disc to itself.
An analogous statement on theupper half-plane can be made as follows:
Let be holomorphic. Then, for all,
This is an easy consequence of the Schwarz–Pick theorem mentioned above: One just needs to remember that theCayley transform maps the upper half-plane conformally onto the unit disc. Then, the map is a holomorphic map from onto. Using the Schwarz–Pick theorem on this map, and finally simplifying the results by using the formula for, we get the desired result. Also, for all,
If equality holds for either the one or the other expressions, then must be aMöbius transformation with real coefficients. That is, if equality holds, then
The proof of the Schwarz–Pick theorem follows from Schwarz's lemma and the fact that aMöbius transformation of the form
maps theunit circle to itself. Fix and define the Möbius transformations
Since and the Möbius transformation is invertible, the composition maps to and the unit disk is mapped into itself. Thus we can apply Schwarz's lemma, which is to say
Now calling (which will still be in the unit disk) yields the desired conclusion
To prove the second part of the theorem, we rearrange the left-hand side into thedifference quotient and let tend to.
De Branges' theorem, formerly known as the Bieberbach Conjecture, is an important extension of the lemma, giving restrictions on the higher derivatives of at in case isinjective; that is,univalent.
TheKoebe 1/4 theorem provides a related estimate in the case that is univalent.
^Theorem 5.34 inRodriguez, Jane P. Gilman, Irwin Kra, Rubi E. (2007).Complex analysis : in the spirit of Lipman Bers ([Online] ed.). New York: Springer. p. 95.ISBN978-0-387-74714-9.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Carathéodory, Constantin. "Sur quelques applications du théorème de Landau–Picard".C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris.144: 1203–1206.